DDF: __write_init_super_ddf: just use seq number of active header

It's not necessary to check for 0xffffffff, which is a valid
sequential number.

Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@arcor.de>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

diff --git a/super-ddf.c b/super-ddf.c
index 32dd023787fb2d84dd53e92e54ae78950f45e452..85af345b1b0fe87d071368b748a7250eae623b3b 100644 (file)
--- a/super-ddf.c
+++ b/super-ddf.c
@@ -2483,12 +2483,7 @@ static int __write_init_super_ddf(struct supertype *st)
        }
        memset(null_aligned, 0xff, NULL_CONF_SZ);
 
-       if (ddf->primary.seq != 0xffffffff)
-               seq = __cpu_to_be32(__be32_to_cpu(ddf->primary.seq)+1);
-       else if (ddf->secondary.seq != 0xffffffff)
-               seq = __cpu_to_be32(__be32_to_cpu(ddf->secondary.seq)+1);
-       else
-               seq = __cpu_to_be32(1);
+       seq = ddf->active->seq + 1;
 
        /* try to write updated metadata,
         * if we catch a failure move on to the next disk