]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/git.git/blob - Documentation/git-tag.txt
Merge branch 'ds/maint-deflatebound'
[thirdparty/git.git] / Documentation / git-tag.txt
1 git-tag(1)
2 ==========
3
4 NAME
5 ----
6 git-tag - Create, list, delete or verify a tag object signed with GPG
7
8
9 SYNOPSIS
10 --------
11 [verse]
12 'git-tag' [-a | -s | -u <key-id>] [-f] [-m <msg> | -F <file>] <name> [<head>]
13 'git-tag' -d <name>...
14 'git-tag' [-n [<num>]] -l [<pattern>]
15 'git-tag' -v <name>...
16
17 DESCRIPTION
18 -----------
19 Adds a 'tag' reference in `.git/refs/tags/`
20
21 Unless `-f` is given, the tag must not yet exist in
22 `.git/refs/tags/` directory.
23
24 If one of `-a`, `-s`, or `-u <key-id>` is passed, the command
25 creates a 'tag' object, and requires the tag message. Unless
26 `-m <msg>` or `-F <file>` is given, an editor is started for the user to type
27 in the tag message.
28
29 Otherwise just the SHA1 object name of the commit object is
30 written (i.e. a lightweight tag).
31
32 A GnuPG signed tag object will be created when `-s` or `-u
33 <key-id>` is used. When `-u <key-id>` is not used, the
34 committer identity for the current user is used to find the
35 GnuPG key for signing.
36
37 OPTIONS
38 -------
39 -a::
40 Make an unsigned, annotated tag object
41
42 -s::
43 Make a GPG-signed tag, using the default e-mail address's key
44
45 -u <key-id>::
46 Make a GPG-signed tag, using the given key
47
48 -f::
49 Replace an existing tag with the given name (instead of failing)
50
51 -d::
52 Delete existing tags with the given names.
53
54 -v::
55 Verify the gpg signature of the given tag names.
56
57 -n <num>::
58 <num> specifies how many lines from the annotation, if any,
59 are printed when using -l.
60 The default is not to print any annotation lines.
61 If no number is given to `-n`, only the first line is printed.
62
63 -l <pattern>::
64 List tags with names that match the given pattern (or all if no pattern is given).
65 Typing "git tag" without arguments, also lists all tags.
66
67 -m <msg>::
68 Use the given tag message (instead of prompting)
69
70 -F <file>::
71 Take the tag message from the given file. Use '-' to
72 read the message from the standard input.
73
74 CONFIGURATION
75 -------------
76 By default, git-tag in sign-with-default mode (-s) will use your
77 committer identity (of the form "Your Name <your@email.address>") to
78 find a key. If you want to use a different default key, you can specify
79 it in the repository configuration as follows:
80
81 -------------------------------------
82 [user]
83 signingkey = <gpg-key-id>
84 -------------------------------------
85
86
87 DISCUSSION
88 ----------
89
90 On Re-tagging
91 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
92
93 What should you do when you tag a wrong commit and you would
94 want to re-tag?
95
96 If you never pushed anything out, just re-tag it. Use "-f" to
97 replace the old one. And you're done.
98
99 But if you have pushed things out (or others could just read
100 your repository directly), then others will have already seen
101 the old tag. In that case you can do one of two things:
102
103 . The sane thing.
104 Just admit you screwed up, and use a different name. Others have
105 already seen one tag-name, and if you keep the same name, you
106 may be in the situation that two people both have "version X",
107 but they actually have 'different' "X"'s. So just call it "X.1"
108 and be done with it.
109
110 . The insane thing.
111 You really want to call the new version "X" too, 'even though'
112 others have already seen the old one. So just use "git tag -f"
113 again, as if you hadn't already published the old one.
114
115 However, Git does *not* (and it should not) change tags behind
116 users back. So if somebody already got the old tag, doing a "git
117 pull" on your tree shouldn't just make them overwrite the old
118 one.
119
120 If somebody got a release tag from you, you cannot just change
121 the tag for them by updating your own one. This is a big
122 security issue, in that people MUST be able to trust their
123 tag-names. If you really want to do the insane thing, you need
124 to just fess up to it, and tell people that you messed up. You
125 can do that by making a very public announcement saying:
126
127 ------------
128 Ok, I messed up, and I pushed out an earlier version tagged as X. I
129 then fixed something, and retagged the *fixed* tree as X again.
130
131 If you got the wrong tag, and want the new one, please delete
132 the old one and fetch the new one by doing:
133
134 git tag -d X
135 git fetch origin tag X
136
137 to get my updated tag.
138
139 You can test which tag you have by doing
140
141 git rev-parse X
142
143 which should return 0123456789abcdef.. if you have the new version.
144
145 Sorry for inconvenience.
146 ------------
147
148 Does this seem a bit complicated? It *should* be. There is no
149 way that it would be correct to just "fix" it behind peoples
150 backs. People need to know that their tags might have been
151 changed.
152
153
154 On Automatic following
155 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
156
157 If you are following somebody else's tree, you are most likely
158 using tracking branches (`refs/heads/origin` in traditional
159 layout, or `refs/remotes/origin/master` in the separate-remote
160 layout). You usually want the tags from the other end.
161
162 On the other hand, if you are fetching because you would want a
163 one-shot merge from somebody else, you typically do not want to
164 get tags from there. This happens more often for people near
165 the toplevel but not limited to them. Mere mortals when pulling
166 from each other do not necessarily want to automatically get
167 private anchor point tags from the other person.
168
169 You would notice "please pull" messages on the mailing list says
170 repo URL and branch name alone. This is designed to be easily
171 cut&pasted to "git fetch" command line:
172
173 ------------
174 Linus, please pull from
175
176 git://git..../proj.git master
177
178 to get the following updates...
179 ------------
180
181 becomes:
182
183 ------------
184 $ git pull git://git..../proj.git master
185 ------------
186
187 In such a case, you do not want to automatically follow other's
188 tags.
189
190 One important aspect of git is it is distributed, and being
191 distributed largely means there is no inherent "upstream" or
192 "downstream" in the system. On the face of it, the above
193 example might seem to indicate that the tag namespace is owned
194 by upper echelon of people and tags only flow downwards, but
195 that is not the case. It only shows that the usage pattern
196 determines who are interested in whose tags.
197
198 A one-shot pull is a sign that a commit history is now crossing
199 the boundary between one circle of people (e.g. "people who are
200 primarily interested in networking part of the kernel") who may
201 have their own set of tags (e.g. "this is the third release
202 candidate from the networking group to be proposed for general
203 consumption with 2.6.21 release") to another circle of people
204 (e.g. "people who integrate various subsystem improvements").
205 The latter are usually not interested in the detailed tags used
206 internally in the former group (that is what "internal" means).
207 That is why it is desirable not to follow tags automatically in
208 this case.
209
210 It may well be that among networking people, they may want to
211 exchange the tags internal to their group, but in that workflow
212 they are most likely tracking with each other's progress by
213 having tracking branches. Again, the heuristic to automatically
214 follow such tags is a good thing.
215
216
217 On Backdating Tags
218 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
219
220 If you have imported some changes from another VCS and would like
221 to add tags for major releases of your work, it is useful to be able
222 to specify the date to embed inside of the tag object. The data in
223 the tag object affects, for example, the ordering of tags in the
224 gitweb interface.
225
226 To set the date used in future tag objects, set the environment
227 variable GIT_AUTHOR_DATE to one or more of the date and time. The
228 date and time can be specified in a number of ways; the most common
229 is "YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM".
230
231 An example follows.
232
233 ------------
234 $ GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="2006-10-02 10:31" git tag -s v1.0.1
235 ------------
236
237
238 Author
239 ------
240 Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
241 Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> and Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>.
242
243 Documentation
244 --------------
245 Documentation by David Greaves, Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
246
247 GIT
248 ---
249 Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite