]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git/blame - gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/psmang.exp
Copyright updates for 2007.
[thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / testsuite / gdb.cp / psmang.exp
CommitLineData
6aba47ca 1# Copyright 2002, 2004, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
f0708dbb
JB
2
3# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
4# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
5# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
6# (at your option) any later version.
7#
8# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
9# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
10# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
11# GNU General Public License for more details.
12#
13# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
14# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
15# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
16
f0708dbb
JB
17# This file is part of the gdb testsuite
18
19# Looking up methods by name, in programs with multiple compilation units.
20
21# ====== PLEASE BE VERY CAREFUL WHEN CHANGING THIS TEST. =====
22#
23# The bug we're testing for (circa October 2002) is very sensitive to
24# various conditions that are hard to control directly in the test
25# suite. If you change the test, please revert this change, and make
26# sure the test still fails:
27#
28# 2002-08-29 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
29#
30# * symtab.c (lookup_symbol_aux): In the cases where we find a
31# minimal symbol of an appropriate name and use its address to
32# select a symtab to read and search, use `name' (as passed to us)
33# as the demangled name when searching the symtab's global and
34# static blocks, not the minsym's name.
35#
36# The original bug was that you'd try to set a breakpoint on a method
37# (e.g., `break s::method1'), and you'd get an error, but if you
38# repeated the command, it would work the second time:
39#
40# (gdb) break s::method1
41# the class s does not have any method named method1
42# Hint: try 's::method1<TAB> or 's::method1<ESC-?>
43# (Note leading single quote.)
44# (gdb) break s::method1
45# Breakpoint 1 at 0x804841b: file psmang1.cc, line 13.
46# (gdb)
47#
4c2acfea
JB
48# We observed this bug first using Stabs, and then using Dwarf 2.
49#
f0708dbb
JB
50# The problem was in lookup_symbol_aux: when looking up s::method1, it
51# would fail to find it in any symtabs, find the minsym with the
52# corresponding mangled name (say, `_ZN1S7method1Ev'), pass the
53# minsym's address to find_pc_sect_symtab to look up the symtab
54# (causing the compilation unit's full symbols to be read in), and
55# then look up the symbol in that symtab's global block. All that is
56# correct. However, it would pass the minsym's name as the NAME
57# argument to lookup_block_symbol; a minsym's name is mangled, whereas
58# lookup_block_symbol's NAME argument should be demangled.
59#
60# This is a pretty simple bug, but it turns out to be a bear to
61# construct a test for. That's why this test case is so delicate. If
62# you can see how to make it less so, please contribute a patch.
63#
64# Here are the twists:
65#
66# The bug only manifests itself when we call lookup_symbol to look up
67# a method name (like "s::method1" or "s::method2"), and that method's
68# definition is in a compilation unit for which we have read partial
69# symbols, but not full symbols. The partial->full conversion must be
70# caused by that specific lookup. (If we already have full symbols
71# for the method's compilation unit, we won't need to look up the
72# minsym, find the symtab for the minsym's address, and then call
73# lookup_block_symbol; it's that last call where things go awry.)
74#
75# Now, when asked to set a breakpoint at `s::method1', GDB will first
76# look up `s' to see if that is, in fact, the name of a class, and
77# then look up 's::method1'. So we have to make sure that looking up
78# `s' doesn't cause full symbols to be read for the compilation unit
79# containing the definition of `s::method1'.
80#
81# The partial symbol tables for `psmang1.cc' and `psmang2.cc' will
82# both have entries for `s'; GDB will read full symbols for whichever
83# compilation unit's partial symbol table appears first in the
84# objfile's list. The order in which compilation units appear in the
85# partial symbol table list depends on how the program is linked, and
86# how the debug info reader does the partial symbol scan. Ideally,
87# the test shouldn't rely on them appearing in any particular order.
88#
89# So, since we don't know which compilation unit's full symbols are
90# going to get read, we simply try looking up one method from each of
91# the two compilation units. One of them has to come after the other
92# in the partial symbol table list, so whichever comes later will
93# still need its partial symbols read by the time we go to look up
94# 's::methodX'.
95#
96# Second twist: don't move the common definition of `struct s' into a
97# header file. If the compiler emits identical stabs for the
98# #inclusion of that header file into psmang1.cc and into psmang2.cc,
99# then the linker will do stabs compression, and replace one of the
100# BINCL/EINCL regions with an EXCL stab, pointing to the other
101# BINCL/EINCL region. GDB will read this, and record that the
102# compilation unit that got the EXCL depends on the compilation unit
103# that kept the BINCL/EINCL. Then, when it decides it needs to read
104# full symbols for the former, it'll also read full symbols for the
105# latter. Now, if it just so happens that the compilation unit that
106# got the EXCL is also the first one with a definition of `s' in the
107# partial symbol table list, then that first probe for `s' will cause
108# both compilation units' full symbols to be read --- again defeating
109# the test.
110#
111# We could work around this by having three compilation units, or by
112# ensuring that the header file produces different stabs each time
113# it's #included, but it seems simplest just to avoid compilation unit
114# dependencies altogether, drop the header file, and duplicate the
115# (pretty trivial) struct definition.
116#
117# Note that #including any header file at all into both compilation
118# units --- say, <stdio.h> --- could create this sort of dependency.
119#
4c2acfea
JB
120# This is the aspect of the test which the debug format is most likely
121# to affect, I think. The different formats create different kinds of
122# inter-CU dependencies, which could mask the bug. It might be
123# possible for the test to check that at least one of the partial
124# symtabs remains unread, and fail otherwise --- the failure
125# indicating that the test itself isn't going to catch the bug it was
126# meant to, not that GDB is misbehaving.
127#
f0708dbb
JB
128# Third twist: given the way lookup_block_symbol is written, it's
129# possible to find the symbol even when it gets passed a mangled name
130# for its NAME parameter. There are three ways lookup_block_symbol
131# might search a block, depending on how it was constructed:
132#
133# linear search. In this case, this bug will never manifest itself,
134# since we check every symbol against NAME using SYMBOL_MATCHES_NAME.
135# Since that macro checks its second argument (NAME) against both the
136# mangled and demangled names of the symbol, this will always find the
137# symbol successfully, so, no bug.
138#
139# hash table. If both the mangled and demangled names hash to the
140# same bucket, then you'll again find the symbol "by accident", since
141# we search the entire bucket using SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME. Since GDB
142# chooses the number of buckets based on the number of symbols, small
143# compilation units may have only one hash bucket; in this case, the
144# search always succeeds, even though we hashed on the wrong name.
145# This test works around that by having a lot of dummy variables,
146# making it less likely that the mangled and demangled names fall in
147# the same bucket.
148#
149# binary search. (GDB 5.2 produced these sorts of blocks, and this
150# test tries to detect the bug there, but subsequent versions of GDB
151# almost never build them, and they may soon be removed entirely.) In
152# this case, the symbols in the block are sorted by their
153# SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (whose behavior depends on the current demangling
154# setting, so that's wrong, but let's try to stay focussed).
155# lookup_block_symbol does a binary search comparing NAME with
156# SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME until the range has been narrowed down to only a
157# few symbols; then it starts a linear search forward from the lower
158# end of that range, until it reaches a symbol whose
159# SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME follows NAME in lexicographic order. This means
160# that, if you're doing a binary search for a mangled name in a block
161# sorted by SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME, you might find the symbol `by
162# accident' if the mangled and demangled names happen to fall near
163# each other in the ordering. The initial version of this patch used
164# a class called `S'; all the other symbols in the compilation unit
165# started with lower-case letters, so the demangled name `S::method1'
166# sorted at the same place as the mangled name `_ZN1S7method1Ev': at
167# the very beginning. Using a lower-case 's' as the name ensures that
168# the demangled name falls after all the dummy symbols introduced for
169# the hash table, as described above.
170#
171# This is all so tortured, someone will probably come up with still
172# other ways this test could fail to do its job. If you need to make
173# revisions, please be very careful.
174
175if $tracelevel then {
176 strace $tracelevel
177}
178
179#
180# test running programs
181#
182
183set prms_id 0
184set bug_id 0
185
186if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
187
188set testfile "psmang"
189set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
190
191if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
192 return -1;
193}
194
195if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}1.cc" "${testfile}1.o" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
b60f0898
JB
196 untested psmang.exp
197 return -1
f0708dbb
JB
198}
199
200if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}2.cc" "${testfile}2.o" object {debug c++}] != "" } {
b60f0898
JB
201 untested psmang.exp
202 return -1
f0708dbb
JB
203}
204
205if { [gdb_compile "${testfile}1.o ${testfile}2.o" ${binfile} executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
b60f0898
JB
206 untested psmang.exp
207 return -1
f0708dbb
JB
208}
209
210
211gdb_exit
212gdb_start
213gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
214gdb_load ${binfile}
215
216gdb_test "break s::method1" "Breakpoint .* at .*: file .*psmang1.cc.*"
217
218# We have to exit and restart GDB here, to make sure that all the
219# compilation units are psymtabs again.
220
221gdb_exit
222gdb_start
223gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
224gdb_load ${binfile}
225
226gdb_test "break s::method2" "Breakpoint .* at .*: file .*psmang2.cc.*"