]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/git.git/blob - t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh
directory rename detection: more involved edge/corner testcases
[thirdparty/git.git] / t / t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh
1 #!/bin/sh
2
3 test_description="recursive merge with directory renames"
4 # includes checking of many corner cases, with a similar methodology to:
5 # t6042: corner cases with renames but not criss-cross merges
6 # t6036: corner cases with both renames and criss-cross merges
7 #
8 # The setup for all of them, pictorially, is:
9 #
10 # A
11 # o
12 # / \
13 # O o ?
14 # \ /
15 # o
16 # B
17 #
18 # To help make it easier to follow the flow of tests, they have been
19 # divided into sections and each test will start with a quick explanation
20 # of what commits O, A, and B contain.
21 #
22 # Notation:
23 # z/{b,c} means files z/b and z/c both exist
24 # x/d_1 means file x/d exists with content d1. (Purpose of the
25 # underscore notation is to differentiate different
26 # files that might be renamed into each other's paths.)
27
28 . ./test-lib.sh
29
30
31 ###########################################################################
32 # SECTION 1: Basic cases we should be able to handle
33 ###########################################################################
34
35 # Testcase 1a, Basic directory rename.
36 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
37 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
38 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e/f}
39 # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e/f}
40
41 test_expect_success '1a-setup: Simple directory rename detection' '
42 test_create_repo 1a &&
43 (
44 cd 1a &&
45
46 mkdir z &&
47 echo b >z/b &&
48 echo c >z/c &&
49 git add z &&
50 test_tick &&
51 git commit -m "O" &&
52
53 git branch O &&
54 git branch A &&
55 git branch B &&
56
57 git checkout A &&
58 git mv z y &&
59 test_tick &&
60 git commit -m "A" &&
61
62 git checkout B &&
63 echo d >z/d &&
64 mkdir z/e &&
65 echo f >z/e/f &&
66 git add z/d z/e/f &&
67 test_tick &&
68 git commit -m "B"
69 )
70 '
71
72 test_expect_failure '1a-check: Simple directory rename detection' '
73 (
74 cd 1a &&
75
76 git checkout A^0 &&
77
78 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
79
80 git ls-files -s >out &&
81 test_line_count = 4 out &&
82
83 git rev-parse >actual \
84 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:y/e/f &&
85 git rev-parse >expect \
86 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d B:z/e/f &&
87 test_cmp expect actual &&
88
89 git hash-object y/d >actual &&
90 git rev-parse B:z/d >expect &&
91 test_cmp expect actual &&
92
93 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d &&
94 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/e/f &&
95 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
96 test_path_is_missing z/e/f
97 )
98 '
99
100 # Testcase 1b, Merge a directory with another
101 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, y/d
102 # Commit A: z/{b,c,e}, y/d
103 # Commit B: y/{b,c,d}
104 # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e}
105
106 test_expect_success '1b-setup: Merge a directory with another' '
107 test_create_repo 1b &&
108 (
109 cd 1b &&
110
111 mkdir z &&
112 echo b >z/b &&
113 echo c >z/c &&
114 mkdir y &&
115 echo d >y/d &&
116 git add z y &&
117 test_tick &&
118 git commit -m "O" &&
119
120 git branch O &&
121 git branch A &&
122 git branch B &&
123
124 git checkout A &&
125 echo e >z/e &&
126 git add z/e &&
127 test_tick &&
128 git commit -m "A" &&
129
130 git checkout B &&
131 git mv z/b y &&
132 git mv z/c y &&
133 rmdir z &&
134 test_tick &&
135 git commit -m "B"
136 )
137 '
138
139 test_expect_failure '1b-check: Merge a directory with another' '
140 (
141 cd 1b &&
142
143 git checkout A^0 &&
144
145 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
146
147 git ls-files -s >out &&
148 test_line_count = 4 out &&
149
150 git rev-parse >actual \
151 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:y/e &&
152 git rev-parse >expect \
153 O:z/b O:z/c O:y/d A:z/e &&
154 test_cmp expect actual &&
155 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/e
156 )
157 '
158
159 # Testcase 1c, Transitive renaming
160 # (Related to testcases 3a and 6d -- when should a transitive rename apply?)
161 # (Related to testcases 9c and 9d -- can transitivity repeat?)
162 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d
163 # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/d
164 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d}
165 # Expected: y/{b,c,d} (because x/d -> z/d -> y/d)
166
167 test_expect_success '1c-setup: Transitive renaming' '
168 test_create_repo 1c &&
169 (
170 cd 1c &&
171
172 mkdir z &&
173 echo b >z/b &&
174 echo c >z/c &&
175 mkdir x &&
176 echo d >x/d &&
177 git add z x &&
178 test_tick &&
179 git commit -m "O" &&
180
181 git branch O &&
182 git branch A &&
183 git branch B &&
184
185 git checkout A &&
186 git mv z y &&
187 test_tick &&
188 git commit -m "A" &&
189
190 git checkout B &&
191 git mv x/d z/d &&
192 test_tick &&
193 git commit -m "B"
194 )
195 '
196
197 test_expect_failure '1c-check: Transitive renaming' '
198 (
199 cd 1c &&
200
201 git checkout A^0 &&
202
203 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
204
205 git ls-files -s >out &&
206 test_line_count = 3 out &&
207
208 git rev-parse >actual \
209 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d &&
210 git rev-parse >expect \
211 O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d &&
212 test_cmp expect actual &&
213 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:x/d &&
214 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d &&
215 test_path_is_missing z/d
216 )
217 '
218
219 # Testcase 1d, Directory renames (merging two directories into one new one)
220 # cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict
221 # (Related to testcases 1c and 7b)
222 # Commit O. z/{b,c}, y/{d,e}
223 # Commit A. x/{b,c}, y/{d,e,m,wham_1}
224 # Commit B. z/{b,c,n,wham_2}, x/{d,e}
225 # Expected: x/{b,c,d,e,m,n}, CONFLICT:(y/wham_1 & z/wham_2 -> x/wham)
226 # Note: y/m & z/n should definitely move into x. By the same token, both
227 # y/wham_1 & z/wham_2 should too...giving us a conflict.
228
229 test_expect_success '1d-setup: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' '
230 test_create_repo 1d &&
231 (
232 cd 1d &&
233
234 mkdir z &&
235 echo b >z/b &&
236 echo c >z/c &&
237 mkdir y &&
238 echo d >y/d &&
239 echo e >y/e &&
240 git add z y &&
241 test_tick &&
242 git commit -m "O" &&
243
244 git branch O &&
245 git branch A &&
246 git branch B &&
247
248 git checkout A &&
249 git mv z x &&
250 echo m >y/m &&
251 echo wham1 >y/wham &&
252 git add y &&
253 test_tick &&
254 git commit -m "A" &&
255
256 git checkout B &&
257 git mv y x &&
258 echo n >z/n &&
259 echo wham2 >z/wham &&
260 git add z &&
261 test_tick &&
262 git commit -m "B"
263 )
264 '
265
266 test_expect_failure '1d-check: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' '
267 (
268 cd 1d &&
269
270 git checkout A^0 &&
271
272 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
273 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
274
275 git ls-files -s >out &&
276 test_line_count = 8 out &&
277 git ls-files -u >out &&
278 test_line_count = 2 out &&
279 git ls-files -o >out &&
280 test_line_count = 3 out &&
281
282 git rev-parse >actual \
283 :0:x/b :0:x/c :0:x/d :0:x/e :0:x/m :0:x/n &&
284 git rev-parse >expect \
285 O:z/b O:z/c O:y/d O:y/e A:y/m B:z/n &&
286 test_cmp expect actual &&
287
288 test_must_fail git rev-parse :0:x/wham &&
289 git rev-parse >actual \
290 :2:x/wham :3:x/wham &&
291 git rev-parse >expect \
292 A:y/wham B:z/wham &&
293 test_cmp expect actual &&
294
295 test_path_is_missing x/wham &&
296 test_path_is_file x/wham~HEAD &&
297 test_path_is_file x/wham~B^0 &&
298
299 git hash-object >actual \
300 x/wham~HEAD x/wham~B^0 &&
301 git rev-parse >expect \
302 A:y/wham B:z/wham &&
303 test_cmp expect actual
304 )
305 '
306
307 # Testcase 1e, Renamed directory, with all filenames being renamed too
308 # Commit O: z/{oldb,oldc}
309 # Commit A: y/{newb,newc}
310 # Commit B: z/{oldb,oldc,d}
311 # Expected: y/{newb,newc,d}
312
313 test_expect_success '1e-setup: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' '
314 test_create_repo 1e &&
315 (
316 cd 1e &&
317
318 mkdir z &&
319 echo b >z/oldb &&
320 echo c >z/oldc &&
321 git add z &&
322 test_tick &&
323 git commit -m "O" &&
324
325 git branch O &&
326 git branch A &&
327 git branch B &&
328
329 git checkout A &&
330 mkdir y &&
331 git mv z/oldb y/newb &&
332 git mv z/oldc y/newc &&
333 test_tick &&
334 git commit -m "A" &&
335
336 git checkout B &&
337 echo d >z/d &&
338 git add z/d &&
339 test_tick &&
340 git commit -m "B"
341 )
342 '
343
344 test_expect_failure '1e-check: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' '
345 (
346 cd 1e &&
347
348 git checkout A^0 &&
349
350 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
351
352 git ls-files -s >out &&
353 test_line_count = 3 out &&
354
355 git rev-parse >actual \
356 HEAD:y/newb HEAD:y/newc HEAD:y/d &&
357 git rev-parse >expect \
358 O:z/oldb O:z/oldc B:z/d &&
359 test_cmp expect actual &&
360 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d
361 )
362 '
363
364 # Testcase 1f, Split a directory into two other directories
365 # (Related to testcases 3a, all of section 2, and all of section 4)
366 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d,e,f}
367 # Commit A: z/{b,c,d,e,f,g}
368 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f}
369 # Expected: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f,g}
370
371 test_expect_success '1f-setup: Split a directory into two other directories' '
372 test_create_repo 1f &&
373 (
374 cd 1f &&
375
376 mkdir z &&
377 echo b >z/b &&
378 echo c >z/c &&
379 echo d >z/d &&
380 echo e >z/e &&
381 echo f >z/f &&
382 git add z &&
383 test_tick &&
384 git commit -m "O" &&
385
386 git branch O &&
387 git branch A &&
388 git branch B &&
389
390 git checkout A &&
391 echo g >z/g &&
392 git add z/g &&
393 test_tick &&
394 git commit -m "A" &&
395
396 git checkout B &&
397 mkdir y &&
398 mkdir x &&
399 git mv z/b y/ &&
400 git mv z/c y/ &&
401 git mv z/d x/ &&
402 git mv z/e x/ &&
403 git mv z/f x/ &&
404 rmdir z &&
405 test_tick &&
406 git commit -m "B"
407 )
408 '
409
410 test_expect_failure '1f-check: Split a directory into two other directories' '
411 (
412 cd 1f &&
413
414 git checkout A^0 &&
415
416 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
417
418 git ls-files -s >out &&
419 test_line_count = 6 out &&
420
421 git rev-parse >actual \
422 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:x/d HEAD:x/e HEAD:x/f HEAD:x/g &&
423 git rev-parse >expect \
424 O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d O:z/e O:z/f A:z/g &&
425 test_cmp expect actual &&
426 test_path_is_missing z/g &&
427 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/g
428 )
429 '
430
431 ###########################################################################
432 # Rules suggested by testcases in section 1:
433 #
434 # We should still detect the directory rename even if it wasn't just
435 # the directory renamed, but the files within it. (see 1b)
436 #
437 # If renames split a directory into two or more others, the directory
438 # with the most renames, "wins" (see 1c). However, see the testcases
439 # in section 2, plus testcases 3a and 4a.
440 ###########################################################################
441
442
443 ###########################################################################
444 # SECTION 2: Split into multiple directories, with equal number of paths
445 #
446 # Explore the splitting-a-directory rules a bit; what happens in the
447 # edge cases?
448 #
449 # Note that there is a closely related case of a directory not being
450 # split on either side of history, but being renamed differently on
451 # each side. See testcase 8e for that.
452 ###########################################################################
453
454 # Testcase 2a, Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths
455 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
456 # Commit A: y/b, w/c
457 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d}
458 # Expected: y/b, w/c, z/d, with warning about z/ -> (y/ vs. w/) conflict
459 test_expect_success '2a-setup: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
460 test_create_repo 2a &&
461 (
462 cd 2a &&
463
464 mkdir z &&
465 echo b >z/b &&
466 echo c >z/c &&
467 git add z &&
468 test_tick &&
469 git commit -m "O" &&
470
471 git branch O &&
472 git branch A &&
473 git branch B &&
474
475 git checkout A &&
476 mkdir y &&
477 mkdir w &&
478 git mv z/b y/ &&
479 git mv z/c w/ &&
480 test_tick &&
481 git commit -m "A" &&
482
483 git checkout B &&
484 echo d >z/d &&
485 git add z/d &&
486 test_tick &&
487 git commit -m "B"
488 )
489 '
490
491 test_expect_failure '2a-check: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
492 (
493 cd 2a &&
494
495 git checkout A^0 &&
496
497 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
498 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT.*directory rename split" out &&
499
500 git ls-files -s >out &&
501 test_line_count = 3 out &&
502 git ls-files -u >out &&
503 test_line_count = 0 out &&
504 git ls-files -o >out &&
505 test_line_count = 1 out &&
506
507 git rev-parse >actual \
508 :0:y/b :0:w/c :0:z/d &&
509 git rev-parse >expect \
510 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d &&
511 test_cmp expect actual
512 )
513 '
514
515 # Testcase 2b, Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths
516 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
517 # Commit A: y/b, w/c
518 # Commit B: z/{b,c}, x/d
519 # Expected: y/b, w/c, x/d; No warning about z/ -> (y/ vs. w/) conflict
520 test_expect_success '2b-setup: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
521 test_create_repo 2b &&
522 (
523 cd 2b &&
524
525 mkdir z &&
526 echo b >z/b &&
527 echo c >z/c &&
528 git add z &&
529 test_tick &&
530 git commit -m "O" &&
531
532 git branch O &&
533 git branch A &&
534 git branch B &&
535
536 git checkout A &&
537 mkdir y &&
538 mkdir w &&
539 git mv z/b y/ &&
540 git mv z/c w/ &&
541 test_tick &&
542 git commit -m "A" &&
543
544 git checkout B &&
545 mkdir x &&
546 echo d >x/d &&
547 git add x/d &&
548 test_tick &&
549 git commit -m "B"
550 )
551 '
552
553 test_expect_success '2b-check: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
554 (
555 cd 2b &&
556
557 git checkout A^0 &&
558
559 git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
560
561 git ls-files -s >out &&
562 test_line_count = 3 out &&
563 git ls-files -u >out &&
564 test_line_count = 0 out &&
565 git ls-files -o >out &&
566 test_line_count = 1 out &&
567
568 git rev-parse >actual \
569 :0:y/b :0:w/c :0:x/d &&
570 git rev-parse >expect \
571 O:z/b O:z/c B:x/d &&
572 test_cmp expect actual &&
573 test_i18ngrep ! "CONFLICT.*directory rename split" out
574 )
575 '
576
577 ###########################################################################
578 # Rules suggested by section 2:
579 #
580 # None; the rule was already covered in section 1. These testcases are
581 # here just to make sure the conflict resolution and necessary warning
582 # messages are handled correctly.
583 ###########################################################################
584
585
586 ###########################################################################
587 # SECTION 3: Path in question is the source path for some rename already
588 #
589 # Combining cases from Section 1 and trying to handle them could lead to
590 # directory renaming detection being over-applied. So, this section
591 # provides some good testcases to check that the implementation doesn't go
592 # too far.
593 ###########################################################################
594
595 # Testcase 3a, Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side
596 # (Related to testcases 1c and 1f)
597 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d}
598 # Commit A: z/{b,c,d} (no change)
599 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/d
600 # Expected: y/{b,c}, x/d
601 test_expect_success '3a-setup: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' '
602 test_create_repo 3a &&
603 (
604 cd 3a &&
605
606 mkdir z &&
607 echo b >z/b &&
608 echo c >z/c &&
609 echo d >z/d &&
610 git add z &&
611 test_tick &&
612 git commit -m "O" &&
613
614 git branch O &&
615 git branch A &&
616 git branch B &&
617
618 git checkout A &&
619 test_tick &&
620 git commit --allow-empty -m "A" &&
621
622 git checkout B &&
623 mkdir y &&
624 mkdir x &&
625 git mv z/b y/ &&
626 git mv z/c y/ &&
627 git mv z/d x/ &&
628 rmdir z &&
629 test_tick &&
630 git commit -m "B"
631 )
632 '
633
634 test_expect_success '3a-check: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' '
635 (
636 cd 3a &&
637
638 git checkout A^0 &&
639
640 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
641
642 git ls-files -s >out &&
643 test_line_count = 3 out &&
644
645 git rev-parse >actual \
646 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:x/d &&
647 git rev-parse >expect \
648 O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d &&
649 test_cmp expect actual
650 )
651 '
652
653 # Testcase 3b, Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side
654 # (Related to testcases 5c and 7c, also kind of 1e and 1f)
655 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d}
656 # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/d
657 # Commit B: z/{b,c}, w/d
658 # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT:(z/d -> x/d vs. w/d)
659 # NOTE: We're particularly checking that since z/d is already involved as
660 # a source in a file rename on the same side of history, that we don't
661 # get it involved in directory rename detection. If it were, we might
662 # end up with CONFLICT:(z/d -> y/d vs. x/d vs. w/d), i.e. a
663 # rename/rename/rename(1to3) conflict, which is just weird.
664 test_expect_success '3b-setup: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' '
665 test_create_repo 3b &&
666 (
667 cd 3b &&
668
669 mkdir z &&
670 echo b >z/b &&
671 echo c >z/c &&
672 echo d >z/d &&
673 git add z &&
674 test_tick &&
675 git commit -m "O" &&
676
677 git branch O &&
678 git branch A &&
679 git branch B &&
680
681 git checkout A &&
682 mkdir y &&
683 mkdir x &&
684 git mv z/b y/ &&
685 git mv z/c y/ &&
686 git mv z/d x/ &&
687 rmdir z &&
688 test_tick &&
689 git commit -m "A" &&
690
691 git checkout B &&
692 mkdir w &&
693 git mv z/d w/ &&
694 test_tick &&
695 git commit -m "B"
696 )
697 '
698
699 test_expect_success '3b-check: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' '
700 (
701 cd 3b &&
702
703 git checkout A^0 &&
704
705 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
706 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT.*rename/rename.*z/d.*x/d.*w/d out &&
707 test_i18ngrep ! CONFLICT.*rename/rename.*y/d out &&
708
709 git ls-files -s >out &&
710 test_line_count = 5 out &&
711 git ls-files -u >out &&
712 test_line_count = 3 out &&
713 git ls-files -o >out &&
714 test_line_count = 1 out &&
715
716 git rev-parse >actual \
717 :0:y/b :0:y/c :1:z/d :2:x/d :3:w/d &&
718 git rev-parse >expect \
719 O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d O:z/d O:z/d &&
720 test_cmp expect actual &&
721
722 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
723 git hash-object >actual \
724 x/d w/d &&
725 git rev-parse >expect \
726 O:z/d O:z/d &&
727 test_cmp expect actual
728 )
729 '
730
731 ###########################################################################
732 # Rules suggested by section 3:
733 #
734 # Avoid directory-rename-detection for a path, if that path is the source
735 # of a rename on either side of a merge.
736 ###########################################################################
737
738
739 ###########################################################################
740 # SECTION 4: Partially renamed directory; still exists on both sides of merge
741 #
742 # What if we were to attempt to do directory rename detection when someone
743 # "mostly" moved a directory but still left some files around, or,
744 # equivalently, fully renamed a directory in one commmit and then recreated
745 # that directory in a later commit adding some new files and then tried to
746 # merge?
747 #
748 # It's hard to divine user intent in these cases, because you can make an
749 # argument that, depending on the intermediate history of the side being
750 # merged, that some users will want files in that directory to
751 # automatically be detected and renamed, while users with a different
752 # intermediate history wouldn't want that rename to happen.
753 #
754 # I think that it is best to simply not have directory rename detection
755 # apply to such cases. My reasoning for this is four-fold: (1) it's
756 # easiest for users in general to figure out what happened if we don't
757 # apply directory rename detection in any such case, (2) it's an easy rule
758 # to explain ["We don't do directory rename detection if the directory
759 # still exists on both sides of the merge"], (3) we can get some hairy
760 # edge/corner cases that would be really confusing and possibly not even
761 # representable in the index if we were to even try, and [related to 3] (4)
762 # attempting to resolve this issue of divining user intent by examining
763 # intermediate history goes against the spirit of three-way merges and is a
764 # path towards crazy corner cases that are far more complex than what we're
765 # already dealing with.
766 #
767 # Note that the wording of the rule ("We don't do directory rename
768 # detection if the directory still exists on both sides of the merge.")
769 # also excludes "renaming" of a directory into a subdirectory of itself
770 # (e.g. /some/dir/* -> /some/dir/subdir/*). It may be possible to carve
771 # out an exception for "renaming"-beneath-itself cases without opening
772 # weird edge/corner cases for other partial directory renames, but for now
773 # we are keeping the rule simple.
774 #
775 # This section contains a test for a partially-renamed-directory case.
776 ###########################################################################
777
778 # Testcase 4a, Directory split, with original directory still present
779 # (Related to testcase 1f)
780 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d,e}
781 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d}, z/e
782 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e,f}
783 # Expected: y/{b,c,d}, z/{e,f}
784 # NOTE: Even though most files from z moved to y, we don't want f to follow.
785
786 test_expect_success '4a-setup: Directory split, with original directory still present' '
787 test_create_repo 4a &&
788 (
789 cd 4a &&
790
791 mkdir z &&
792 echo b >z/b &&
793 echo c >z/c &&
794 echo d >z/d &&
795 echo e >z/e &&
796 git add z &&
797 test_tick &&
798 git commit -m "O" &&
799
800 git branch O &&
801 git branch A &&
802 git branch B &&
803
804 git checkout A &&
805 mkdir y &&
806 git mv z/b y/ &&
807 git mv z/c y/ &&
808 git mv z/d y/ &&
809 test_tick &&
810 git commit -m "A" &&
811
812 git checkout B &&
813 echo f >z/f &&
814 git add z/f &&
815 test_tick &&
816 git commit -m "B"
817 )
818 '
819
820 test_expect_success '4a-check: Directory split, with original directory still present' '
821 (
822 cd 4a &&
823
824 git checkout A^0 &&
825
826 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
827
828 git ls-files -s >out &&
829 test_line_count = 5 out &&
830 git ls-files -u >out &&
831 test_line_count = 0 out &&
832 git ls-files -o >out &&
833 test_line_count = 1 out &&
834
835 git rev-parse >actual \
836 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:z/e HEAD:z/f &&
837 git rev-parse >expect \
838 O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d O:z/e B:z/f &&
839 test_cmp expect actual
840 )
841 '
842
843 ###########################################################################
844 # Rules suggested by section 4:
845 #
846 # Directory-rename-detection should be turned off for any directories (as
847 # a source for renames) that exist on both sides of the merge. (The "as
848 # a source for renames" clarification is due to cases like 1c where
849 # the target directory exists on both sides and we do want the rename
850 # detection.) But, sadly, see testcase 8b.
851 ###########################################################################
852
853
854 ###########################################################################
855 # SECTION 5: Files/directories in the way of subset of to-be-renamed paths
856 #
857 # Implicitly renaming files due to a detected directory rename could run
858 # into problems if there are files or directories in the way of the paths
859 # we want to rename. Explore such cases in this section.
860 ###########################################################################
861
862 # Testcase 5a, Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target
863 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, y/d
864 # Commit A: z/{b,c,e_1,f}, y/{d,e_2}
865 # Commit B: y/{b,c,d}
866 # Expected: z/e_1, y/{b,c,d,e_2,f} + CONFLICT warning
867 # NOTE: While directory rename detection is active here causing z/f to
868 # become y/f, we did not apply this for z/e_1 because that would
869 # give us an add/add conflict for y/e_1 vs y/e_2. This problem with
870 # this add/add, is that both versions of y/e are from the same side
871 # of history, giving us no way to represent this conflict in the
872 # index.
873
874 test_expect_success '5a-setup: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' '
875 test_create_repo 5a &&
876 (
877 cd 5a &&
878
879 mkdir z &&
880 echo b >z/b &&
881 echo c >z/c &&
882 mkdir y &&
883 echo d >y/d &&
884 git add z y &&
885 test_tick &&
886 git commit -m "O" &&
887
888 git branch O &&
889 git branch A &&
890 git branch B &&
891
892 git checkout A &&
893 echo e1 >z/e &&
894 echo f >z/f &&
895 echo e2 >y/e &&
896 git add z/e z/f y/e &&
897 test_tick &&
898 git commit -m "A" &&
899
900 git checkout B &&
901 git mv z/b y/ &&
902 git mv z/c y/ &&
903 rmdir z &&
904 test_tick &&
905 git commit -m "B"
906 )
907 '
908
909 test_expect_failure '5a-check: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' '
910 (
911 cd 5a &&
912
913 git checkout A^0 &&
914
915 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
916 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT.*implicit dir rename" out &&
917
918 git ls-files -s >out &&
919 test_line_count = 6 out &&
920 git ls-files -u >out &&
921 test_line_count = 0 out &&
922 git ls-files -o >out &&
923 test_line_count = 1 out &&
924
925 git rev-parse >actual \
926 :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/d :0:y/e :0:z/e :0:y/f &&
927 git rev-parse >expect \
928 O:z/b O:z/c O:y/d A:y/e A:z/e A:z/f &&
929 test_cmp expect actual
930 )
931 '
932
933 # Testcase 5b, Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict
934 # (Related to testcase 8d; these may appear slightly inconsistent to users;
935 # Also related to testcases 7d and 7e)
936 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d_1}
937 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_2}
938 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1,e}, y/d_3
939 # Expected: y/{b,c,e}, CONFLICT(add/add: y/d_2 vs. y/d_3)
940 # NOTE: If z/d_1 in commit B were to be involved in dir rename detection, as
941 # we normaly would since z/ is being renamed to y/, then this would be
942 # a rename/delete (z/d_1 -> y/d_1 vs. deleted) AND an add/add/add
943 # conflict of y/d_1 vs. y/d_2 vs. y/d_3. Add/add/add is not
944 # representable in the index, so the existence of y/d_3 needs to
945 # cause us to bail on directory rename detection for that path, falling
946 # back to git behavior without the directory rename detection.
947
948 test_expect_success '5b-setup: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' '
949 test_create_repo 5b &&
950 (
951 cd 5b &&
952
953 mkdir z &&
954 echo b >z/b &&
955 echo c >z/c &&
956 echo d1 >z/d &&
957 git add z &&
958 test_tick &&
959 git commit -m "O" &&
960
961 git branch O &&
962 git branch A &&
963 git branch B &&
964
965 git checkout A &&
966 git rm z/d &&
967 git mv z y &&
968 echo d2 >y/d &&
969 git add y/d &&
970 test_tick &&
971 git commit -m "A" &&
972
973 git checkout B &&
974 mkdir y &&
975 echo d3 >y/d &&
976 echo e >z/e &&
977 git add y/d z/e &&
978 test_tick &&
979 git commit -m "B"
980 )
981 '
982
983 test_expect_failure '5b-check: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' '
984 (
985 cd 5b &&
986
987 git checkout A^0 &&
988
989 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
990 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (add/add).* y/d" out &&
991
992 git ls-files -s >out &&
993 test_line_count = 5 out &&
994 git ls-files -u >out &&
995 test_line_count = 2 out &&
996 git ls-files -o >out &&
997 test_line_count = 1 out &&
998
999 git rev-parse >actual \
1000 :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/e :2:y/d :3:y/d &&
1001 git rev-parse >expect \
1002 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e A:y/d B:y/d &&
1003 test_cmp expect actual &&
1004
1005 test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/d &&
1006 test_path_is_file y/d
1007 )
1008 '
1009
1010 # Testcase 5c, Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add
1011 # (Directory rename detection would result in transitive rename vs.
1012 # rename/rename(1to2) and turn it into a rename/rename(1to3). Further,
1013 # rename paths conflict with separate adds on the other side)
1014 # (Related to testcases 3b and 7c)
1015 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1
1016 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_2}, w/d_1
1017 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1,e}, w/d_3, y/d_4
1018 # Expected: A mess, but only a rename/rename(1to2)/add/add mess. Use the
1019 # presence of y/d_4 in B to avoid doing transitive rename of
1020 # x/d_1 -> z/d_1 -> y/d_1, so that the only paths we have at
1021 # y/d are y/d_2 and y/d_4. We still do the move from z/e to y/e,
1022 # though, because it doesn't have anything in the way.
1023
1024 test_expect_success '5c-setup: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' '
1025 test_create_repo 5c &&
1026 (
1027 cd 5c &&
1028
1029 mkdir z &&
1030 echo b >z/b &&
1031 echo c >z/c &&
1032 mkdir x &&
1033 echo d1 >x/d &&
1034 git add z x &&
1035 test_tick &&
1036 git commit -m "O" &&
1037
1038 git branch O &&
1039 git branch A &&
1040 git branch B &&
1041
1042 git checkout A &&
1043 git mv z y &&
1044 echo d2 >y/d &&
1045 git add y/d &&
1046 git mv x w &&
1047 test_tick &&
1048 git commit -m "A" &&
1049
1050 git checkout B &&
1051 git mv x/d z/ &&
1052 mkdir w &&
1053 mkdir y &&
1054 echo d3 >w/d &&
1055 echo d4 >y/d &&
1056 echo e >z/e &&
1057 git add w/ y/ z/e &&
1058 test_tick &&
1059 git commit -m "B"
1060 )
1061 '
1062
1063 test_expect_failure '5c-check: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' '
1064 (
1065 cd 5c &&
1066
1067 git checkout A^0 &&
1068
1069 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1070 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*x/d.*w/d.*z/d" out &&
1071 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (add/add).* y/d" out &&
1072
1073 git ls-files -s >out &&
1074 test_line_count = 9 out &&
1075 git ls-files -u >out &&
1076 test_line_count = 6 out &&
1077 git ls-files -o >out &&
1078 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1079
1080 git rev-parse >actual \
1081 :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/e &&
1082 git rev-parse >expect \
1083 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e &&
1084 test_cmp expect actual &&
1085
1086 test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/d &&
1087 git rev-parse >actual \
1088 :2:w/d :3:w/d :1:x/d :2:y/d :3:y/d :3:z/d &&
1089 git rev-parse >expect \
1090 O:x/d B:w/d O:x/d A:y/d B:y/d O:x/d &&
1091 test_cmp expect actual &&
1092
1093 git hash-object >actual \
1094 w/d~HEAD w/d~B^0 z/d &&
1095 git rev-parse >expect \
1096 O:x/d B:w/d O:x/d &&
1097 test_cmp expect actual &&
1098 test_path_is_missing x/d &&
1099 test_path_is_file y/d &&
1100 grep -q "<<<<" y/d # conflict markers should be present
1101 )
1102 '
1103
1104 # Testcase 5d, Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename
1105 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
1106 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_1}
1107 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_2,f}, y/d/e
1108 # Expected: y/{b,c,d/e,f}, z/d_2, CONFLICT(file/directory), y/d_1~HEAD
1109 # Note: The fact that y/d/ exists in B makes us bail on directory rename
1110 # detection for z/d_2, but that doesn't prevent us from applying the
1111 # directory rename detection for z/f -> y/f.
1112
1113 test_expect_success '5d-setup: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' '
1114 test_create_repo 5d &&
1115 (
1116 cd 5d &&
1117
1118 mkdir z &&
1119 echo b >z/b &&
1120 echo c >z/c &&
1121 git add z &&
1122 test_tick &&
1123 git commit -m "O" &&
1124
1125 git branch O &&
1126 git branch A &&
1127 git branch B &&
1128
1129 git checkout A &&
1130 git mv z y &&
1131 echo d1 >y/d &&
1132 git add y/d &&
1133 test_tick &&
1134 git commit -m "A" &&
1135
1136 git checkout B &&
1137 mkdir -p y/d &&
1138 echo e >y/d/e &&
1139 echo d2 >z/d &&
1140 echo f >z/f &&
1141 git add y/d/e z/d z/f &&
1142 test_tick &&
1143 git commit -m "B"
1144 )
1145 '
1146
1147 test_expect_failure '5d-check: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' '
1148 (
1149 cd 5d &&
1150
1151 git checkout A^0 &&
1152
1153 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1154 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (file/directory).*y/d" out &&
1155
1156 git ls-files -s >out &&
1157 test_line_count = 6 out &&
1158 git ls-files -u >out &&
1159 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1160 git ls-files -o >out &&
1161 test_line_count = 2 out &&
1162
1163 git rev-parse >actual \
1164 :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:z/d :0:y/f :2:y/d :0:y/d/e &&
1165 git rev-parse >expect \
1166 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d B:z/f A:y/d B:y/d/e &&
1167 test_cmp expect actual &&
1168
1169 git hash-object y/d~HEAD >actual &&
1170 git rev-parse A:y/d >expect &&
1171 test_cmp expect actual
1172 )
1173 '
1174
1175 ###########################################################################
1176 # Rules suggested by section 5:
1177 #
1178 # If a subset of to-be-renamed files have a file or directory in the way,
1179 # "turn off" the directory rename for those specific sub-paths, falling
1180 # back to old handling. But, sadly, see testcases 8a and 8b.
1181 ###########################################################################
1182
1183
1184 ###########################################################################
1185 # SECTION 6: Same side of the merge was the one that did the rename
1186 #
1187 # It may sound obvious that you only want to apply implicit directory
1188 # renames to directories if the _other_ side of history did the renaming.
1189 # If you did make an implementation that didn't explicitly enforce this
1190 # rule, the majority of cases that would fall under this section would
1191 # also be solved by following the rules from the above sections. But
1192 # there are still a few that stick out, so this section covers them just
1193 # to make sure we also get them right.
1194 ###########################################################################
1195
1196 # Testcase 6a, Tricky rename/delete
1197 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d}
1198 # Commit A: z/b
1199 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d
1200 # Expected: y/b, CONFLICT(rename/delete, z/c -> y/c vs. NULL)
1201 # Note: We're just checking here that the rename of z/b and z/c to put
1202 # them under y/ doesn't accidentally catch z/d and make it look like
1203 # it is also involved in a rename/delete conflict.
1204
1205 test_expect_success '6a-setup: Tricky rename/delete' '
1206 test_create_repo 6a &&
1207 (
1208 cd 6a &&
1209
1210 mkdir z &&
1211 echo b >z/b &&
1212 echo c >z/c &&
1213 echo d >z/d &&
1214 git add z &&
1215 test_tick &&
1216 git commit -m "O" &&
1217
1218 git branch O &&
1219 git branch A &&
1220 git branch B &&
1221
1222 git checkout A &&
1223 git rm z/c &&
1224 git rm z/d &&
1225 test_tick &&
1226 git commit -m "A" &&
1227
1228 git checkout B &&
1229 mkdir y &&
1230 git mv z/b y/ &&
1231 git mv z/c y/ &&
1232 test_tick &&
1233 git commit -m "B"
1234 )
1235 '
1236
1237 test_expect_success '6a-check: Tricky rename/delete' '
1238 (
1239 cd 6a &&
1240
1241 git checkout A^0 &&
1242
1243 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1244 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*z/c.*y/c" out &&
1245
1246 git ls-files -s >out &&
1247 test_line_count = 2 out &&
1248 git ls-files -u >out &&
1249 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1250 git ls-files -o >out &&
1251 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1252
1253 git rev-parse >actual \
1254 :0:y/b :3:y/c &&
1255 git rev-parse >expect \
1256 O:z/b O:z/c &&
1257 test_cmp expect actual
1258 )
1259 '
1260
1261 # Testcase 6b, Same rename done on both sides
1262 # (Related to testcases 6c and 8e)
1263 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
1264 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
1265 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d
1266 # Expected: y/{b,c}, z/d
1267 # Note: If we did directory rename detection here, we'd move z/d into y/,
1268 # but B did that rename and still decided to put the file into z/,
1269 # so we probably shouldn't apply directory rename detection for it.
1270
1271 test_expect_success '6b-setup: Same rename done on both sides' '
1272 test_create_repo 6b &&
1273 (
1274 cd 6b &&
1275
1276 mkdir z &&
1277 echo b >z/b &&
1278 echo c >z/c &&
1279 git add z &&
1280 test_tick &&
1281 git commit -m "O" &&
1282
1283 git branch O &&
1284 git branch A &&
1285 git branch B &&
1286
1287 git checkout A &&
1288 git mv z y &&
1289 test_tick &&
1290 git commit -m "A" &&
1291
1292 git checkout B &&
1293 git mv z y &&
1294 mkdir z &&
1295 echo d >z/d &&
1296 git add z/d &&
1297 test_tick &&
1298 git commit -m "B"
1299 )
1300 '
1301
1302 test_expect_success '6b-check: Same rename done on both sides' '
1303 (
1304 cd 6b &&
1305
1306 git checkout A^0 &&
1307
1308 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
1309
1310 git ls-files -s >out &&
1311 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1312 git ls-files -u >out &&
1313 test_line_count = 0 out &&
1314 git ls-files -o >out &&
1315 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1316
1317 git rev-parse >actual \
1318 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:z/d &&
1319 git rev-parse >expect \
1320 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d &&
1321 test_cmp expect actual
1322 )
1323 '
1324
1325 # Testcase 6c, Rename only done on same side
1326 # (Related to testcases 6b and 8e)
1327 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
1328 # Commit A: z/{b,c} (no change)
1329 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d
1330 # Expected: y/{b,c}, z/d
1331 # NOTE: Seems obvious, but just checking that the implementation doesn't
1332 # "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}.
1333
1334 test_expect_success '6c-setup: Rename only done on same side' '
1335 test_create_repo 6c &&
1336 (
1337 cd 6c &&
1338
1339 mkdir z &&
1340 echo b >z/b &&
1341 echo c >z/c &&
1342 git add z &&
1343 test_tick &&
1344 git commit -m "O" &&
1345
1346 git branch O &&
1347 git branch A &&
1348 git branch B &&
1349
1350 git checkout A &&
1351 test_tick &&
1352 git commit --allow-empty -m "A" &&
1353
1354 git checkout B &&
1355 git mv z y &&
1356 mkdir z &&
1357 echo d >z/d &&
1358 git add z/d &&
1359 test_tick &&
1360 git commit -m "B"
1361 )
1362 '
1363
1364 test_expect_success '6c-check: Rename only done on same side' '
1365 (
1366 cd 6c &&
1367
1368 git checkout A^0 &&
1369
1370 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
1371
1372 git ls-files -s >out &&
1373 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1374 git ls-files -u >out &&
1375 test_line_count = 0 out &&
1376 git ls-files -o >out &&
1377 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1378
1379 git rev-parse >actual \
1380 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:z/d &&
1381 git rev-parse >expect \
1382 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d &&
1383 test_cmp expect actual
1384 )
1385 '
1386
1387 # Testcase 6d, We don't always want transitive renaming
1388 # (Related to testcase 1c)
1389 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d
1390 # Commit A: z/{b,c}, x/d (no change)
1391 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d
1392 # Expected: y/{b,c}, z/d
1393 # NOTE: Again, this seems obvious but just checking that the implementation
1394 # doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}.
1395
1396 test_expect_success '6d-setup: We do not always want transitive renaming' '
1397 test_create_repo 6d &&
1398 (
1399 cd 6d &&
1400
1401 mkdir z &&
1402 echo b >z/b &&
1403 echo c >z/c &&
1404 mkdir x &&
1405 echo d >x/d &&
1406 git add z x &&
1407 test_tick &&
1408 git commit -m "O" &&
1409
1410 git branch O &&
1411 git branch A &&
1412 git branch B &&
1413
1414 git checkout A &&
1415 test_tick &&
1416 git commit --allow-empty -m "A" &&
1417
1418 git checkout B &&
1419 git mv z y &&
1420 git mv x z &&
1421 test_tick &&
1422 git commit -m "B"
1423 )
1424 '
1425
1426 test_expect_success '6d-check: We do not always want transitive renaming' '
1427 (
1428 cd 6d &&
1429
1430 git checkout A^0 &&
1431
1432 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
1433
1434 git ls-files -s >out &&
1435 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1436 git ls-files -u >out &&
1437 test_line_count = 0 out &&
1438 git ls-files -o >out &&
1439 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1440
1441 git rev-parse >actual \
1442 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:z/d &&
1443 git rev-parse >expect \
1444 O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d &&
1445 test_cmp expect actual
1446 )
1447 '
1448
1449 # Testcase 6e, Add/add from one-side
1450 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
1451 # Commit A: z/{b,c} (no change)
1452 # Commit B: y/{b,c,d_1}, z/d_2
1453 # Expected: y/{b,c,d_1}, z/d_2
1454 # NOTE: Again, this seems obvious but just checking that the implementation
1455 # doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c} +
1456 # add/add conflict on y/d_1 vs y/d_2.
1457
1458 test_expect_success '6e-setup: Add/add from one side' '
1459 test_create_repo 6e &&
1460 (
1461 cd 6e &&
1462
1463 mkdir z &&
1464 echo b >z/b &&
1465 echo c >z/c &&
1466 git add z &&
1467 test_tick &&
1468 git commit -m "O" &&
1469
1470 git branch O &&
1471 git branch A &&
1472 git branch B &&
1473
1474 git checkout A &&
1475 test_tick &&
1476 git commit --allow-empty -m "A" &&
1477
1478 git checkout B &&
1479 git mv z y &&
1480 echo d1 > y/d &&
1481 mkdir z &&
1482 echo d2 > z/d &&
1483 git add y/d z/d &&
1484 test_tick &&
1485 git commit -m "B"
1486 )
1487 '
1488
1489 test_expect_success '6e-check: Add/add from one side' '
1490 (
1491 cd 6e &&
1492
1493 git checkout A^0 &&
1494
1495 git merge -s recursive B^0 &&
1496
1497 git ls-files -s >out &&
1498 test_line_count = 4 out &&
1499 git ls-files -u >out &&
1500 test_line_count = 0 out &&
1501 git ls-files -o >out &&
1502 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1503
1504 git rev-parse >actual \
1505 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:z/d &&
1506 git rev-parse >expect \
1507 O:z/b O:z/c B:y/d B:z/d &&
1508 test_cmp expect actual
1509 )
1510 '
1511
1512 ###########################################################################
1513 # Rules suggested by section 6:
1514 #
1515 # Only apply implicit directory renames to directories if the other
1516 # side of history is the one doing the renaming.
1517 ###########################################################################
1518
1519
1520 ###########################################################################
1521 # SECTION 7: More involved Edge/Corner cases
1522 #
1523 # The ruleset we have generated in the above sections seems to provide
1524 # well-defined merges. But can we find edge/corner cases that either (a)
1525 # are harder for users to understand, or (b) have a resolution that is
1526 # non-intuitive or suboptimal?
1527 #
1528 # The testcases in this section dive into cases that I've tried to craft in
1529 # a way to find some that might be surprising to users or difficult for
1530 # them to understand (the next section will look at non-intuitive or
1531 # suboptimal merge results). Some of the testcases are similar to ones
1532 # from past sections, but have been simplified to try to highlight error
1533 # messages using a "modified" path (due to the directory rename). Are
1534 # users okay with these?
1535 #
1536 # In my opinion, testcases that are difficult to understand from this
1537 # section is due to difficulty in the testcase rather than the directory
1538 # renaming (similar to how t6042 and t6036 have difficult resolutions due
1539 # to the problem setup itself being complex). And I don't think the
1540 # error messages are a problem.
1541 #
1542 # On the other hand, the testcases in section 8 worry me slightly more...
1543 ###########################################################################
1544
1545 # Testcase 7a, rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file
1546 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
1547 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
1548 # Commit B: w/b, x/c, z/d
1549 # Expected: y/d, CONFLICT(rename/rename for both z/b and z/c)
1550 # NOTE: There's a rename of z/ here, y/ has more renames, so z/d -> y/d.
1551
1552 test_expect_success '7a-setup: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' '
1553 test_create_repo 7a &&
1554 (
1555 cd 7a &&
1556
1557 mkdir z &&
1558 echo b >z/b &&
1559 echo c >z/c &&
1560 git add z &&
1561 test_tick &&
1562 git commit -m "O" &&
1563
1564 git branch O &&
1565 git branch A &&
1566 git branch B &&
1567
1568 git checkout A &&
1569 git mv z y &&
1570 test_tick &&
1571 git commit -m "A" &&
1572
1573 git checkout B &&
1574 mkdir w &&
1575 mkdir x &&
1576 git mv z/b w/ &&
1577 git mv z/c x/ &&
1578 echo d > z/d &&
1579 git add z/d &&
1580 test_tick &&
1581 git commit -m "B"
1582 )
1583 '
1584
1585 test_expect_failure '7a-check: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' '
1586 (
1587 cd 7a &&
1588
1589 git checkout A^0 &&
1590
1591 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1592 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*z/b.*y/b.*w/b" out &&
1593 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*z/c.*y/c.*x/c" out &&
1594
1595 git ls-files -s >out &&
1596 test_line_count = 7 out &&
1597 git ls-files -u >out &&
1598 test_line_count = 6 out &&
1599 git ls-files -o >out &&
1600 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1601
1602 git rev-parse >actual \
1603 :1:z/b :2:y/b :3:w/b :1:z/c :2:y/c :3:x/c :0:y/d &&
1604 git rev-parse >expect \
1605 O:z/b O:z/b O:z/b O:z/c O:z/c O:z/c B:z/d &&
1606 test_cmp expect actual &&
1607
1608 git hash-object >actual \
1609 y/b w/b y/c x/c &&
1610 git rev-parse >expect \
1611 O:z/b O:z/b O:z/c O:z/c &&
1612 test_cmp expect actual
1613 )
1614 '
1615
1616 # Testcase 7b, rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename
1617 # (Related to testcase 1d)
1618 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1, w/d_2
1619 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_2}, x/d_1
1620 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1}, w/d_2
1621 # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(rename/rename(2to1): x/d_1, w/d_2 -> y_d)
1622
1623 test_expect_success '7b-setup: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' '
1624 test_create_repo 7b &&
1625 (
1626 cd 7b &&
1627
1628 mkdir z &&
1629 mkdir x &&
1630 mkdir w &&
1631 echo b >z/b &&
1632 echo c >z/c &&
1633 echo d1 > x/d &&
1634 echo d2 > w/d &&
1635 git add z x w &&
1636 test_tick &&
1637 git commit -m "O" &&
1638
1639 git branch O &&
1640 git branch A &&
1641 git branch B &&
1642
1643 git checkout A &&
1644 git mv z y &&
1645 git mv w/d y/ &&
1646 test_tick &&
1647 git commit -m "A" &&
1648
1649 git checkout B &&
1650 git mv x/d z/ &&
1651 rmdir x &&
1652 test_tick &&
1653 git commit -m "B"
1654 )
1655 '
1656
1657 test_expect_failure '7b-check: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' '
1658 (
1659 cd 7b &&
1660
1661 git checkout A^0 &&
1662
1663 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1664 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
1665
1666 git ls-files -s >out &&
1667 test_line_count = 4 out &&
1668 git ls-files -u >out &&
1669 test_line_count = 2 out &&
1670 git ls-files -o >out &&
1671 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1672
1673 git rev-parse >actual \
1674 :0:y/b :0:y/c :2:y/d :3:y/d &&
1675 git rev-parse >expect \
1676 O:z/b O:z/c O:w/d O:x/d &&
1677 test_cmp expect actual &&
1678
1679 test_path_is_missing y/d &&
1680 test_path_is_file y/d~HEAD &&
1681 test_path_is_file y/d~B^0 &&
1682
1683 git hash-object >actual \
1684 y/d~HEAD y/d~B^0 &&
1685 git rev-parse >expect \
1686 O:w/d O:x/d &&
1687 test_cmp expect actual
1688 )
1689 '
1690
1691 # Testcase 7c, rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity
1692 # (Related to testcases 3b and 5c)
1693 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d
1694 # Commit A: y/{b,c}, w/d
1695 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d}
1696 # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(x/d -> w/d vs. y/d)
1697 # NOTE: z/ was renamed to y/ so we do want to report
1698 # neither CONFLICT(x/d -> w/d vs. z/d)
1699 # nor CONFLiCT x/d -> w/d vs. y/d vs. z/d)
1700
1701 test_expect_success '7c-setup: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' '
1702 test_create_repo 7c &&
1703 (
1704 cd 7c &&
1705
1706 mkdir z &&
1707 echo b >z/b &&
1708 echo c >z/c &&
1709 mkdir x &&
1710 echo d >x/d &&
1711 git add z x &&
1712 test_tick &&
1713 git commit -m "O" &&
1714
1715 git branch O &&
1716 git branch A &&
1717 git branch B &&
1718
1719 git checkout A &&
1720 git mv z y &&
1721 git mv x w &&
1722 test_tick &&
1723 git commit -m "A" &&
1724
1725 git checkout B &&
1726 git mv x/d z/ &&
1727 rmdir x &&
1728 test_tick &&
1729 git commit -m "B"
1730 )
1731 '
1732
1733 test_expect_failure '7c-check: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' '
1734 (
1735 cd 7c &&
1736
1737 git checkout A^0 &&
1738
1739 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1740 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*x/d.*w/d.*y/d" out &&
1741
1742 git ls-files -s >out &&
1743 test_line_count = 5 out &&
1744 git ls-files -u >out &&
1745 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1746 git ls-files -o >out &&
1747 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1748
1749 git rev-parse >actual \
1750 :0:y/b :0:y/c :1:x/d :2:w/d :3:y/d &&
1751 git rev-parse >expect \
1752 O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d O:x/d O:x/d &&
1753 test_cmp expect actual
1754 )
1755 '
1756
1757 # Testcase 7d, transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?
1758 # (Related somewhat to testcases 5b and 8d)
1759 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d
1760 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
1761 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d}
1762 # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(delete x/d vs rename to y/d)
1763 # NOTE: z->y so NOT CONFLICT(delete x/d vs rename to z/d)
1764
1765 test_expect_success '7d-setup: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' '
1766 test_create_repo 7d &&
1767 (
1768 cd 7d &&
1769
1770 mkdir z &&
1771 echo b >z/b &&
1772 echo c >z/c &&
1773 mkdir x &&
1774 echo d >x/d &&
1775 git add z x &&
1776 test_tick &&
1777 git commit -m "O" &&
1778
1779 git branch O &&
1780 git branch A &&
1781 git branch B &&
1782
1783 git checkout A &&
1784 git mv z y &&
1785 git rm -rf x &&
1786 test_tick &&
1787 git commit -m "A" &&
1788
1789 git checkout B &&
1790 git mv x/d z/ &&
1791 rmdir x &&
1792 test_tick &&
1793 git commit -m "B"
1794 )
1795 '
1796
1797 test_expect_failure '7d-check: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' '
1798 (
1799 cd 7d &&
1800
1801 git checkout A^0 &&
1802
1803 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1804 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*x/d.*y/d" out &&
1805
1806 git ls-files -s >out &&
1807 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1808 git ls-files -u >out &&
1809 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1810 git ls-files -o >out &&
1811 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1812
1813 git rev-parse >actual \
1814 :0:y/b :0:y/c :3:y/d &&
1815 git rev-parse >expect \
1816 O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d &&
1817 test_cmp expect actual
1818 )
1819 '
1820
1821 # Testcase 7e, transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way
1822 # (Very similar to 'both rename source and destination involved in D/F conflict' from t6022-merge-rename.sh)
1823 # (Also related to testcases 9c and 9d)
1824 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1
1825 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d/g}, x/d/f
1826 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1}
1827 # Expected: rename/delete(x/d_1->y/d_1 vs. None) + D/F conflict on y/d
1828 # y/{b,c,d/g}, y/d_1~B^0, x/d/f
1829
1830 # NOTE: The main path of interest here is d_1 and where it ends up, but
1831 # this is actually a case that has two potential directory renames
1832 # involved and D/F conflict(s), so it makes sense to walk through
1833 # each step.
1834 #
1835 # Commit A renames z/ -> y/. Thus everything that B adds to z/
1836 # should be instead moved to y/. This gives us the D/F conflict on
1837 # y/d because x/d_1 -> z/d_1 -> y/d_1 conflicts with y/d/g.
1838 #
1839 # Further, commit B renames x/ -> z/, thus everything A adds to x/
1840 # should instead be moved to z/...BUT we removed z/ and renamed it
1841 # to y/, so maybe everything should move not from x/ to z/, but
1842 # from x/ to z/ to y/. Doing so might make sense from the logic so
1843 # far, but note that commit A had both an x/ and a y/; it did the
1844 # renaming of z/ to y/ and created x/d/f and it clearly made these
1845 # things separate, so it doesn't make much sense to push these
1846 # together. Doing so is what I'd call a doubly transitive rename;
1847 # see testcases 9c and 9d for further discussion of this issue and
1848 # how it's resolved.
1849
1850 test_expect_success '7e-setup: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' '
1851 test_create_repo 7e &&
1852 (
1853 cd 7e &&
1854
1855 mkdir z &&
1856 echo b >z/b &&
1857 echo c >z/c &&
1858 mkdir x &&
1859 echo d1 >x/d &&
1860 git add z x &&
1861 test_tick &&
1862 git commit -m "O" &&
1863
1864 git branch O &&
1865 git branch A &&
1866 git branch B &&
1867
1868 git checkout A &&
1869 git mv z y &&
1870 git rm x/d &&
1871 mkdir -p x/d &&
1872 mkdir -p y/d &&
1873 echo f >x/d/f &&
1874 echo g >y/d/g &&
1875 git add x/d/f y/d/g &&
1876 test_tick &&
1877 git commit -m "A" &&
1878
1879 git checkout B &&
1880 git mv x/d z/ &&
1881 rmdir x &&
1882 test_tick &&
1883 git commit -m "B"
1884 )
1885 '
1886
1887 test_expect_failure '7e-check: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' '
1888 (
1889 cd 7e &&
1890
1891 git checkout A^0 &&
1892
1893 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1894 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*x/d.*y/d" out &&
1895
1896 git ls-files -s >out &&
1897 test_line_count = 5 out &&
1898 git ls-files -u >out &&
1899 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1900 git ls-files -o >out &&
1901 test_line_count = 2 out &&
1902
1903 git rev-parse >actual \
1904 :0:x/d/f :0:y/d/g :0:y/b :0:y/c :3:y/d &&
1905 git rev-parse >expect \
1906 A:x/d/f A:y/d/g O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d &&
1907 test_cmp expect actual &&
1908
1909 git hash-object y/d~B^0 >actual &&
1910 git rev-parse O:x/d >expect &&
1911 test_cmp expect actual
1912 )
1913 '
1914
1915 test_done