]> git.ipfire.org Git - people/arne_f/ipfire-3.x.git/blobdiff - gdb/patches/gdb-6.6-scheduler_locking-step-sw-watchpoints2.patch
gdb: Update to 7.3.50.20110722.
[people/arne_f/ipfire-3.x.git] / gdb / patches / gdb-6.6-scheduler_locking-step-sw-watchpoints2.patch
diff --git a/gdb/patches/gdb-6.6-scheduler_locking-step-sw-watchpoints2.patch b/gdb/patches/gdb-6.6-scheduler_locking-step-sw-watchpoints2.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..671b457
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+2007-06-25  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+       * inferior.h (enum resume_step): New definition.
+       (resume): Change STEP parameter type to ENUM RESUME_STEP.
+       * infrun.c (resume): Likewise.  Extend debug printing of the STEP
+       parameter.  Lock the scheduler only for intentional stepping.
+       (proceed): Replace the variable ONESTEP with tristate RESUME_STEP.
+       Set the third RESUME_STEP state according to BPSTAT_SHOULD_STEP.
+       (currently_stepping): Change the return type to ENUM RESUME_STEP.
+       Return RESUME_STEP_NEEDED if it is just due to BPSTAT_SHOULD_STEP.
+       * linux-nat.c (select_singlestep_lwp_callback): Do not focus on
+       the software watchpoint events.
+       * linux-nat.h (struct lwp_info): Redeclare STEP as ENUM RESUME_STEP.
+
+2007-10-19  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+       * infrun.c (proceed): RESUME_STEP initialized for non-stepping.
+       RESUME_STEP set according to STEP only at the end of the function.
+
+2008-02-24  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+       Port to GDB-6.8pre.
+
+Index: gdb-7.3.50.20110722/gdb/inferior.h
+===================================================================
+--- gdb-7.3.50.20110722.orig/gdb/inferior.h    2011-07-22 01:46:08.000000000 +0200
++++ gdb-7.3.50.20110722/gdb/inferior.h 2011-07-22 19:13:30.000000000 +0200
+@@ -158,7 +158,15 @@ extern void reopen_exec_file (void);
+ /* The `resume' routine should only be called in special circumstances.
+    Normally, use `proceed', which handles a lot of bookkeeping.  */
+-extern void resume (int, enum target_signal);
++enum resume_step
++  {
++    /* currently_stepping () should return non-zero for non-continue.  */
++    RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE = 0,
++    RESUME_STEP_USER,         /* Stepping is intentional by the user.  */
++    RESUME_STEP_NEEDED                /* Stepping only for software watchpoints.  */
++  };
++
++extern void resume (enum resume_step, enum target_signal);
+ extern ptid_t user_visible_resume_ptid (int step);
+Index: gdb-7.3.50.20110722/gdb/infrun.c
+===================================================================
+--- gdb-7.3.50.20110722.orig/gdb/infrun.c      2011-07-22 19:08:19.000000000 +0200
++++ gdb-7.3.50.20110722/gdb/infrun.c   2011-07-22 19:12:56.000000000 +0200
+@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int follow_fork (void);
+ static void set_schedlock_func (char *args, int from_tty,
+                               struct cmd_list_element *c);
+-static int currently_stepping (struct thread_info *tp);
++static enum resume_step currently_stepping (struct thread_info *tp);
+ static int currently_stepping_or_nexting_callback (struct thread_info *tp,
+                                                  void *data);
+@@ -1630,7 +1630,8 @@ user_visible_resume_ptid (int step)
+     }
+   else if ((scheduler_mode == schedlock_on)
+          || (scheduler_mode == schedlock_step
+-             && (step || singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p)))
++             && (step == RESUME_STEP_USER
++                 || singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p)))
+     {
+       /* User-settable 'scheduler' mode requires solo thread resume.  */
+       resume_ptid = inferior_ptid;
+@@ -1648,7 +1649,7 @@ user_visible_resume_ptid (int step)
+    STEP nonzero if we should step (zero to continue instead).
+    SIG is the signal to give the inferior (zero for none).  */
+ void
+-resume (int step, enum target_signal sig)
++resume (enum resume_step step, enum target_signal sig)
+ {
+   int should_resume = 1;
+   struct cleanup *old_cleanups = make_cleanup (resume_cleanups, 0);
+@@ -1681,9 +1682,13 @@ resume (int step, enum target_signal sig
+   if (debug_infrun)
+     fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
+-                        "infrun: resume (step=%d, signal=%d), "
++                        "infrun: resume (step=%s, signal=%d), "
+                       "trap_expected=%d, current thread [%s] at %s\n",
+-                      step, sig, tp->control.trap_expected,
++                      (step == RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE
++                       ? "RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE"
++                       : (step == RESUME_STEP_USER ? "RESUME_STEP_USER"
++                                                   : "RESUME_STEP_NEEDED")),
++                      sig, tp->control.trap_expected,
+                       target_pid_to_str (inferior_ptid),
+                       paddress (gdbarch, pc));
+@@ -2056,7 +2061,7 @@ proceed (CORE_ADDR addr, enum target_sig
+   struct thread_info *tp;
+   CORE_ADDR pc;
+   struct address_space *aspace;
+-  int oneproc = 0;
++  enum resume_step resume_step = RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE;
+   /* If we're stopped at a fork/vfork, follow the branch set by the
+      "set follow-fork-mode" command; otherwise, we'll just proceed
+@@ -2096,13 +2101,13 @@ proceed (CORE_ADDR addr, enum target_sig
+          actually be executing the breakpoint insn anyway.
+          We'll be (un-)executing the previous instruction.  */
+-      oneproc = 1;
++      resume_step = RESUME_STEP_USER;
+       else if (gdbarch_single_step_through_delay_p (gdbarch)
+              && gdbarch_single_step_through_delay (gdbarch,
+                                                    get_current_frame ()))
+       /* We stepped onto an instruction that needs to be stepped
+          again before re-inserting the breakpoint, do so.  */
+-      oneproc = 1;
++      resume_step = RESUME_STEP_USER;
+     }
+   else
+     {
+@@ -2133,13 +2138,13 @@ proceed (CORE_ADDR addr, enum target_sig
+        is required it returns TRUE and sets the current thread to
+        the old thread.  */
+       if (prepare_to_proceed (step))
+-      oneproc = 1;
++      resume_step = RESUME_STEP_USER;
+     }
+   /* prepare_to_proceed may change the current thread.  */
+   tp = inferior_thread ();
+-  if (oneproc)
++  if (resume_step == RESUME_STEP_USER)
+     {
+       tp->control.trap_expected = 1;
+       /* If displaced stepping is enabled, we can step over the
+@@ -2226,8 +2231,13 @@ proceed (CORE_ADDR addr, enum target_sig
+   /* Reset to normal state.  */
+   init_infwait_state ();
++  if (step)
++    resume_step = RESUME_STEP_USER;
++  if (resume_step == RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE && bpstat_should_step ())
++    resume_step = RESUME_STEP_NEEDED;
++
+   /* Resume inferior.  */
+-  resume (oneproc || step || bpstat_should_step (), tp->suspend.stop_signal);
++  resume (resume_step, tp->suspend.stop_signal);
+   /* Wait for it to stop (if not standalone)
+      and in any case decode why it stopped, and act accordingly.  */
+@@ -5123,14 +5133,19 @@ process_event_stop_test:
+ /* Is thread TP in the middle of single-stepping?  */
+-static int
++static enum resume_step
+ currently_stepping (struct thread_info *tp)
+ {
+-  return ((tp->control.step_range_end
+-         && tp->control.step_resume_breakpoint == NULL)
+-        || tp->control.trap_expected
+-        || tp->stepping_through_solib_after_catch
+-        || bpstat_should_step ());
++  if ((tp->control.step_range_end
++       && tp->control.step_resume_breakpoint == NULL)
++      || tp->control.trap_expected
++      || tp->stepping_through_solib_after_catch)
++    return RESUME_STEP_USER;
++
++  if (bpstat_should_step ())
++    return RESUME_STEP_NEEDED;
++
++  return RESUME_STEP_CONTINUE;
+ }
+ /* Returns true if any thread *but* the one passed in "data" is in the
+Index: gdb-7.3.50.20110722/gdb/linux-nat.c
+===================================================================
+--- gdb-7.3.50.20110722.orig/gdb/linux-nat.c   2011-07-22 19:08:19.000000000 +0200
++++ gdb-7.3.50.20110722/gdb/linux-nat.c        2011-07-22 19:10:24.000000000 +0200
+@@ -2986,7 +2986,10 @@ count_events_callback (struct lwp_info *
+ static int
+ select_singlestep_lwp_callback (struct lwp_info *lp, void *data)
+ {
+-  if (lp->step && lp->status != 0)
++  /* We do not focus on software watchpoints as we would not catch
++     STEPPING_PAST_SINGLESTEP_BREAKPOINT breakpoints in some other thread
++     as they would remain pending due to `Push back breakpoint for %s'.  */
++  if (lp->step == RESUME_STEP_USER && lp->status != 0)
+     return 1;
+   else
+     return 0;
+Index: gdb-7.3.50.20110722/gdb/linux-nat.h
+===================================================================
+--- gdb-7.3.50.20110722.orig/gdb/linux-nat.h   2011-07-22 19:08:19.000000000 +0200
++++ gdb-7.3.50.20110722/gdb/linux-nat.h        2011-07-22 19:10:24.000000000 +0200
+@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ struct lwp_info
+   /* If non-zero, a pending wait status.  */
+   int status;
+-  /* Non-zero if we were stepping this LWP.  */
+-  int step;
++  /* The kind of stepping of this LWP.  */
++  enum resume_step step;
+   /* Non-zero si_signo if this LWP stopped with a trap.  si_addr may
+      be the address of a hardware watchpoint.  */