Updated xen patches taken from suse.

[people/pmueller/ipfire-2.x.git] / src / patches / suse-2.6.27.25 / patches.arch / s390-personality-mask.patch

diff --git a/src/patches/suse-2.6.27.25/patches.arch/s390-personality-mask.patch b/src/patches/suse-2.6.27.25/patches.arch/s390-personality-mask.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..0c47193
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/patches/suse-2.6.27.25/patches.arch/s390-personality-mask.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+Subject: [PATCH] fix s390x_newuname
+
+From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
+
+The uname system call for 64 bit compares current->personality without
+masking the upper 16 bits. If e.g. READ_IMPLIES_EXEC is set the result
+of a uname system call will always be s390x even if the process uses
+the s390 personality.
+
+Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
+Acked-by: John Jolly <jjolly@novell.com>
+---
+ arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c |    2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c
++++ b/arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c
+@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(s390_newuname, struct ne
+ {
+       int ret = sys_newuname(name);
+ 
+-      if (current->personality == PER_LINUX32 && !ret) {
++      if (personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32 && !ret) {
+               ret = copy_to_user(name->machine, "s390\0\0\0\0", 8);
+               if (ret) ret = -EFAULT;
+       }