]>
Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
04550ab5 EN |
1 | #!/bin/sh |
2 | ||
3 | test_description="recursive merge with directory renames" | |
4 | # includes checking of many corner cases, with a similar methodology to: | |
5 | # t6042: corner cases with renames but not criss-cross merges | |
6 | # t6036: corner cases with both renames and criss-cross merges | |
7 | # | |
8 | # The setup for all of them, pictorially, is: | |
9 | # | |
10 | # A | |
11 | # o | |
12 | # / \ | |
13 | # O o ? | |
14 | # \ / | |
15 | # o | |
16 | # B | |
17 | # | |
18 | # To help make it easier to follow the flow of tests, they have been | |
19 | # divided into sections and each test will start with a quick explanation | |
20 | # of what commits O, A, and B contain. | |
21 | # | |
22 | # Notation: | |
23 | # z/{b,c} means files z/b and z/c both exist | |
24 | # x/d_1 means file x/d exists with content d1. (Purpose of the | |
25 | # underscore notation is to differentiate different | |
26 | # files that might be renamed into each other's paths.) | |
27 | ||
28 | . ./test-lib.sh | |
29 | ||
30 | ||
31 | ########################################################################### | |
32 | # SECTION 1: Basic cases we should be able to handle | |
33 | ########################################################################### | |
34 | ||
35 | # Testcase 1a, Basic directory rename. | |
36 | # Commit O: z/{b,c} | |
37 | # Commit A: y/{b,c} | |
38 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e/f} | |
39 | # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e/f} | |
40 | ||
41 | test_expect_success '1a-setup: Simple directory rename detection' ' | |
42 | test_create_repo 1a && | |
43 | ( | |
44 | cd 1a && | |
45 | ||
46 | mkdir z && | |
47 | echo b >z/b && | |
48 | echo c >z/c && | |
49 | git add z && | |
50 | test_tick && | |
51 | git commit -m "O" && | |
52 | ||
53 | git branch O && | |
54 | git branch A && | |
55 | git branch B && | |
56 | ||
57 | git checkout A && | |
58 | git mv z y && | |
59 | test_tick && | |
60 | git commit -m "A" && | |
61 | ||
62 | git checkout B && | |
63 | echo d >z/d && | |
64 | mkdir z/e && | |
65 | echo f >z/e/f && | |
66 | git add z/d z/e/f && | |
67 | test_tick && | |
68 | git commit -m "B" | |
69 | ) | |
70 | ' | |
71 | ||
9c0743fe | 72 | test_expect_success '1a-check: Simple directory rename detection' ' |
04550ab5 EN |
73 | ( |
74 | cd 1a && | |
75 | ||
76 | git checkout A^0 && | |
77 | ||
78 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
79 | ||
80 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
81 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
82 | ||
83 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
84 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:y/e/f && | |
85 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
86 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d B:z/e/f && | |
87 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
88 | ||
89 | git hash-object y/d >actual && | |
90 | git rev-parse B:z/d >expect && | |
91 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
92 | ||
93 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d && | |
94 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/e/f && | |
95 | test_path_is_missing z/d && | |
96 | test_path_is_missing z/e/f | |
97 | ) | |
98 | ' | |
99 | ||
100 | # Testcase 1b, Merge a directory with another | |
101 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, y/d | |
102 | # Commit A: z/{b,c,e}, y/d | |
103 | # Commit B: y/{b,c,d} | |
104 | # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e} | |
105 | ||
106 | test_expect_success '1b-setup: Merge a directory with another' ' | |
107 | test_create_repo 1b && | |
108 | ( | |
109 | cd 1b && | |
110 | ||
111 | mkdir z && | |
112 | echo b >z/b && | |
113 | echo c >z/c && | |
114 | mkdir y && | |
115 | echo d >y/d && | |
116 | git add z y && | |
117 | test_tick && | |
118 | git commit -m "O" && | |
119 | ||
120 | git branch O && | |
121 | git branch A && | |
122 | git branch B && | |
123 | ||
124 | git checkout A && | |
125 | echo e >z/e && | |
126 | git add z/e && | |
127 | test_tick && | |
128 | git commit -m "A" && | |
129 | ||
130 | git checkout B && | |
131 | git mv z/b y && | |
132 | git mv z/c y && | |
133 | rmdir z && | |
134 | test_tick && | |
135 | git commit -m "B" | |
136 | ) | |
137 | ' | |
138 | ||
9c0743fe | 139 | test_expect_success '1b-check: Merge a directory with another' ' |
04550ab5 EN |
140 | ( |
141 | cd 1b && | |
142 | ||
143 | git checkout A^0 && | |
144 | ||
145 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
146 | ||
147 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
148 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
149 | ||
150 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
151 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:y/e && | |
152 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
153 | O:z/b O:z/c O:y/d A:z/e && | |
154 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
155 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/e | |
156 | ) | |
157 | ' | |
158 | ||
159 | # Testcase 1c, Transitive renaming | |
160 | # (Related to testcases 3a and 6d -- when should a transitive rename apply?) | |
161 | # (Related to testcases 9c and 9d -- can transitivity repeat?) | |
162 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d | |
163 | # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/d | |
164 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d} | |
165 | # Expected: y/{b,c,d} (because x/d -> z/d -> y/d) | |
166 | ||
167 | test_expect_success '1c-setup: Transitive renaming' ' | |
168 | test_create_repo 1c && | |
169 | ( | |
170 | cd 1c && | |
171 | ||
172 | mkdir z && | |
173 | echo b >z/b && | |
174 | echo c >z/c && | |
175 | mkdir x && | |
176 | echo d >x/d && | |
177 | git add z x && | |
178 | test_tick && | |
179 | git commit -m "O" && | |
180 | ||
181 | git branch O && | |
182 | git branch A && | |
183 | git branch B && | |
184 | ||
185 | git checkout A && | |
186 | git mv z y && | |
187 | test_tick && | |
188 | git commit -m "A" && | |
189 | ||
190 | git checkout B && | |
191 | git mv x/d z/d && | |
192 | test_tick && | |
193 | git commit -m "B" | |
194 | ) | |
195 | ' | |
196 | ||
9c0743fe | 197 | test_expect_success '1c-check: Transitive renaming' ' |
04550ab5 EN |
198 | ( |
199 | cd 1c && | |
200 | ||
201 | git checkout A^0 && | |
202 | ||
203 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
204 | ||
205 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
206 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
207 | ||
208 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
209 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d && | |
210 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
211 | O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d && | |
212 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
213 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:x/d && | |
214 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d && | |
215 | test_path_is_missing z/d | |
216 | ) | |
217 | ' | |
218 | ||
219 | # Testcase 1d, Directory renames (merging two directories into one new one) | |
220 | # cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict | |
221 | # (Related to testcases 1c and 7b) | |
222 | # Commit O. z/{b,c}, y/{d,e} | |
223 | # Commit A. x/{b,c}, y/{d,e,m,wham_1} | |
224 | # Commit B. z/{b,c,n,wham_2}, x/{d,e} | |
225 | # Expected: x/{b,c,d,e,m,n}, CONFLICT:(y/wham_1 & z/wham_2 -> x/wham) | |
226 | # Note: y/m & z/n should definitely move into x. By the same token, both | |
227 | # y/wham_1 & z/wham_2 should too...giving us a conflict. | |
228 | ||
229 | test_expect_success '1d-setup: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' ' | |
230 | test_create_repo 1d && | |
231 | ( | |
232 | cd 1d && | |
233 | ||
234 | mkdir z && | |
235 | echo b >z/b && | |
236 | echo c >z/c && | |
237 | mkdir y && | |
238 | echo d >y/d && | |
239 | echo e >y/e && | |
240 | git add z y && | |
241 | test_tick && | |
242 | git commit -m "O" && | |
243 | ||
244 | git branch O && | |
245 | git branch A && | |
246 | git branch B && | |
247 | ||
248 | git checkout A && | |
249 | git mv z x && | |
250 | echo m >y/m && | |
251 | echo wham1 >y/wham && | |
252 | git add y && | |
253 | test_tick && | |
254 | git commit -m "A" && | |
255 | ||
256 | git checkout B && | |
257 | git mv y x && | |
258 | echo n >z/n && | |
259 | echo wham2 >z/wham && | |
260 | git add z && | |
261 | test_tick && | |
262 | git commit -m "B" | |
263 | ) | |
264 | ' | |
265 | ||
9c0743fe | 266 | test_expect_success '1d-check: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' ' |
04550ab5 EN |
267 | ( |
268 | cd 1d && | |
269 | ||
270 | git checkout A^0 && | |
271 | ||
272 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
273 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && | |
274 | ||
275 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
276 | test_line_count = 8 out && | |
277 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
278 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
279 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
280 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
281 | ||
282 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
283 | :0:x/b :0:x/c :0:x/d :0:x/e :0:x/m :0:x/n && | |
284 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
285 | O:z/b O:z/c O:y/d O:y/e A:y/m B:z/n && | |
286 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
287 | ||
288 | test_must_fail git rev-parse :0:x/wham && | |
289 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
290 | :2:x/wham :3:x/wham && | |
291 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
292 | A:y/wham B:z/wham && | |
293 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
294 | ||
295 | test_path_is_missing x/wham && | |
296 | test_path_is_file x/wham~HEAD && | |
297 | test_path_is_file x/wham~B^0 && | |
298 | ||
299 | git hash-object >actual \ | |
300 | x/wham~HEAD x/wham~B^0 && | |
301 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
302 | A:y/wham B:z/wham && | |
303 | test_cmp expect actual | |
304 | ) | |
305 | ' | |
306 | ||
307 | # Testcase 1e, Renamed directory, with all filenames being renamed too | |
792e1371 | 308 | # (Related to testcases 9f & 9g) |
04550ab5 EN |
309 | # Commit O: z/{oldb,oldc} |
310 | # Commit A: y/{newb,newc} | |
311 | # Commit B: z/{oldb,oldc,d} | |
312 | # Expected: y/{newb,newc,d} | |
313 | ||
314 | test_expect_success '1e-setup: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' ' | |
315 | test_create_repo 1e && | |
316 | ( | |
317 | cd 1e && | |
318 | ||
319 | mkdir z && | |
320 | echo b >z/oldb && | |
321 | echo c >z/oldc && | |
322 | git add z && | |
323 | test_tick && | |
324 | git commit -m "O" && | |
325 | ||
326 | git branch O && | |
327 | git branch A && | |
328 | git branch B && | |
329 | ||
330 | git checkout A && | |
331 | mkdir y && | |
332 | git mv z/oldb y/newb && | |
333 | git mv z/oldc y/newc && | |
334 | test_tick && | |
335 | git commit -m "A" && | |
336 | ||
337 | git checkout B && | |
338 | echo d >z/d && | |
339 | git add z/d && | |
340 | test_tick && | |
341 | git commit -m "B" | |
342 | ) | |
343 | ' | |
344 | ||
9c0743fe | 345 | test_expect_success '1e-check: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' ' |
04550ab5 EN |
346 | ( |
347 | cd 1e && | |
348 | ||
349 | git checkout A^0 && | |
350 | ||
351 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
352 | ||
353 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
354 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
355 | ||
356 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
357 | HEAD:y/newb HEAD:y/newc HEAD:y/d && | |
358 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
359 | O:z/oldb O:z/oldc B:z/d && | |
360 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
361 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d | |
362 | ) | |
363 | ' | |
364 | ||
365 | # Testcase 1f, Split a directory into two other directories | |
366 | # (Related to testcases 3a, all of section 2, and all of section 4) | |
367 | # Commit O: z/{b,c,d,e,f} | |
368 | # Commit A: z/{b,c,d,e,f,g} | |
369 | # Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f} | |
370 | # Expected: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f,g} | |
371 | ||
372 | test_expect_success '1f-setup: Split a directory into two other directories' ' | |
373 | test_create_repo 1f && | |
374 | ( | |
375 | cd 1f && | |
376 | ||
377 | mkdir z && | |
378 | echo b >z/b && | |
379 | echo c >z/c && | |
380 | echo d >z/d && | |
381 | echo e >z/e && | |
382 | echo f >z/f && | |
383 | git add z && | |
384 | test_tick && | |
385 | git commit -m "O" && | |
386 | ||
387 | git branch O && | |
388 | git branch A && | |
389 | git branch B && | |
390 | ||
391 | git checkout A && | |
392 | echo g >z/g && | |
393 | git add z/g && | |
394 | test_tick && | |
395 | git commit -m "A" && | |
396 | ||
397 | git checkout B && | |
398 | mkdir y && | |
399 | mkdir x && | |
400 | git mv z/b y/ && | |
401 | git mv z/c y/ && | |
402 | git mv z/d x/ && | |
403 | git mv z/e x/ && | |
404 | git mv z/f x/ && | |
405 | rmdir z && | |
406 | test_tick && | |
407 | git commit -m "B" | |
408 | ) | |
409 | ' | |
410 | ||
9c0743fe | 411 | test_expect_success '1f-check: Split a directory into two other directories' ' |
04550ab5 EN |
412 | ( |
413 | cd 1f && | |
414 | ||
415 | git checkout A^0 && | |
416 | ||
417 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
418 | ||
419 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
420 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
421 | ||
422 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
423 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:x/d HEAD:x/e HEAD:x/f HEAD:x/g && | |
424 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
425 | O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d O:z/e O:z/f A:z/g && | |
426 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
427 | test_path_is_missing z/g && | |
428 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/g | |
429 | ) | |
430 | ' | |
431 | ||
432 | ########################################################################### | |
433 | # Rules suggested by testcases in section 1: | |
434 | # | |
435 | # We should still detect the directory rename even if it wasn't just | |
436 | # the directory renamed, but the files within it. (see 1b) | |
437 | # | |
438 | # If renames split a directory into two or more others, the directory | |
439 | # with the most renames, "wins" (see 1c). However, see the testcases | |
440 | # in section 2, plus testcases 3a and 4a. | |
441 | ########################################################################### | |
442 | ||
509555d8 EN |
443 | |
444 | ########################################################################### | |
445 | # SECTION 2: Split into multiple directories, with equal number of paths | |
446 | # | |
447 | # Explore the splitting-a-directory rules a bit; what happens in the | |
448 | # edge cases? | |
449 | # | |
450 | # Note that there is a closely related case of a directory not being | |
451 | # split on either side of history, but being renamed differently on | |
452 | # each side. See testcase 8e for that. | |
453 | ########################################################################### | |
454 | ||
455 | # Testcase 2a, Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths | |
456 | # Commit O: z/{b,c} | |
457 | # Commit A: y/b, w/c | |
458 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d} | |
459 | # Expected: y/b, w/c, z/d, with warning about z/ -> (y/ vs. w/) conflict | |
460 | test_expect_success '2a-setup: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' ' | |
461 | test_create_repo 2a && | |
462 | ( | |
463 | cd 2a && | |
464 | ||
465 | mkdir z && | |
466 | echo b >z/b && | |
467 | echo c >z/c && | |
468 | git add z && | |
469 | test_tick && | |
470 | git commit -m "O" && | |
471 | ||
472 | git branch O && | |
473 | git branch A && | |
474 | git branch B && | |
475 | ||
476 | git checkout A && | |
477 | mkdir y && | |
478 | mkdir w && | |
479 | git mv z/b y/ && | |
480 | git mv z/c w/ && | |
481 | test_tick && | |
482 | git commit -m "A" && | |
483 | ||
484 | git checkout B && | |
485 | echo d >z/d && | |
486 | git add z/d && | |
487 | test_tick && | |
488 | git commit -m "B" | |
489 | ) | |
490 | ' | |
491 | ||
f6f77559 | 492 | test_expect_success '2a-check: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' ' |
509555d8 EN |
493 | ( |
494 | cd 2a && | |
495 | ||
496 | git checkout A^0 && | |
497 | ||
498 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
499 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT.*directory rename split" out && | |
500 | ||
501 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
502 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
503 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
504 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
505 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
506 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
507 | ||
508 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
509 | :0:y/b :0:w/c :0:z/d && | |
510 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
511 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d && | |
512 | test_cmp expect actual | |
513 | ) | |
514 | ' | |
515 | ||
516 | # Testcase 2b, Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths | |
517 | # Commit O: z/{b,c} | |
518 | # Commit A: y/b, w/c | |
519 | # Commit B: z/{b,c}, x/d | |
520 | # Expected: y/b, w/c, x/d; No warning about z/ -> (y/ vs. w/) conflict | |
521 | test_expect_success '2b-setup: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' ' | |
522 | test_create_repo 2b && | |
523 | ( | |
524 | cd 2b && | |
525 | ||
526 | mkdir z && | |
527 | echo b >z/b && | |
528 | echo c >z/c && | |
529 | git add z && | |
530 | test_tick && | |
531 | git commit -m "O" && | |
532 | ||
533 | git branch O && | |
534 | git branch A && | |
535 | git branch B && | |
536 | ||
537 | git checkout A && | |
538 | mkdir y && | |
539 | mkdir w && | |
540 | git mv z/b y/ && | |
541 | git mv z/c w/ && | |
542 | test_tick && | |
543 | git commit -m "A" && | |
544 | ||
545 | git checkout B && | |
546 | mkdir x && | |
547 | echo d >x/d && | |
548 | git add x/d && | |
549 | test_tick && | |
550 | git commit -m "B" | |
551 | ) | |
552 | ' | |
553 | ||
554 | test_expect_success '2b-check: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' ' | |
555 | ( | |
556 | cd 2b && | |
557 | ||
558 | git checkout A^0 && | |
559 | ||
560 | git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
561 | ||
562 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
563 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
564 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
565 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
566 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
567 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
568 | ||
569 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
570 | :0:y/b :0:w/c :0:x/d && | |
571 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
572 | O:z/b O:z/c B:x/d && | |
573 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
574 | test_i18ngrep ! "CONFLICT.*directory rename split" out | |
575 | ) | |
576 | ' | |
577 | ||
578 | ########################################################################### | |
579 | # Rules suggested by section 2: | |
580 | # | |
581 | # None; the rule was already covered in section 1. These testcases are | |
582 | # here just to make sure the conflict resolution and necessary warning | |
583 | # messages are handled correctly. | |
584 | ########################################################################### | |
585 | ||
21b53733 EN |
586 | |
587 | ########################################################################### | |
588 | # SECTION 3: Path in question is the source path for some rename already | |
589 | # | |
590 | # Combining cases from Section 1 and trying to handle them could lead to | |
591 | # directory renaming detection being over-applied. So, this section | |
592 | # provides some good testcases to check that the implementation doesn't go | |
593 | # too far. | |
594 | ########################################################################### | |
595 | ||
596 | # Testcase 3a, Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side | |
792e1371 | 597 | # (Related to testcases 1c, 1f, and 9h) |
21b53733 EN |
598 | # Commit O: z/{b,c,d} |
599 | # Commit A: z/{b,c,d} (no change) | |
600 | # Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/d | |
601 | # Expected: y/{b,c}, x/d | |
602 | test_expect_success '3a-setup: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' ' | |
603 | test_create_repo 3a && | |
604 | ( | |
605 | cd 3a && | |
606 | ||
607 | mkdir z && | |
608 | echo b >z/b && | |
609 | echo c >z/c && | |
610 | echo d >z/d && | |
611 | git add z && | |
612 | test_tick && | |
613 | git commit -m "O" && | |
614 | ||
615 | git branch O && | |
616 | git branch A && | |
617 | git branch B && | |
618 | ||
619 | git checkout A && | |
620 | test_tick && | |
621 | git commit --allow-empty -m "A" && | |
622 | ||
623 | git checkout B && | |
624 | mkdir y && | |
625 | mkdir x && | |
626 | git mv z/b y/ && | |
627 | git mv z/c y/ && | |
628 | git mv z/d x/ && | |
629 | rmdir z && | |
630 | test_tick && | |
631 | git commit -m "B" | |
632 | ) | |
633 | ' | |
634 | ||
635 | test_expect_success '3a-check: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' ' | |
636 | ( | |
637 | cd 3a && | |
638 | ||
639 | git checkout A^0 && | |
640 | ||
641 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
642 | ||
643 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
644 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
645 | ||
646 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
647 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:x/d && | |
648 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
649 | O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d && | |
650 | test_cmp expect actual | |
651 | ) | |
652 | ' | |
653 | ||
654 | # Testcase 3b, Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side | |
655 | # (Related to testcases 5c and 7c, also kind of 1e and 1f) | |
656 | # Commit O: z/{b,c,d} | |
657 | # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/d | |
658 | # Commit B: z/{b,c}, w/d | |
659 | # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT:(z/d -> x/d vs. w/d) | |
660 | # NOTE: We're particularly checking that since z/d is already involved as | |
661 | # a source in a file rename on the same side of history, that we don't | |
662 | # get it involved in directory rename detection. If it were, we might | |
663 | # end up with CONFLICT:(z/d -> y/d vs. x/d vs. w/d), i.e. a | |
664 | # rename/rename/rename(1to3) conflict, which is just weird. | |
665 | test_expect_success '3b-setup: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' ' | |
666 | test_create_repo 3b && | |
667 | ( | |
668 | cd 3b && | |
669 | ||
670 | mkdir z && | |
671 | echo b >z/b && | |
672 | echo c >z/c && | |
673 | echo d >z/d && | |
674 | git add z && | |
675 | test_tick && | |
676 | git commit -m "O" && | |
677 | ||
678 | git branch O && | |
679 | git branch A && | |
680 | git branch B && | |
681 | ||
682 | git checkout A && | |
683 | mkdir y && | |
684 | mkdir x && | |
685 | git mv z/b y/ && | |
686 | git mv z/c y/ && | |
687 | git mv z/d x/ && | |
688 | rmdir z && | |
689 | test_tick && | |
690 | git commit -m "A" && | |
691 | ||
692 | git checkout B && | |
693 | mkdir w && | |
694 | git mv z/d w/ && | |
695 | test_tick && | |
696 | git commit -m "B" | |
697 | ) | |
698 | ' | |
699 | ||
700 | test_expect_success '3b-check: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' ' | |
701 | ( | |
702 | cd 3b && | |
703 | ||
704 | git checkout A^0 && | |
705 | ||
706 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
707 | test_i18ngrep CONFLICT.*rename/rename.*z/d.*x/d.*w/d out && | |
708 | test_i18ngrep ! CONFLICT.*rename/rename.*y/d out && | |
709 | ||
710 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
711 | test_line_count = 5 out && | |
712 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
713 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
714 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
715 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
716 | ||
717 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
718 | :0:y/b :0:y/c :1:z/d :2:x/d :3:w/d && | |
719 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
720 | O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d O:z/d O:z/d && | |
721 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
722 | ||
723 | test_path_is_missing z/d && | |
724 | git hash-object >actual \ | |
725 | x/d w/d && | |
726 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
727 | O:z/d O:z/d && | |
728 | test_cmp expect actual | |
729 | ) | |
730 | ' | |
731 | ||
732 | ########################################################################### | |
733 | # Rules suggested by section 3: | |
734 | # | |
735 | # Avoid directory-rename-detection for a path, if that path is the source | |
736 | # of a rename on either side of a merge. | |
737 | ########################################################################### | |
738 | ||
de632e4e EN |
739 | |
740 | ########################################################################### | |
741 | # SECTION 4: Partially renamed directory; still exists on both sides of merge | |
742 | # | |
743 | # What if we were to attempt to do directory rename detection when someone | |
744 | # "mostly" moved a directory but still left some files around, or, | |
745 | # equivalently, fully renamed a directory in one commmit and then recreated | |
746 | # that directory in a later commit adding some new files and then tried to | |
747 | # merge? | |
748 | # | |
749 | # It's hard to divine user intent in these cases, because you can make an | |
750 | # argument that, depending on the intermediate history of the side being | |
751 | # merged, that some users will want files in that directory to | |
752 | # automatically be detected and renamed, while users with a different | |
753 | # intermediate history wouldn't want that rename to happen. | |
754 | # | |
755 | # I think that it is best to simply not have directory rename detection | |
756 | # apply to such cases. My reasoning for this is four-fold: (1) it's | |
757 | # easiest for users in general to figure out what happened if we don't | |
758 | # apply directory rename detection in any such case, (2) it's an easy rule | |
759 | # to explain ["We don't do directory rename detection if the directory | |
760 | # still exists on both sides of the merge"], (3) we can get some hairy | |
761 | # edge/corner cases that would be really confusing and possibly not even | |
762 | # representable in the index if we were to even try, and [related to 3] (4) | |
763 | # attempting to resolve this issue of divining user intent by examining | |
764 | # intermediate history goes against the spirit of three-way merges and is a | |
765 | # path towards crazy corner cases that are far more complex than what we're | |
766 | # already dealing with. | |
767 | # | |
768 | # Note that the wording of the rule ("We don't do directory rename | |
769 | # detection if the directory still exists on both sides of the merge.") | |
770 | # also excludes "renaming" of a directory into a subdirectory of itself | |
771 | # (e.g. /some/dir/* -> /some/dir/subdir/*). It may be possible to carve | |
772 | # out an exception for "renaming"-beneath-itself cases without opening | |
773 | # weird edge/corner cases for other partial directory renames, but for now | |
774 | # we are keeping the rule simple. | |
775 | # | |
776 | # This section contains a test for a partially-renamed-directory case. | |
777 | ########################################################################### | |
778 | ||
779 | # Testcase 4a, Directory split, with original directory still present | |
780 | # (Related to testcase 1f) | |
781 | # Commit O: z/{b,c,d,e} | |
782 | # Commit A: y/{b,c,d}, z/e | |
783 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e,f} | |
784 | # Expected: y/{b,c,d}, z/{e,f} | |
785 | # NOTE: Even though most files from z moved to y, we don't want f to follow. | |
786 | ||
787 | test_expect_success '4a-setup: Directory split, with original directory still present' ' | |
788 | test_create_repo 4a && | |
789 | ( | |
790 | cd 4a && | |
791 | ||
792 | mkdir z && | |
793 | echo b >z/b && | |
794 | echo c >z/c && | |
795 | echo d >z/d && | |
796 | echo e >z/e && | |
797 | git add z && | |
798 | test_tick && | |
799 | git commit -m "O" && | |
800 | ||
801 | git branch O && | |
802 | git branch A && | |
803 | git branch B && | |
804 | ||
805 | git checkout A && | |
806 | mkdir y && | |
807 | git mv z/b y/ && | |
808 | git mv z/c y/ && | |
809 | git mv z/d y/ && | |
810 | test_tick && | |
811 | git commit -m "A" && | |
812 | ||
813 | git checkout B && | |
814 | echo f >z/f && | |
815 | git add z/f && | |
816 | test_tick && | |
817 | git commit -m "B" | |
818 | ) | |
819 | ' | |
820 | ||
821 | test_expect_success '4a-check: Directory split, with original directory still present' ' | |
822 | ( | |
823 | cd 4a && | |
824 | ||
825 | git checkout A^0 && | |
826 | ||
827 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
828 | ||
829 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
830 | test_line_count = 5 out && | |
831 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
832 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
833 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
834 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
835 | ||
836 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
837 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:z/e HEAD:z/f && | |
838 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
839 | O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d O:z/e B:z/f && | |
840 | test_cmp expect actual | |
841 | ) | |
842 | ' | |
843 | ||
844 | ########################################################################### | |
845 | # Rules suggested by section 4: | |
846 | # | |
847 | # Directory-rename-detection should be turned off for any directories (as | |
848 | # a source for renames) that exist on both sides of the merge. (The "as | |
849 | # a source for renames" clarification is due to cases like 1c where | |
850 | # the target directory exists on both sides and we do want the rename | |
851 | # detection.) But, sadly, see testcase 8b. | |
852 | ########################################################################### | |
853 | ||
c449947a EN |
854 | |
855 | ########################################################################### | |
856 | # SECTION 5: Files/directories in the way of subset of to-be-renamed paths | |
857 | # | |
858 | # Implicitly renaming files due to a detected directory rename could run | |
859 | # into problems if there are files or directories in the way of the paths | |
860 | # we want to rename. Explore such cases in this section. | |
861 | ########################################################################### | |
862 | ||
863 | # Testcase 5a, Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target | |
864 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, y/d | |
865 | # Commit A: z/{b,c,e_1,f}, y/{d,e_2} | |
866 | # Commit B: y/{b,c,d} | |
867 | # Expected: z/e_1, y/{b,c,d,e_2,f} + CONFLICT warning | |
868 | # NOTE: While directory rename detection is active here causing z/f to | |
869 | # become y/f, we did not apply this for z/e_1 because that would | |
870 | # give us an add/add conflict for y/e_1 vs y/e_2. This problem with | |
871 | # this add/add, is that both versions of y/e are from the same side | |
872 | # of history, giving us no way to represent this conflict in the | |
873 | # index. | |
874 | ||
875 | test_expect_success '5a-setup: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' ' | |
876 | test_create_repo 5a && | |
877 | ( | |
878 | cd 5a && | |
879 | ||
880 | mkdir z && | |
881 | echo b >z/b && | |
882 | echo c >z/c && | |
883 | mkdir y && | |
884 | echo d >y/d && | |
885 | git add z y && | |
886 | test_tick && | |
887 | git commit -m "O" && | |
888 | ||
889 | git branch O && | |
890 | git branch A && | |
891 | git branch B && | |
892 | ||
893 | git checkout A && | |
894 | echo e1 >z/e && | |
895 | echo f >z/f && | |
896 | echo e2 >y/e && | |
897 | git add z/e z/f y/e && | |
898 | test_tick && | |
899 | git commit -m "A" && | |
900 | ||
901 | git checkout B && | |
902 | git mv z/b y/ && | |
903 | git mv z/c y/ && | |
904 | rmdir z && | |
905 | test_tick && | |
906 | git commit -m "B" | |
907 | ) | |
908 | ' | |
909 | ||
9c0743fe | 910 | test_expect_success '5a-check: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' ' |
c449947a EN |
911 | ( |
912 | cd 5a && | |
913 | ||
914 | git checkout A^0 && | |
915 | ||
916 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
917 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT.*implicit dir rename" out && | |
918 | ||
919 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
920 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
921 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
922 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
923 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
924 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
925 | ||
926 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
927 | :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/d :0:y/e :0:z/e :0:y/f && | |
928 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
929 | O:z/b O:z/c O:y/d A:y/e A:z/e A:z/f && | |
930 | test_cmp expect actual | |
931 | ) | |
932 | ' | |
933 | ||
934 | # Testcase 5b, Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict | |
935 | # (Related to testcase 8d; these may appear slightly inconsistent to users; | |
936 | # Also related to testcases 7d and 7e) | |
937 | # Commit O: z/{b,c,d_1} | |
938 | # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_2} | |
939 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1,e}, y/d_3 | |
940 | # Expected: y/{b,c,e}, CONFLICT(add/add: y/d_2 vs. y/d_3) | |
941 | # NOTE: If z/d_1 in commit B were to be involved in dir rename detection, as | |
942 | # we normaly would since z/ is being renamed to y/, then this would be | |
943 | # a rename/delete (z/d_1 -> y/d_1 vs. deleted) AND an add/add/add | |
944 | # conflict of y/d_1 vs. y/d_2 vs. y/d_3. Add/add/add is not | |
945 | # representable in the index, so the existence of y/d_3 needs to | |
946 | # cause us to bail on directory rename detection for that path, falling | |
947 | # back to git behavior without the directory rename detection. | |
948 | ||
949 | test_expect_success '5b-setup: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' ' | |
950 | test_create_repo 5b && | |
951 | ( | |
952 | cd 5b && | |
953 | ||
954 | mkdir z && | |
955 | echo b >z/b && | |
956 | echo c >z/c && | |
957 | echo d1 >z/d && | |
958 | git add z && | |
959 | test_tick && | |
960 | git commit -m "O" && | |
961 | ||
962 | git branch O && | |
963 | git branch A && | |
964 | git branch B && | |
965 | ||
966 | git checkout A && | |
967 | git rm z/d && | |
968 | git mv z y && | |
969 | echo d2 >y/d && | |
970 | git add y/d && | |
971 | test_tick && | |
972 | git commit -m "A" && | |
973 | ||
974 | git checkout B && | |
975 | mkdir y && | |
976 | echo d3 >y/d && | |
977 | echo e >z/e && | |
978 | git add y/d z/e && | |
979 | test_tick && | |
980 | git commit -m "B" | |
981 | ) | |
982 | ' | |
983 | ||
9c0743fe | 984 | test_expect_success '5b-check: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' ' |
c449947a EN |
985 | ( |
986 | cd 5b && | |
987 | ||
988 | git checkout A^0 && | |
989 | ||
990 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
991 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (add/add).* y/d" out && | |
992 | ||
993 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
994 | test_line_count = 5 out && | |
995 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
996 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
997 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
998 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
999 | ||
1000 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1001 | :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/e :2:y/d :3:y/d && | |
1002 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1003 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e A:y/d B:y/d && | |
1004 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
1005 | ||
1006 | test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/d && | |
1007 | test_path_is_file y/d | |
1008 | ) | |
1009 | ' | |
1010 | ||
1011 | # Testcase 5c, Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add | |
1012 | # (Directory rename detection would result in transitive rename vs. | |
1013 | # rename/rename(1to2) and turn it into a rename/rename(1to3). Further, | |
1014 | # rename paths conflict with separate adds on the other side) | |
1015 | # (Related to testcases 3b and 7c) | |
1016 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1 | |
1017 | # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_2}, w/d_1 | |
1018 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1,e}, w/d_3, y/d_4 | |
1019 | # Expected: A mess, but only a rename/rename(1to2)/add/add mess. Use the | |
1020 | # presence of y/d_4 in B to avoid doing transitive rename of | |
1021 | # x/d_1 -> z/d_1 -> y/d_1, so that the only paths we have at | |
1022 | # y/d are y/d_2 and y/d_4. We still do the move from z/e to y/e, | |
1023 | # though, because it doesn't have anything in the way. | |
1024 | ||
1025 | test_expect_success '5c-setup: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' ' | |
1026 | test_create_repo 5c && | |
1027 | ( | |
1028 | cd 5c && | |
1029 | ||
1030 | mkdir z && | |
1031 | echo b >z/b && | |
1032 | echo c >z/c && | |
1033 | mkdir x && | |
1034 | echo d1 >x/d && | |
1035 | git add z x && | |
1036 | test_tick && | |
1037 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1038 | ||
1039 | git branch O && | |
1040 | git branch A && | |
1041 | git branch B && | |
1042 | ||
1043 | git checkout A && | |
1044 | git mv z y && | |
1045 | echo d2 >y/d && | |
1046 | git add y/d && | |
1047 | git mv x w && | |
1048 | test_tick && | |
1049 | git commit -m "A" && | |
1050 | ||
1051 | git checkout B && | |
1052 | git mv x/d z/ && | |
1053 | mkdir w && | |
1054 | mkdir y && | |
1055 | echo d3 >w/d && | |
1056 | echo d4 >y/d && | |
1057 | echo e >z/e && | |
1058 | git add w/ y/ z/e && | |
1059 | test_tick && | |
1060 | git commit -m "B" | |
1061 | ) | |
1062 | ' | |
1063 | ||
9c0743fe | 1064 | test_expect_success '5c-check: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' ' |
c449947a EN |
1065 | ( |
1066 | cd 5c && | |
1067 | ||
1068 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1069 | ||
1070 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
1071 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*x/d.*w/d.*z/d" out && | |
1072 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (add/add).* y/d" out && | |
1073 | ||
1074 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1075 | test_line_count = 9 out && | |
1076 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1077 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
1078 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1079 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
1080 | ||
1081 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1082 | :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/e && | |
1083 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1084 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e && | |
1085 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
1086 | ||
1087 | test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/d && | |
1088 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1089 | :2:w/d :3:w/d :1:x/d :2:y/d :3:y/d :3:z/d && | |
1090 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1091 | O:x/d B:w/d O:x/d A:y/d B:y/d O:x/d && | |
1092 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
1093 | ||
1094 | git hash-object >actual \ | |
1095 | w/d~HEAD w/d~B^0 z/d && | |
1096 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1097 | O:x/d B:w/d O:x/d && | |
1098 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
1099 | test_path_is_missing x/d && | |
1100 | test_path_is_file y/d && | |
1101 | grep -q "<<<<" y/d # conflict markers should be present | |
1102 | ) | |
1103 | ' | |
1104 | ||
1105 | # Testcase 5d, Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename | |
1106 | # Commit O: z/{b,c} | |
1107 | # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_1} | |
1108 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_2,f}, y/d/e | |
1109 | # Expected: y/{b,c,d/e,f}, z/d_2, CONFLICT(file/directory), y/d_1~HEAD | |
1110 | # Note: The fact that y/d/ exists in B makes us bail on directory rename | |
1111 | # detection for z/d_2, but that doesn't prevent us from applying the | |
1112 | # directory rename detection for z/f -> y/f. | |
1113 | ||
1114 | test_expect_success '5d-setup: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' ' | |
1115 | test_create_repo 5d && | |
1116 | ( | |
1117 | cd 5d && | |
1118 | ||
1119 | mkdir z && | |
1120 | echo b >z/b && | |
1121 | echo c >z/c && | |
1122 | git add z && | |
1123 | test_tick && | |
1124 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1125 | ||
1126 | git branch O && | |
1127 | git branch A && | |
1128 | git branch B && | |
1129 | ||
1130 | git checkout A && | |
1131 | git mv z y && | |
1132 | echo d1 >y/d && | |
1133 | git add y/d && | |
1134 | test_tick && | |
1135 | git commit -m "A" && | |
1136 | ||
1137 | git checkout B && | |
1138 | mkdir -p y/d && | |
1139 | echo e >y/d/e && | |
1140 | echo d2 >z/d && | |
1141 | echo f >z/f && | |
1142 | git add y/d/e z/d z/f && | |
1143 | test_tick && | |
1144 | git commit -m "B" | |
1145 | ) | |
1146 | ' | |
1147 | ||
9c0743fe | 1148 | test_expect_success '5d-check: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' ' |
c449947a EN |
1149 | ( |
1150 | cd 5d && | |
1151 | ||
1152 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1153 | ||
1154 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
1155 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (file/directory).*y/d" out && | |
1156 | ||
1157 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1158 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
1159 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1160 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1161 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1162 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
1163 | ||
1164 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1165 | :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:z/d :0:y/f :2:y/d :0:y/d/e && | |
1166 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1167 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d B:z/f A:y/d B:y/d/e && | |
1168 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
1169 | ||
1170 | git hash-object y/d~HEAD >actual && | |
1171 | git rev-parse A:y/d >expect && | |
1172 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1173 | ) | |
1174 | ' | |
1175 | ||
1176 | ########################################################################### | |
1177 | # Rules suggested by section 5: | |
1178 | # | |
1179 | # If a subset of to-be-renamed files have a file or directory in the way, | |
1180 | # "turn off" the directory rename for those specific sub-paths, falling | |
1181 | # back to old handling. But, sadly, see testcases 8a and 8b. | |
1182 | ########################################################################### | |
1183 | ||
f3499876 EN |
1184 | |
1185 | ########################################################################### | |
1186 | # SECTION 6: Same side of the merge was the one that did the rename | |
1187 | # | |
1188 | # It may sound obvious that you only want to apply implicit directory | |
1189 | # renames to directories if the _other_ side of history did the renaming. | |
1190 | # If you did make an implementation that didn't explicitly enforce this | |
1191 | # rule, the majority of cases that would fall under this section would | |
1192 | # also be solved by following the rules from the above sections. But | |
1193 | # there are still a few that stick out, so this section covers them just | |
1194 | # to make sure we also get them right. | |
1195 | ########################################################################### | |
1196 | ||
1197 | # Testcase 6a, Tricky rename/delete | |
1198 | # Commit O: z/{b,c,d} | |
1199 | # Commit A: z/b | |
1200 | # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d | |
1201 | # Expected: y/b, CONFLICT(rename/delete, z/c -> y/c vs. NULL) | |
1202 | # Note: We're just checking here that the rename of z/b and z/c to put | |
1203 | # them under y/ doesn't accidentally catch z/d and make it look like | |
1204 | # it is also involved in a rename/delete conflict. | |
1205 | ||
1206 | test_expect_success '6a-setup: Tricky rename/delete' ' | |
1207 | test_create_repo 6a && | |
1208 | ( | |
1209 | cd 6a && | |
1210 | ||
1211 | mkdir z && | |
1212 | echo b >z/b && | |
1213 | echo c >z/c && | |
1214 | echo d >z/d && | |
1215 | git add z && | |
1216 | test_tick && | |
1217 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1218 | ||
1219 | git branch O && | |
1220 | git branch A && | |
1221 | git branch B && | |
1222 | ||
1223 | git checkout A && | |
1224 | git rm z/c && | |
1225 | git rm z/d && | |
1226 | test_tick && | |
1227 | git commit -m "A" && | |
1228 | ||
1229 | git checkout B && | |
1230 | mkdir y && | |
1231 | git mv z/b y/ && | |
1232 | git mv z/c y/ && | |
1233 | test_tick && | |
1234 | git commit -m "B" | |
1235 | ) | |
1236 | ' | |
1237 | ||
1238 | test_expect_success '6a-check: Tricky rename/delete' ' | |
1239 | ( | |
1240 | cd 6a && | |
1241 | ||
1242 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1243 | ||
1244 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
1245 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*z/c.*y/c" out && | |
1246 | ||
1247 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1248 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
1249 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1250 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1251 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1252 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1253 | ||
1254 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1255 | :0:y/b :3:y/c && | |
1256 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1257 | O:z/b O:z/c && | |
1258 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1259 | ) | |
1260 | ' | |
1261 | ||
1262 | # Testcase 6b, Same rename done on both sides | |
1263 | # (Related to testcases 6c and 8e) | |
1264 | # Commit O: z/{b,c} | |
1265 | # Commit A: y/{b,c} | |
1266 | # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d | |
1267 | # Expected: y/{b,c}, z/d | |
1268 | # Note: If we did directory rename detection here, we'd move z/d into y/, | |
1269 | # but B did that rename and still decided to put the file into z/, | |
1270 | # so we probably shouldn't apply directory rename detection for it. | |
1271 | ||
1272 | test_expect_success '6b-setup: Same rename done on both sides' ' | |
1273 | test_create_repo 6b && | |
1274 | ( | |
1275 | cd 6b && | |
1276 | ||
1277 | mkdir z && | |
1278 | echo b >z/b && | |
1279 | echo c >z/c && | |
1280 | git add z && | |
1281 | test_tick && | |
1282 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1283 | ||
1284 | git branch O && | |
1285 | git branch A && | |
1286 | git branch B && | |
1287 | ||
1288 | git checkout A && | |
1289 | git mv z y && | |
1290 | test_tick && | |
1291 | git commit -m "A" && | |
1292 | ||
1293 | git checkout B && | |
1294 | git mv z y && | |
1295 | mkdir z && | |
1296 | echo d >z/d && | |
1297 | git add z/d && | |
1298 | test_tick && | |
1299 | git commit -m "B" | |
1300 | ) | |
1301 | ' | |
1302 | ||
1303 | test_expect_success '6b-check: Same rename done on both sides' ' | |
1304 | ( | |
1305 | cd 6b && | |
1306 | ||
1307 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1308 | ||
1309 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
1310 | ||
1311 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1312 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
1313 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1314 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
1315 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1316 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1317 | ||
1318 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1319 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:z/d && | |
1320 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1321 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d && | |
1322 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1323 | ) | |
1324 | ' | |
1325 | ||
1326 | # Testcase 6c, Rename only done on same side | |
1327 | # (Related to testcases 6b and 8e) | |
1328 | # Commit O: z/{b,c} | |
1329 | # Commit A: z/{b,c} (no change) | |
1330 | # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d | |
1331 | # Expected: y/{b,c}, z/d | |
1332 | # NOTE: Seems obvious, but just checking that the implementation doesn't | |
1333 | # "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}. | |
1334 | ||
1335 | test_expect_success '6c-setup: Rename only done on same side' ' | |
1336 | test_create_repo 6c && | |
1337 | ( | |
1338 | cd 6c && | |
1339 | ||
1340 | mkdir z && | |
1341 | echo b >z/b && | |
1342 | echo c >z/c && | |
1343 | git add z && | |
1344 | test_tick && | |
1345 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1346 | ||
1347 | git branch O && | |
1348 | git branch A && | |
1349 | git branch B && | |
1350 | ||
1351 | git checkout A && | |
1352 | test_tick && | |
1353 | git commit --allow-empty -m "A" && | |
1354 | ||
1355 | git checkout B && | |
1356 | git mv z y && | |
1357 | mkdir z && | |
1358 | echo d >z/d && | |
1359 | git add z/d && | |
1360 | test_tick && | |
1361 | git commit -m "B" | |
1362 | ) | |
1363 | ' | |
1364 | ||
1365 | test_expect_success '6c-check: Rename only done on same side' ' | |
1366 | ( | |
1367 | cd 6c && | |
1368 | ||
1369 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1370 | ||
1371 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
1372 | ||
1373 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1374 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
1375 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1376 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
1377 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1378 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1379 | ||
1380 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1381 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:z/d && | |
1382 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1383 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d && | |
1384 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1385 | ) | |
1386 | ' | |
1387 | ||
1388 | # Testcase 6d, We don't always want transitive renaming | |
1389 | # (Related to testcase 1c) | |
1390 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d | |
1391 | # Commit A: z/{b,c}, x/d (no change) | |
1392 | # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d | |
1393 | # Expected: y/{b,c}, z/d | |
1394 | # NOTE: Again, this seems obvious but just checking that the implementation | |
1395 | # doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}. | |
1396 | ||
1397 | test_expect_success '6d-setup: We do not always want transitive renaming' ' | |
1398 | test_create_repo 6d && | |
1399 | ( | |
1400 | cd 6d && | |
1401 | ||
1402 | mkdir z && | |
1403 | echo b >z/b && | |
1404 | echo c >z/c && | |
1405 | mkdir x && | |
1406 | echo d >x/d && | |
1407 | git add z x && | |
1408 | test_tick && | |
1409 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1410 | ||
1411 | git branch O && | |
1412 | git branch A && | |
1413 | git branch B && | |
1414 | ||
1415 | git checkout A && | |
1416 | test_tick && | |
1417 | git commit --allow-empty -m "A" && | |
1418 | ||
1419 | git checkout B && | |
1420 | git mv z y && | |
1421 | git mv x z && | |
1422 | test_tick && | |
1423 | git commit -m "B" | |
1424 | ) | |
1425 | ' | |
1426 | ||
1427 | test_expect_success '6d-check: We do not always want transitive renaming' ' | |
1428 | ( | |
1429 | cd 6d && | |
1430 | ||
1431 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1432 | ||
1433 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
1434 | ||
1435 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1436 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
1437 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1438 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
1439 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1440 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1441 | ||
1442 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1443 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:z/d && | |
1444 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1445 | O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d && | |
1446 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1447 | ) | |
1448 | ' | |
1449 | ||
1450 | # Testcase 6e, Add/add from one-side | |
1451 | # Commit O: z/{b,c} | |
1452 | # Commit A: z/{b,c} (no change) | |
1453 | # Commit B: y/{b,c,d_1}, z/d_2 | |
1454 | # Expected: y/{b,c,d_1}, z/d_2 | |
1455 | # NOTE: Again, this seems obvious but just checking that the implementation | |
1456 | # doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c} + | |
1457 | # add/add conflict on y/d_1 vs y/d_2. | |
1458 | ||
1459 | test_expect_success '6e-setup: Add/add from one side' ' | |
1460 | test_create_repo 6e && | |
1461 | ( | |
1462 | cd 6e && | |
1463 | ||
1464 | mkdir z && | |
1465 | echo b >z/b && | |
1466 | echo c >z/c && | |
1467 | git add z && | |
1468 | test_tick && | |
1469 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1470 | ||
1471 | git branch O && | |
1472 | git branch A && | |
1473 | git branch B && | |
1474 | ||
1475 | git checkout A && | |
1476 | test_tick && | |
1477 | git commit --allow-empty -m "A" && | |
1478 | ||
1479 | git checkout B && | |
1480 | git mv z y && | |
1481 | echo d1 > y/d && | |
1482 | mkdir z && | |
1483 | echo d2 > z/d && | |
1484 | git add y/d z/d && | |
1485 | test_tick && | |
1486 | git commit -m "B" | |
1487 | ) | |
1488 | ' | |
1489 | ||
1490 | test_expect_success '6e-check: Add/add from one side' ' | |
1491 | ( | |
1492 | cd 6e && | |
1493 | ||
1494 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1495 | ||
1496 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
1497 | ||
1498 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1499 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
1500 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1501 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
1502 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1503 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1504 | ||
1505 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1506 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:z/d && | |
1507 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1508 | O:z/b O:z/c B:y/d B:z/d && | |
1509 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1510 | ) | |
1511 | ' | |
1512 | ||
1513 | ########################################################################### | |
1514 | # Rules suggested by section 6: | |
1515 | # | |
1516 | # Only apply implicit directory renames to directories if the other | |
1517 | # side of history is the one doing the renaming. | |
1518 | ########################################################################### | |
1519 | ||
f95de960 EN |
1520 | |
1521 | ########################################################################### | |
1522 | # SECTION 7: More involved Edge/Corner cases | |
1523 | # | |
1524 | # The ruleset we have generated in the above sections seems to provide | |
1525 | # well-defined merges. But can we find edge/corner cases that either (a) | |
1526 | # are harder for users to understand, or (b) have a resolution that is | |
1527 | # non-intuitive or suboptimal? | |
1528 | # | |
1529 | # The testcases in this section dive into cases that I've tried to craft in | |
1530 | # a way to find some that might be surprising to users or difficult for | |
1531 | # them to understand (the next section will look at non-intuitive or | |
1532 | # suboptimal merge results). Some of the testcases are similar to ones | |
1533 | # from past sections, but have been simplified to try to highlight error | |
1534 | # messages using a "modified" path (due to the directory rename). Are | |
1535 | # users okay with these? | |
1536 | # | |
1537 | # In my opinion, testcases that are difficult to understand from this | |
1538 | # section is due to difficulty in the testcase rather than the directory | |
1539 | # renaming (similar to how t6042 and t6036 have difficult resolutions due | |
1540 | # to the problem setup itself being complex). And I don't think the | |
1541 | # error messages are a problem. | |
1542 | # | |
1543 | # On the other hand, the testcases in section 8 worry me slightly more... | |
1544 | ########################################################################### | |
1545 | ||
1546 | # Testcase 7a, rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file | |
1547 | # Commit O: z/{b,c} | |
1548 | # Commit A: y/{b,c} | |
1549 | # Commit B: w/b, x/c, z/d | |
1550 | # Expected: y/d, CONFLICT(rename/rename for both z/b and z/c) | |
1551 | # NOTE: There's a rename of z/ here, y/ has more renames, so z/d -> y/d. | |
1552 | ||
1553 | test_expect_success '7a-setup: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' ' | |
1554 | test_create_repo 7a && | |
1555 | ( | |
1556 | cd 7a && | |
1557 | ||
1558 | mkdir z && | |
1559 | echo b >z/b && | |
1560 | echo c >z/c && | |
1561 | git add z && | |
1562 | test_tick && | |
1563 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1564 | ||
1565 | git branch O && | |
1566 | git branch A && | |
1567 | git branch B && | |
1568 | ||
1569 | git checkout A && | |
1570 | git mv z y && | |
1571 | test_tick && | |
1572 | git commit -m "A" && | |
1573 | ||
1574 | git checkout B && | |
1575 | mkdir w && | |
1576 | mkdir x && | |
1577 | git mv z/b w/ && | |
1578 | git mv z/c x/ && | |
1579 | echo d > z/d && | |
1580 | git add z/d && | |
1581 | test_tick && | |
1582 | git commit -m "B" | |
1583 | ) | |
1584 | ' | |
1585 | ||
9c0743fe | 1586 | test_expect_success '7a-check: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' ' |
f95de960 EN |
1587 | ( |
1588 | cd 7a && | |
1589 | ||
1590 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1591 | ||
1592 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
1593 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*z/b.*y/b.*w/b" out && | |
1594 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*z/c.*y/c.*x/c" out && | |
1595 | ||
1596 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1597 | test_line_count = 7 out && | |
1598 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1599 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
1600 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1601 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1602 | ||
1603 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1604 | :1:z/b :2:y/b :3:w/b :1:z/c :2:y/c :3:x/c :0:y/d && | |
1605 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1606 | O:z/b O:z/b O:z/b O:z/c O:z/c O:z/c B:z/d && | |
1607 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
1608 | ||
1609 | git hash-object >actual \ | |
1610 | y/b w/b y/c x/c && | |
1611 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1612 | O:z/b O:z/b O:z/c O:z/c && | |
1613 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1614 | ) | |
1615 | ' | |
1616 | ||
1617 | # Testcase 7b, rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename | |
1618 | # (Related to testcase 1d) | |
1619 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1, w/d_2 | |
1620 | # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_2}, x/d_1 | |
1621 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1}, w/d_2 | |
1622 | # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(rename/rename(2to1): x/d_1, w/d_2 -> y_d) | |
1623 | ||
1624 | test_expect_success '7b-setup: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' ' | |
1625 | test_create_repo 7b && | |
1626 | ( | |
1627 | cd 7b && | |
1628 | ||
1629 | mkdir z && | |
1630 | mkdir x && | |
1631 | mkdir w && | |
1632 | echo b >z/b && | |
1633 | echo c >z/c && | |
1634 | echo d1 > x/d && | |
1635 | echo d2 > w/d && | |
1636 | git add z x w && | |
1637 | test_tick && | |
1638 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1639 | ||
1640 | git branch O && | |
1641 | git branch A && | |
1642 | git branch B && | |
1643 | ||
1644 | git checkout A && | |
1645 | git mv z y && | |
1646 | git mv w/d y/ && | |
1647 | test_tick && | |
1648 | git commit -m "A" && | |
1649 | ||
1650 | git checkout B && | |
1651 | git mv x/d z/ && | |
1652 | rmdir x && | |
1653 | test_tick && | |
1654 | git commit -m "B" | |
1655 | ) | |
1656 | ' | |
1657 | ||
9c0743fe | 1658 | test_expect_success '7b-check: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' ' |
f95de960 EN |
1659 | ( |
1660 | cd 7b && | |
1661 | ||
1662 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1663 | ||
1664 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
1665 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && | |
1666 | ||
1667 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1668 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
1669 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1670 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
1671 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1672 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
1673 | ||
1674 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1675 | :0:y/b :0:y/c :2:y/d :3:y/d && | |
1676 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1677 | O:z/b O:z/c O:w/d O:x/d && | |
1678 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
1679 | ||
1680 | test_path_is_missing y/d && | |
1681 | test_path_is_file y/d~HEAD && | |
1682 | test_path_is_file y/d~B^0 && | |
1683 | ||
1684 | git hash-object >actual \ | |
1685 | y/d~HEAD y/d~B^0 && | |
1686 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1687 | O:w/d O:x/d && | |
1688 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1689 | ) | |
1690 | ' | |
1691 | ||
1692 | # Testcase 7c, rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity | |
1693 | # (Related to testcases 3b and 5c) | |
1694 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d | |
1695 | # Commit A: y/{b,c}, w/d | |
1696 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d} | |
1697 | # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(x/d -> w/d vs. y/d) | |
1698 | # NOTE: z/ was renamed to y/ so we do want to report | |
1699 | # neither CONFLICT(x/d -> w/d vs. z/d) | |
1700 | # nor CONFLiCT x/d -> w/d vs. y/d vs. z/d) | |
1701 | ||
1702 | test_expect_success '7c-setup: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' ' | |
1703 | test_create_repo 7c && | |
1704 | ( | |
1705 | cd 7c && | |
1706 | ||
1707 | mkdir z && | |
1708 | echo b >z/b && | |
1709 | echo c >z/c && | |
1710 | mkdir x && | |
1711 | echo d >x/d && | |
1712 | git add z x && | |
1713 | test_tick && | |
1714 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1715 | ||
1716 | git branch O && | |
1717 | git branch A && | |
1718 | git branch B && | |
1719 | ||
1720 | git checkout A && | |
1721 | git mv z y && | |
1722 | git mv x w && | |
1723 | test_tick && | |
1724 | git commit -m "A" && | |
1725 | ||
1726 | git checkout B && | |
1727 | git mv x/d z/ && | |
1728 | rmdir x && | |
1729 | test_tick && | |
1730 | git commit -m "B" | |
1731 | ) | |
1732 | ' | |
1733 | ||
9c0743fe | 1734 | test_expect_success '7c-check: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' ' |
f95de960 EN |
1735 | ( |
1736 | cd 7c && | |
1737 | ||
1738 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1739 | ||
1740 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
1741 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*x/d.*w/d.*y/d" out && | |
1742 | ||
1743 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1744 | test_line_count = 5 out && | |
1745 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1746 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
1747 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1748 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1749 | ||
1750 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1751 | :0:y/b :0:y/c :1:x/d :2:w/d :3:y/d && | |
1752 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1753 | O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d O:x/d O:x/d && | |
1754 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1755 | ) | |
1756 | ' | |
1757 | ||
1758 | # Testcase 7d, transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported? | |
1759 | # (Related somewhat to testcases 5b and 8d) | |
1760 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d | |
1761 | # Commit A: y/{b,c} | |
1762 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d} | |
1763 | # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(delete x/d vs rename to y/d) | |
1764 | # NOTE: z->y so NOT CONFLICT(delete x/d vs rename to z/d) | |
1765 | ||
1766 | test_expect_success '7d-setup: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' ' | |
1767 | test_create_repo 7d && | |
1768 | ( | |
1769 | cd 7d && | |
1770 | ||
1771 | mkdir z && | |
1772 | echo b >z/b && | |
1773 | echo c >z/c && | |
1774 | mkdir x && | |
1775 | echo d >x/d && | |
1776 | git add z x && | |
1777 | test_tick && | |
1778 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1779 | ||
1780 | git branch O && | |
1781 | git branch A && | |
1782 | git branch B && | |
1783 | ||
1784 | git checkout A && | |
1785 | git mv z y && | |
1786 | git rm -rf x && | |
1787 | test_tick && | |
1788 | git commit -m "A" && | |
1789 | ||
1790 | git checkout B && | |
1791 | git mv x/d z/ && | |
1792 | rmdir x && | |
1793 | test_tick && | |
1794 | git commit -m "B" | |
1795 | ) | |
1796 | ' | |
1797 | ||
9c0743fe | 1798 | test_expect_success '7d-check: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' ' |
f95de960 EN |
1799 | ( |
1800 | cd 7d && | |
1801 | ||
1802 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1803 | ||
1804 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
1805 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*x/d.*y/d" out && | |
1806 | ||
1807 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1808 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
1809 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1810 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1811 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1812 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1813 | ||
1814 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1815 | :0:y/b :0:y/c :3:y/d && | |
1816 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1817 | O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d && | |
1818 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1819 | ) | |
1820 | ' | |
1821 | ||
1822 | # Testcase 7e, transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way | |
1823 | # (Very similar to 'both rename source and destination involved in D/F conflict' from t6022-merge-rename.sh) | |
1824 | # (Also related to testcases 9c and 9d) | |
1825 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1 | |
1826 | # Commit A: y/{b,c,d/g}, x/d/f | |
1827 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1} | |
1828 | # Expected: rename/delete(x/d_1->y/d_1 vs. None) + D/F conflict on y/d | |
1829 | # y/{b,c,d/g}, y/d_1~B^0, x/d/f | |
1830 | ||
1831 | # NOTE: The main path of interest here is d_1 and where it ends up, but | |
1832 | # this is actually a case that has two potential directory renames | |
1833 | # involved and D/F conflict(s), so it makes sense to walk through | |
1834 | # each step. | |
1835 | # | |
1836 | # Commit A renames z/ -> y/. Thus everything that B adds to z/ | |
1837 | # should be instead moved to y/. This gives us the D/F conflict on | |
1838 | # y/d because x/d_1 -> z/d_1 -> y/d_1 conflicts with y/d/g. | |
1839 | # | |
1840 | # Further, commit B renames x/ -> z/, thus everything A adds to x/ | |
1841 | # should instead be moved to z/...BUT we removed z/ and renamed it | |
1842 | # to y/, so maybe everything should move not from x/ to z/, but | |
1843 | # from x/ to z/ to y/. Doing so might make sense from the logic so | |
1844 | # far, but note that commit A had both an x/ and a y/; it did the | |
1845 | # renaming of z/ to y/ and created x/d/f and it clearly made these | |
1846 | # things separate, so it doesn't make much sense to push these | |
1847 | # together. Doing so is what I'd call a doubly transitive rename; | |
1848 | # see testcases 9c and 9d for further discussion of this issue and | |
1849 | # how it's resolved. | |
1850 | ||
1851 | test_expect_success '7e-setup: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' ' | |
1852 | test_create_repo 7e && | |
1853 | ( | |
1854 | cd 7e && | |
1855 | ||
1856 | mkdir z && | |
1857 | echo b >z/b && | |
1858 | echo c >z/c && | |
1859 | mkdir x && | |
1860 | echo d1 >x/d && | |
1861 | git add z x && | |
1862 | test_tick && | |
1863 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1864 | ||
1865 | git branch O && | |
1866 | git branch A && | |
1867 | git branch B && | |
1868 | ||
1869 | git checkout A && | |
1870 | git mv z y && | |
1871 | git rm x/d && | |
1872 | mkdir -p x/d && | |
1873 | mkdir -p y/d && | |
1874 | echo f >x/d/f && | |
1875 | echo g >y/d/g && | |
1876 | git add x/d/f y/d/g && | |
1877 | test_tick && | |
1878 | git commit -m "A" && | |
1879 | ||
1880 | git checkout B && | |
1881 | git mv x/d z/ && | |
1882 | rmdir x && | |
1883 | test_tick && | |
1884 | git commit -m "B" | |
1885 | ) | |
1886 | ' | |
1887 | ||
9c0743fe | 1888 | test_expect_success '7e-check: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' ' |
f95de960 EN |
1889 | ( |
1890 | cd 7e && | |
1891 | ||
1892 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1893 | ||
1894 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
1895 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*x/d.*y/d" out && | |
1896 | ||
1897 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1898 | test_line_count = 5 out && | |
1899 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1900 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1901 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1902 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
1903 | ||
1904 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1905 | :0:x/d/f :0:y/d/g :0:y/b :0:y/c :3:y/d && | |
1906 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1907 | A:x/d/f A:y/d/g O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d && | |
1908 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
1909 | ||
1910 | git hash-object y/d~B^0 >actual && | |
1911 | git rev-parse O:x/d >expect && | |
1912 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1913 | ) | |
1914 | ' | |
1915 | ||
362ab315 EN |
1916 | ########################################################################### |
1917 | # SECTION 8: Suboptimal merges | |
1918 | # | |
1919 | # As alluded to in the last section, the ruleset we have built up for | |
1920 | # detecting directory renames unfortunately has some special cases where it | |
1921 | # results in slightly suboptimal or non-intuitive behavior. This section | |
1922 | # explores these cases. | |
1923 | # | |
1924 | # To be fair, we already had non-intuitive or suboptimal behavior for most | |
1925 | # of these cases in git before introducing implicit directory rename | |
1926 | # detection, but it'd be nice if there was a modified ruleset out there | |
1927 | # that handled these cases a bit better. | |
1928 | ########################################################################### | |
1929 | ||
1930 | # Testcase 8a, Dual-directory rename, one into the others' way | |
1931 | # Commit O. x/{a,b}, y/{c,d} | |
1932 | # Commit A. x/{a,b,e}, y/{c,d,f} | |
1933 | # Commit B. y/{a,b}, z/{c,d} | |
1934 | # | |
1935 | # Possible Resolutions: | |
1936 | # w/o dir-rename detection: y/{a,b,f}, z/{c,d}, x/e | |
1937 | # Currently expected: y/{a,b,e,f}, z/{c,d} | |
1938 | # Optimal: y/{a,b,e}, z/{c,d,f} | |
1939 | # | |
1940 | # Note: Both x and y got renamed and it'd be nice to detect both, and we do | |
1941 | # better with directory rename detection than git did without, but the | |
1942 | # simple rule from section 5 prevents me from handling this as optimally as | |
1943 | # we potentially could. | |
1944 | ||
1945 | test_expect_success '8a-setup: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' ' | |
1946 | test_create_repo 8a && | |
1947 | ( | |
1948 | cd 8a && | |
1949 | ||
1950 | mkdir x && | |
1951 | mkdir y && | |
1952 | echo a >x/a && | |
1953 | echo b >x/b && | |
1954 | echo c >y/c && | |
1955 | echo d >y/d && | |
1956 | git add x y && | |
1957 | test_tick && | |
1958 | git commit -m "O" && | |
1959 | ||
1960 | git branch O && | |
1961 | git branch A && | |
1962 | git branch B && | |
1963 | ||
1964 | git checkout A && | |
1965 | echo e >x/e && | |
1966 | echo f >y/f && | |
1967 | git add x/e y/f && | |
1968 | test_tick && | |
1969 | git commit -m "A" && | |
1970 | ||
1971 | git checkout B && | |
1972 | git mv y z && | |
1973 | git mv x y && | |
1974 | test_tick && | |
1975 | git commit -m "B" | |
1976 | ) | |
1977 | ' | |
1978 | ||
9c0743fe | 1979 | test_expect_success '8a-check: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' ' |
362ab315 EN |
1980 | ( |
1981 | cd 8a && | |
1982 | ||
1983 | git checkout A^0 && | |
1984 | ||
1985 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
1986 | ||
1987 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
1988 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
1989 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
1990 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
1991 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
1992 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
1993 | ||
1994 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
1995 | HEAD:y/a HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/e HEAD:y/f HEAD:z/c HEAD:z/d && | |
1996 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
1997 | O:x/a O:x/b A:x/e A:y/f O:y/c O:y/d && | |
1998 | test_cmp expect actual | |
1999 | ) | |
2000 | ' | |
2001 | ||
2002 | # Testcase 8b, Dual-directory rename, one into the others' way, with conflicting filenames | |
2003 | # Commit O. x/{a_1,b_1}, y/{a_2,b_2} | |
2004 | # Commit A. x/{a_1,b_1,e_1}, y/{a_2,b_2,e_2} | |
2005 | # Commit B. y/{a_1,b_1}, z/{a_2,b_2} | |
2006 | # | |
2007 | # w/o dir-rename detection: y/{a_1,b_1,e_2}, z/{a_2,b_2}, x/e_1 | |
2008 | # Currently expected: <same> | |
2009 | # Scary: y/{a_1,b_1}, z/{a_2,b_2}, CONFLICT(add/add, e_1 vs. e_2) | |
2010 | # Optimal: y/{a_1,b_1,e_1}, z/{a_2,b_2,e_2} | |
2011 | # | |
2012 | # Note: Very similar to 8a, except instead of 'e' and 'f' in directories x and | |
2013 | # y, both are named 'e'. Without directory rename detection, neither file | |
2014 | # moves directories. Implement directory rename detection suboptimally, and | |
2015 | # you get an add/add conflict, but both files were added in commit A, so this | |
2016 | # is an add/add conflict where one side of history added both files -- | |
2017 | # something we can't represent in the index. Obviously, we'd prefer the last | |
2018 | # resolution, but our previous rules are too coarse to allow it. Using both | |
2019 | # the rules from section 4 and section 5 save us from the Scary resolution, | |
2020 | # making us fall back to pre-directory-rename-detection behavior for both | |
2021 | # e_1 and e_2. | |
2022 | ||
2023 | test_expect_success '8b-setup: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, with conflicting filenames' ' | |
2024 | test_create_repo 8b && | |
2025 | ( | |
2026 | cd 8b && | |
2027 | ||
2028 | mkdir x && | |
2029 | mkdir y && | |
2030 | echo a1 >x/a && | |
2031 | echo b1 >x/b && | |
2032 | echo a2 >y/a && | |
2033 | echo b2 >y/b && | |
2034 | git add x y && | |
2035 | test_tick && | |
2036 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2037 | ||
2038 | git branch O && | |
2039 | git branch A && | |
2040 | git branch B && | |
2041 | ||
2042 | git checkout A && | |
2043 | echo e1 >x/e && | |
2044 | echo e2 >y/e && | |
2045 | git add x/e y/e && | |
2046 | test_tick && | |
2047 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2048 | ||
2049 | git checkout B && | |
2050 | git mv y z && | |
2051 | git mv x y && | |
2052 | test_tick && | |
2053 | git commit -m "B" | |
2054 | ) | |
2055 | ' | |
2056 | ||
2057 | test_expect_success '8b-check: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, with conflicting filenames' ' | |
2058 | ( | |
2059 | cd 8b && | |
2060 | ||
2061 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2062 | ||
2063 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
2064 | ||
2065 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2066 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
2067 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
2068 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
2069 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
2070 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
2071 | ||
2072 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2073 | HEAD:y/a HEAD:y/b HEAD:z/a HEAD:z/b HEAD:x/e HEAD:y/e && | |
2074 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2075 | O:x/a O:x/b O:y/a O:y/b A:x/e A:y/e && | |
2076 | test_cmp expect actual | |
2077 | ) | |
2078 | ' | |
2079 | ||
2080 | # Testcase 8c, rename+modify/delete | |
2081 | # (Related to testcases 5b and 8d) | |
2082 | # Commit O: z/{b,c,d} | |
2083 | # Commit A: y/{b,c} | |
2084 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_modified,e} | |
2085 | # Expected: y/{b,c,e}, CONFLICT(rename+modify/delete: x/d -> y/d or deleted) | |
2086 | # | |
2087 | # Note: This testcase doesn't present any concerns for me...until you | |
2088 | # compare it with testcases 5b and 8d. See notes in 8d for more | |
2089 | # details. | |
2090 | ||
2091 | test_expect_success '8c-setup: rename+modify/delete' ' | |
2092 | test_create_repo 8c && | |
2093 | ( | |
2094 | cd 8c && | |
2095 | ||
2096 | mkdir z && | |
2097 | echo b >z/b && | |
2098 | echo c >z/c && | |
2099 | test_seq 1 10 >z/d && | |
2100 | git add z && | |
2101 | test_tick && | |
2102 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2103 | ||
2104 | git branch O && | |
2105 | git branch A && | |
2106 | git branch B && | |
2107 | ||
2108 | git checkout A && | |
2109 | git rm z/d && | |
2110 | git mv z y && | |
2111 | test_tick && | |
2112 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2113 | ||
2114 | git checkout B && | |
2115 | echo 11 >z/d && | |
2116 | test_chmod +x z/d && | |
2117 | echo e >z/e && | |
2118 | git add z/d z/e && | |
2119 | test_tick && | |
2120 | git commit -m "B" | |
2121 | ) | |
2122 | ' | |
2123 | ||
9c0743fe | 2124 | test_expect_success '8c-check: rename+modify/delete' ' |
362ab315 EN |
2125 | ( |
2126 | cd 8c && | |
2127 | ||
2128 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2129 | ||
2130 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
2131 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).* z/d.*y/d" out && | |
2132 | ||
2133 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2134 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
2135 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
2136 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
2137 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
2138 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
2139 | ||
2140 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2141 | :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/e :3:y/d && | |
2142 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2143 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e B:z/d && | |
2144 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
2145 | ||
2146 | test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/d && | |
2147 | test_must_fail git rev-parse :2:y/d && | |
2148 | git ls-files -s y/d | grep ^100755 && | |
2149 | test_path_is_file y/d | |
2150 | ) | |
2151 | ' | |
2152 | ||
2153 | # Testcase 8d, rename/delete...or not? | |
2154 | # (Related to testcase 5b; these may appear slightly inconsistent to users; | |
2155 | # Also related to testcases 7d and 7e) | |
2156 | # Commit O: z/{b,c,d} | |
2157 | # Commit A: y/{b,c} | |
2158 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e} | |
2159 | # Expected: y/{b,c,e} | |
2160 | # | |
2161 | # Note: It would also be somewhat reasonable to resolve this as | |
2162 | # y/{b,c,e}, CONFLICT(rename/delete: x/d -> y/d or deleted) | |
2163 | # The logic being that the only difference between this testcase and 8c | |
2164 | # is that there is no modification to d. That suggests that instead of a | |
2165 | # rename/modify vs. delete conflict, we should just have a rename/delete | |
2166 | # conflict, otherwise we are being inconsistent. | |
2167 | # | |
2168 | # However...as far as consistency goes, we didn't report a conflict for | |
2169 | # path d_1 in testcase 5b due to a different file being in the way. So, | |
2170 | # we seem to be forced to have cases where users can change things | |
2171 | # slightly and get what they may perceive as inconsistent results. It | |
2172 | # would be nice to avoid that, but I'm not sure I see how. | |
2173 | # | |
2174 | # In this case, I'm leaning towards: commit A was the one that deleted z/d | |
2175 | # and it did the rename of z to y, so the two "conflicts" (rename vs. | |
2176 | # delete) are both coming from commit A, which is illogical. Conflicts | |
2177 | # during merging are supposed to be about opposite sides doing things | |
2178 | # differently. | |
2179 | ||
2180 | test_expect_success '8d-setup: rename/delete...or not?' ' | |
2181 | test_create_repo 8d && | |
2182 | ( | |
2183 | cd 8d && | |
2184 | ||
2185 | mkdir z && | |
2186 | echo b >z/b && | |
2187 | echo c >z/c && | |
2188 | test_seq 1 10 >z/d && | |
2189 | git add z && | |
2190 | test_tick && | |
2191 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2192 | ||
2193 | git branch O && | |
2194 | git branch A && | |
2195 | git branch B && | |
2196 | ||
2197 | git checkout A && | |
2198 | git rm z/d && | |
2199 | git mv z y && | |
2200 | test_tick && | |
2201 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2202 | ||
2203 | git checkout B && | |
2204 | echo e >z/e && | |
2205 | git add z/e && | |
2206 | test_tick && | |
2207 | git commit -m "B" | |
2208 | ) | |
2209 | ' | |
2210 | ||
9c0743fe | 2211 | test_expect_success '8d-check: rename/delete...or not?' ' |
362ab315 EN |
2212 | ( |
2213 | cd 8d && | |
2214 | ||
2215 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2216 | ||
2217 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
2218 | ||
2219 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2220 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
2221 | ||
2222 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2223 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/e && | |
2224 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2225 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e && | |
2226 | test_cmp expect actual | |
2227 | ) | |
2228 | ' | |
2229 | ||
2230 | # Testcase 8e, Both sides rename, one side adds to original directory | |
2231 | # Commit O: z/{b,c} | |
2232 | # Commit A: y/{b,c} | |
2233 | # Commit B: w/{b,c}, z/d | |
2234 | # | |
2235 | # Possible Resolutions: | |
2236 | # w/o dir-rename detection: z/d, CONFLICT(z/b -> y/b vs. w/b), | |
2237 | # CONFLICT(z/c -> y/c vs. w/c) | |
2238 | # Currently expected: y/d, CONFLICT(z/b -> y/b vs. w/b), | |
2239 | # CONFLICT(z/c -> y/c vs. w/c) | |
2240 | # Optimal: ?? | |
2241 | # | |
2242 | # Notes: In commit A, directory z got renamed to y. In commit B, directory z | |
2243 | # did NOT get renamed; the directory is still present; instead it is | |
2244 | # considered to have just renamed a subset of paths in directory z | |
2245 | # elsewhere. Therefore, the directory rename done in commit A to z/ | |
2246 | # applies to z/d and maps it to y/d. | |
2247 | # | |
2248 | # It's possible that users would get confused about this, but what | |
2249 | # should we do instead? Silently leaving at z/d seems just as bad or | |
2250 | # maybe even worse. Perhaps we could print a big warning about z/d | |
2251 | # and how we're moving to y/d in this case, but when I started thinking | |
2252 | # about the ramifications of doing that, I didn't know how to rule out | |
2253 | # that opening other weird edge and corner cases so I just punted. | |
2254 | ||
2255 | test_expect_success '8e-setup: Both sides rename, one side adds to original directory' ' | |
2256 | test_create_repo 8e && | |
2257 | ( | |
2258 | cd 8e && | |
2259 | ||
2260 | mkdir z && | |
2261 | echo b >z/b && | |
2262 | echo c >z/c && | |
2263 | git add z && | |
2264 | test_tick && | |
2265 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2266 | ||
2267 | git branch O && | |
2268 | git branch A && | |
2269 | git branch B && | |
2270 | ||
2271 | git checkout A && | |
2272 | git mv z y && | |
2273 | test_tick && | |
2274 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2275 | ||
2276 | git checkout B && | |
2277 | git mv z w && | |
2278 | mkdir z && | |
2279 | echo d >z/d && | |
2280 | git add z/d && | |
2281 | test_tick && | |
2282 | git commit -m "B" | |
2283 | ) | |
2284 | ' | |
2285 | ||
9c0743fe | 2286 | test_expect_success '8e-check: Both sides rename, one side adds to original directory' ' |
362ab315 EN |
2287 | ( |
2288 | cd 8e && | |
2289 | ||
2290 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2291 | ||
2292 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
2293 | test_i18ngrep CONFLICT.*rename/rename.*z/c.*y/c.*w/c out && | |
2294 | test_i18ngrep CONFLICT.*rename/rename.*z/b.*y/b.*w/b out && | |
2295 | ||
2296 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2297 | test_line_count = 7 out && | |
2298 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
2299 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
2300 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
2301 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
2302 | ||
2303 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2304 | :1:z/b :2:y/b :3:w/b :1:z/c :2:y/c :3:w/c :0:y/d && | |
2305 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2306 | O:z/b O:z/b O:z/b O:z/c O:z/c O:z/c B:z/d && | |
2307 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
2308 | ||
2309 | git hash-object >actual \ | |
2310 | y/b w/b y/c w/c && | |
2311 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2312 | O:z/b O:z/b O:z/c O:z/c && | |
2313 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
2314 | ||
2315 | test_path_is_missing z/b && | |
2316 | test_path_is_missing z/c | |
2317 | ) | |
2318 | ' | |
2319 | ||
792e1371 EN |
2320 | ########################################################################### |
2321 | # SECTION 9: Other testcases | |
2322 | # | |
2323 | # This section consists of miscellaneous testcases I thought of during | |
2324 | # the implementation which round out the testing. | |
2325 | ########################################################################### | |
2326 | ||
2327 | # Testcase 9a, Inner renamed directory within outer renamed directory | |
2328 | # (Related to testcase 1f) | |
2329 | # Commit O: z/{b,c,d/{e,f,g}} | |
2330 | # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/w/{e,f,g} | |
2331 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d/{e,f,g,h},i} | |
2332 | # Expected: y/{b,c,i}, x/w/{e,f,g,h} | |
2333 | # NOTE: The only reason this one is interesting is because when a directory | |
2334 | # is split into multiple other directories, we determine by the weight | |
2335 | # of which one had the most paths going to it. A naive implementation | |
2336 | # of that could take the new file in commit B at z/i to x/w/i or x/i. | |
2337 | ||
2338 | test_expect_success '9a-setup: Inner renamed directory within outer renamed directory' ' | |
2339 | test_create_repo 9a && | |
2340 | ( | |
2341 | cd 9a && | |
2342 | ||
2343 | mkdir -p z/d && | |
2344 | echo b >z/b && | |
2345 | echo c >z/c && | |
2346 | echo e >z/d/e && | |
2347 | echo f >z/d/f && | |
2348 | echo g >z/d/g && | |
2349 | git add z && | |
2350 | test_tick && | |
2351 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2352 | ||
2353 | git branch O && | |
2354 | git branch A && | |
2355 | git branch B && | |
2356 | ||
2357 | git checkout A && | |
2358 | mkdir x && | |
2359 | git mv z/d x/w && | |
2360 | git mv z y && | |
2361 | test_tick && | |
2362 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2363 | ||
2364 | git checkout B && | |
2365 | echo h >z/d/h && | |
2366 | echo i >z/i && | |
2367 | git add z && | |
2368 | test_tick && | |
2369 | git commit -m "B" | |
2370 | ) | |
2371 | ' | |
2372 | ||
9c0743fe | 2373 | test_expect_success '9a-check: Inner renamed directory within outer renamed directory' ' |
792e1371 EN |
2374 | ( |
2375 | cd 9a && | |
2376 | ||
2377 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2378 | ||
2379 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
2380 | ||
2381 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2382 | test_line_count = 7 out && | |
2383 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
2384 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
2385 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
2386 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
2387 | ||
2388 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2389 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/i && | |
2390 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2391 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/i && | |
2392 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
2393 | ||
2394 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2395 | HEAD:x/w/e HEAD:x/w/f HEAD:x/w/g HEAD:x/w/h && | |
2396 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2397 | O:z/d/e O:z/d/f O:z/d/g B:z/d/h && | |
2398 | test_cmp expect actual | |
2399 | ) | |
2400 | ' | |
2401 | ||
2402 | # Testcase 9b, Transitive rename with content merge | |
2403 | # (Related to testcase 1c) | |
2404 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1 | |
2405 | # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/d_2 | |
2406 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_3} | |
2407 | # Expected: y/{b,c,d_merged} | |
2408 | ||
2409 | test_expect_success '9b-setup: Transitive rename with content merge' ' | |
2410 | test_create_repo 9b && | |
2411 | ( | |
2412 | cd 9b && | |
2413 | ||
2414 | mkdir z && | |
2415 | echo b >z/b && | |
2416 | echo c >z/c && | |
2417 | mkdir x && | |
2418 | test_seq 1 10 >x/d && | |
2419 | git add z x && | |
2420 | test_tick && | |
2421 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2422 | ||
2423 | git branch O && | |
2424 | git branch A && | |
2425 | git branch B && | |
2426 | ||
2427 | git checkout A && | |
2428 | git mv z y && | |
2429 | test_seq 1 11 >x/d && | |
2430 | git add x/d && | |
2431 | test_tick && | |
2432 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2433 | ||
2434 | git checkout B && | |
2435 | test_seq 0 10 >x/d && | |
2436 | git mv x/d z/d && | |
2437 | git add z/d && | |
2438 | test_tick && | |
2439 | git commit -m "B" | |
2440 | ) | |
2441 | ' | |
2442 | ||
9c0743fe | 2443 | test_expect_success '9b-check: Transitive rename with content merge' ' |
792e1371 EN |
2444 | ( |
2445 | cd 9b && | |
2446 | ||
2447 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2448 | ||
2449 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
2450 | ||
2451 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2452 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
2453 | ||
2454 | test_seq 0 11 >expected && | |
2455 | test_cmp expected y/d && | |
2456 | git add expected && | |
2457 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2458 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d && | |
2459 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2460 | O:z/b O:z/c :0:expected && | |
2461 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
2462 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:x/d && | |
2463 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d && | |
2464 | test_path_is_missing z/d && | |
2465 | ||
2466 | test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/d) != $(git rev-parse O:x/d) && | |
2467 | test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/d) != $(git rev-parse A:x/d) && | |
2468 | test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/d) != $(git rev-parse B:z/d) | |
2469 | ) | |
2470 | ' | |
2471 | ||
2472 | # Testcase 9c, Doubly transitive rename? | |
2473 | # (Related to testcase 1c, 7e, and 9d) | |
2474 | # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/{d,e}, w/f | |
2475 | # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f,g} | |
2476 | # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e}, w/f | |
2477 | # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e}, x/{f,g} | |
2478 | # | |
2479 | # NOTE: x/f and x/g may be slightly confusing here. The rename from w/f to | |
2480 | # x/f is clear. Let's look beyond that. Here's the logic: | |
2481 | # Commit B renamed x/ -> z/ | |
2482 | # Commit A renamed z/ -> y/ | |
2483 | # So, we could possibly further rename x/f to z/f to y/f, a doubly | |
2484 | # transient rename. However, where does it end? We can chain these | |
2485 | # indefinitely (see testcase 9d). What if there is a D/F conflict | |
2486 | # at z/f/ or y/f/? Or just another file conflict at one of those | |
2487 | # paths? In the case of an N-long chain of transient renamings, | |
2488 | # where do we "abort" the rename at? Can the user make sense of | |
2489 | # the resulting conflict and resolve it? | |
2490 | # | |
2491 | # To avoid this confusion I use the simple rule that if the other side | |
2492 | # of history did a directory rename to a path that your side renamed | |
2493 | # away, then ignore that particular rename from the other side of | |
2494 | # history for any implicit directory renames. | |
2495 | ||
2496 | test_expect_success '9c-setup: Doubly transitive rename?' ' | |
2497 | test_create_repo 9c && | |
2498 | ( | |
2499 | cd 9c && | |
2500 | ||
2501 | mkdir z && | |
2502 | echo b >z/b && | |
2503 | echo c >z/c && | |
2504 | mkdir x && | |
2505 | echo d >x/d && | |
2506 | echo e >x/e && | |
2507 | mkdir w && | |
2508 | echo f >w/f && | |
2509 | git add z x w && | |
2510 | test_tick && | |
2511 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2512 | ||
2513 | git branch O && | |
2514 | git branch A && | |
2515 | git branch B && | |
2516 | ||
2517 | git checkout A && | |
2518 | git mv z y && | |
2519 | git mv w/f x/ && | |
2520 | echo g >x/g && | |
2521 | git add x/g && | |
2522 | test_tick && | |
2523 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2524 | ||
2525 | git checkout B && | |
2526 | git mv x/d z/d && | |
2527 | git mv x/e z/e && | |
2528 | test_tick && | |
2529 | git commit -m "B" | |
2530 | ) | |
2531 | ' | |
2532 | ||
9c0743fe | 2533 | test_expect_success '9c-check: Doubly transitive rename?' ' |
792e1371 EN |
2534 | ( |
2535 | cd 9c && | |
2536 | ||
2537 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2538 | ||
2539 | git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
2540 | test_i18ngrep "WARNING: Avoiding applying x -> z rename to x/f" out && | |
2541 | ||
2542 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2543 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
2544 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
2545 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
2546 | ||
2547 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2548 | HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:y/e HEAD:x/f HEAD:x/g && | |
2549 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2550 | O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d O:x/e O:w/f A:x/g && | |
2551 | test_cmp expect actual | |
2552 | ) | |
2553 | ' | |
2554 | ||
2555 | # Testcase 9d, N-fold transitive rename? | |
2556 | # (Related to testcase 9c...and 1c and 7e) | |
2557 | # Commit O: z/a, y/b, x/c, w/d, v/e, u/f | |
2558 | # Commit A: y/{a,b}, w/{c,d}, u/{e,f} | |
2559 | # Commit B: z/{a,t}, x/{b,c}, v/{d,e}, u/f | |
2560 | # Expected: <see NOTE first> | |
2561 | # | |
2562 | # NOTE: z/ -> y/ (in commit A) | |
2563 | # y/ -> x/ (in commit B) | |
2564 | # x/ -> w/ (in commit A) | |
2565 | # w/ -> v/ (in commit B) | |
2566 | # v/ -> u/ (in commit A) | |
2567 | # So, if we add a file to z, say z/t, where should it end up? In u? | |
2568 | # What if there's another file or directory named 't' in one of the | |
2569 | # intervening directories and/or in u itself? Also, shouldn't the | |
2570 | # same logic that places 't' in u/ also move ALL other files to u/? | |
2571 | # What if there are file or directory conflicts in any of them? If | |
2572 | # we attempted to do N-way (N-fold? N-ary? N-uple?) transitive renames | |
2573 | # like this, would the user have any hope of understanding any | |
2574 | # conflicts or how their working tree ended up? I think not, so I'm | |
2575 | # ruling out N-ary transitive renames for N>1. | |
2576 | # | |
2577 | # Therefore our expected result is: | |
2578 | # z/t, y/a, x/b, w/c, u/d, u/e, u/f | |
2579 | # The reason that v/d DOES get transitively renamed to u/d is that u/ isn't | |
2580 | # renamed somewhere. A slightly sub-optimal result, but it uses fairly | |
2581 | # simple rules that are consistent with what we need for all the other | |
2582 | # testcases and simplifies things for the user. | |
2583 | ||
2584 | test_expect_success '9d-setup: N-way transitive rename?' ' | |
2585 | test_create_repo 9d && | |
2586 | ( | |
2587 | cd 9d && | |
2588 | ||
2589 | mkdir z y x w v u && | |
2590 | echo a >z/a && | |
2591 | echo b >y/b && | |
2592 | echo c >x/c && | |
2593 | echo d >w/d && | |
2594 | echo e >v/e && | |
2595 | echo f >u/f && | |
2596 | git add z y x w v u && | |
2597 | test_tick && | |
2598 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2599 | ||
2600 | git branch O && | |
2601 | git branch A && | |
2602 | git branch B && | |
2603 | ||
2604 | git checkout A && | |
2605 | git mv z/a y/ && | |
2606 | git mv x/c w/ && | |
2607 | git mv v/e u/ && | |
2608 | test_tick && | |
2609 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2610 | ||
2611 | git checkout B && | |
2612 | echo t >z/t && | |
2613 | git mv y/b x/ && | |
2614 | git mv w/d v/ && | |
2615 | git add z/t && | |
2616 | test_tick && | |
2617 | git commit -m "B" | |
2618 | ) | |
2619 | ' | |
2620 | ||
9c0743fe | 2621 | test_expect_success '9d-check: N-way transitive rename?' ' |
792e1371 EN |
2622 | ( |
2623 | cd 9d && | |
2624 | ||
2625 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2626 | ||
2627 | git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
2628 | test_i18ngrep "WARNING: Avoiding applying z -> y rename to z/t" out && | |
2629 | test_i18ngrep "WARNING: Avoiding applying y -> x rename to y/a" out && | |
2630 | test_i18ngrep "WARNING: Avoiding applying x -> w rename to x/b" out && | |
2631 | test_i18ngrep "WARNING: Avoiding applying w -> v rename to w/c" out && | |
2632 | ||
2633 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2634 | test_line_count = 7 out && | |
2635 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
2636 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
2637 | ||
2638 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2639 | HEAD:z/t \ | |
2640 | HEAD:y/a HEAD:x/b HEAD:w/c \ | |
2641 | HEAD:u/d HEAD:u/e HEAD:u/f && | |
2642 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2643 | B:z/t \ | |
2644 | O:z/a O:y/b O:x/c \ | |
2645 | O:w/d O:v/e A:u/f && | |
2646 | test_cmp expect actual | |
2647 | ) | |
2648 | ' | |
2649 | ||
2650 | # Testcase 9e, N-to-1 whammo | |
2651 | # (Related to testcase 9c...and 1c and 7e) | |
2652 | # Commit O: dir1/{a,b}, dir2/{d,e}, dir3/{g,h}, dirN/{j,k} | |
2653 | # Commit A: dir1/{a,b,c,yo}, dir2/{d,e,f,yo}, dir3/{g,h,i,yo}, dirN/{j,k,l,yo} | |
2654 | # Commit B: combined/{a,b,d,e,g,h,j,k} | |
2655 | # Expected: combined/{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l}, CONFLICT(Nto1) warnings, | |
2656 | # dir1/yo, dir2/yo, dir3/yo, dirN/yo | |
2657 | ||
2658 | test_expect_success '9e-setup: N-to-1 whammo' ' | |
2659 | test_create_repo 9e && | |
2660 | ( | |
2661 | cd 9e && | |
2662 | ||
2663 | mkdir dir1 dir2 dir3 dirN && | |
2664 | echo a >dir1/a && | |
2665 | echo b >dir1/b && | |
2666 | echo d >dir2/d && | |
2667 | echo e >dir2/e && | |
2668 | echo g >dir3/g && | |
2669 | echo h >dir3/h && | |
2670 | echo j >dirN/j && | |
2671 | echo k >dirN/k && | |
2672 | git add dir* && | |
2673 | test_tick && | |
2674 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2675 | ||
2676 | git branch O && | |
2677 | git branch A && | |
2678 | git branch B && | |
2679 | ||
2680 | git checkout A && | |
2681 | echo c >dir1/c && | |
2682 | echo yo >dir1/yo && | |
2683 | echo f >dir2/f && | |
2684 | echo yo >dir2/yo && | |
2685 | echo i >dir3/i && | |
2686 | echo yo >dir3/yo && | |
2687 | echo l >dirN/l && | |
2688 | echo yo >dirN/yo && | |
2689 | git add dir* && | |
2690 | test_tick && | |
2691 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2692 | ||
2693 | git checkout B && | |
2694 | git mv dir1 combined && | |
2695 | git mv dir2/* combined/ && | |
2696 | git mv dir3/* combined/ && | |
2697 | git mv dirN/* combined/ && | |
2698 | test_tick && | |
2699 | git commit -m "B" | |
2700 | ) | |
2701 | ' | |
2702 | ||
9c0743fe | 2703 | test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT '9e-check: N-to-1 whammo' ' |
792e1371 EN |
2704 | ( |
2705 | cd 9e && | |
2706 | ||
2707 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2708 | ||
2709 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out && | |
2710 | grep "CONFLICT (implicit dir rename): Cannot map more than one path to combined/yo" out >error_line && | |
2711 | grep -q dir1/yo error_line && | |
2712 | grep -q dir2/yo error_line && | |
2713 | grep -q dir3/yo error_line && | |
2714 | grep -q dirN/yo error_line && | |
2715 | ||
2716 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2717 | test_line_count = 16 out && | |
2718 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
2719 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
2720 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
2721 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
2722 | ||
2723 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2724 | :0:combined/a :0:combined/b :0:combined/c \ | |
2725 | :0:combined/d :0:combined/e :0:combined/f \ | |
2726 | :0:combined/g :0:combined/h :0:combined/i \ | |
2727 | :0:combined/j :0:combined/k :0:combined/l && | |
2728 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2729 | O:dir1/a O:dir1/b A:dir1/c \ | |
2730 | O:dir2/d O:dir2/e A:dir2/f \ | |
2731 | O:dir3/g O:dir3/h A:dir3/i \ | |
2732 | O:dirN/j O:dirN/k A:dirN/l && | |
2733 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
2734 | ||
2735 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2736 | :0:dir1/yo :0:dir2/yo :0:dir3/yo :0:dirN/yo && | |
2737 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2738 | A:dir1/yo A:dir2/yo A:dir3/yo A:dirN/yo && | |
2739 | test_cmp expect actual | |
2740 | ) | |
2741 | ' | |
2742 | ||
2743 | # Testcase 9f, Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs | |
2744 | # (Related to testcases 1e & 9g) | |
2745 | # Commit O: goal/{a,b}/$more_files | |
2746 | # Commit A: priority/{a,b}/$more_files | |
2747 | # Commit B: goal/{a,b}/$more_files, goal/c | |
2748 | # Expected: priority/{a,b}/$more_files, priority/c | |
2749 | ||
2750 | test_expect_success '9f-setup: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs' ' | |
2751 | test_create_repo 9f && | |
2752 | ( | |
2753 | cd 9f && | |
2754 | ||
2755 | mkdir -p goal/a && | |
2756 | mkdir -p goal/b && | |
2757 | echo foo >goal/a/foo && | |
2758 | echo bar >goal/b/bar && | |
2759 | echo baz >goal/b/baz && | |
2760 | git add goal && | |
2761 | test_tick && | |
2762 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2763 | ||
2764 | git branch O && | |
2765 | git branch A && | |
2766 | git branch B && | |
2767 | ||
2768 | git checkout A && | |
2769 | git mv goal/ priority && | |
2770 | test_tick && | |
2771 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2772 | ||
2773 | git checkout B && | |
2774 | echo c >goal/c && | |
2775 | git add goal/c && | |
2776 | test_tick && | |
2777 | git commit -m "B" | |
2778 | ) | |
2779 | ' | |
2780 | ||
9c0743fe | 2781 | test_expect_success '9f-check: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs' ' |
792e1371 EN |
2782 | ( |
2783 | cd 9f && | |
2784 | ||
2785 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2786 | ||
2787 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
2788 | ||
2789 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2790 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
2791 | ||
2792 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2793 | HEAD:priority/a/foo \ | |
2794 | HEAD:priority/b/bar \ | |
2795 | HEAD:priority/b/baz \ | |
2796 | HEAD:priority/c && | |
2797 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2798 | O:goal/a/foo \ | |
2799 | O:goal/b/bar \ | |
2800 | O:goal/b/baz \ | |
2801 | B:goal/c && | |
2802 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
2803 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:goal/c | |
2804 | ) | |
2805 | ' | |
2806 | ||
2807 | # Testcase 9g, Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs, immediate subdirs renamed | |
2808 | # (Related to testcases 1e & 9f) | |
2809 | # Commit O: goal/{a,b}/$more_files | |
2810 | # Commit A: priority/{alpha,bravo}/$more_files | |
2811 | # Commit B: goal/{a,b}/$more_files, goal/c | |
2812 | # Expected: priority/{alpha,bravo}/$more_files, priority/c | |
2813 | ||
2814 | test_expect_success '9g-setup: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs, immediate subdirs renamed' ' | |
2815 | test_create_repo 9g && | |
2816 | ( | |
2817 | cd 9g && | |
2818 | ||
2819 | mkdir -p goal/a && | |
2820 | mkdir -p goal/b && | |
2821 | echo foo >goal/a/foo && | |
2822 | echo bar >goal/b/bar && | |
2823 | echo baz >goal/b/baz && | |
2824 | git add goal && | |
2825 | test_tick && | |
2826 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2827 | ||
2828 | git branch O && | |
2829 | git branch A && | |
2830 | git branch B && | |
2831 | ||
2832 | git checkout A && | |
2833 | mkdir priority && | |
2834 | git mv goal/a/ priority/alpha && | |
2835 | git mv goal/b/ priority/beta && | |
2836 | rmdir goal/ && | |
2837 | test_tick && | |
2838 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2839 | ||
2840 | git checkout B && | |
2841 | echo c >goal/c && | |
2842 | git add goal/c && | |
2843 | test_tick && | |
2844 | git commit -m "B" | |
2845 | ) | |
2846 | ' | |
2847 | ||
2848 | test_expect_failure '9g-check: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs, immediate subdirs renamed' ' | |
2849 | ( | |
2850 | cd 9g && | |
2851 | ||
2852 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2853 | ||
2854 | git merge -s recursive B^0 && | |
2855 | ||
2856 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2857 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
2858 | ||
2859 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
2860 | HEAD:priority/alpha/foo \ | |
2861 | HEAD:priority/beta/bar \ | |
2862 | HEAD:priority/beta/baz \ | |
2863 | HEAD:priority/c && | |
2864 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
2865 | O:goal/a/foo \ | |
2866 | O:goal/b/bar \ | |
2867 | O:goal/b/baz \ | |
2868 | B:goal/c && | |
2869 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
2870 | test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:goal/c | |
2871 | ) | |
2872 | ' | |
2873 | ||
2874 | ########################################################################### | |
2875 | # Rules suggested by section 9: | |
2876 | # | |
2877 | # If the other side of history did a directory rename to a path that your | |
2878 | # side renamed away, then ignore that particular rename from the other | |
2879 | # side of history for any implicit directory renames. | |
2880 | ########################################################################### | |
2881 | ||
a0b0a151 EN |
2882 | ########################################################################### |
2883 | # SECTION 10: Handling untracked files | |
2884 | # | |
2885 | # unpack_trees(), upon which the recursive merge algorithm is based, aborts | |
2886 | # the operation if untracked or dirty files would be deleted or overwritten | |
2887 | # by the merge. Unfortunately, unpack_trees() does not understand renames, | |
2888 | # and if it doesn't abort, then it muddies up the working directory before | |
2889 | # we even get to the point of detecting renames, so we need some special | |
2890 | # handling, at least in the case of directory renames. | |
2891 | ########################################################################### | |
2892 | ||
2893 | # Testcase 10a, Overwrite untracked: normal rename/delete | |
2894 | # Commit O: z/{b,c_1} | |
2895 | # Commit A: z/b + untracked z/c + untracked z/d | |
2896 | # Commit B: z/{b,d_1} | |
2897 | # Expected: Aborted Merge + | |
2898 | # ERROR_MSG(untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge) | |
2899 | ||
2900 | test_expect_success '10a-setup: Overwrite untracked with normal rename/delete' ' | |
2901 | test_create_repo 10a && | |
2902 | ( | |
2903 | cd 10a && | |
2904 | ||
2905 | mkdir z && | |
2906 | echo b >z/b && | |
2907 | echo c >z/c && | |
2908 | git add z && | |
2909 | test_tick && | |
2910 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2911 | ||
2912 | git branch O && | |
2913 | git branch A && | |
2914 | git branch B && | |
2915 | ||
2916 | git checkout A && | |
2917 | git rm z/c && | |
2918 | test_tick && | |
2919 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2920 | ||
2921 | git checkout B && | |
2922 | git mv z/c z/d && | |
2923 | test_tick && | |
2924 | git commit -m "B" | |
2925 | ) | |
2926 | ' | |
2927 | ||
2928 | test_expect_success '10a-check: Overwrite untracked with normal rename/delete' ' | |
2929 | ( | |
2930 | cd 10a && | |
2931 | ||
2932 | git checkout A^0 && | |
2933 | echo very >z/c && | |
2934 | echo important >z/d && | |
2935 | ||
2936 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
2937 | test_i18ngrep "The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge" err && | |
2938 | ||
2939 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
2940 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
2941 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
2942 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
2943 | ||
2944 | echo very >expect && | |
2945 | test_cmp expect z/c && | |
2946 | ||
2947 | echo important >expect && | |
2948 | test_cmp expect z/d && | |
2949 | ||
2950 | git rev-parse HEAD:z/b >actual && | |
2951 | git rev-parse O:z/b >expect && | |
2952 | test_cmp expect actual | |
2953 | ) | |
2954 | ' | |
2955 | ||
2956 | # Testcase 10b, Overwrite untracked: dir rename + delete | |
2957 | # Commit O: z/{b,c_1} | |
2958 | # Commit A: y/b + untracked y/{c,d,e} | |
2959 | # Commit B: z/{b,d_1,e} | |
2960 | # Expected: Failed Merge; y/b + untracked y/c + untracked y/d on disk + | |
2961 | # z/c_1 -> z/d_1 rename recorded at stage 3 for y/d + | |
2962 | # ERROR_MSG(refusing to lose untracked file at 'y/d') | |
2963 | ||
2964 | test_expect_success '10b-setup: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' ' | |
2965 | test_create_repo 10b && | |
2966 | ( | |
2967 | cd 10b && | |
2968 | ||
2969 | mkdir z && | |
2970 | echo b >z/b && | |
2971 | echo c >z/c && | |
2972 | git add z && | |
2973 | test_tick && | |
2974 | git commit -m "O" && | |
2975 | ||
2976 | git branch O && | |
2977 | git branch A && | |
2978 | git branch B && | |
2979 | ||
2980 | git checkout A && | |
2981 | git rm z/c && | |
2982 | git mv z/ y/ && | |
2983 | test_tick && | |
2984 | git commit -m "A" && | |
2985 | ||
2986 | git checkout B && | |
2987 | git mv z/c z/d && | |
2988 | echo e >z/e && | |
2989 | git add z/e && | |
2990 | test_tick && | |
2991 | git commit -m "B" | |
2992 | ) | |
2993 | ' | |
2994 | ||
79c47598 | 2995 | test_expect_success '10b-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' ' |
a0b0a151 EN |
2996 | ( |
2997 | cd 10b && | |
2998 | ||
2999 | git checkout A^0 && | |
3000 | echo very >y/c && | |
3001 | echo important >y/d && | |
3002 | echo contents >y/e && | |
3003 | ||
3004 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
3005 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*Version B\^0 of y/d left in tree at y/d~B\^0" out && | |
3006 | test_i18ngrep "Error: Refusing to lose untracked file at y/e; writing to y/e~B\^0 instead" out && | |
3007 | ||
3008 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
3009 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
3010 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
3011 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
3012 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
3013 | test_line_count = 5 out && | |
3014 | ||
3015 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
3016 | :0:y/b :3:y/d :3:y/e && | |
3017 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3018 | O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e && | |
3019 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
3020 | ||
3021 | echo very >expect && | |
3022 | test_cmp expect y/c && | |
3023 | ||
3024 | echo important >expect && | |
3025 | test_cmp expect y/d && | |
3026 | ||
3027 | echo contents >expect && | |
3028 | test_cmp expect y/e | |
3029 | ) | |
3030 | ' | |
3031 | ||
3032 | # Testcase 10c, Overwrite untracked: dir rename/rename(1to2) | |
3033 | # Commit O: z/{a,b}, x/{c,d} | |
3034 | # Commit A: y/{a,b}, w/c, x/d + different untracked y/c | |
3035 | # Commit B: z/{a,b,c}, x/d | |
3036 | # Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b} + x/d + untracked y/c + | |
3037 | # CONFLICT(rename/rename) x/c -> w/c vs y/c + | |
3038 | # y/c~B^0 + | |
3039 | # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose untracked file at y/c) | |
3040 | ||
3041 | test_expect_success '10c-setup: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)' ' | |
3042 | test_create_repo 10c && | |
3043 | ( | |
3044 | cd 10c && | |
3045 | ||
3046 | mkdir z x && | |
3047 | echo a >z/a && | |
3048 | echo b >z/b && | |
3049 | echo c >x/c && | |
3050 | echo d >x/d && | |
3051 | git add z x && | |
3052 | test_tick && | |
3053 | git commit -m "O" && | |
3054 | ||
3055 | git branch O && | |
3056 | git branch A && | |
3057 | git branch B && | |
3058 | ||
3059 | git checkout A && | |
3060 | mkdir w && | |
3061 | git mv x/c w/c && | |
3062 | git mv z/ y/ && | |
3063 | test_tick && | |
3064 | git commit -m "A" && | |
3065 | ||
3066 | git checkout B && | |
3067 | git mv x/c z/ && | |
3068 | test_tick && | |
3069 | git commit -m "B" | |
3070 | ) | |
3071 | ' | |
3072 | ||
79c47598 | 3073 | test_expect_success '10c-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)' ' |
a0b0a151 EN |
3074 | ( |
3075 | cd 10c && | |
3076 | ||
3077 | git checkout A^0 && | |
3078 | echo important >y/c && | |
3079 | ||
3080 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
3081 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && | |
3082 | test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose untracked file at y/c; adding as y/c~B\^0 instead" out && | |
3083 | ||
3084 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
3085 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
3086 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
3087 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
3088 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
3089 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
3090 | ||
3091 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
3092 | :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:x/d :1:x/c :2:w/c :3:y/c && | |
3093 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3094 | O:z/a O:z/b O:x/d O:x/c O:x/c O:x/c && | |
3095 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
3096 | ||
3097 | git hash-object y/c~B^0 >actual && | |
3098 | git rev-parse O:x/c >expect && | |
3099 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
3100 | ||
3101 | echo important >expect && | |
3102 | test_cmp expect y/c | |
3103 | ) | |
3104 | ' | |
3105 | ||
3106 | # Testcase 10d, Delete untracked w/ dir rename/rename(2to1) | |
3107 | # Commit O: z/{a,b,c_1}, x/{d,e,f_2} | |
3108 | # Commit A: y/{a,b}, x/{d,e,f_2,wham_1} + untracked y/wham | |
3109 | # Commit B: z/{a,b,c_1,wham_2}, y/{d,e} | |
3110 | # Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b,d,e} + untracked y/{wham,wham~B^0,wham~HEAD}+ | |
3111 | # CONFLICT(rename/rename) z/c_1 vs x/f_2 -> y/wham | |
3112 | # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose untracked file at y/wham) | |
3113 | ||
3114 | test_expect_success '10d-setup: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' ' | |
3115 | test_create_repo 10d && | |
3116 | ( | |
3117 | cd 10d && | |
3118 | ||
3119 | mkdir z x && | |
3120 | echo a >z/a && | |
3121 | echo b >z/b && | |
3122 | echo c >z/c && | |
3123 | echo d >x/d && | |
3124 | echo e >x/e && | |
3125 | echo f >x/f && | |
3126 | git add z x && | |
3127 | test_tick && | |
3128 | git commit -m "O" && | |
3129 | ||
3130 | git branch O && | |
3131 | git branch A && | |
3132 | git branch B && | |
3133 | ||
3134 | git checkout A && | |
3135 | git mv z/c x/wham && | |
3136 | git mv z/ y/ && | |
3137 | test_tick && | |
3138 | git commit -m "A" && | |
3139 | ||
3140 | git checkout B && | |
3141 | git mv x/f z/wham && | |
3142 | git mv x/ y/ && | |
3143 | test_tick && | |
3144 | git commit -m "B" | |
3145 | ) | |
3146 | ' | |
3147 | ||
79c47598 | 3148 | test_expect_success '10d-check: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' ' |
a0b0a151 EN |
3149 | ( |
3150 | cd 10d && | |
3151 | ||
3152 | git checkout A^0 && | |
3153 | echo important >y/wham && | |
3154 | ||
3155 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
3156 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && | |
3157 | test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose untracked file at y/wham" out && | |
3158 | ||
3159 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
3160 | test_line_count = 6 out && | |
3161 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
3162 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
3163 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
3164 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
3165 | ||
3166 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
3167 | :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:y/d :0:y/e :2:y/wham :3:y/wham && | |
3168 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3169 | O:z/a O:z/b O:x/d O:x/e O:z/c O:x/f && | |
3170 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
3171 | ||
3172 | test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/wham && | |
3173 | ||
3174 | echo important >expect && | |
3175 | test_cmp expect y/wham && | |
3176 | ||
3177 | git hash-object >actual \ | |
3178 | y/wham~B^0 y/wham~HEAD && | |
3179 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3180 | O:x/f O:z/c && | |
3181 | test_cmp expect actual | |
3182 | ) | |
3183 | ' | |
3184 | ||
3185 | # Testcase 10e, Does git complain about untracked file that's not in the way? | |
3186 | # Commit O: z/{a,b} | |
3187 | # Commit A: y/{a,b} + untracked z/c | |
3188 | # Commit B: z/{a,b,c} | |
3189 | # Expected: y/{a,b,c} + untracked z/c | |
3190 | ||
3191 | test_expect_success '10e-setup: Does git complain about untracked file that is not really in the way?' ' | |
3192 | test_create_repo 10e && | |
3193 | ( | |
3194 | cd 10e && | |
3195 | ||
3196 | mkdir z && | |
3197 | echo a >z/a && | |
3198 | echo b >z/b && | |
3199 | git add z && | |
3200 | test_tick && | |
3201 | git commit -m "O" && | |
3202 | ||
3203 | git branch O && | |
3204 | git branch A && | |
3205 | git branch B && | |
3206 | ||
3207 | git checkout A && | |
3208 | git mv z/ y/ && | |
3209 | test_tick && | |
3210 | git commit -m "A" && | |
3211 | ||
3212 | git checkout B && | |
3213 | echo c >z/c && | |
3214 | git add z/c && | |
3215 | test_tick && | |
3216 | git commit -m "B" | |
3217 | ) | |
3218 | ' | |
3219 | ||
3220 | test_expect_failure '10e-check: Does git complain about untracked file that is not really in the way?' ' | |
3221 | ( | |
3222 | cd 10e && | |
3223 | ||
3224 | git checkout A^0 && | |
3225 | mkdir z && | |
3226 | echo random >z/c && | |
3227 | ||
3228 | git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
3229 | test_i18ngrep ! "following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge" err && | |
3230 | ||
3231 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
3232 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
3233 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
3234 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
3235 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
3236 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
3237 | ||
3238 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
3239 | :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:y/c && | |
3240 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3241 | O:z/a O:z/b B:z/c && | |
3242 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
3243 | ||
3244 | echo random >expect && | |
3245 | test_cmp expect z/c | |
3246 | ) | |
3247 | ' | |
3248 | ||
a7a43604 EN |
3249 | ########################################################################### |
3250 | # SECTION 11: Handling dirty (not up-to-date) files | |
3251 | # | |
3252 | # unpack_trees(), upon which the recursive merge algorithm is based, aborts | |
3253 | # the operation if untracked or dirty files would be deleted or overwritten | |
3254 | # by the merge. Unfortunately, unpack_trees() does not understand renames, | |
3255 | # and if it doesn't abort, then it muddies up the working directory before | |
3256 | # we even get to the point of detecting renames, so we need some special | |
3257 | # handling. This was true even of normal renames, but there are additional | |
3258 | # codepaths that need special handling with directory renames. Add | |
3259 | # testcases for both renamed-by-directory-rename-detection and standard | |
3260 | # rename cases. | |
3261 | ########################################################################### | |
3262 | ||
3263 | # Testcase 11a, Avoid losing dirty contents with simple rename | |
3264 | # Commit O: z/{a,b_v1}, | |
3265 | # Commit A: z/{a,c_v1}, and z/c_v1 has uncommitted mods | |
3266 | # Commit B: z/{a,b_v2} | |
3267 | # Expected: ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c) + | |
3268 | # z/a, staged version of z/c has sha1sum matching B:z/b_v2, | |
3269 | # z/c~HEAD with contents of B:z/b_v2, | |
3270 | # z/c with uncommitted mods on top of A:z/c_v1 | |
3271 | ||
3272 | test_expect_success '11a-setup: Avoid losing dirty contents with simple rename' ' | |
3273 | test_create_repo 11a && | |
3274 | ( | |
3275 | cd 11a && | |
3276 | ||
3277 | mkdir z && | |
3278 | echo a >z/a && | |
3279 | test_seq 1 10 >z/b && | |
3280 | git add z && | |
3281 | test_tick && | |
3282 | git commit -m "O" && | |
3283 | ||
3284 | git branch O && | |
3285 | git branch A && | |
3286 | git branch B && | |
3287 | ||
3288 | git checkout A && | |
3289 | git mv z/b z/c && | |
3290 | test_tick && | |
3291 | git commit -m "A" && | |
3292 | ||
3293 | git checkout B && | |
3294 | echo 11 >>z/b && | |
3295 | git add z/b && | |
3296 | test_tick && | |
3297 | git commit -m "B" | |
3298 | ) | |
3299 | ' | |
3300 | ||
64b1abe9 | 3301 | test_expect_success '11a-check: Avoid losing dirty contents with simple rename' ' |
a7a43604 EN |
3302 | ( |
3303 | cd 11a && | |
3304 | ||
3305 | git checkout A^0 && | |
3306 | echo stuff >>z/c && | |
3307 | ||
3308 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
3309 | test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c" out && | |
3310 | ||
3311 | test_seq 1 10 >expected && | |
3312 | echo stuff >>expected && | |
3313 | test_cmp expected z/c && | |
3314 | ||
3315 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
3316 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
3317 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
3318 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
3319 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
3320 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
3321 | ||
3322 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
3323 | :0:z/a :2:z/c && | |
3324 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3325 | O:z/a B:z/b && | |
3326 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
3327 | ||
3328 | git hash-object z/c~HEAD >actual && | |
3329 | git rev-parse B:z/b >expect && | |
3330 | test_cmp expect actual | |
3331 | ) | |
3332 | ' | |
3333 | ||
3334 | # Testcase 11b, Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory rename | |
3335 | # Commit O: z/a, x/{b,c_v1} | |
3336 | # Commit A: z/{a,c_v1}, x/b, and z/c_v1 has uncommitted mods | |
3337 | # Commit B: y/a, x/{b,c_v2} | |
3338 | # Expected: y/{a,c_v2}, x/b, z/c_v1 with uncommitted mods untracked, | |
3339 | # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c) | |
3340 | ||
3341 | ||
3342 | test_expect_success '11b-setup: Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory rename' ' | |
3343 | test_create_repo 11b && | |
3344 | ( | |
3345 | cd 11b && | |
3346 | ||
3347 | mkdir z x && | |
3348 | echo a >z/a && | |
3349 | echo b >x/b && | |
3350 | test_seq 1 10 >x/c && | |
3351 | git add z x && | |
3352 | test_tick && | |
3353 | git commit -m "O" && | |
3354 | ||
3355 | git branch O && | |
3356 | git branch A && | |
3357 | git branch B && | |
3358 | ||
3359 | git checkout A && | |
3360 | git mv x/c z/c && | |
3361 | test_tick && | |
3362 | git commit -m "A" && | |
3363 | ||
3364 | git checkout B && | |
3365 | git mv z y && | |
3366 | echo 11 >>x/c && | |
3367 | git add x/c && | |
3368 | test_tick && | |
3369 | git commit -m "B" | |
3370 | ) | |
3371 | ' | |
3372 | ||
18797a3b | 3373 | test_expect_success '11b-check: Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory rename' ' |
a7a43604 EN |
3374 | ( |
3375 | cd 11b && | |
3376 | ||
3377 | git checkout A^0 && | |
3378 | echo stuff >>z/c && | |
3379 | ||
3380 | git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
3381 | test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c" out && | |
3382 | ||
3383 | grep -q stuff z/c && | |
3384 | test_seq 1 10 >expected && | |
3385 | echo stuff >>expected && | |
3386 | test_cmp expected z/c && | |
3387 | ||
3388 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
3389 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
3390 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
3391 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
3392 | git ls-files -m >out && | |
3393 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
3394 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
3395 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
3396 | ||
3397 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
3398 | :0:x/b :0:y/a :0:y/c && | |
3399 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3400 | O:x/b O:z/a B:x/c && | |
3401 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
3402 | ||
3403 | git hash-object y/c >actual && | |
3404 | git rev-parse B:x/c >expect && | |
3405 | test_cmp expect actual | |
3406 | ) | |
3407 | ' | |
3408 | ||
3409 | # Testcase 11c, Avoid losing not-up-to-date with rename + D/F conflict | |
3410 | # Commit O: y/a, x/{b,c_v1} | |
3411 | # Commit A: y/{a,c_v1}, x/b, and y/c_v1 has uncommitted mods | |
3412 | # Commit B: y/{a,c/d}, x/{b,c_v2} | |
3413 | # Expected: Abort_msg("following files would be overwritten by merge") + | |
3414 | # y/c left untouched (still has uncommitted mods) | |
3415 | ||
3416 | test_expect_success '11c-setup: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' ' | |
3417 | test_create_repo 11c && | |
3418 | ( | |
3419 | cd 11c && | |
3420 | ||
3421 | mkdir y x && | |
3422 | echo a >y/a && | |
3423 | echo b >x/b && | |
3424 | test_seq 1 10 >x/c && | |
3425 | git add y x && | |
3426 | test_tick && | |
3427 | git commit -m "O" && | |
3428 | ||
3429 | git branch O && | |
3430 | git branch A && | |
3431 | git branch B && | |
3432 | ||
3433 | git checkout A && | |
3434 | git mv x/c y/c && | |
3435 | test_tick && | |
3436 | git commit -m "A" && | |
3437 | ||
3438 | git checkout B && | |
3439 | mkdir y/c && | |
3440 | echo d >y/c/d && | |
3441 | echo 11 >>x/c && | |
3442 | git add x/c y/c/d && | |
3443 | test_tick && | |
3444 | git commit -m "B" | |
3445 | ) | |
3446 | ' | |
3447 | ||
3448 | test_expect_success '11c-check: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' ' | |
3449 | ( | |
3450 | cd 11c && | |
3451 | ||
3452 | git checkout A^0 && | |
3453 | echo stuff >>y/c && | |
3454 | ||
3455 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
3456 | test_i18ngrep "following files would be overwritten by merge" err && | |
3457 | ||
3458 | grep -q stuff y/c && | |
3459 | test_seq 1 10 >expected && | |
3460 | echo stuff >>expected && | |
3461 | test_cmp expected y/c && | |
3462 | ||
3463 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
3464 | test_line_count = 3 out && | |
3465 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
3466 | test_line_count = 0 out && | |
3467 | git ls-files -m >out && | |
3468 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
3469 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
3470 | test_line_count = 3 out | |
3471 | ) | |
3472 | ' | |
3473 | ||
3474 | # Testcase 11d, Avoid losing not-up-to-date with rename + D/F conflict | |
3475 | # Commit O: z/a, x/{b,c_v1} | |
3476 | # Commit A: z/{a,c_v1}, x/b, and z/c_v1 has uncommitted mods | |
3477 | # Commit B: y/{a,c/d}, x/{b,c_v2} | |
3478 | # Expected: D/F: y/c_v2 vs y/c/d) + | |
3479 | # Warning_Msg("Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c) + | |
3480 | # y/{a,c~HEAD,c/d}, x/b, now-untracked z/c_v1 with uncommitted mods | |
3481 | ||
3482 | test_expect_success '11d-setup: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' ' | |
3483 | test_create_repo 11d && | |
3484 | ( | |
3485 | cd 11d && | |
3486 | ||
3487 | mkdir z x && | |
3488 | echo a >z/a && | |
3489 | echo b >x/b && | |
3490 | test_seq 1 10 >x/c && | |
3491 | git add z x && | |
3492 | test_tick && | |
3493 | git commit -m "O" && | |
3494 | ||
3495 | git branch O && | |
3496 | git branch A && | |
3497 | git branch B && | |
3498 | ||
3499 | git checkout A && | |
3500 | git mv x/c z/c && | |
3501 | test_tick && | |
3502 | git commit -m "A" && | |
3503 | ||
3504 | git checkout B && | |
3505 | git mv z y && | |
3506 | mkdir y/c && | |
3507 | echo d >y/c/d && | |
3508 | echo 11 >>x/c && | |
3509 | git add x/c y/c/d && | |
3510 | test_tick && | |
3511 | git commit -m "B" | |
3512 | ) | |
3513 | ' | |
3514 | ||
18797a3b | 3515 | test_expect_success '11d-check: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' ' |
a7a43604 EN |
3516 | ( |
3517 | cd 11d && | |
3518 | ||
3519 | git checkout A^0 && | |
3520 | echo stuff >>z/c && | |
3521 | ||
3522 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
3523 | test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c" out && | |
3524 | ||
3525 | grep -q stuff z/c && | |
3526 | test_seq 1 10 >expected && | |
3527 | echo stuff >>expected && | |
3528 | test_cmp expected z/c | |
3529 | ||
3530 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
3531 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
3532 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
3533 | test_line_count = 1 out && | |
3534 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
3535 | test_line_count = 5 out && | |
3536 | ||
3537 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
3538 | :0:x/b :0:y/a :0:y/c/d :3:y/c && | |
3539 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3540 | O:x/b O:z/a B:y/c/d B:x/c && | |
3541 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
3542 | ||
3543 | git hash-object y/c~HEAD >actual && | |
3544 | git rev-parse B:x/c >expect && | |
3545 | test_cmp expect actual | |
3546 | ) | |
3547 | ' | |
3548 | ||
3549 | # Testcase 11e, Avoid deleting not-up-to-date with dir rename/rename(1to2)/add | |
3550 | # Commit O: z/{a,b}, x/{c_1,d} | |
3551 | # Commit A: y/{a,b,c_2}, x/d, w/c_1, and y/c_2 has uncommitted mods | |
3552 | # Commit B: z/{a,b,c_1}, x/d | |
3553 | # Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b} + x/d + | |
3554 | # CONFLICT(rename/rename) x/c_1 -> w/c_1 vs y/c_1 + | |
3555 | # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at y/c) | |
3556 | # y/c~B^0 has O:x/c_1 contents | |
3557 | # y/c~HEAD has A:y/c_2 contents | |
3558 | # y/c has dirty file from before merge | |
3559 | ||
3560 | test_expect_success '11e-setup: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(1to2)/add' ' | |
3561 | test_create_repo 11e && | |
3562 | ( | |
3563 | cd 11e && | |
3564 | ||
3565 | mkdir z x && | |
3566 | echo a >z/a && | |
3567 | echo b >z/b && | |
3568 | echo c >x/c && | |
3569 | echo d >x/d && | |
3570 | git add z x && | |
3571 | test_tick && | |
3572 | git commit -m "O" && | |
3573 | ||
3574 | git branch O && | |
3575 | git branch A && | |
3576 | git branch B && | |
3577 | ||
3578 | git checkout A && | |
3579 | git mv z/ y/ && | |
3580 | echo different >y/c && | |
3581 | mkdir w && | |
3582 | git mv x/c w/ && | |
3583 | git add y/c && | |
3584 | test_tick && | |
3585 | git commit -m "A" && | |
3586 | ||
3587 | git checkout B && | |
3588 | git mv x/c z/ && | |
3589 | test_tick && | |
3590 | git commit -m "B" | |
3591 | ) | |
3592 | ' | |
3593 | ||
18797a3b | 3594 | test_expect_success '11e-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(1to2)/add' ' |
a7a43604 EN |
3595 | ( |
3596 | cd 11e && | |
3597 | ||
3598 | git checkout A^0 && | |
3599 | echo mods >>y/c && | |
3600 | ||
3601 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
3602 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && | |
3603 | test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at y/c" out && | |
3604 | ||
3605 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
3606 | test_line_count = 7 out && | |
3607 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
3608 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
3609 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
3610 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
3611 | ||
3612 | echo different >expected && | |
3613 | echo mods >>expected && | |
3614 | test_cmp expected y/c && | |
3615 | ||
3616 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
3617 | :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:x/d :1:x/c :2:w/c :2:y/c :3:y/c && | |
3618 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3619 | O:z/a O:z/b O:x/d O:x/c O:x/c A:y/c O:x/c && | |
3620 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
3621 | ||
3622 | git hash-object >actual \ | |
3623 | y/c~B^0 y/c~HEAD && | |
3624 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3625 | O:x/c A:y/c && | |
3626 | test_cmp expect actual | |
3627 | ) | |
3628 | ' | |
3629 | ||
3630 | # Testcase 11f, Avoid deleting not-up-to-date w/ dir rename/rename(2to1) | |
3631 | # Commit O: z/{a,b}, x/{c_1,d_2} | |
3632 | # Commit A: y/{a,b,wham_1}, x/d_2, except y/wham has uncommitted mods | |
3633 | # Commit B: z/{a,b,wham_2}, x/c_1 | |
3634 | # Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b} + untracked y/{wham~B^0,wham~B^HEAD} + | |
3635 | # y/wham with dirty changes from before merge + | |
3636 | # CONFLICT(rename/rename) x/c vs x/d -> y/wham | |
3637 | # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at y/wham) | |
3638 | ||
3639 | test_expect_success '11f-setup: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(2to1)' ' | |
3640 | test_create_repo 11f && | |
3641 | ( | |
3642 | cd 11f && | |
3643 | ||
3644 | mkdir z x && | |
3645 | echo a >z/a && | |
3646 | echo b >z/b && | |
3647 | test_seq 1 10 >x/c && | |
3648 | echo d >x/d && | |
3649 | git add z x && | |
3650 | test_tick && | |
3651 | git commit -m "O" && | |
3652 | ||
3653 | git branch O && | |
3654 | git branch A && | |
3655 | git branch B && | |
3656 | ||
3657 | git checkout A && | |
3658 | git mv z/ y/ && | |
3659 | git mv x/c y/wham && | |
3660 | test_tick && | |
3661 | git commit -m "A" && | |
3662 | ||
3663 | git checkout B && | |
3664 | git mv x/d z/wham && | |
3665 | test_tick && | |
3666 | git commit -m "B" | |
3667 | ) | |
3668 | ' | |
3669 | ||
18797a3b | 3670 | test_expect_success '11f-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(2to1)' ' |
a7a43604 EN |
3671 | ( |
3672 | cd 11f && | |
3673 | ||
3674 | git checkout A^0 && | |
3675 | echo important >>y/wham && | |
3676 | ||
3677 | test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && | |
3678 | test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && | |
3679 | test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at y/wham" out && | |
3680 | ||
3681 | git ls-files -s >out && | |
3682 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
3683 | git ls-files -u >out && | |
3684 | test_line_count = 2 out && | |
3685 | git ls-files -o >out && | |
3686 | test_line_count = 4 out && | |
3687 | ||
3688 | test_seq 1 10 >expected && | |
3689 | echo important >>expected && | |
3690 | test_cmp expected y/wham && | |
3691 | ||
3692 | test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/wham && | |
3693 | git hash-object >actual \ | |
3694 | y/wham~B^0 y/wham~HEAD && | |
3695 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3696 | O:x/d O:x/c && | |
3697 | test_cmp expect actual && | |
3698 | ||
3699 | git rev-parse >actual \ | |
3700 | :0:y/a :0:y/b :2:y/wham :3:y/wham && | |
3701 | git rev-parse >expect \ | |
3702 | O:z/a O:z/b O:x/c O:x/d && | |
3703 | test_cmp expect actual | |
3704 | ) | |
3705 | ' | |
3706 | ||
04550ab5 | 3707 | test_done |