]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git/blame - gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs.exp
Switch the license of all .exp files to GPLv3.
[thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / testsuite / gdb.base / structs.exp
CommitLineData
e53890ae
AC
1# This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
2
6aba47ca 3# Copyright 1996, 1997, 1999, 2003, 2004, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
74cf1395
JM
4
5# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
6# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
e22f8b7c 7# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
74cf1395 8# (at your option) any later version.
e22f8b7c 9#
74cf1395
JM
10# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
11# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
12# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
13# GNU General Public License for more details.
e22f8b7c 14#
74cf1395 15# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
e22f8b7c 16# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
74cf1395
JM
17
18# Please email any bugs, comments, and/or additions to this file to:
19# bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu
20
74cf1395
JM
21if $tracelevel then {
22 strace $tracelevel
23}
24
25set prms_id 0
26set bug_id 0
27
e53890ae
AC
28# Some targets can't call functions, so don't even bother with this
29# test.
30
31if [target_info exists gdb,cannot_call_functions] {
32 setup_xfail "*-*-*"
33 fail "This target can not call functions"
34 continue
35}
36
74cf1395
JM
37set testfile "structs"
38set srcfile ${testfile}.c
39set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
40
e53890ae
AC
41# Create and source the file that provides information about the
42# compiler used to compile the test case.
853d6e5b 43
b4967060
AC
44if [get_compiler_info ${binfile}] {
45 return -1;
853d6e5b
AC
46}
47
e53890ae
AC
48# Compile a variant of structs.c using TYPES to specify the type of
49# the first N struct elements (the remaining elements take the type of
50# the last TYPES field). Run the compmiled program up to "main".
51# Also updates the global "testfile" to reflect the most recent build.
853d6e5b 52
e53890ae
AC
53proc start_structs_test { types } {
54 global testfile
55 global srcfile
56 global binfile
57 global objdir
58 global subdir
59 global srcdir
60 global gdb_prompt
61
62 # Create the additional flags
63 set flags "debug"
64 set testfile "structs"
65 set n 0
66 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
67 set m [I2A ${n}]
68 set t [lindex ${types} $n]
69 lappend flags "additional_flags=-Dt${m}=${t}"
70 append testfile "-" "$t"
71 }
72
73 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
74 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags}"] != "" } {
75 # built the second test case since we can't use prototypes
76 warning "Prototypes not supported, rebuilding with -DNO_PROTOTYPES"
77 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable "${flags} additional_flags=-DNO_PROTOTYPES"] != "" } {
b60f0898
JB
78 untested structs.exp
79 return -1
e53890ae
AC
80 }
81 }
82
83 # Start with a fresh gdb.
e42c7771 84 gdb_exit
e53890ae
AC
85 gdb_start
86 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
87 gdb_load ${binfile}
88
89 # Make certain that the output is consistent
90 gdb_test "set print sevenbit-strings" "" \
91 "set print sevenbit-strings; ${testfile}"
92 gdb_test "set print address off" "" \
93 "set print address off; ${testfile}"
94 gdb_test "set width 0" "" \
95 "set width 0; ${testfile}"
96
97 # Advance to main
98 if { ![runto_main] } then {
99 gdb_suppress_tests;
100 }
b729099e
MC
101
102 # Get the debug format
103 get_debug_format
e53890ae
AC
104
105 # check that at the struct containing all the relevant types is correct
106 set foo_t "type = struct struct[llength ${types}] \{"
107 for {set n 0} {$n<[llength ${types}]} {incr n} {
108 append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+[lindex ${types} $n] [i2a $n];"
109 }
110 append foo_t "\[\r\n \]+\}"
111 gdb_test "ptype foo[llength ${types}]" "${foo_t}" \
112 "ptype foo[llength ${types}]; ${testfile}"
74cf1395
JM
113}
114
e53890ae
AC
115# The expected value for fun${n}, L${n} and foo${n}. First element is
116# empty to make indexing easier. "foo" returns the modified value,
117# "zed" returns the invalid value.
853d6e5b 118
e53890ae
AC
119proc foo { n } {
120 return [lindex {
121 "{}"
122 "{a = 49 '1'}"
123 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2'}"
124 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3'}"
125 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4'}"
126 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5'}"
127 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6'}"
128 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7'}"
129 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8'}"
130 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9'}"
131 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A'}"
132 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B'}"
133 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C'}"
134 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D'}"
135 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E'}"
136 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F'}"
137 "{a = 97 'a', b = 50 '2', c = 99 'c', d = 52 '4', e = 101 'e', f = 54 '6', g = 103 'g', h = 56 '8', i = 105 'i', j = 65 'A', k = 107 'k', l = 67 'C', m = 109 'm', n = 69 'E', o = 111 'o', p = 71 'G'}"
138 "{a = 49 '1', b = 98 'b', c = 51 '3', d = 100 'd', e = 53 '5', f = 102 'f', g = 55 '7', h = 104 'h', i = 57 '9', j = 106 'j', k = 66 'B', l = 108 'l', m = 68 'D', n = 110 'n', o = 70 'F', p = 112 'p', q = 72 'H'}"
139 } $n]
140}
141
142proc zed { n } {
143 return [lindex {
144 "{}"
145 "{a = 90 'Z'}"
146 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z'}"
147 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z'}"
148 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z'}"
149 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z'}"
150 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z'}"
151 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z'}"
152 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z'}"
153 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z'}"
154 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z'}"
155 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z'}"
156 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z'}"
157 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z'}"
158 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z'}"
159 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z'}"
160 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z'}"
161 "{a = 90 'Z', b = 90 'Z', c = 90 'Z', d = 90 'Z', e = 90 'Z', f = 90 'Z', g = 90 'Z', h = 90 'Z', i = 90 'Z', j = 90 'Z', k = 90 'Z', l = 90 'Z', m = 90 'Z', n = 90 'Z', o = 90 'Z', p = 90 'Z', q = 90 'Z'}"
162 } $n]
163}
164
987a9106
JB
165proc any { n } {
166 return [lindex {
167 "{}"
168 "{a = \[^,\}\]*}"
169 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*}"
170 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*}"
171 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*}"
172 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*}"
173 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*}"
174 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*}"
175 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*}"
176 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*}"
177 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*}"
178 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*}"
179 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*}"
180 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*}"
181 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*}"
182 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*, o = \[^,\}\]*}"
183 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*, o = \[^,\}\]*, p = \[^,\}\]*}"
184 "{a = \[^,\}\]*, b = \[^,\}\]*, c = \[^,\}\]*, d = \[^,\}\]*, e = \[^,\}\]*, f = \[^,\}\]*, g = \[^,\}\]*, h = \[^,\}\]*, i = \[^,\}\]*, j = \[^,\}\]*, k = \[^,\}\]*, l = \[^,\}\]*, m = \[^,\}\]*, n = \[^,\}\]*, o = \[^,\}\]*, p = \[^,\}\]*, q = \[^,\}\]*}"
185 } $n]
186}
187
e53890ae
AC
188# Given N (0..25), return the corresponding alphabetic letter in lower
189# or upper case. This is ment to be i18n proof.
190
191proc i2a { n } {
192 return [string range "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" $n $n]
193}
194
195proc I2A { n } {
196 return [string toupper [i2a $n]]
197}
198
199
200# Use the file name, compiler and tuples to set up any needed KFAILs.
201
202proc setup_kfails { file tuples bug } {
203 global testfile
204 if [string match $file $testfile] {
205 foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
853d6e5b 206 }
74cf1395
JM
207}
208
e53890ae
AC
209proc setup_compiler_kfails { file compiler format tuples bug } {
210 global testfile
211 if {[string match $file $testfile] && [test_compiler_info $compiler] && [test_debug_format $format]} {
212 foreach f $tuples { setup_kfail $f $bug }
213 }
214}
215
216# Test GDB's ability to make inferior function calls to functions
217# returning (or passing in a single structs.
218
219# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
220# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
221# this test.
853d6e5b 222
e53890ae
AC
223# start_structs_test() will have previously built a program with a
224# specified combination of types for those elements. To ensure
225# robustness of the output, "p/c" is used.
226
227# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?" and
228# "extract return-value from registers" called by "infcall.c".
229
230proc test_struct_calls { n } {
231 global testfile
b4967060 232 global gdb_prompt
853d6e5b 233
e53890ae
AC
234 # Check that GDB can always extract a struct-return value from an
235 # inferior function call. Since GDB always knows the location of an
236 # inferior function call's return value these should never fail
237
238 # Implemented by calling the parameterless function "fun$N" and then
239 # examining the return value printed by GDB.
853d6e5b 240
e53890ae 241 set tests "call $n ${testfile}"
853d6e5b 242
e53890ae 243 # Call fun${n}, checking the printed return-value.
338e05af
AC
244 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
245 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
e53890ae 246 gdb_test "p/c fun${n}()" "[foo ${n}]" "p/c fun<n>(); ${tests}"
853d6e5b 247
e53890ae
AC
248 # Check that GDB can always pass a structure to an inferior function.
249 # This test can never fail.
250
251 # Implemented by calling the one parameter function "Fun$N" which
252 # stores its parameter in the global variable "L$N". GDB then
253 # examining that global to confirm that the value is as expected.
254
255 gdb_test "call Fun${n}(foo${n})" "" "call Fun<n>(foo<n>); ${tests}"
338e05af
AC
256 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-tll gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
257 setup_compiler_kfails structs-tc-td gcc-3-3-* "DWARF 2" i*86-*-* gdb/1455
e53890ae 258 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" [foo ${n}] "p/c L<n>; ${tests}"
b4967060 259}
853d6e5b 260
e53890ae
AC
261# Test GDB's ability to both return a function (with "return" or
262# "finish") and correctly extract/store any corresponding
263# return-value.
264
265# Check that GDB can consistently extract/store structure return
266# values. There are two cases - returned in registers and returned in
267# memory. For the latter case, the return value can't be found and a
268# failure is "expected". However GDB must still both return the
269# function and display the final source and line information.
270
271# N identifies the number of elements in the struct that will be used
272# for the test case. FAILS is a list of target tuples that will fail
273# this test.
274
275# This tests the code paths "which return-value convention?", "extract
276# return-value from registers", and "store return-value in registers".
277# Unlike "test struct calls", this test is expected to "fail" when the
278# return-value is in memory (GDB can't find the location). The test
279# is in three parts: test "return"; test "finish"; check that the two
280# are consistent. GDB can sometimes work for one command and not the
281# other.
282
283proc test_struct_returns { n } {
284 global gdb_prompt
285 global testfile
286
287 set tests "return $n ${testfile}"
288
289
290 # Check that "return" works.
291
292 # GDB must always force the return of a function that has
293 # a struct result. Dependant on the ABI, it may, or may not be
294 # possible to store the return value in a register.
295
296 # The relevant code looks like "L{n} = fun{n}()". The test forces
297 # "fun{n}" to "return" with an explicit value. Since that code
298 # snippet will store the the returned value in "L{n}" the return
299 # is tested by examining "L{n}". This assumes that the
300 # compiler implemented this as fun{n}(&L{n}) and hence that when
301 # the value isn't stored "L{n}" remains unchanged. Also check for
302 # consistency between this and the "finish" case.
303
304 # Get into a call of fun${n}
305 gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
306 "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
307 "advance to fun<n> for return; ${tests}"
308
309 # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
1bfbbb9d 310 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for return; ${tests}"
e53890ae
AC
311
312 # Force the "return". This checks that the return is always
313 # performed, and that GDB correctly reported this to the user.
314 # GDB 6.0 and earlier, when the return-value's location wasn't
315 # known, both failed to print a final "source and line" and misplaced
316 # the frame ("No frame").
317
318 # The test is writen so that it only reports one FAIL/PASS for the
319 # entire operation. The value returned is checked further down.
b5c0bfa2
AC
320 # "return_value_known", if non-zero, indicates that GDB knew where
321 # the return value was located.
e53890ae 322
e53890ae 323 set test "return foo<n>; ${tests}"
b5c0bfa2 324 set return_value_known 1
5266b69c 325 set return_value_unimplemented 0
d422fe19 326 gdb_test_multiple "return foo${n}" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
327 -re "The location" {
328 # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
b5c0bfa2 329 set return_value_known 0
e53890ae
AC
330 exp_continue
331 }
332 -re "A structure or union" {
333 # Ulgh, a struct return, remember this (still need prompt).
b5c0bfa2 334 set return_value_known 0
5266b69c
AC
335 # Double ulgh. Architecture doesn't use return_value and
336 # hence hasn't implemented small structure return.
337 set return_value_unimplemented 1
e53890ae
AC
338 exp_continue
339 }
340 -re "Make fun${n} return now.*y or n. $" {
d422fe19 341 gdb_test_multiple "y" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
342 -re "L${n} *= fun${n}.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
343 # Need to step off the function call
344 gdb_test "next" "L.* *= fun.*" "${test}"
345 }
346 -re "L[expr ${n} + 1] *= fun[expr ${n} + 1].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
347 pass "${test}"
348 }
e53890ae
AC
349 }
350 }
e53890ae
AC
351 }
352
353 # Check that the return-value is as expected. At this stage we're
354 # just checking that GDB has returned a value consistent with
b5c0bfa2 355 # "return_value_known" set above.
987a9106
JB
356 #
357 # Note that, when return_value_known is false, we can't make any
358 # assumptions at all about the value L<n>:
359 #
360 # - If the caller passed the address of L<n> directly as fun<n>'s
361 # return value buffer, then L<n> will be unchanged, because we
362 # forced fun<n> to return before it could store anything in it.
363 #
364 # - If the caller passed the address of some temporary buffer to
365 # fun<n>, and then copied the buffer into L<n>, then L<n> will
366 # have been overwritten with whatever garbage was in the
367 # uninitialized buffer.
368 #
369 # - However, if the temporary buffer just happened to have the
370 # "right" value of foo<n> in it, then L<n> will, in fact, have
371 # the value you'd expect to see if the 'return' had worked!
372 # This has actually been observed to happen on the Renesas M32C.
373 #
374 # So, really, anything is acceptable unless return_value_known is
375 # true.
e53890ae 376
e53890ae 377 set test "value foo<n> returned; ${tests}"
d422fe19 378 gdb_test_multiple "p/c L${n}" "${test}" {
e53890ae 379 -re " = [foo ${n}].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
987a9106
JB
380 # This answer is okay regardless of whether GDB claims to
381 # have set the return value: if it did, then this is what
382 # we expected; and if it didn't, then any answer is okay.
383 pass "${test}"
e53890ae 384 }
987a9106 385 -re " = [any $n].*${gdb_prompt} $" {
b5c0bfa2
AC
386 if $return_value_known {
387 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB knew
987a9106 388 # the location of the return value.
b5c0bfa2
AC
389 fail "${test}"
390 } else {
987a9106
JB
391 # We expected L${n} to be set to garbage, so any
392 # answer is acceptable.
e53890ae 393 pass "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
394 }
395 }
5266b69c
AC
396 -re ".*${gdb_prompt} $" {
397 if $return_value_unimplemented {
398 # What a suprize. The architecture hasn't implemented
399 # return_value, and hence has to fail.
400 kfail "$test" gdb/1444
401 } else {
402 fail "$test"
403 }
404 }
e53890ae
AC
405 }
406
407 # Check that a "finish" works.
408
409 # This is almost but not quite the same as "call struct funcs".
410 # Architectures can have subtle differences in the two code paths.
411
412 # The relevant code snippet is "L{n} = fun{n}()". The program is
413 # advanced into a call to "fun{n}" and then that function is
414 # finished. The returned value that GDB prints, reformatted using
415 # "p/c", is checked.
416
417 # Get into "fun${n}()".
418 gdb_test "advance fun${n}" \
419 "fun${n} .*\[\r\n\]+\[0-9\].*return foo${n}.*" \
420 "advance to fun<n> for finish; ${tests}"
421
422 # Check that the program invalidated the relevant global.
e53890ae
AC
423 gdb_test "p/c L${n}" " = [zed $n]" "zed L<n> for finish; ${tests}"
424
b5c0bfa2
AC
425 # Finish the function, set 'finish_value_known" to non-empty if
426 # the return-value was found.
427
6882279b 428 set test "finish foo<n>; ${tests}"
b5c0bfa2 429 set finish_value_known 1
d422fe19 430 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "${test}" {
e53890ae
AC
431 -re "Value returned is .*${gdb_prompt} $" {
432 pass "${test}"
433 }
434 -re "Cannot determine contents.*${gdb_prompt} $" {
435 # Expected bad value. For the moment this is ok.
b5c0bfa2 436 set finish_value_known 0
e53890ae
AC
437 pass "${test}"
438 }
e53890ae
AC
439 }
440
441 # Re-print the last (return-value) using the more robust
442 # "p/c". If no return value was found, the 'Z' from the previous
443 # check that the variable was cleared, is printed.
6882279b 444 set test "value foo<n> finished; ${tests}"
d422fe19 445 gdb_test_multiple "p/c" "${test}" {
e53890ae 446 -re "[foo ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
b5c0bfa2
AC
447 if $finish_value_known {
448 pass "${test}"
449 } else {
e53890ae
AC
450 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB didn't
451 # know the location of the return-value.
452 fail "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
453 }
454 }
455 -re "[zed ${n}]\[\r\n\]+${gdb_prompt} $" {
456 # The value didn't get found. This is "expected".
b5c0bfa2 457 if $finish_value_known {
e53890ae
AC
458 # This contradicts the above claim that GDB did
459 # know the location of the return-value.
460 fail "${test}"
b5c0bfa2
AC
461 } else {
462 pass "${test}"
e53890ae
AC
463 }
464 }
e53890ae
AC
465 }
466
467 # Finally, check that "return" and finish" have consistent
468 # behavior.
469
b5c0bfa2
AC
470 # Since "finish" works in more cases than "return" (see
471 # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_RETURNS_ADDRESS and
472 # RETURN_VALUE_ABI_PRESERVES_ADDRESS), the "return" value being
473 # known implies that the "finish" value is known (but not the
474 # reverse).
e53890ae 475
b5c0bfa2
AC
476 set test "return value known implies finish value known; ${tests}"
477 if {$return_value_known && ! $finish_value_known} {
e53890ae 478 kfail gdb/1444 "${test}"
b5c0bfa2
AC
479 } else {
480 pass "${test}"
e53890ae 481 }
b4967060 482}
853d6e5b 483
e53890ae
AC
484# ABIs pass anything >8 or >16 bytes in memory but below that things
485# randomly use register and/and structure conventions. Check all
486# possible sized char structs in that range. But only a restricted
487# range of the other types.
488
489# NetBSD/PPC returns "unnatural" (3, 5, 6, 7) sized structs in memory.
490
491# d10v is weird. 5/6 byte structs go in memory. 2 or more char
492# structs go in memory. Everything else is in a register!
493
494# Test every single char struct from 1..17 in size. This is what the
495# original "structs" test was doing.
496
497start_structs_test { tc }
498test_struct_calls 1
499test_struct_calls 2
500test_struct_calls 3
501test_struct_calls 4
502test_struct_calls 5
503test_struct_calls 6
504test_struct_calls 7
505test_struct_calls 8
506test_struct_calls 9
507test_struct_calls 10
508test_struct_calls 11
509test_struct_calls 12
510test_struct_calls 13
511test_struct_calls 14
512test_struct_calls 15
513test_struct_calls 16
514test_struct_calls 17
515test_struct_returns 1
516test_struct_returns 2
517test_struct_returns 3
518test_struct_returns 4
519test_struct_returns 5
520test_struct_returns 6
521test_struct_returns 7
522test_struct_returns 8
523
524
525# Let the fun begin.
526
527# Assuming that any integer struct larger than 8 bytes goes in memory,
528# come up with many and varied combinations of a return struct. For
529# "struct calls" test just beyond that 8 byte boundary, for "struct
530# returns" test up to that boundary.
531
532# For floats, assumed that up to two struct elements can be stored in
533# floating point registers, regardless of their size.
534
535# The approx size of each structure it is computed assumed that tc=1,
536# ts=2, ti=4, tl=4, tll=8, tf=4, td=8, tld=16, and that all fields are
537# naturally aligned. Padding being added where needed. Note that
538# these numbers are just approx, the d10v has ti=2, a 64-bit has has
539# tl=8.
540
541# Approx size: 2, 4, ...
542start_structs_test { ts }
543test_struct_calls 1
544test_struct_calls 2
545test_struct_calls 3
546test_struct_calls 4
547test_struct_calls 5
548test_struct_returns 1
549test_struct_returns 2
550test_struct_returns 3
551test_struct_returns 4
552
553# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
554start_structs_test { ti }
555test_struct_calls 1
556test_struct_calls 2
557test_struct_calls 3
558test_struct_returns 1
559test_struct_returns 2
560
561# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
562start_structs_test { tl }
563test_struct_calls 1
564test_struct_calls 2
565test_struct_calls 3
566test_struct_returns 1
567test_struct_returns 2
568
569# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
570start_structs_test { tll }
571test_struct_calls 1
572test_struct_calls 2
573test_struct_returns 1
574
575# Approx size: 4, 8, ...
576start_structs_test { tf }
577test_struct_calls 1
578test_struct_calls 2
579test_struct_calls 3
580test_struct_returns 1
581test_struct_returns 2
582
583# Approx size: 8, 16, ...
584start_structs_test { td }
585test_struct_calls 1
586test_struct_calls 2
587test_struct_returns 1
588
589# Approx size: 16, 32, ...
590start_structs_test { tld }
591test_struct_calls 1
592test_struct_calls 2
593test_struct_returns 1
594
595# Approx size: 2+1=3, 4, ...
596start_structs_test { ts tc }
597test_struct_calls 2
598test_struct_calls 3
599test_struct_calls 4
600test_struct_calls 5
601test_struct_calls 6
602test_struct_calls 7
603test_struct_calls 8
604test_struct_returns 2
605
606# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
607start_structs_test { ti tc }
608test_struct_calls 2
609test_struct_calls 3
610test_struct_calls 4
611test_struct_calls 5
612test_struct_calls 6
613test_struct_returns 2
614
615# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
616start_structs_test { tl tc }
617test_struct_calls 2
618test_struct_calls 3
619test_struct_calls 4
620test_struct_calls 5
621test_struct_calls 6
622test_struct_returns 2
623
624# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
625start_structs_test { tll tc }
626test_struct_calls 2
627
628# Approx size: 4+1=5, 6, ...
629start_structs_test { tf tc }
630test_struct_calls 2
631test_struct_calls 3
632test_struct_calls 4
633test_struct_calls 5
634test_struct_calls 6
635test_struct_returns 2
636
637# Approx size: 8+1=9, 10, ...
638start_structs_test { td tc }
639test_struct_calls 2
640
641# Approx size: 16+1=17, 18, ...
642start_structs_test { tld tc }
643test_struct_calls 2
644
645# Approx size: (1+1)+2=4, 6, ...
646start_structs_test { tc ts }
647test_struct_calls 2
648test_struct_calls 3
649test_struct_calls 4
650test_struct_calls 5
651test_struct_calls 6
652test_struct_returns 2
653
654# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
655start_structs_test { tc ti }
656test_struct_calls 2
657test_struct_calls 3
658test_struct_calls 4
659test_struct_returns 2
660
661# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
662start_structs_test { tc tl }
663test_struct_calls 2
664test_struct_calls 3
665test_struct_calls 4
666test_struct_returns 2
667
668# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
669start_structs_test { tc tll }
670test_struct_calls 2
671
672# Approx size: (1+3)+4=8, 12, ...
673start_structs_test { tc tf }
674test_struct_calls 2
675test_struct_calls 3
676test_struct_calls 4
677
678# Approx size: (1+7)+8=16, 24, ...
679start_structs_test { tc td }
680test_struct_calls 2
681
682# Approx size: (1+15)+16=32, 48, ...
683start_structs_test { tc tld }
684test_struct_calls 2
685
686# Some float combinations
687
688# Approx size: 8+4=12, 16, ...
689# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
690start_structs_test { td tf }
691test_struct_calls 2
692test_struct_returns 2
74cf1395 693
e53890ae
AC
694# Approx size: (4+4)+8=16, 32, ...
695# d10v: 4+4=8, 12, ...
696start_structs_test { tf td }
697test_struct_calls 2
698test_struct_returns 2
74cf1395
JM
699
700return 0