]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git/blob - gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-test.exp
Copyright updates for 2007.
[thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git] / gdb / testsuite / gdb.base / step-test.exp
1 # This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
2
3 # Copyright 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2007
4 # Free Software Foundation, Inc.
5
6 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
7 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
8 # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
9 # (at your option) any later version.
10 #
11 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
12 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
13 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
14 # GNU General Public License for more details.
15 #
16 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
17 # along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
18 # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
19 # step-test.exp -- Expect script to test stepping in gdb
20
21 if $tracelevel then {
22 strace $tracelevel
23 }
24
25 set testfile step-test
26 set srcfile ${testfile}.c
27 set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
28
29 remote_exec build "rm -f ${binfile}"
30 if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug}] != "" } {
31 untested step-test.exp
32 return -1
33 }
34
35 gdb_exit
36 gdb_start
37 gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
38 gdb_load ${binfile}
39
40 if ![runto_main] then {
41 fail "Can't run to main"
42 return 0
43 }
44
45 # Set a breakpoint at line 45, if stepi then finish fails, we would
46 # run to the end of the program, which would mess up the rest of the tests.
47
48 # Vanilla step/next
49 #
50 gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*x = 1;.*" "next 1"
51 gdb_test "step" ".*${decimal}.*y = 2;.*" "step 1"
52
53 # With count
54 #
55 gdb_test "next 2" ".*${decimal}.*w = w.*2;.*" "next 2"
56 gdb_test "step 3" ".*${decimal}.*z = z.*5;.*" "step 3"
57 gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*OVER.*" "next 3"
58
59 # Step over call
60 #
61 gdb_test "next" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*INTO.*" "next over"
62
63 # Step into call
64 #
65 gdb_test "step" ".*${decimal}.*myglob.*" "step into"
66
67 # Step out of call
68 #
69 # I wonder if this is really portable. Are there any caller-saves
70 # platforms, on which `finish' will return you to some kind of pop
71 # instruction, which is attributed to the line containing the function
72 # call?
73
74 # On PA64, we end up at a different instruction than PA32.
75 # On IA-64, we also end up on callee instead of on the next line due
76 # to the restoration of the global pointer (which is a caller-save).
77 # Similarly on MIPS PIC targets.
78 set test "step out"
79 if { [istarget "hppa2.0w-hp-hpux*"] || [istarget "ia64-*-*"] || [istarget "mips*-*-*"]} {
80 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "$test" {
81 -re ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.*= a.*3.*$gdb_prompt $" {
82 pass "$test"
83 }
84 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*INTO.*$gdb_prompt $" {
85 pass "$test"
86 }
87 }
88 } else {
89 gdb_test "finish" ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.*= a.*3.*" "step out"
90 }
91
92 ### Testing nexti and stepi.
93 ###
94 ### test_i NAME COMMAND HERE THERE
95 ###
96 ### Send COMMAND to gdb over and over, while the output matches the
97 ### regexp HERE, followed by the gdb prompt. Pass if the output
98 ### eventually matches the regexp THERE, followed by the gdb prompt;
99 ### fail if we have to iterate more than a hundred times, we time out
100 ### talking to gdb, or we get output which is neither HERE nor THERE. :)
101 ###
102 ### Use NAME as the name of the test.
103 ###
104 ### The exact regexps used are "$HERE.*$gdb_prompt $"
105 ### and "$THERE.*$gdb_prompt $"
106 ###
107 proc test_i {name command here there} {
108 global gdb_prompt
109
110 set i 0
111 gdb_test_multiple "$command" "$name" {
112 -re "$here.*$gdb_prompt $" {
113 # Have we gone for too many steps without seeing any progress?
114 if {[incr i] >= 100} {
115 fail "$name (no progress after 100 steps)"
116 return
117 }
118 send_gdb "$command\n"
119 exp_continue
120 }
121 -re "$there.*$gdb_prompt $" {
122 # We've reached the next line. Rah.
123 pass "$name"
124 return
125 }
126 }
127 }
128
129 test_i "stepi to next line" "stepi" \
130 ".*${decimal}.*a.*5.* = a.*3" \
131 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI"
132 test_i "stepi into function" "stepi" \
133 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI" \
134 ".*callee \\(\\) at .*step-test\\.c"
135
136 # Continue to step until we reach the function's body. This makes it
137 # more likely that we've actually completed the prologue, so "finish"
138 # will work.
139 test_i "stepi into function's first source line" "stepi" \
140 ".*${decimal}.*int callee" \
141 ".*${decimal}.*myglob.*; return 0;"
142
143 # Have to be careful here, if the finish does not work,
144 # then we may run to the end of the program, which
145 # will cause erroneous failures in the rest of the tests
146 set test "stepi: finish call"
147 gdb_test_multiple "finish" "$test" {
148 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
149 pass "$test"
150 }
151 -re ".*(Program received|Program exited).*$gdb_prompt $" {
152 # Oops... We ran to the end of the program... Better reset
153 if {![runto_main]} then {
154 fail "$test (Can't run to main)"
155 return 0
156 }
157 if {![runto step-test.c:45]} {
158 fail "$test (Can't run to line 45)"
159 return 0
160 }
161 fail "$test"
162 }
163 -re ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI.*$gdb_prompt $" {
164 # On PA64, we end up at a different instruction than PA32.
165 # On IA-64, we end up on callee instead of on the following line due
166 # to the restoration of the global pointer.
167 # Similarly on MIPS PIC targets.
168 if { [istarget "hppa2.0w-hp-hpux*"] || [istarget "ia64-*-*"] || [istarget "mips*-*-*"] } {
169 test_i "$test" "stepi" \
170 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*STEPI" ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI"
171 } else {
172 fail "$test"
173 }
174 }
175 }
176
177 test_i "nexti over function" "nexti" \
178 ".*${decimal}.*callee.*NEXTI" \
179 ".*${decimal}.*y = w \\+ z;"
180
181 # On some platforms, if we try to step into a function call that
182 # passes a large structure by value, then we actually end up stepping
183 # into memcpy, bcopy, or some such --- GCC emits the call to pass the
184 # argument. Opinion is bitterly divided about whether this is the
185 # right behavior for GDB or not, but we'll catch it here, so folks
186 # won't forget about it.
187 # Update 4/4/2002 - Regardless of which opinion you have, you would
188 # probably have to agree that gdb is currently behaving as designed,
189 # in the absence of additional code to not stop in functions used
190 # internally by the compiler. Since the testsuite should be checking
191 # for conformance to the design, the correct behavior is to accept the
192 # cases where gdb stops in memcpy/bcopy.
193
194 gdb_test \
195 "break [gdb_get_line_number "step-test.exp: large struct by value"]" \
196 ".*Breakpoint.* at .*" \
197 "set breakpoint at call to large_struct_by_value"
198 gdb_test "continue" \
199 ".*Breakpoint ${decimal},.*large_struct_by_value.*" \
200 "run to pass large struct"
201 set test "large struct by value"
202 gdb_test_multiple "step" "$test" {
203 -re ".*step-test.exp: arrive here 1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
204 pass "$test"
205 }
206 -re ".*(memcpy|bcopy).*$gdb_prompt $" {
207 send_gdb "finish\n" ; gdb_expect -re "$gdb_prompt $"
208 send_gdb "step\n"
209 exp_continue
210 }
211 }
212
213 gdb_continue_to_end "step-test.exp"
214
215 return 0