1 From 8e2b8a9fa512709e6fee744dcd4e2a20ee7f5c56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2 From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
3 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:31:04 +0100
4 Subject: mptcp: don't overwrite sock_ops in mptcp_is_tcpsk()
6 From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
8 commit 8e2b8a9fa512709e6fee744dcd4e2a20ee7f5c56 upstream.
10 Eric Dumazet suggests:
12 > The fact that mptcp_is_tcpsk() was able to write over sock->ops was a
14 > mptcp_is_tcpsk() should answer a question, with a read-only argument.
16 re-factor code to avoid overwriting sock_ops inside that function. Also,
17 change the helper name to reflect the semantics and to disambiguate from
18 its dual, sk_is_mptcp(). While at it, collapse mptcp_stream_accept() and
19 mptcp_accept() into a single function, where fallback / non-fallback are
20 separated into a single sk_is_mptcp() conditional.
22 Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/432
23 Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
24 Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
25 Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
26 Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
27 Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
28 Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
29 Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
31 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
32 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
34 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
35 +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
36 @@ -55,28 +55,14 @@ static u64 mptcp_wnd_end(const struct mp
37 return READ_ONCE(msk->wnd_end);
40 -static bool mptcp_is_tcpsk(struct sock *sk)
41 +static const struct proto_ops *mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops(const struct sock *sk)
43 - struct socket *sock = sk->sk_socket;
45 - if (unlikely(sk->sk_prot == &tcp_prot)) {
46 - /* we are being invoked after mptcp_accept() has
47 - * accepted a non-mp-capable flow: sk is a tcp_sk,
50 - * Hand the socket over to tcp so all further socket ops
53 - WRITE_ONCE(sock->ops, &inet_stream_ops);
55 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6)
56 - } else if (unlikely(sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)) {
57 - WRITE_ONCE(sock->ops, &inet6_stream_ops);
59 + if (sk->sk_prot == &tcpv6_prot)
60 + return &inet6_stream_ops;
65 + WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_prot != &tcp_prot);
66 + return &inet_stream_ops;
69 static int __mptcp_socket_create(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
70 @@ -3328,44 +3314,6 @@ void mptcp_rcv_space_init(struct mptcp_s
71 msk->rcvq_space.space = TCP_INIT_CWND * TCP_MSS_DEFAULT;
74 -static struct sock *mptcp_accept(struct sock *ssk, int flags, int *err,
79 - pr_debug("ssk=%p, listener=%p", ssk, mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk));
80 - newsk = inet_csk_accept(ssk, flags, err, kern);
84 - pr_debug("newsk=%p, subflow is mptcp=%d", newsk, sk_is_mptcp(newsk));
85 - if (sk_is_mptcp(newsk)) {
86 - struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
87 - struct sock *new_mptcp_sock;
89 - subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(newsk);
90 - new_mptcp_sock = subflow->conn;
92 - /* is_mptcp should be false if subflow->conn is missing, see
93 - * subflow_syn_recv_sock()
95 - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_mptcp_sock)) {
96 - tcp_sk(newsk)->is_mptcp = 0;
100 - newsk = new_mptcp_sock;
101 - MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEACK);
103 - MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk),
104 - MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEFALLBACK);
108 - newsk->sk_kern_sock = kern;
112 void mptcp_destroy_common(struct mptcp_sock *msk, unsigned int flags)
114 struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow, *tmp;
115 @@ -3802,7 +3750,6 @@ static struct proto mptcp_prot = {
116 .connect = mptcp_connect,
117 .disconnect = mptcp_disconnect,
118 .close = mptcp_close,
119 - .accept = mptcp_accept,
120 .setsockopt = mptcp_setsockopt,
121 .getsockopt = mptcp_getsockopt,
122 .shutdown = mptcp_shutdown,
123 @@ -3912,18 +3859,36 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct so
127 - newsk = mptcp_accept(ssk, flags, &err, kern);
128 + pr_debug("ssk=%p, listener=%p", ssk, mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk));
129 + newsk = inet_csk_accept(ssk, flags, &err, kern);
135 - __inet_accept(sock, newsock, newsk);
136 - if (!mptcp_is_tcpsk(newsock->sk)) {
137 - struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(newsk);
138 + pr_debug("newsk=%p, subflow is mptcp=%d", newsk, sk_is_mptcp(newsk));
139 + if (sk_is_mptcp(newsk)) {
140 struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
141 + struct sock *new_mptcp_sock;
143 + subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(newsk);
144 + new_mptcp_sock = subflow->conn;
146 + /* is_mptcp should be false if subflow->conn is missing, see
147 + * subflow_syn_recv_sock()
149 + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_mptcp_sock)) {
150 + tcp_sk(newsk)->is_mptcp = 0;
154 + newsk = new_mptcp_sock;
155 + MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEACK);
157 + newsk->sk_kern_sock = kern;
159 + __inet_accept(sock, newsock, newsk);
161 set_bit(SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT, &newsock->flags);
162 + msk = mptcp_sk(newsk);
163 msk->in_accept_queue = 0;
165 /* set ssk->sk_socket of accept()ed flows to mptcp socket.
166 @@ -3945,6 +3910,21 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct so
167 if (unlikely(list_is_singular(&msk->conn_list)))
168 mptcp_set_state(newsk, TCP_CLOSE);
171 + MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk),
172 + MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEFALLBACK);
174 + newsk->sk_kern_sock = kern;
176 + __inet_accept(sock, newsock, newsk);
177 + /* we are being invoked after accepting a non-mp-capable
178 + * flow: sk is a tcp_sk, not an mptcp one.
180 + * Hand the socket over to tcp so all further socket ops
183 + WRITE_ONCE(newsock->sk->sk_socket->ops,
184 + mptcp_fallback_tcp_ops(newsock->sk));