]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git/blob - binutils/MAINTAINERS
2013-02-06 Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
[thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git] / binutils / MAINTAINERS
1 ========= Binutils Maintainers =========
2
3 This is the list of individuals responsible for maintenance and update
4 of the GNU Binary Utilities project. This includes the linker (ld),
5 the assembler (gas), the profiler (gprof), a whole suite of other
6 programs (binutils) and the libraries that they use (bfd and
7 opcodes). This project shares a common set of header files with the
8 GCC and GDB projects (include), so maintainership of those files is
9 shared amoungst the projects.
10
11 The home page for binutils is:
12
13 http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/binutils.html
14
15 and patches should be sent to:
16
17 binutils@sourceware.org
18
19 with "[Patch]" as part of the subject line. Note - patches to the
20 top level config.guess and config.sub scripts should be sent to:
21
22 config-patches@gnu.org
23
24 and not to the binutils lists. Patches to the other top level
25 configure files (configure, configure.in, config-ml.in) should
26 be sent to the binutils lists, and copied to the gcc and gdb
27 lists as well (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org and
28 gdb-patches@sourceware.org).
29
30 --------- Blanket Write Privs ---------
31
32 The following people have permission to check patches into the
33 repository without obtaining approval first:
34
35 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> (head maintainer)
36 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
37 Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
38 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
39 Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
40 DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
41 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
42 Michael Meissner <gnu@the-meissners.org>
43 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
44 Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
45
46 --------- Maintainers ---------
47
48 Maintainers are individuals who are responsible for, and have
49 permission to check in changes in, certain subsets of the code. Note
50 that maintainers still need approval to check in changes outside of
51 the immediate domain that they maintain.
52
53 If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
54 falls to the head maintainer (above). If there are several
55 maintainers for a given domain then responsibility falls to the first
56 maintainer. The first maintainer is free to devolve that
57 responsibility among the other maintainers.
58
59 ALPHA Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
60 AARCH64 Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
61 AARCH64 Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@arm.com>
62 ARM Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
63 ARM Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
64 ARM Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
65 ARM (Symbian) Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
66 AVR Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru>
67 AVR Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@amelek.gda.pl>
68 BFIN Jie Zhang <jzhang918@gmail.com>
69 BFIN Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com>
70 BFIN Mike Frysinger <michael.frysinger@analog.com>
71 BUILD SYSTEM Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
72 CR16 M R Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@nsc.com>
73 CRIS Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
74 CRX M R Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@nsc.com>
75 DLX Nikolaos Kavvadias <nkavv@physics.auth.gr>
76 DWARF2 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
77 DWARF2 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
78 EPIPHANY Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@embecosm.com>
79 FR30 Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
80 FRV Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
81 FRV Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
82 H8300 Prafulla Thakare <prafulla.thakare@kpitcummins.com>
83 HPPA Dave Anglin <dave.anglin@nrc.ca>
84 HPPA elf32 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
85 HPPA elf64 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> [Basic maintainance only]
86 IA-64 Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
87 IQ2000 Stan Cox <scox@redhat.com>
88 i860 Jason Eckhardt <jle@rice.edu>
89 ix86 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
90 ix86 PE Christopher Faylor <me+binutils@cgf.cx>
91 ix86 COFF DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
92 ix86 PE/COFF Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com>
93 ix86 INTEL MODE Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
94 LM32 Jon Beniston <jon@beniston.com>
95 M32R Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org>
96 M68HC11 M68HC12 Stephane Carrez <Stephane.Carrez@gmail.com>
97 M68HC11 M68HC12 Sean Keys <skeys@ipdatasys.com>
98 M88k Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
99 MACH-O Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
100 MAXQ Inderpreet Singh <inderpreetb@noida.hcltech.com>
101 MEP Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
102 MICROBLAZE Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>
103 MIPS Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>
104 MMIX Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
105 MN10300 Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>
106 MN10300 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
107 Moxie Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>
108 MSP430 Dmitry Diky <diwil@spec.ru>
109 NetBSD support Matt Thomas <matt@netbsd.org>
110 Nios II Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
111 Nios II Andrew Jenner <andrew@codesourcery.com>
112 PPC Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
113 PPC Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
114 PPC vector ext Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
115 RL78 DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
116 RX DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
117 RX Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
118 s390, s390x Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
119 SCORE Mei Ligang <ligang@sunnorth.com.cn>
120 SH Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
121 SH Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
122 SPARC David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
123 SPU Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
124 TIC4X Svein Seldal <svein@dev.seldal.com>
125 TIC54X Timothy Wall <twall@alum.mit.edu>
126 TIC6X Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
127 TILE-Gx Walter Lee <walt@tilera.com>
128 TILEPro Walter Lee <walt@tilera.com>
129 VAX Matt Thomas <matt@netbsd.org>
130 VAX Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
131 VMS Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
132 x86_64 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
133 x86_64 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
134 x86_64 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
135 XCOFF Richard Sandiford <r.sandiford@uk.ibm.com>
136 XGATE Sean Keys <skeys@ipdatasys.com>
137 Xtensa Sterling Augustine <augustine.sterling@gmail.com>
138 z80 Arnold Metselaar <arnold.metselaar@planet.nl>
139 z8k Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org>
140
141
142 --------- CGEN Maintainers -------------
143
144 CGEN is a tool for building, amongst other things, assemblers,
145 disassemblers and simulators from a single description of a CPU.
146 It creates files in several of the binutils directories, but it
147 is mentioned here since there is a single group that maintains
148 CGEN and the files that it creates.
149
150 If you have CGEN related problems you can send email to;
151
152 cgen@sourceware.org
153
154 The current CGEN maintainers are:
155
156 Doug Evans, Frank Eigler
157
158 --------- Write After Approval ---------
159
160 Individuals with "write after approval" have the ability to check in
161 changes, but they must get approval for each change from someone in
162 one of the above lists (blanket write or maintainers).
163
164 [It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the
165 *ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Just
166 remember to get approval before checking anything in.]
167
168 ------------- Obvious Fixes -------------
169
170 Fixes for obvious mistakes do not need approval, and can be checked in
171 right away, but the patch should still be sent to the binutils list.
172 The definition of obvious is a bit hazy, and if you are not sure, then
173 you should seek approval first. Obvious fixes include fixes for
174 spelling mistakes, blatantly incorrect code (where the correct code is
175 also blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always be
176 small, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they contain
177 some un-obvious side effect or consequence.
178
179 --------- Branch Checkins ---------
180
181 If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can
182 also be checked into the current release branch. Normally however
183 only bug fixes should be applied to the branch. New features, new
184 ports, etc, should be restricted to the mainline. (Otherwise the
185 burden of maintaining the branch in sync with the mainline becomes too
186 great). If you are uncertain as to whether a patch is appropriate for
187 the branch, ask the branch maintainer. This is:
188
189 Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
190
191 -------- Testsuites ---------------
192
193 In general patches to any of the binutils testsuites should be
194 considered generic and sent to the binutils mailing list for
195 approval. Patches to target specific tests are the responsibility the
196 relevent port maintainer(s), and can be approved/checked in by them.
197 Other testsuite patches need the approval of a blanket-write-priveleges
198 person.
199
200 -------- Configure patches ----------
201
202 Patches to the top level configure files (config.sub & config.guess)
203 are not the domain of the binutils project and they cannot be approved
204 by the binutils group. Instead they should be submitted to the config
205 maintainer at:
206
207 config-patches@gnu.org
208
209 --------- Creating Branches ---------
210
211 Anyone with at least write-after-approval access may create a branch
212 to use for their own development purposes. In keeping with FSF
213 policies, all patches applied to such a branch must come from people
214 with appropriate copyright assignments on file. All legal
215 requirements that would apply to any other contribution apply equally
216 to contributions on a branch.
217
218 Before creating the branch, you should select a name for the branch of
219 the form:
220
221 binutils-<org>-<name>
222
223 where "org" is the initials of your organization, or your own initials
224 if you are acting as an individual. For example, for a branch created
225 by The GNUDist Company, "tgc" would be an appropriate choice for
226 "org". It's up to each organization to select an appropriate choice
227 for "name"; some organizations may use more structure than others, so
228 "name" may contain additional hyphens.
229
230 Suppose that The GNUDist Company was creating a branch to develop a
231 port of Binutils to the FullMonty processor. Then, an appropriate
232 choice of branch name would be:
233
234 binutils-tgc-fm
235
236 A date stamp is not required as part of the name field, but some
237 organizations like to have one. If you do include the date, you
238 should follow these rules:
239
240 1. The date should be the date that the branch was created.
241
242 2. The date should be numerical and in the form YYYYMMDD.
243
244 For example:
245
246 binutils-tgc-fm_20050101
247
248 would be appropriate if the branch was created on January 1st, 2005.
249
250 Having selected the branch name, create the branch as follows:
251
252 1. Check out binutils, so that you have a CVS checkout corresponding
253 to the initial state of your branch.
254
255 2. Create a tag:
256
257 cvs tag binutils-<org>-<name>-branchpoint
258
259 That tag will allow you, and others, to easily determine what's
260 changed on the branch relative to the initial state.
261
262 3. Create the branch:
263
264 cvs rtag -b -r binutils-<org>-<name>-branchpoint \
265 binutils-<org>-<name>-branch
266
267 4. Document the branch:
268
269 Add a description of the branch to binutils/BRANCHES, and check
270 that file in. All branch descriptions should be added to the
271 HEAD revision of the file; it doesn't help to modify
272 binutils/BRANCHES on a branch!
273
274 Please do not commit any patches to a branch you did not create
275 without the explicit permission of the person who created the branch.
276 \f
277 Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
278
279 Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
280 are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
281 notice and this notice are preserved.