Imported linux-2.6.27.39 suse/xen patches.

[people/teissler/ipfire-2.x.git] / src / patches / suse-2.6.27.31 / patches.arch / s390-06-03-dasd_sim_sense_condition.patch

diff --git a/src/patches/suse-2.6.27.31/patches.arch/s390-06-03-dasd_sim_sense_condition.patch b/src/patches/suse-2.6.27.31/patches.arch/s390-06-03-dasd_sim_sense_condition.patch
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 401967f..0000000
--- a/src/patches/suse-2.6.27.31/patches.arch/s390-06-03-dasd_sim_sense_condition.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-From: Gerald Schaefer <geraldsc@de.ibm.com>
-Subject: Fix unsolicited SIM sense condition.
-References: bnc#458339
-
-Symptom:     SIM reported via unsolicited interrupt are not shown.
-Problem:     SIMs are alway 32 bit sense data so byte 27 bit 0 has not to
-            be set. This was mixed up.
-Solution:    Negate condition for byte 27 bit 0.
-
-Acked-by: John Jolly <jjolly@suse.de>
-
----
- drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c |    2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
---- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
-+++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c
-@@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@ static void dasd_eckd_handle_unsolicited
- 
- 
-       /* service information message SIM */
--      if (irb->esw.esw0.erw.cons && (irb->ecw[27] & DASD_SENSE_BIT_0) &&
-+      if (irb->esw.esw0.erw.cons && !(irb->ecw[27] & DASD_SENSE_BIT_0) &&
-           ((irb->ecw[6] & DASD_SIM_SENSE) == DASD_SIM_SENSE)) {
-               dasd_3990_erp_handle_sim(device, irb->ecw);
-               dasd_schedule_device_bh(device);