]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/binutils-gdb.git/commitdiff
gdb: fix build error in unittests/vec-utils-selftests.c
authorSimon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:50:20 +0000 (06:50 -0500)
committerSimon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:51:30 +0000 (06:51 -0500)
When building with gcc 9.2.0, I get the following build error:

    In file included from /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/vec-utils-selftests.c:23:
    /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/gdbsupport/gdb_vecs.h: In instantiation of ‘T unordered_remove(std::__debug::vector<T>&, typename std::__debug::vector<T>::iterator) [with T = selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj; typename std::__debug::vector<T>::iterator = __gnu_debug::_Safe_iterator<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj*, std::__cxx1998::vector<selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj, std::allocator<selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj> > >, std::__debug::vector<selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj>, std::random_access_iterator_tag>]’:
    /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/vec-utils-selftests.c:53:26:   required from here
    /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/gdbsupport/gdb_vecs.h:53:5: error: implicitly-declared ‘selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj::obj(const selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj&)’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-copy]
       53 |   T removed = std::move (*it);
          |     ^~~~~~~
    /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/vec-utils-selftests.c:41:10: note: because ‘selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj’ has user-provided ‘selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj& selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj::operator=(const selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj&)’
       41 |     obj &operator= (const obj &other)
          |          ^~~~~~~~
    In file included from /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/vec-utils-selftests.c:23:
    /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/gdbsupport/gdb_vecs.h:58:10: error: implicitly-declared ‘selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj::obj(const selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj&)’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-copy]
       58 |   return removed;
          |          ^~~~~~~
    /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/vec-utils-selftests.c:41:10: note: because ‘selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj’ has user-provided ‘selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj& selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj::operator=(const selftests::vector_utils_tests::unordered_remove_tests()::obj&)’
       41 |     obj &operator= (const obj &other)
          |          ^~~~~~~~

I think gcc is just trying to be nice and recommends the good practice
of providing a copy constructor if an assignment operator is provided.

Silence the warning by providing that copy constructor.

gdb/ChangeLog:

* unittests/vec-utils-selftests.c (unordered_remove_tests::obj):
Provide explicit default and copy constructor.

Change-Id: I323361b1c120bf8525613b74e7e5983910e002df

gdb/ChangeLog
gdb/unittests/vec-utils-selftests.c

index 8be8efbb4176e777e596ed5bf1fff9d6bdadd323..719574f30967a35fa71cf16aaddf29dc36d74580 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2019-11-14  Simon Marchi  <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
+
+       * unittests/vec-utils-selftests.c (unordered_remove_tests::obj):
+       Provide explicit default and copy constructor.
+
 2019-11-14  Philippe Waroquiers  <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be>
 
        * python/py-finishbreakpoint.c (gdbpy_breakpoint_created):
index 823bbb61c25f7a3124150f4a5565ac5dca3fa657..51490916b085201abbe70714c5cb92405dff1137 100644 (file)
@@ -38,6 +38,15 @@ unordered_remove_tests ()
   {
     std::vector<void *> var;
 
+    obj() = default;
+
+    /* gcc complains if we provide an assignment operator but no copy
+       constructor, so provide one even if don't really care for this test.  */
+    obj(const obj &other)
+    {
+      this->var = other.var;
+    }
+
     obj &operator= (const obj &other)
     {
       if (this == &other)