From e8eb99d4a6b2505c15a2be916d611f4e7f9cde2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Elijah Newren Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:29:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] t642[23]: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving pair renames Much like the last commit accepted 'add/add' and 'rename/add' interchangably, we also want to do the same for 'add/add' and 'rename/rename'. This also allows us to avoid the ambiguity in meaning with 'rename/rename' (is it two separate files renamed to the same location, or one file renamed on both sides but differently)? Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- t/t6422-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh | 18 ++++++++++++------ t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/t6422-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6422-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh index f3929b65c0..3375eaf4e7 100755 --- a/t/t6422-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh +++ b/t/t6422-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ test_expect_success 'handle rename/rename (2to1) conflict correctly' ' git checkout B^0 && test_must_fail git merge -s recursive C^0 >out && - test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && + test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (\(.*\)/\1)" out && git ls-files -s >out && test_line_count = 2 out && @@ -959,11 +959,17 @@ test_expect_failure 'rrdd-check: rename/rename(2to1)/delete/delete conflict' ' git checkout A^0 && test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err && - # Not sure whether the output should contain just one - # "CONFLICT (rename/rename/delete/delete)" line, or if it - # should break it into three: "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" and - # two "CONFLICT (rename/delete)" lines; allow for either. - test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && + # Instead of requiring the output to contain one combined line + # CONFLICT (rename/rename/delete/delete) + # or perhaps two lines: + # CONFLICT (rename/rename): ... + # CONFLICT (rename/delete): info about pair 1 + # CONFLICT (rename/delete): info about pair 2 + # and instead of requiring "rename/rename" instead of "add/add", + # be flexible in the type of console output message(s) reported + # for this particular case; we will be more stringent about the + # contents of the index and working directory. + test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (\(.*\)/\1)" out && test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename.*delete)" out && test_must_be_empty err && diff --git a/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh b/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh index 2b4a482277..f7ecbb886d 100755 --- a/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh +++ b/t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ test_expect_success '1d: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' git checkout A^0 && test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out && - test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && + test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (\(.*\)/\1)" out && git ls-files -s >out && test_line_count = 8 out && @@ -1686,7 +1686,7 @@ test_expect_success '7b: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' git checkout A^0 && test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out && - test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && + test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (\(.*\)/\1)" out && git ls-files -s >out && test_line_count = 4 out && -- 2.39.2