]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/kernel/stable-queue.git/blob - releases/4.4.133/sctp-handle-two-v4-addrs-comparison-in-sctp_inet6_cmp_addr.patch
Fixes for 5.10
[thirdparty/kernel/stable-queue.git] / releases / 4.4.133 / sctp-handle-two-v4-addrs-comparison-in-sctp_inet6_cmp_addr.patch
1 From foo@baz Wed May 16 16:57:32 CEST 2018
2 From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
3 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:13:57 +0800
4 Subject: sctp: handle two v4 addrs comparison in sctp_inet6_cmp_addr
5
6 From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
7
8 [ Upstream commit d625329b06e46bd20baf9ee40847d11982569204 ]
9
10 Since sctp ipv6 socket also supports v4 addrs, it's possible to
11 compare two v4 addrs in pf v6 .cmp_addr, sctp_inet6_cmp_addr.
12
13 However after Commit 1071ec9d453a ("sctp: do not check port in
14 sctp_inet6_cmp_addr"), it no longer calls af1->cmp_addr, which
15 in this case is sctp_v4_cmp_addr, but calls __sctp_v6_cmp_addr
16 where it handles them as two v6 addrs. It would cause a out of
17 bounds crash.
18
19 syzbot found this crash when trying to bind two v4 addrs to a
20 v6 socket.
21
22 This patch fixes it by adding the process for two v4 addrs in
23 sctp_inet6_cmp_addr.
24
25 Fixes: 1071ec9d453a ("sctp: do not check port in sctp_inet6_cmp_addr")
26 Reported-by: syzbot+cd494c1dd681d4d93ebb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
27 Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
28 Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
29 Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
30 Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
31 Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
32 ---
33 net/sctp/ipv6.c | 3 +++
34 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
35
36 --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
37 +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
38 @@ -863,6 +863,9 @@ static int sctp_inet6_cmp_addr(const uni
39 if (sctp_is_any(sk, addr1) || sctp_is_any(sk, addr2))
40 return 1;
41
42 + if (addr1->sa.sa_family == AF_INET && addr2->sa.sa_family == AF_INET)
43 + return addr1->v4.sin_addr.s_addr == addr2->v4.sin_addr.s_addr;
44 +
45 return __sctp_v6_cmp_addr(addr1, addr2);
46 }
47