]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
1d506c26 | 1 | # Copyright 2003-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc. |
58da2eb2 DC |
2 | |
3 | # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify | |
4 | # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by | |
e22f8b7c | 5 | # the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or |
58da2eb2 | 6 | # (at your option) any later version. |
e22f8b7c | 7 | # |
58da2eb2 DC |
8 | # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, |
9 | # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of | |
10 | # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the | |
11 | # GNU General Public License for more details. | |
e22f8b7c | 12 | # |
58da2eb2 | 13 | # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License |
e22f8b7c | 14 | # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. |
58da2eb2 DC |
15 | |
16 | # This file is part of the gdb testsuite. | |
17 | ||
18 | # This contains tests for GDB's use of RTTI information. This stems | |
19 | # from a bug reported in PR gdb/488 and other places, which leads to | |
20 | # statements like 'warning: can't find class named 'C::D', as given by | |
21 | # C++ RTTI'. It arises from GDB not knowing about classes that are | |
22 | # defined in namespaces. | |
23 | ||
24 | # NOTE: carlton/2003-05-16: I suspect it could arise from nested class | |
25 | # issues, too, and even once we fix that, there might be situations | |
26 | # (involving templates, in particular) where this problem triggers | |
27 | # because GDB and GCC have different ideas what a class is called. | |
28 | ||
0b94d2b9 | 29 | require allow_cplus_tests |
58da2eb2 DC |
30 | |
31 | # | |
32 | # test running programs | |
33 | # | |
58da2eb2 | 34 | |
f5f3a911 | 35 | standard_testfile rtti1.cc rtti2.cc |
58da2eb2 | 36 | |
722c4596 TV |
37 | include_file rtti.h |
38 | ||
5b362f04 | 39 | if {[prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile \ |
f5f3a911 TT |
40 | [list $srcfile $srcfile2] {debug c++}]} { |
41 | return -1 | |
42 | } | |
58da2eb2 | 43 | |
95701cae | 44 | if {![runto_main]} { |
cdd42066 | 45 | return |
58da2eb2 DC |
46 | } |
47 | ||
48 | # First, run to after we've constructed the object: | |
49 | ||
f5f3a911 | 50 | gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "main-constructs-done" "$srcfile"] |
b368761e | 51 | gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in main" |
58da2eb2 DC |
52 | |
53 | gdb_test_multiple "print *e1" "print *e1" { | |
374451f0 MC |
54 | -re "warning: RTTI symbol not found for class 'n1::D1'.*$gdb_prompt $" { |
55 | # gdb HEAD 2003-12-05 | |
56 | kfail "gdb/488" "print *e1" | |
57 | } | |
58da2eb2 | 58 | -re "warning: can't find class named `n1::D1', as given by C\\+\\+ RTTI.*$gdb_prompt $" { |
374451f0 | 59 | # gdb 6.0 |
58da2eb2 DC |
60 | kfail "gdb/488" "print *e1" |
61 | } | |
62 | -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n1::Base1> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { | |
63 | pass "print *e1" | |
64 | } | |
65 | -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<Base1> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { | |
66 | # NOTE: carlton/2003-05-16: If code is compiled by GCC2, we | |
67 | # don't print the warning (for no particular reason), but we | |
68 | # still call the class via the wrong name; PR gdb/57 is our | |
69 | # catch-all PR for nested type problems. | |
70 | kfail "gdb/57" "print *e1" | |
71 | } | |
72 | } | |
73 | ||
3e5fc8d2 DC |
74 | # NOTE: carlton/2004-01-14: This test with an "<incomplete type>" |
75 | # message because, within rtt1.cc, GDB has no way of knowing that the | |
76 | # class is called 'n2::D2' instead of just 'D2'. This is an artifical | |
77 | # test case, though: if we were using these classes in a more | |
78 | # substantial way, G++ would emit more debug info. As is, I don't | |
79 | # think there's anything that GDB can do about this case until G++ | |
80 | # starts emitting DW_TAG_namespace info; this should arrive with GCC | |
81 | # 3.4. | |
58da2eb2 DC |
82 | |
83 | gdb_test_multiple "print *e2" "print *e2" { | |
374451f0 MC |
84 | -re "warning: RTTI symbol not found for class 'n2::D2'.*$gdb_prompt $" { |
85 | # gdb HEAD 2003-12-05 | |
86 | kfail "gdb/488" "print *e2" | |
87 | } | |
58da2eb2 | 88 | -re "warning: can't find class named `n2::D2', as given by C\\+\\+ RTTI.*$gdb_prompt $" { |
374451f0 | 89 | # gdb 6.0 |
58da2eb2 DC |
90 | kfail "gdb/488" "print *e2" |
91 | } | |
92 | -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = <incomplete type>\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { | |
3e5fc8d2 | 93 | kfail "gdb/1511" "print *e2" |
58da2eb2 DC |
94 | } |
95 | -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::Base2> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { | |
96 | pass "print *e2" | |
97 | } | |
98 | -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<Base2> = .*}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { | |
99 | kfail "gdb/57" "print *e2" | |
100 | } | |
101 | } | |
102 | ||
b368761e DC |
103 | # Now we test the hack that's been implemented to get around some |
104 | # instances of PR gdb/1511. | |
105 | ||
f5f3a911 | 106 | gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "func-constructs-done" "$srcfile"] |
b368761e DC |
107 | gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in func" |
108 | ||
109 | gdb_test "print *obj" "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::Base2> = .*}" | |
110 | ||
f5f3a911 | 111 | gdb_breakpoint [gdb_get_line_number "func3-constructs-done" "$srcfile"] |
1198ecbe DC |
112 | gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "end of constructors in func3" |
113 | ||
114 | gdb_test "print *obj3" "\\$\[0-9\]* = {<n2::C2> = .*}" | |
115 | ||
58da2eb2 | 116 | gdb_exit |