]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/git.git/blob - t/t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh
Merge branch 'jk/checkout-index-errors'
[thirdparty/git.git] / t / t6423-merge-rename-directories.sh
1 #!/bin/sh
2
3 test_description="recursive merge with directory renames"
4 # includes checking of many corner cases, with a similar methodology to:
5 # t6042: corner cases with renames but not criss-cross merges
6 # t6036: corner cases with both renames and criss-cross merges
7 #
8 # The setup for all of them, pictorially, is:
9 #
10 # A
11 # o
12 # / \
13 # O o ?
14 # \ /
15 # o
16 # B
17 #
18 # To help make it easier to follow the flow of tests, they have been
19 # divided into sections and each test will start with a quick explanation
20 # of what commits O, A, and B contain.
21 #
22 # Notation:
23 # z/{b,c} means files z/b and z/c both exist
24 # x/d_1 means file x/d exists with content d1. (Purpose of the
25 # underscore notation is to differentiate different
26 # files that might be renamed into each other's paths.)
27
28 . ./test-lib.sh
29
30
31 ###########################################################################
32 # SECTION 1: Basic cases we should be able to handle
33 ###########################################################################
34
35 # Testcase 1a, Basic directory rename.
36 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
37 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
38 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e/f}
39 # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e/f}
40
41 test_setup_1a () {
42 test_create_repo 1a &&
43 (
44 cd 1a &&
45
46 mkdir z &&
47 echo b >z/b &&
48 echo c >z/c &&
49 git add z &&
50 test_tick &&
51 git commit -m "O" &&
52
53 git branch O &&
54 git branch A &&
55 git branch B &&
56
57 git checkout A &&
58 git mv z y &&
59 test_tick &&
60 git commit -m "A" &&
61
62 git checkout B &&
63 echo d >z/d &&
64 mkdir z/e &&
65 echo f >z/e/f &&
66 git add z/d z/e/f &&
67 test_tick &&
68 git commit -m "B"
69 )
70 }
71
72 test_expect_success '1a: Simple directory rename detection' '
73 test_setup_1a &&
74 (
75 cd 1a &&
76
77 git checkout A^0 &&
78
79 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
80
81 git ls-files -s >out &&
82 test_line_count = 4 out &&
83
84 git rev-parse >actual \
85 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:y/e/f &&
86 git rev-parse >expect \
87 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d B:z/e/f &&
88 test_cmp expect actual &&
89
90 git hash-object y/d >actual &&
91 git rev-parse B:z/d >expect &&
92 test_cmp expect actual &&
93
94 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d &&
95 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/e/f &&
96 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
97 test_path_is_missing z/e/f
98 )
99 '
100
101 # Testcase 1b, Merge a directory with another
102 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, y/d
103 # Commit A: z/{b,c,e}, y/d
104 # Commit B: y/{b,c,d}
105 # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e}
106
107 test_setup_1b () {
108 test_create_repo 1b &&
109 (
110 cd 1b &&
111
112 mkdir z &&
113 echo b >z/b &&
114 echo c >z/c &&
115 mkdir y &&
116 echo d >y/d &&
117 git add z y &&
118 test_tick &&
119 git commit -m "O" &&
120
121 git branch O &&
122 git branch A &&
123 git branch B &&
124
125 git checkout A &&
126 echo e >z/e &&
127 git add z/e &&
128 test_tick &&
129 git commit -m "A" &&
130
131 git checkout B &&
132 git mv z/b y &&
133 git mv z/c y &&
134 rmdir z &&
135 test_tick &&
136 git commit -m "B"
137 )
138 }
139
140 test_expect_success '1b: Merge a directory with another' '
141 test_setup_1b &&
142 (
143 cd 1b &&
144
145 git checkout A^0 &&
146
147 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
148
149 git ls-files -s >out &&
150 test_line_count = 4 out &&
151
152 git rev-parse >actual \
153 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:y/e &&
154 git rev-parse >expect \
155 O:z/b O:z/c O:y/d A:z/e &&
156 test_cmp expect actual &&
157 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/e
158 )
159 '
160
161 # Testcase 1c, Transitive renaming
162 # (Related to testcases 3a and 6d -- when should a transitive rename apply?)
163 # (Related to testcases 9c and 9d -- can transitivity repeat?)
164 # (Related to testcase 12b -- joint-transitivity?)
165 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d
166 # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/d
167 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d}
168 # Expected: y/{b,c,d} (because x/d -> z/d -> y/d)
169
170 test_setup_1c () {
171 test_create_repo 1c &&
172 (
173 cd 1c &&
174
175 mkdir z &&
176 echo b >z/b &&
177 echo c >z/c &&
178 mkdir x &&
179 echo d >x/d &&
180 git add z x &&
181 test_tick &&
182 git commit -m "O" &&
183
184 git branch O &&
185 git branch A &&
186 git branch B &&
187
188 git checkout A &&
189 git mv z y &&
190 test_tick &&
191 git commit -m "A" &&
192
193 git checkout B &&
194 git mv x/d z/d &&
195 test_tick &&
196 git commit -m "B"
197 )
198 }
199
200 test_expect_success '1c: Transitive renaming' '
201 test_setup_1c &&
202 (
203 cd 1c &&
204
205 git checkout A^0 &&
206
207 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
208
209 git ls-files -s >out &&
210 test_line_count = 3 out &&
211
212 git rev-parse >actual \
213 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d &&
214 git rev-parse >expect \
215 O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d &&
216 test_cmp expect actual &&
217 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:x/d &&
218 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d &&
219 test_path_is_missing z/d
220 )
221 '
222
223 # Testcase 1d, Directory renames (merging two directories into one new one)
224 # cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict
225 # (Related to testcases 1c and 7b)
226 # Commit O. z/{b,c}, y/{d,e}
227 # Commit A. x/{b,c}, y/{d,e,m,wham_1}
228 # Commit B. z/{b,c,n,wham_2}, x/{d,e}
229 # Expected: x/{b,c,d,e,m,n}, CONFLICT:(y/wham_1 & z/wham_2 -> x/wham)
230 # Note: y/m & z/n should definitely move into x. By the same token, both
231 # y/wham_1 & z/wham_2 should too...giving us a conflict.
232
233 test_setup_1d () {
234 test_create_repo 1d &&
235 (
236 cd 1d &&
237
238 mkdir z &&
239 echo b >z/b &&
240 echo c >z/c &&
241 mkdir y &&
242 echo d >y/d &&
243 echo e >y/e &&
244 git add z y &&
245 test_tick &&
246 git commit -m "O" &&
247
248 git branch O &&
249 git branch A &&
250 git branch B &&
251
252 git checkout A &&
253 git mv z x &&
254 echo m >y/m &&
255 echo wham1 >y/wham &&
256 git add y &&
257 test_tick &&
258 git commit -m "A" &&
259
260 git checkout B &&
261 git mv y x &&
262 echo n >z/n &&
263 echo wham2 >z/wham &&
264 git add z &&
265 test_tick &&
266 git commit -m "B"
267 )
268 }
269
270 test_expect_success '1d: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) conflict' '
271 test_setup_1d &&
272 (
273 cd 1d &&
274
275 git checkout A^0 &&
276
277 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
278 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (\(.*\)/\1)" out &&
279
280 git ls-files -s >out &&
281 test_line_count = 8 out &&
282 git ls-files -u >out &&
283 test_line_count = 2 out &&
284 git ls-files -o >out &&
285 test_line_count = 1 out &&
286
287 git rev-parse >actual \
288 :0:x/b :0:x/c :0:x/d :0:x/e :0:x/m :0:x/n &&
289 git rev-parse >expect \
290 O:z/b O:z/c O:y/d O:y/e A:y/m B:z/n &&
291 test_cmp expect actual &&
292
293 test_must_fail git rev-parse :0:x/wham &&
294 git rev-parse >actual \
295 :2:x/wham :3:x/wham &&
296 git rev-parse >expect \
297 A:y/wham B:z/wham &&
298 test_cmp expect actual &&
299
300 # Test that the two-way merge in x/wham is as expected
301 git cat-file -p :2:x/wham >expect &&
302 git cat-file -p :3:x/wham >other &&
303 >empty &&
304 test_must_fail git merge-file \
305 -L "HEAD" \
306 -L "" \
307 -L "B^0" \
308 expect empty other &&
309 test_cmp expect x/wham
310 )
311 '
312
313 # Testcase 1e, Renamed directory, with all filenames being renamed too
314 # (Related to testcases 9f & 9g)
315 # Commit O: z/{oldb,oldc}
316 # Commit A: y/{newb,newc}
317 # Commit B: z/{oldb,oldc,d}
318 # Expected: y/{newb,newc,d}
319
320 test_setup_1e () {
321 test_create_repo 1e &&
322 (
323 cd 1e &&
324
325 mkdir z &&
326 echo b >z/oldb &&
327 echo c >z/oldc &&
328 git add z &&
329 test_tick &&
330 git commit -m "O" &&
331
332 git branch O &&
333 git branch A &&
334 git branch B &&
335
336 git checkout A &&
337 mkdir y &&
338 git mv z/oldb y/newb &&
339 git mv z/oldc y/newc &&
340 test_tick &&
341 git commit -m "A" &&
342
343 git checkout B &&
344 echo d >z/d &&
345 git add z/d &&
346 test_tick &&
347 git commit -m "B"
348 )
349 }
350
351 test_expect_success '1e: Renamed directory, with all files being renamed too' '
352 test_setup_1e &&
353 (
354 cd 1e &&
355
356 git checkout A^0 &&
357
358 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
359
360 git ls-files -s >out &&
361 test_line_count = 3 out &&
362
363 git rev-parse >actual \
364 HEAD:y/newb HEAD:y/newc HEAD:y/d &&
365 git rev-parse >expect \
366 O:z/oldb O:z/oldc B:z/d &&
367 test_cmp expect actual &&
368 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d
369 )
370 '
371
372 # Testcase 1f, Split a directory into two other directories
373 # (Related to testcases 3a, all of section 2, and all of section 4)
374 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d,e,f}
375 # Commit A: z/{b,c,d,e,f,g}
376 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f}
377 # Expected: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f,g}
378
379 test_setup_1f () {
380 test_create_repo 1f &&
381 (
382 cd 1f &&
383
384 mkdir z &&
385 echo b >z/b &&
386 echo c >z/c &&
387 echo d >z/d &&
388 echo e >z/e &&
389 echo f >z/f &&
390 git add z &&
391 test_tick &&
392 git commit -m "O" &&
393
394 git branch O &&
395 git branch A &&
396 git branch B &&
397
398 git checkout A &&
399 echo g >z/g &&
400 git add z/g &&
401 test_tick &&
402 git commit -m "A" &&
403
404 git checkout B &&
405 mkdir y &&
406 mkdir x &&
407 git mv z/b y/ &&
408 git mv z/c y/ &&
409 git mv z/d x/ &&
410 git mv z/e x/ &&
411 git mv z/f x/ &&
412 rmdir z &&
413 test_tick &&
414 git commit -m "B"
415 )
416 }
417
418 test_expect_success '1f: Split a directory into two other directories' '
419 test_setup_1f &&
420 (
421 cd 1f &&
422
423 git checkout A^0 &&
424
425 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
426
427 git ls-files -s >out &&
428 test_line_count = 6 out &&
429
430 git rev-parse >actual \
431 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:x/d HEAD:x/e HEAD:x/f HEAD:x/g &&
432 git rev-parse >expect \
433 O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d O:z/e O:z/f A:z/g &&
434 test_cmp expect actual &&
435 test_path_is_missing z/g &&
436 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/g
437 )
438 '
439
440 ###########################################################################
441 # Rules suggested by testcases in section 1:
442 #
443 # We should still detect the directory rename even if it wasn't just
444 # the directory renamed, but the files within it. (see 1b)
445 #
446 # If renames split a directory into two or more others, the directory
447 # with the most renames, "wins" (see 1c). However, see the testcases
448 # in section 2, plus testcases 3a and 4a.
449 ###########################################################################
450
451
452 ###########################################################################
453 # SECTION 2: Split into multiple directories, with equal number of paths
454 #
455 # Explore the splitting-a-directory rules a bit; what happens in the
456 # edge cases?
457 #
458 # Note that there is a closely related case of a directory not being
459 # split on either side of history, but being renamed differently on
460 # each side. See testcase 8e for that.
461 ###########################################################################
462
463 # Testcase 2a, Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths
464 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
465 # Commit A: y/b, w/c
466 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d}
467 # Expected: y/b, w/c, z/d, with warning about z/ -> (y/ vs. w/) conflict
468 test_setup_2a () {
469 test_create_repo 2a &&
470 (
471 cd 2a &&
472
473 mkdir z &&
474 echo b >z/b &&
475 echo c >z/c &&
476 git add z &&
477 test_tick &&
478 git commit -m "O" &&
479
480 git branch O &&
481 git branch A &&
482 git branch B &&
483
484 git checkout A &&
485 mkdir y &&
486 mkdir w &&
487 git mv z/b y/ &&
488 git mv z/c w/ &&
489 test_tick &&
490 git commit -m "A" &&
491
492 git checkout B &&
493 echo d >z/d &&
494 git add z/d &&
495 test_tick &&
496 git commit -m "B"
497 )
498 }
499
500 test_expect_success '2a: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
501 test_setup_2a &&
502 (
503 cd 2a &&
504
505 git checkout A^0 &&
506
507 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
508 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT.*directory rename split" out &&
509
510 git ls-files -s >out &&
511 test_line_count = 3 out &&
512 git ls-files -u >out &&
513 test_line_count = 0 out &&
514 git ls-files -o >out &&
515 test_line_count = 1 out &&
516
517 git rev-parse >actual \
518 :0:y/b :0:w/c :0:z/d &&
519 git rev-parse >expect \
520 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d &&
521 test_cmp expect actual
522 )
523 '
524
525 # Testcase 2b, Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths
526 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
527 # Commit A: y/b, w/c
528 # Commit B: z/{b,c}, x/d
529 # Expected: y/b, w/c, x/d; No warning about z/ -> (y/ vs. w/) conflict
530 test_setup_2b () {
531 test_create_repo 2b &&
532 (
533 cd 2b &&
534
535 mkdir z &&
536 echo b >z/b &&
537 echo c >z/c &&
538 git add z &&
539 test_tick &&
540 git commit -m "O" &&
541
542 git branch O &&
543 git branch A &&
544 git branch B &&
545
546 git checkout A &&
547 mkdir y &&
548 mkdir w &&
549 git mv z/b y/ &&
550 git mv z/c w/ &&
551 test_tick &&
552 git commit -m "A" &&
553
554 git checkout B &&
555 mkdir x &&
556 echo d >x/d &&
557 git add x/d &&
558 test_tick &&
559 git commit -m "B"
560 )
561 }
562
563 test_expect_success '2b: Directory split into two on one side, with equal numbers of paths' '
564 test_setup_2b &&
565 (
566 cd 2b &&
567
568 git checkout A^0 &&
569
570 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
571
572 git ls-files -s >out &&
573 test_line_count = 3 out &&
574 git ls-files -u >out &&
575 test_line_count = 0 out &&
576 git ls-files -o >out &&
577 test_line_count = 1 out &&
578
579 git rev-parse >actual \
580 :0:y/b :0:w/c :0:x/d &&
581 git rev-parse >expect \
582 O:z/b O:z/c B:x/d &&
583 test_cmp expect actual &&
584 test_i18ngrep ! "CONFLICT.*directory rename split" out
585 )
586 '
587
588 ###########################################################################
589 # Rules suggested by section 2:
590 #
591 # None; the rule was already covered in section 1. These testcases are
592 # here just to make sure the conflict resolution and necessary warning
593 # messages are handled correctly.
594 ###########################################################################
595
596
597 ###########################################################################
598 # SECTION 3: Path in question is the source path for some rename already
599 #
600 # Combining cases from Section 1 and trying to handle them could lead to
601 # directory renaming detection being over-applied. So, this section
602 # provides some good testcases to check that the implementation doesn't go
603 # too far.
604 ###########################################################################
605
606 # Testcase 3a, Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side
607 # (Related to testcases 1c, 1f, and 9h)
608 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d}
609 # Commit A: z/{b,c,d} (no change)
610 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/d
611 # Expected: y/{b,c}, x/d
612 test_setup_3a () {
613 test_create_repo 3a &&
614 (
615 cd 3a &&
616
617 mkdir z &&
618 echo b >z/b &&
619 echo c >z/c &&
620 echo d >z/d &&
621 git add z &&
622 test_tick &&
623 git commit -m "O" &&
624
625 git branch O &&
626 git branch A &&
627 git branch B &&
628
629 git checkout A &&
630 test_tick &&
631 git commit --allow-empty -m "A" &&
632
633 git checkout B &&
634 mkdir y &&
635 mkdir x &&
636 git mv z/b y/ &&
637 git mv z/c y/ &&
638 git mv z/d x/ &&
639 rmdir z &&
640 test_tick &&
641 git commit -m "B"
642 )
643 }
644
645 test_expect_success '3a: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side' '
646 test_setup_3a &&
647 (
648 cd 3a &&
649
650 git checkout A^0 &&
651
652 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
653
654 git ls-files -s >out &&
655 test_line_count = 3 out &&
656
657 git rev-parse >actual \
658 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:x/d &&
659 git rev-parse >expect \
660 O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d &&
661 test_cmp expect actual
662 )
663 '
664
665 # Testcase 3b, Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side
666 # (Related to testcases 5c and 7c, also kind of 1e and 1f)
667 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d}
668 # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/d
669 # Commit B: z/{b,c}, w/d
670 # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT:(z/d -> x/d vs. w/d)
671 # NOTE: We're particularly checking that since z/d is already involved as
672 # a source in a file rename on the same side of history, that we don't
673 # get it involved in directory rename detection. If it were, we might
674 # end up with CONFLICT:(z/d -> y/d vs. x/d vs. w/d), i.e. a
675 # rename/rename/rename(1to3) conflict, which is just weird.
676 test_setup_3b () {
677 test_create_repo 3b &&
678 (
679 cd 3b &&
680
681 mkdir z &&
682 echo b >z/b &&
683 echo c >z/c &&
684 echo d >z/d &&
685 git add z &&
686 test_tick &&
687 git commit -m "O" &&
688
689 git branch O &&
690 git branch A &&
691 git branch B &&
692
693 git checkout A &&
694 mkdir y &&
695 mkdir x &&
696 git mv z/b y/ &&
697 git mv z/c y/ &&
698 git mv z/d x/ &&
699 rmdir z &&
700 test_tick &&
701 git commit -m "A" &&
702
703 git checkout B &&
704 mkdir w &&
705 git mv z/d w/ &&
706 test_tick &&
707 git commit -m "B"
708 )
709 }
710
711 test_expect_success '3b: Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on current side' '
712 test_setup_3b &&
713 (
714 cd 3b &&
715
716 git checkout A^0 &&
717
718 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
719 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT.*rename/rename.*z/d.*x/d.*w/d out &&
720 test_i18ngrep ! CONFLICT.*rename/rename.*y/d out &&
721
722 git ls-files -s >out &&
723 test_line_count = 5 out &&
724 git ls-files -u >out &&
725 test_line_count = 3 out &&
726 git ls-files -o >out &&
727 test_line_count = 1 out &&
728
729 git rev-parse >actual \
730 :0:y/b :0:y/c :1:z/d :2:x/d :3:w/d &&
731 git rev-parse >expect \
732 O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d O:z/d O:z/d &&
733 test_cmp expect actual &&
734
735 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
736 git hash-object >actual \
737 x/d w/d &&
738 git rev-parse >expect \
739 O:z/d O:z/d &&
740 test_cmp expect actual
741 )
742 '
743
744 ###########################################################################
745 # Rules suggested by section 3:
746 #
747 # Avoid directory-rename-detection for a path, if that path is the source
748 # of a rename on either side of a merge.
749 ###########################################################################
750
751
752 ###########################################################################
753 # SECTION 4: Partially renamed directory; still exists on both sides of merge
754 #
755 # What if we were to attempt to do directory rename detection when someone
756 # "mostly" moved a directory but still left some files around, or,
757 # equivalently, fully renamed a directory in one commit and then recreated
758 # that directory in a later commit adding some new files and then tried to
759 # merge?
760 #
761 # It's hard to divine user intent in these cases, because you can make an
762 # argument that, depending on the intermediate history of the side being
763 # merged, that some users will want files in that directory to
764 # automatically be detected and renamed, while users with a different
765 # intermediate history wouldn't want that rename to happen.
766 #
767 # I think that it is best to simply not have directory rename detection
768 # apply to such cases. My reasoning for this is four-fold: (1) it's
769 # easiest for users in general to figure out what happened if we don't
770 # apply directory rename detection in any such case, (2) it's an easy rule
771 # to explain ["We don't do directory rename detection if the directory
772 # still exists on both sides of the merge"], (3) we can get some hairy
773 # edge/corner cases that would be really confusing and possibly not even
774 # representable in the index if we were to even try, and [related to 3] (4)
775 # attempting to resolve this issue of divining user intent by examining
776 # intermediate history goes against the spirit of three-way merges and is a
777 # path towards crazy corner cases that are far more complex than what we're
778 # already dealing with.
779 #
780 # Note that the wording of the rule ("We don't do directory rename
781 # detection if the directory still exists on both sides of the merge.")
782 # also excludes "renaming" of a directory into a subdirectory of itself
783 # (e.g. /some/dir/* -> /some/dir/subdir/*). It may be possible to carve
784 # out an exception for "renaming"-beneath-itself cases without opening
785 # weird edge/corner cases for other partial directory renames, but for now
786 # we are keeping the rule simple.
787 #
788 # This section contains a test for a partially-renamed-directory case.
789 ###########################################################################
790
791 # Testcase 4a, Directory split, with original directory still present
792 # (Related to testcase 1f)
793 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d,e}
794 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d}, z/e
795 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e,f}
796 # Expected: y/{b,c,d}, z/{e,f}
797 # NOTE: Even though most files from z moved to y, we don't want f to follow.
798
799 test_setup_4a () {
800 test_create_repo 4a &&
801 (
802 cd 4a &&
803
804 mkdir z &&
805 echo b >z/b &&
806 echo c >z/c &&
807 echo d >z/d &&
808 echo e >z/e &&
809 git add z &&
810 test_tick &&
811 git commit -m "O" &&
812
813 git branch O &&
814 git branch A &&
815 git branch B &&
816
817 git checkout A &&
818 mkdir y &&
819 git mv z/b y/ &&
820 git mv z/c y/ &&
821 git mv z/d y/ &&
822 test_tick &&
823 git commit -m "A" &&
824
825 git checkout B &&
826 echo f >z/f &&
827 git add z/f &&
828 test_tick &&
829 git commit -m "B"
830 )
831 }
832
833 test_expect_success '4a: Directory split, with original directory still present' '
834 test_setup_4a &&
835 (
836 cd 4a &&
837
838 git checkout A^0 &&
839
840 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
841
842 git ls-files -s >out &&
843 test_line_count = 5 out &&
844 git ls-files -u >out &&
845 test_line_count = 0 out &&
846 git ls-files -o >out &&
847 test_line_count = 1 out &&
848
849 git rev-parse >actual \
850 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:z/e HEAD:z/f &&
851 git rev-parse >expect \
852 O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d O:z/e B:z/f &&
853 test_cmp expect actual
854 )
855 '
856
857 ###########################################################################
858 # Rules suggested by section 4:
859 #
860 # Directory-rename-detection should be turned off for any directories (as
861 # a source for renames) that exist on both sides of the merge. (The "as
862 # a source for renames" clarification is due to cases like 1c where
863 # the target directory exists on both sides and we do want the rename
864 # detection.) But, sadly, see testcase 8b.
865 ###########################################################################
866
867
868 ###########################################################################
869 # SECTION 5: Files/directories in the way of subset of to-be-renamed paths
870 #
871 # Implicitly renaming files due to a detected directory rename could run
872 # into problems if there are files or directories in the way of the paths
873 # we want to rename. Explore such cases in this section.
874 ###########################################################################
875
876 # Testcase 5a, Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target
877 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, y/d
878 # Commit A: z/{b,c,e_1,f}, y/{d,e_2}
879 # Commit B: y/{b,c,d}
880 # Expected: z/e_1, y/{b,c,d,e_2,f} + CONFLICT warning
881 # NOTE: While directory rename detection is active here causing z/f to
882 # become y/f, we did not apply this for z/e_1 because that would
883 # give us an add/add conflict for y/e_1 vs y/e_2. This problem with
884 # this add/add, is that both versions of y/e are from the same side
885 # of history, giving us no way to represent this conflict in the
886 # index.
887
888 test_setup_5a () {
889 test_create_repo 5a &&
890 (
891 cd 5a &&
892
893 mkdir z &&
894 echo b >z/b &&
895 echo c >z/c &&
896 mkdir y &&
897 echo d >y/d &&
898 git add z y &&
899 test_tick &&
900 git commit -m "O" &&
901
902 git branch O &&
903 git branch A &&
904 git branch B &&
905
906 git checkout A &&
907 echo e1 >z/e &&
908 echo f >z/f &&
909 echo e2 >y/e &&
910 git add z/e z/f y/e &&
911 test_tick &&
912 git commit -m "A" &&
913
914 git checkout B &&
915 git mv z/b y/ &&
916 git mv z/c y/ &&
917 rmdir z &&
918 test_tick &&
919 git commit -m "B"
920 )
921 }
922
923 test_expect_success '5a: Merge directories, other side adds files to original and target' '
924 test_setup_5a &&
925 (
926 cd 5a &&
927
928 git checkout A^0 &&
929
930 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
931 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT.*implicit dir rename" out &&
932
933 git ls-files -s >out &&
934 test_line_count = 6 out &&
935 git ls-files -u >out &&
936 test_line_count = 0 out &&
937 git ls-files -o >out &&
938 test_line_count = 1 out &&
939
940 git rev-parse >actual \
941 :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/d :0:y/e :0:z/e :0:y/f &&
942 git rev-parse >expect \
943 O:z/b O:z/c O:y/d A:y/e A:z/e A:z/f &&
944 test_cmp expect actual
945 )
946 '
947
948 # Testcase 5b, Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict
949 # (Related to testcase 8d; these may appear slightly inconsistent to users;
950 # Also related to testcases 7d and 7e)
951 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d_1}
952 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_2}
953 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1,e}, y/d_3
954 # Expected: y/{b,c,e}, CONFLICT(add/add: y/d_2 vs. y/d_3)
955 # NOTE: If z/d_1 in commit B were to be involved in dir rename detection, as
956 # we normally would since z/ is being renamed to y/, then this would be
957 # a rename/delete (z/d_1 -> y/d_1 vs. deleted) AND an add/add/add
958 # conflict of y/d_1 vs. y/d_2 vs. y/d_3. Add/add/add is not
959 # representable in the index, so the existence of y/d_3 needs to
960 # cause us to bail on directory rename detection for that path, falling
961 # back to git behavior without the directory rename detection.
962
963 test_setup_5b () {
964 test_create_repo 5b &&
965 (
966 cd 5b &&
967
968 mkdir z &&
969 echo b >z/b &&
970 echo c >z/c &&
971 echo d1 >z/d &&
972 git add z &&
973 test_tick &&
974 git commit -m "O" &&
975
976 git branch O &&
977 git branch A &&
978 git branch B &&
979
980 git checkout A &&
981 git rm z/d &&
982 git mv z y &&
983 echo d2 >y/d &&
984 git add y/d &&
985 test_tick &&
986 git commit -m "A" &&
987
988 git checkout B &&
989 mkdir y &&
990 echo d3 >y/d &&
991 echo e >z/e &&
992 git add y/d z/e &&
993 test_tick &&
994 git commit -m "B"
995 )
996 }
997
998 test_expect_success '5b: Rename/delete in order to get add/add/add conflict' '
999 test_setup_5b &&
1000 (
1001 cd 5b &&
1002
1003 git checkout A^0 &&
1004
1005 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1006 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (add/add).* y/d" out &&
1007
1008 git ls-files -s >out &&
1009 test_line_count = 5 out &&
1010 git ls-files -u >out &&
1011 test_line_count = 2 out &&
1012 git ls-files -o >out &&
1013 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1014
1015 git rev-parse >actual \
1016 :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/e :2:y/d :3:y/d &&
1017 git rev-parse >expect \
1018 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e A:y/d B:y/d &&
1019 test_cmp expect actual &&
1020
1021 test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/d &&
1022 test_path_is_file y/d
1023 )
1024 '
1025
1026 # Testcase 5c, Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add
1027 # (Directory rename detection would result in transitive rename vs.
1028 # rename/rename(1to2) and turn it into a rename/rename(1to3). Further,
1029 # rename paths conflict with separate adds on the other side)
1030 # (Related to testcases 3b and 7c)
1031 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1
1032 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_2}, w/d_1
1033 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1,e}, w/d_3, y/d_4
1034 # Expected: A mess, but only a rename/rename(1to2)/add/add mess. Use the
1035 # presence of y/d_4 in B to avoid doing transitive rename of
1036 # x/d_1 -> z/d_1 -> y/d_1, so that the only paths we have at
1037 # y/d are y/d_2 and y/d_4. We still do the move from z/e to y/e,
1038 # though, because it doesn't have anything in the way.
1039
1040 test_setup_5c () {
1041 test_create_repo 5c &&
1042 (
1043 cd 5c &&
1044
1045 mkdir z &&
1046 echo b >z/b &&
1047 echo c >z/c &&
1048 mkdir x &&
1049 echo d1 >x/d &&
1050 git add z x &&
1051 test_tick &&
1052 git commit -m "O" &&
1053
1054 git branch O &&
1055 git branch A &&
1056 git branch B &&
1057
1058 git checkout A &&
1059 git mv z y &&
1060 echo d2 >y/d &&
1061 git add y/d &&
1062 git mv x w &&
1063 test_tick &&
1064 git commit -m "A" &&
1065
1066 git checkout B &&
1067 git mv x/d z/ &&
1068 mkdir w &&
1069 mkdir y &&
1070 echo d3 >w/d &&
1071 echo d4 >y/d &&
1072 echo e >z/e &&
1073 git add w/ y/ z/e &&
1074 test_tick &&
1075 git commit -m "B"
1076 )
1077 }
1078
1079 test_expect_success '5c: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/rename/add/add/add' '
1080 test_setup_5c &&
1081 (
1082 cd 5c &&
1083
1084 git checkout A^0 &&
1085
1086 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1087 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*x/d.*w/d.*z/d" out &&
1088 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (add/add).* y/d" out &&
1089
1090 git ls-files -s >out &&
1091 test_line_count = 9 out &&
1092 git ls-files -u >out &&
1093 test_line_count = 6 out &&
1094 git ls-files -o >out &&
1095 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1096
1097 git rev-parse >actual \
1098 :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/e &&
1099 git rev-parse >expect \
1100 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e &&
1101 test_cmp expect actual &&
1102
1103 test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/d &&
1104 git rev-parse >actual \
1105 :2:w/d :3:w/d :1:x/d :2:y/d :3:y/d :3:z/d &&
1106 git rev-parse >expect \
1107 O:x/d B:w/d O:x/d A:y/d B:y/d O:x/d &&
1108 test_cmp expect actual &&
1109
1110 git hash-object >actual \
1111 z/d &&
1112 git rev-parse >expect \
1113 O:x/d &&
1114 test_cmp expect actual &&
1115 test_path_is_missing x/d &&
1116 test_path_is_file y/d &&
1117 grep -q "<<<<" y/d # conflict markers should be present
1118 )
1119 '
1120
1121 # Testcase 5d, Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename
1122 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
1123 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_1}
1124 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_2,f}, y/d/e
1125 # Expected: y/{b,c,d/e,f}, z/d_2, CONFLICT(file/directory), y/d_1~HEAD
1126 # Note: The fact that y/d/ exists in B makes us bail on directory rename
1127 # detection for z/d_2, but that doesn't prevent us from applying the
1128 # directory rename detection for z/f -> y/f.
1129
1130 test_setup_5d () {
1131 test_create_repo 5d &&
1132 (
1133 cd 5d &&
1134
1135 mkdir z &&
1136 echo b >z/b &&
1137 echo c >z/c &&
1138 git add z &&
1139 test_tick &&
1140 git commit -m "O" &&
1141
1142 git branch O &&
1143 git branch A &&
1144 git branch B &&
1145
1146 git checkout A &&
1147 git mv z y &&
1148 echo d1 >y/d &&
1149 git add y/d &&
1150 test_tick &&
1151 git commit -m "A" &&
1152
1153 git checkout B &&
1154 mkdir -p y/d &&
1155 echo e >y/d/e &&
1156 echo d2 >z/d &&
1157 echo f >z/f &&
1158 git add y/d/e z/d z/f &&
1159 test_tick &&
1160 git commit -m "B"
1161 )
1162 }
1163
1164 test_expect_success '5d: Directory/file/file conflict due to directory rename' '
1165 test_setup_5d &&
1166 (
1167 cd 5d &&
1168
1169 git checkout A^0 &&
1170
1171 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1172 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (file/directory).*y/d" out &&
1173
1174 git ls-files -s >out &&
1175 test_line_count = 6 out &&
1176 git ls-files -u >out &&
1177 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1178 git ls-files -o >out &&
1179 test_line_count = 2 out &&
1180
1181 git rev-parse >actual \
1182 :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:z/d :0:y/f :2:y/d :0:y/d/e &&
1183 git rev-parse >expect \
1184 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d B:z/f A:y/d B:y/d/e &&
1185 test_cmp expect actual &&
1186
1187 git hash-object y/d~HEAD >actual &&
1188 git rev-parse A:y/d >expect &&
1189 test_cmp expect actual
1190 )
1191 '
1192
1193 ###########################################################################
1194 # Rules suggested by section 5:
1195 #
1196 # If a subset of to-be-renamed files have a file or directory in the way,
1197 # "turn off" the directory rename for those specific sub-paths, falling
1198 # back to old handling. But, sadly, see testcases 8a and 8b.
1199 ###########################################################################
1200
1201
1202 ###########################################################################
1203 # SECTION 6: Same side of the merge was the one that did the rename
1204 #
1205 # It may sound obvious that you only want to apply implicit directory
1206 # renames to directories if the _other_ side of history did the renaming.
1207 # If you did make an implementation that didn't explicitly enforce this
1208 # rule, the majority of cases that would fall under this section would
1209 # also be solved by following the rules from the above sections. But
1210 # there are still a few that stick out, so this section covers them just
1211 # to make sure we also get them right.
1212 ###########################################################################
1213
1214 # Testcase 6a, Tricky rename/delete
1215 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d}
1216 # Commit A: z/b
1217 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d
1218 # Expected: y/b, CONFLICT(rename/delete, z/c -> y/c vs. NULL)
1219 # Note: We're just checking here that the rename of z/b and z/c to put
1220 # them under y/ doesn't accidentally catch z/d and make it look like
1221 # it is also involved in a rename/delete conflict.
1222
1223 test_setup_6a () {
1224 test_create_repo 6a &&
1225 (
1226 cd 6a &&
1227
1228 mkdir z &&
1229 echo b >z/b &&
1230 echo c >z/c &&
1231 echo d >z/d &&
1232 git add z &&
1233 test_tick &&
1234 git commit -m "O" &&
1235
1236 git branch O &&
1237 git branch A &&
1238 git branch B &&
1239
1240 git checkout A &&
1241 git rm z/c &&
1242 git rm z/d &&
1243 test_tick &&
1244 git commit -m "A" &&
1245
1246 git checkout B &&
1247 mkdir y &&
1248 git mv z/b y/ &&
1249 git mv z/c y/ &&
1250 test_tick &&
1251 git commit -m "B"
1252 )
1253 }
1254
1255 test_expect_success '6a: Tricky rename/delete' '
1256 test_setup_6a &&
1257 (
1258 cd 6a &&
1259
1260 git checkout A^0 &&
1261
1262 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1263 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*z/c.*y/c" out &&
1264
1265 git ls-files -s >out &&
1266 test_line_count = 2 out &&
1267 git ls-files -u >out &&
1268 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1269 git ls-files -o >out &&
1270 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1271
1272 git rev-parse >actual \
1273 :0:y/b :3:y/c &&
1274 git rev-parse >expect \
1275 O:z/b O:z/c &&
1276 test_cmp expect actual
1277 )
1278 '
1279
1280 # Testcase 6b1, Same rename done on both sides
1281 # (Related to testcase 6b2 and 8e)
1282 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d,e}
1283 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d}, x/e
1284 # Commit B: y/{b,c,d}, z/{e,f}
1285 # Expected: y/{b,c,d,f}, x/e
1286 # Note: Directory rename detection says A renamed z/ -> y/ (3 paths renamed
1287 # to y/ and only 1 renamed to x/), therefore the new file 'z/f' in B
1288 # should be moved to 'y/f'.
1289 #
1290 # This is a bit of an edge case where any behavior might surprise users,
1291 # whether that is treating A as renaming z/ -> y/, treating A as renaming
1292 # z/ -> x/, or treating A as not doing any directory rename. However, I
1293 # think this answer is the least confusing and most consistent with the
1294 # rules elsewhere.
1295 #
1296 # A note about z/ -> x/, since it may not be clear how that could come
1297 # about: If we were to ignore files renamed by both sides
1298 # (i.e. z/{b,c,d}), as directory rename detection did in git-2.18 thru
1299 # at least git-2.28, then we would note there are no renames from z/ to
1300 # y/ and one rename from z/ to x/ and thus come to the conclusion that
1301 # A renamed z/ -> x/. This seems more confusing for end users than a
1302 # rename of z/ to y/, it makes directory rename detection behavior
1303 # harder for them to predict. As such, we modified the rule, changed
1304 # the behavior on testcases 6b2 and 8e, and introduced this 6b1 testcase.
1305
1306 test_setup_6b1 () {
1307 test_create_repo 6b1 &&
1308 (
1309 cd 6b1 &&
1310
1311 mkdir z &&
1312 echo b >z/b &&
1313 echo c >z/c &&
1314 echo d >z/d &&
1315 echo e >z/e &&
1316 git add z &&
1317 test_tick &&
1318 git commit -m "O" &&
1319
1320 git branch O &&
1321 git branch A &&
1322 git branch B &&
1323
1324 git checkout A &&
1325 git mv z y &&
1326 mkdir x &&
1327 git mv y/e x/e &&
1328 test_tick &&
1329 git commit -m "A" &&
1330
1331 git checkout B &&
1332 git mv z y &&
1333 mkdir z &&
1334 git mv y/e z/e &&
1335 echo f >z/f &&
1336 git add z/f &&
1337 test_tick &&
1338 git commit -m "B"
1339 )
1340 }
1341
1342 test_expect_failure '6b1: Same renames done on both sides, plus another rename' '
1343 test_setup_6b1 &&
1344 (
1345 cd 6b1 &&
1346
1347 git checkout A^0 &&
1348
1349 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
1350
1351 git ls-files -s >out &&
1352 test_line_count = 5 out &&
1353 git ls-files -u >out &&
1354 test_line_count = 0 out &&
1355 git ls-files -o >out &&
1356 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1357
1358 git rev-parse >actual \
1359 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:x/e HEAD:y/f &&
1360 git rev-parse >expect \
1361 O:z/b O:z/c O:z/d O:z/e B:z/f &&
1362 test_cmp expect actual
1363 )
1364 '
1365
1366 # Testcase 6b2, Same rename done on both sides
1367 # (Related to testcases 6c and 8e)
1368 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
1369 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
1370 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d
1371 # Expected: y/{b,c,d}
1372 # Alternate: y/{b,c}, z/d
1373 # Note: Directory rename detection says A renamed z/ -> y/, therefore the new
1374 # file 'z/d' in B should be moved to 'y/d'.
1375 #
1376 # We could potentially ignore the renames of z/{b,c} on side A since
1377 # those were renamed on both sides. However, it's a bit of a corner
1378 # case because what if there was also a z/e that side A moved to x/e
1379 # and side B left alone? If we used the "ignore renames done on both
1380 # sides" logic, then we'd compute that A renamed z/ -> x/, and move
1381 # z/d to x/d. That seems more surprising and uglier than allowing
1382 # the z/ -> y/ rename.
1383
1384 test_setup_6b2 () {
1385 test_create_repo 6b2 &&
1386 (
1387 cd 6b2 &&
1388
1389 mkdir z &&
1390 echo b >z/b &&
1391 echo c >z/c &&
1392 git add z &&
1393 test_tick &&
1394 git commit -m "O" &&
1395
1396 git branch O &&
1397 git branch A &&
1398 git branch B &&
1399
1400 git checkout A &&
1401 git mv z y &&
1402 test_tick &&
1403 git commit -m "A" &&
1404
1405 git checkout B &&
1406 git mv z y &&
1407 mkdir z &&
1408 echo d >z/d &&
1409 git add z/d &&
1410 test_tick &&
1411 git commit -m "B"
1412 )
1413 }
1414
1415 test_expect_failure '6b2: Same rename done on both sides' '
1416 test_setup_6b2 &&
1417 (
1418 cd 6b2 &&
1419
1420 git checkout A^0 &&
1421
1422 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
1423
1424 git ls-files -s >out &&
1425 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1426 git ls-files -u >out &&
1427 test_line_count = 0 out &&
1428 git ls-files -o >out &&
1429 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1430
1431 git rev-parse >actual \
1432 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d &&
1433 git rev-parse >expect \
1434 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d &&
1435 test_cmp expect actual
1436 )
1437 '
1438
1439 # Testcase 6c, Rename only done on same side
1440 # (Related to testcases 6b1, 6b2, and 8e)
1441 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
1442 # Commit A: z/{b,c} (no change)
1443 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d
1444 # Expected: y/{b,c}, z/d
1445 # NOTE: Seems obvious, but just checking that the implementation doesn't
1446 # "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}.
1447
1448 test_setup_6c () {
1449 test_create_repo 6c &&
1450 (
1451 cd 6c &&
1452
1453 mkdir z &&
1454 echo b >z/b &&
1455 echo c >z/c &&
1456 git add z &&
1457 test_tick &&
1458 git commit -m "O" &&
1459
1460 git branch O &&
1461 git branch A &&
1462 git branch B &&
1463
1464 git checkout A &&
1465 test_tick &&
1466 git commit --allow-empty -m "A" &&
1467
1468 git checkout B &&
1469 git mv z y &&
1470 mkdir z &&
1471 echo d >z/d &&
1472 git add z/d &&
1473 test_tick &&
1474 git commit -m "B"
1475 )
1476 }
1477
1478 test_expect_success '6c: Rename only done on same side' '
1479 test_setup_6c &&
1480 (
1481 cd 6c &&
1482
1483 git checkout A^0 &&
1484
1485 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
1486
1487 git ls-files -s >out &&
1488 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1489 git ls-files -u >out &&
1490 test_line_count = 0 out &&
1491 git ls-files -o >out &&
1492 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1493
1494 git rev-parse >actual \
1495 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:z/d &&
1496 git rev-parse >expect \
1497 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/d &&
1498 test_cmp expect actual
1499 )
1500 '
1501
1502 # Testcase 6d, We don't always want transitive renaming
1503 # (Related to testcase 1c)
1504 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d
1505 # Commit A: z/{b,c}, x/d (no change)
1506 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, z/d
1507 # Expected: y/{b,c}, z/d
1508 # NOTE: Again, this seems obvious but just checking that the implementation
1509 # doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c,d}.
1510
1511 test_setup_6d () {
1512 test_create_repo 6d &&
1513 (
1514 cd 6d &&
1515
1516 mkdir z &&
1517 echo b >z/b &&
1518 echo c >z/c &&
1519 mkdir x &&
1520 echo d >x/d &&
1521 git add z x &&
1522 test_tick &&
1523 git commit -m "O" &&
1524
1525 git branch O &&
1526 git branch A &&
1527 git branch B &&
1528
1529 git checkout A &&
1530 test_tick &&
1531 git commit --allow-empty -m "A" &&
1532
1533 git checkout B &&
1534 git mv z y &&
1535 git mv x z &&
1536 test_tick &&
1537 git commit -m "B"
1538 )
1539 }
1540
1541 test_expect_success '6d: We do not always want transitive renaming' '
1542 test_setup_6d &&
1543 (
1544 cd 6d &&
1545
1546 git checkout A^0 &&
1547
1548 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
1549
1550 git ls-files -s >out &&
1551 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1552 git ls-files -u >out &&
1553 test_line_count = 0 out &&
1554 git ls-files -o >out &&
1555 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1556
1557 git rev-parse >actual \
1558 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:z/d &&
1559 git rev-parse >expect \
1560 O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d &&
1561 test_cmp expect actual
1562 )
1563 '
1564
1565 # Testcase 6e, Add/add from one-side
1566 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
1567 # Commit A: z/{b,c} (no change)
1568 # Commit B: y/{b,c,d_1}, z/d_2
1569 # Expected: y/{b,c,d_1}, z/d_2
1570 # NOTE: Again, this seems obvious but just checking that the implementation
1571 # doesn't "accidentally detect a rename" and give us y/{b,c} +
1572 # add/add conflict on y/d_1 vs y/d_2.
1573
1574 test_setup_6e () {
1575 test_create_repo 6e &&
1576 (
1577 cd 6e &&
1578
1579 mkdir z &&
1580 echo b >z/b &&
1581 echo c >z/c &&
1582 git add z &&
1583 test_tick &&
1584 git commit -m "O" &&
1585
1586 git branch O &&
1587 git branch A &&
1588 git branch B &&
1589
1590 git checkout A &&
1591 test_tick &&
1592 git commit --allow-empty -m "A" &&
1593
1594 git checkout B &&
1595 git mv z y &&
1596 echo d1 > y/d &&
1597 mkdir z &&
1598 echo d2 > z/d &&
1599 git add y/d z/d &&
1600 test_tick &&
1601 git commit -m "B"
1602 )
1603 }
1604
1605 test_expect_success '6e: Add/add from one side' '
1606 test_setup_6e &&
1607 (
1608 cd 6e &&
1609
1610 git checkout A^0 &&
1611
1612 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
1613
1614 git ls-files -s >out &&
1615 test_line_count = 4 out &&
1616 git ls-files -u >out &&
1617 test_line_count = 0 out &&
1618 git ls-files -o >out &&
1619 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1620
1621 git rev-parse >actual \
1622 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:z/d &&
1623 git rev-parse >expect \
1624 O:z/b O:z/c B:y/d B:z/d &&
1625 test_cmp expect actual
1626 )
1627 '
1628
1629 ###########################################################################
1630 # Rules suggested by section 6:
1631 #
1632 # Only apply implicit directory renames to directories if the other
1633 # side of history is the one doing the renaming.
1634 ###########################################################################
1635
1636
1637 ###########################################################################
1638 # SECTION 7: More involved Edge/Corner cases
1639 #
1640 # The ruleset we have generated in the above sections seems to provide
1641 # well-defined merges. But can we find edge/corner cases that either (a)
1642 # are harder for users to understand, or (b) have a resolution that is
1643 # non-intuitive or suboptimal?
1644 #
1645 # The testcases in this section dive into cases that I've tried to craft in
1646 # a way to find some that might be surprising to users or difficult for
1647 # them to understand (the next section will look at non-intuitive or
1648 # suboptimal merge results). Some of the testcases are similar to ones
1649 # from past sections, but have been simplified to try to highlight error
1650 # messages using a "modified" path (due to the directory rename). Are
1651 # users okay with these?
1652 #
1653 # In my opinion, testcases that are difficult to understand from this
1654 # section is due to difficulty in the testcase rather than the directory
1655 # renaming (similar to how t6042 and t6036 have difficult resolutions due
1656 # to the problem setup itself being complex). And I don't think the
1657 # error messages are a problem.
1658 #
1659 # On the other hand, the testcases in section 8 worry me slightly more...
1660 ###########################################################################
1661
1662 # Testcase 7a, rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file
1663 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
1664 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
1665 # Commit B: w/b, x/c, z/d
1666 # Expected: y/d, CONFLICT(rename/rename for both z/b and z/c)
1667 # NOTE: There's a rename of z/ here, y/ has more renames, so z/d -> y/d.
1668
1669 test_setup_7a () {
1670 test_create_repo 7a &&
1671 (
1672 cd 7a &&
1673
1674 mkdir z &&
1675 echo b >z/b &&
1676 echo c >z/c &&
1677 git add z &&
1678 test_tick &&
1679 git commit -m "O" &&
1680
1681 git branch O &&
1682 git branch A &&
1683 git branch B &&
1684
1685 git checkout A &&
1686 git mv z y &&
1687 test_tick &&
1688 git commit -m "A" &&
1689
1690 git checkout B &&
1691 mkdir w &&
1692 mkdir x &&
1693 git mv z/b w/ &&
1694 git mv z/c x/ &&
1695 echo d > z/d &&
1696 git add z/d &&
1697 test_tick &&
1698 git commit -m "B"
1699 )
1700 }
1701
1702 test_expect_success '7a: rename-dir vs. rename-dir (NOT split evenly) PLUS add-other-file' '
1703 test_setup_7a &&
1704 (
1705 cd 7a &&
1706
1707 git checkout A^0 &&
1708
1709 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1710 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*z/b.*y/b.*w/b" out &&
1711 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*z/c.*y/c.*x/c" out &&
1712
1713 git ls-files -s >out &&
1714 test_line_count = 7 out &&
1715 git ls-files -u >out &&
1716 test_line_count = 6 out &&
1717 git ls-files -o >out &&
1718 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1719
1720 git rev-parse >actual \
1721 :1:z/b :2:y/b :3:w/b :1:z/c :2:y/c :3:x/c :0:y/d &&
1722 git rev-parse >expect \
1723 O:z/b O:z/b O:z/b O:z/c O:z/c O:z/c B:z/d &&
1724 test_cmp expect actual &&
1725
1726 git hash-object >actual \
1727 y/b w/b y/c x/c &&
1728 git rev-parse >expect \
1729 O:z/b O:z/b O:z/c O:z/c &&
1730 test_cmp expect actual
1731 )
1732 '
1733
1734 # Testcase 7b, rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename
1735 # (Related to testcase 1d)
1736 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1, w/d_2
1737 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d_2}, x/d_1
1738 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1}, w/d_2
1739 # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(rename/rename(2to1): x/d_1, w/d_2 -> y_d)
1740
1741 test_setup_7b () {
1742 test_create_repo 7b &&
1743 (
1744 cd 7b &&
1745
1746 mkdir z &&
1747 mkdir x &&
1748 mkdir w &&
1749 echo b >z/b &&
1750 echo c >z/c &&
1751 echo d1 > x/d &&
1752 echo d2 > w/d &&
1753 git add z x w &&
1754 test_tick &&
1755 git commit -m "O" &&
1756
1757 git branch O &&
1758 git branch A &&
1759 git branch B &&
1760
1761 git checkout A &&
1762 git mv z y &&
1763 git mv w/d y/ &&
1764 test_tick &&
1765 git commit -m "A" &&
1766
1767 git checkout B &&
1768 git mv x/d z/ &&
1769 rmdir x &&
1770 test_tick &&
1771 git commit -m "B"
1772 )
1773 }
1774
1775 test_expect_success '7b: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive rename' '
1776 test_setup_7b &&
1777 (
1778 cd 7b &&
1779
1780 git checkout A^0 &&
1781
1782 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1783 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (\(.*\)/\1)" out &&
1784
1785 git ls-files -s >out &&
1786 test_line_count = 4 out &&
1787 git ls-files -u >out &&
1788 test_line_count = 2 out &&
1789 git ls-files -o >out &&
1790 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1791
1792 git rev-parse >actual \
1793 :0:y/b :0:y/c :2:y/d :3:y/d &&
1794 git rev-parse >expect \
1795 O:z/b O:z/c O:w/d O:x/d &&
1796 test_cmp expect actual &&
1797
1798 # Test that the two-way merge in y/d is as expected
1799 git cat-file -p :2:y/d >expect &&
1800 git cat-file -p :3:y/d >other &&
1801 >empty &&
1802 test_must_fail git merge-file \
1803 -L "HEAD" \
1804 -L "" \
1805 -L "B^0" \
1806 expect empty other &&
1807 test_cmp expect y/d
1808 )
1809 '
1810
1811 # Testcase 7c, rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity
1812 # (Related to testcases 3b and 5c)
1813 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d
1814 # Commit A: y/{b,c}, w/d
1815 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d}
1816 # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(x/d -> w/d vs. y/d)
1817 # NOTE: z/ was renamed to y/ so we do want to report
1818 # neither CONFLICT(x/d -> w/d vs. z/d)
1819 # nor CONFLiCT x/d -> w/d vs. y/d vs. z/d)
1820
1821 test_setup_7c () {
1822 test_create_repo 7c &&
1823 (
1824 cd 7c &&
1825
1826 mkdir z &&
1827 echo b >z/b &&
1828 echo c >z/c &&
1829 mkdir x &&
1830 echo d >x/d &&
1831 git add z x &&
1832 test_tick &&
1833 git commit -m "O" &&
1834
1835 git branch O &&
1836 git branch A &&
1837 git branch B &&
1838
1839 git checkout A &&
1840 git mv z y &&
1841 git mv x w &&
1842 test_tick &&
1843 git commit -m "A" &&
1844
1845 git checkout B &&
1846 git mv x/d z/ &&
1847 rmdir x &&
1848 test_tick &&
1849 git commit -m "B"
1850 )
1851 }
1852
1853 test_expect_success '7c: rename/rename(1to...2or3); transitive rename may add complexity' '
1854 test_setup_7c &&
1855 (
1856 cd 7c &&
1857
1858 git checkout A^0 &&
1859
1860 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1861 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename).*x/d.*w/d.*y/d" out &&
1862
1863 git ls-files -s >out &&
1864 test_line_count = 5 out &&
1865 git ls-files -u >out &&
1866 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1867 git ls-files -o >out &&
1868 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1869
1870 git rev-parse >actual \
1871 :0:y/b :0:y/c :1:x/d :2:w/d :3:y/d &&
1872 git rev-parse >expect \
1873 O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d O:x/d O:x/d &&
1874 test_cmp expect actual
1875 )
1876 '
1877
1878 # Testcase 7d, transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?
1879 # (Related somewhat to testcases 5b and 8d)
1880 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d
1881 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
1882 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d}
1883 # Expected: y/{b,c}, CONFLICT(delete x/d vs rename to y/d)
1884 # NOTE: z->y so NOT CONFLICT(delete x/d vs rename to z/d)
1885
1886 test_setup_7d () {
1887 test_create_repo 7d &&
1888 (
1889 cd 7d &&
1890
1891 mkdir z &&
1892 echo b >z/b &&
1893 echo c >z/c &&
1894 mkdir x &&
1895 echo d >x/d &&
1896 git add z x &&
1897 test_tick &&
1898 git commit -m "O" &&
1899
1900 git branch O &&
1901 git branch A &&
1902 git branch B &&
1903
1904 git checkout A &&
1905 git mv z y &&
1906 git rm -rf x &&
1907 test_tick &&
1908 git commit -m "A" &&
1909
1910 git checkout B &&
1911 git mv x/d z/ &&
1912 rmdir x &&
1913 test_tick &&
1914 git commit -m "B"
1915 )
1916 }
1917
1918 test_expect_success '7d: transitive rename involved in rename/delete; how is it reported?' '
1919 test_setup_7d &&
1920 (
1921 cd 7d &&
1922
1923 git checkout A^0 &&
1924
1925 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
1926 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*x/d.*y/d" out &&
1927
1928 git ls-files -s >out &&
1929 test_line_count = 3 out &&
1930 git ls-files -u >out &&
1931 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1932 git ls-files -o >out &&
1933 test_line_count = 1 out &&
1934
1935 git rev-parse >actual \
1936 :0:y/b :0:y/c :3:y/d &&
1937 git rev-parse >expect \
1938 O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d &&
1939 test_cmp expect actual
1940 )
1941 '
1942
1943 # Testcase 7e, transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way
1944 # (Very similar to 'both rename source and destination involved in D/F conflict' from t6022-merge-rename.sh)
1945 # (Also related to testcases 9c and 9d)
1946 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1
1947 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d/g}, x/d/f
1948 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_1}
1949 # Expected: rename/delete(x/d_1->y/d_1 vs. None) + D/F conflict on y/d
1950 # y/{b,c,d/g}, y/d_1~B^0, x/d/f
1951
1952 # NOTE: The main path of interest here is d_1 and where it ends up, but
1953 # this is actually a case that has two potential directory renames
1954 # involved and D/F conflict(s), so it makes sense to walk through
1955 # each step.
1956 #
1957 # Commit A renames z/ -> y/. Thus everything that B adds to z/
1958 # should be instead moved to y/. This gives us the D/F conflict on
1959 # y/d because x/d_1 -> z/d_1 -> y/d_1 conflicts with y/d/g.
1960 #
1961 # Further, commit B renames x/ -> z/, thus everything A adds to x/
1962 # should instead be moved to z/...BUT we removed z/ and renamed it
1963 # to y/, so maybe everything should move not from x/ to z/, but
1964 # from x/ to z/ to y/. Doing so might make sense from the logic so
1965 # far, but note that commit A had both an x/ and a y/; it did the
1966 # renaming of z/ to y/ and created x/d/f and it clearly made these
1967 # things separate, so it doesn't make much sense to push these
1968 # together. Doing so is what I'd call a doubly transitive rename;
1969 # see testcases 9c and 9d for further discussion of this issue and
1970 # how it's resolved.
1971
1972 test_setup_7e () {
1973 test_create_repo 7e &&
1974 (
1975 cd 7e &&
1976
1977 mkdir z &&
1978 echo b >z/b &&
1979 echo c >z/c &&
1980 mkdir x &&
1981 echo d1 >x/d &&
1982 git add z x &&
1983 test_tick &&
1984 git commit -m "O" &&
1985
1986 git branch O &&
1987 git branch A &&
1988 git branch B &&
1989
1990 git checkout A &&
1991 git mv z y &&
1992 git rm x/d &&
1993 mkdir -p x/d &&
1994 mkdir -p y/d &&
1995 echo f >x/d/f &&
1996 echo g >y/d/g &&
1997 git add x/d/f y/d/g &&
1998 test_tick &&
1999 git commit -m "A" &&
2000
2001 git checkout B &&
2002 git mv x/d z/ &&
2003 rmdir x &&
2004 test_tick &&
2005 git commit -m "B"
2006 )
2007 }
2008
2009 test_expect_success '7e: transitive rename in rename/delete AND dirs in the way' '
2010 test_setup_7e &&
2011 (
2012 cd 7e &&
2013
2014 git checkout A^0 &&
2015
2016 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
2017 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*x/d.*y/d" out &&
2018
2019 git ls-files -s >out &&
2020 test_line_count = 5 out &&
2021 git ls-files -u >out &&
2022 test_line_count = 1 out &&
2023 git ls-files -o >out &&
2024 test_line_count = 2 out &&
2025
2026 git rev-parse >actual \
2027 :0:x/d/f :0:y/d/g :0:y/b :0:y/c :3:y/d &&
2028 git rev-parse >expect \
2029 A:x/d/f A:y/d/g O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d &&
2030 test_cmp expect actual &&
2031
2032 git hash-object y/d~B^0 >actual &&
2033 git rev-parse O:x/d >expect &&
2034 test_cmp expect actual
2035 )
2036 '
2037
2038 ###########################################################################
2039 # SECTION 8: Suboptimal merges
2040 #
2041 # As alluded to in the last section, the ruleset we have built up for
2042 # detecting directory renames unfortunately has some special cases where it
2043 # results in slightly suboptimal or non-intuitive behavior. This section
2044 # explores these cases.
2045 #
2046 # To be fair, we already had non-intuitive or suboptimal behavior for most
2047 # of these cases in git before introducing implicit directory rename
2048 # detection, but it'd be nice if there was a modified ruleset out there
2049 # that handled these cases a bit better.
2050 ###########################################################################
2051
2052 # Testcase 8a, Dual-directory rename, one into the others' way
2053 # Commit O. x/{a,b}, y/{c,d}
2054 # Commit A. x/{a,b,e}, y/{c,d,f}
2055 # Commit B. y/{a,b}, z/{c,d}
2056 #
2057 # Possible Resolutions:
2058 # w/o dir-rename detection: y/{a,b,f}, z/{c,d}, x/e
2059 # Currently expected: y/{a,b,e,f}, z/{c,d}
2060 # Optimal: y/{a,b,e}, z/{c,d,f}
2061 #
2062 # Note: Both x and y got renamed and it'd be nice to detect both, and we do
2063 # better with directory rename detection than git did without, but the
2064 # simple rule from section 5 prevents me from handling this as optimally as
2065 # we potentially could.
2066
2067 test_setup_8a () {
2068 test_create_repo 8a &&
2069 (
2070 cd 8a &&
2071
2072 mkdir x &&
2073 mkdir y &&
2074 echo a >x/a &&
2075 echo b >x/b &&
2076 echo c >y/c &&
2077 echo d >y/d &&
2078 git add x y &&
2079 test_tick &&
2080 git commit -m "O" &&
2081
2082 git branch O &&
2083 git branch A &&
2084 git branch B &&
2085
2086 git checkout A &&
2087 echo e >x/e &&
2088 echo f >y/f &&
2089 git add x/e y/f &&
2090 test_tick &&
2091 git commit -m "A" &&
2092
2093 git checkout B &&
2094 git mv y z &&
2095 git mv x y &&
2096 test_tick &&
2097 git commit -m "B"
2098 )
2099 }
2100
2101 test_expect_success '8a: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way' '
2102 test_setup_8a &&
2103 (
2104 cd 8a &&
2105
2106 git checkout A^0 &&
2107
2108 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
2109
2110 git ls-files -s >out &&
2111 test_line_count = 6 out &&
2112 git ls-files -u >out &&
2113 test_line_count = 0 out &&
2114 git ls-files -o >out &&
2115 test_line_count = 1 out &&
2116
2117 git rev-parse >actual \
2118 HEAD:y/a HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/e HEAD:y/f HEAD:z/c HEAD:z/d &&
2119 git rev-parse >expect \
2120 O:x/a O:x/b A:x/e A:y/f O:y/c O:y/d &&
2121 test_cmp expect actual
2122 )
2123 '
2124
2125 # Testcase 8b, Dual-directory rename, one into the others' way, with conflicting filenames
2126 # Commit O. x/{a_1,b_1}, y/{a_2,b_2}
2127 # Commit A. x/{a_1,b_1,e_1}, y/{a_2,b_2,e_2}
2128 # Commit B. y/{a_1,b_1}, z/{a_2,b_2}
2129 #
2130 # w/o dir-rename detection: y/{a_1,b_1,e_2}, z/{a_2,b_2}, x/e_1
2131 # Currently expected: <same>
2132 # Scary: y/{a_1,b_1}, z/{a_2,b_2}, CONFLICT(add/add, e_1 vs. e_2)
2133 # Optimal: y/{a_1,b_1,e_1}, z/{a_2,b_2,e_2}
2134 #
2135 # Note: Very similar to 8a, except instead of 'e' and 'f' in directories x and
2136 # y, both are named 'e'. Without directory rename detection, neither file
2137 # moves directories. Implement directory rename detection suboptimally, and
2138 # you get an add/add conflict, but both files were added in commit A, so this
2139 # is an add/add conflict where one side of history added both files --
2140 # something we can't represent in the index. Obviously, we'd prefer the last
2141 # resolution, but our previous rules are too coarse to allow it. Using both
2142 # the rules from section 4 and section 5 save us from the Scary resolution,
2143 # making us fall back to pre-directory-rename-detection behavior for both
2144 # e_1 and e_2.
2145
2146 test_setup_8b () {
2147 test_create_repo 8b &&
2148 (
2149 cd 8b &&
2150
2151 mkdir x &&
2152 mkdir y &&
2153 echo a1 >x/a &&
2154 echo b1 >x/b &&
2155 echo a2 >y/a &&
2156 echo b2 >y/b &&
2157 git add x y &&
2158 test_tick &&
2159 git commit -m "O" &&
2160
2161 git branch O &&
2162 git branch A &&
2163 git branch B &&
2164
2165 git checkout A &&
2166 echo e1 >x/e &&
2167 echo e2 >y/e &&
2168 git add x/e y/e &&
2169 test_tick &&
2170 git commit -m "A" &&
2171
2172 git checkout B &&
2173 git mv y z &&
2174 git mv x y &&
2175 test_tick &&
2176 git commit -m "B"
2177 )
2178 }
2179
2180 test_expect_success '8b: Dual-directory rename, one into the others way, with conflicting filenames' '
2181 test_setup_8b &&
2182 (
2183 cd 8b &&
2184
2185 git checkout A^0 &&
2186
2187 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
2188
2189 git ls-files -s >out &&
2190 test_line_count = 6 out &&
2191 git ls-files -u >out &&
2192 test_line_count = 0 out &&
2193 git ls-files -o >out &&
2194 test_line_count = 1 out &&
2195
2196 git rev-parse >actual \
2197 HEAD:y/a HEAD:y/b HEAD:z/a HEAD:z/b HEAD:x/e HEAD:y/e &&
2198 git rev-parse >expect \
2199 O:x/a O:x/b O:y/a O:y/b A:x/e A:y/e &&
2200 test_cmp expect actual
2201 )
2202 '
2203
2204 # Testcase 8c, modify/delete or rename+modify/delete?
2205 # (Related to testcases 5b, 8d, and 9h)
2206 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d}
2207 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
2208 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_modified,e}
2209 # Expected: y/{b,c,e}, CONFLICT(modify/delete: on z/d)
2210 #
2211 # Note: It could easily be argued that the correct resolution here is
2212 # y/{b,c,e}, CONFLICT(rename/delete: z/d -> y/d vs deleted)
2213 # and that the modified version of d should be present in y/ after
2214 # the merge, just marked as conflicted. Indeed, I previously did
2215 # argue that. But applying directory renames to the side of
2216 # history where a file is merely modified results in spurious
2217 # rename/rename(1to2) conflicts -- see testcase 9h. See also
2218 # notes in 8d.
2219
2220 test_setup_8c () {
2221 test_create_repo 8c &&
2222 (
2223 cd 8c &&
2224
2225 mkdir z &&
2226 echo b >z/b &&
2227 echo c >z/c &&
2228 test_seq 1 10 >z/d &&
2229 git add z &&
2230 test_tick &&
2231 git commit -m "O" &&
2232
2233 git branch O &&
2234 git branch A &&
2235 git branch B &&
2236
2237 git checkout A &&
2238 git rm z/d &&
2239 git mv z y &&
2240 test_tick &&
2241 git commit -m "A" &&
2242
2243 git checkout B &&
2244 echo 11 >z/d &&
2245 test_chmod +x z/d &&
2246 echo e >z/e &&
2247 git add z/d z/e &&
2248 test_tick &&
2249 git commit -m "B"
2250 )
2251 }
2252
2253 test_expect_success '8c: modify/delete or rename+modify/delete' '
2254 test_setup_8c &&
2255 (
2256 cd 8c &&
2257
2258 git checkout A^0 &&
2259
2260 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
2261 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (modify/delete).* z/d" out &&
2262
2263 git ls-files -s >out &&
2264 test_line_count = 5 out &&
2265 git ls-files -u >out &&
2266 test_line_count = 2 out &&
2267 git ls-files -o >out &&
2268 test_line_count = 1 out &&
2269
2270 git rev-parse >actual \
2271 :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/e :1:z/d :3:z/d &&
2272 git rev-parse >expect \
2273 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e O:z/d B:z/d &&
2274 test_cmp expect actual &&
2275
2276 test_must_fail git rev-parse :2:z/d &&
2277 git ls-files -s z/d | grep ^100755 &&
2278 test_path_is_file z/d &&
2279 test_path_is_missing y/d
2280 )
2281 '
2282
2283 # Testcase 8d, rename/delete...or not?
2284 # (Related to testcase 5b; these may appear slightly inconsistent to users;
2285 # Also related to testcases 7d and 7e)
2286 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d}
2287 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
2288 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e}
2289 # Expected: y/{b,c,e}
2290 #
2291 # Note: It would also be somewhat reasonable to resolve this as
2292 # y/{b,c,e}, CONFLICT(rename/delete: x/d -> y/d or deleted)
2293 #
2294 # In this case, I'm leaning towards: commit A was the one that deleted z/d
2295 # and it did the rename of z to y, so the two "conflicts" (rename vs.
2296 # delete) are both coming from commit A, which is illogical. Conflicts
2297 # during merging are supposed to be about opposite sides doing things
2298 # differently.
2299
2300 test_setup_8d () {
2301 test_create_repo 8d &&
2302 (
2303 cd 8d &&
2304
2305 mkdir z &&
2306 echo b >z/b &&
2307 echo c >z/c &&
2308 test_seq 1 10 >z/d &&
2309 git add z &&
2310 test_tick &&
2311 git commit -m "O" &&
2312
2313 git branch O &&
2314 git branch A &&
2315 git branch B &&
2316
2317 git checkout A &&
2318 git rm z/d &&
2319 git mv z y &&
2320 test_tick &&
2321 git commit -m "A" &&
2322
2323 git checkout B &&
2324 echo e >z/e &&
2325 git add z/e &&
2326 test_tick &&
2327 git commit -m "B"
2328 )
2329 }
2330
2331 test_expect_success '8d: rename/delete...or not?' '
2332 test_setup_8d &&
2333 (
2334 cd 8d &&
2335
2336 git checkout A^0 &&
2337
2338 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
2339
2340 git ls-files -s >out &&
2341 test_line_count = 3 out &&
2342
2343 git rev-parse >actual \
2344 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/e &&
2345 git rev-parse >expect \
2346 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e &&
2347 test_cmp expect actual
2348 )
2349 '
2350
2351 # Testcase 8e, Both sides rename, one side adds to original directory
2352 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
2353 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
2354 # Commit B: w/{b,c}, z/d
2355 #
2356 # Possible Resolutions:
2357 # if z not considered renamed: z/d, CONFLICT(z/b -> y/b vs. w/b),
2358 # CONFLICT(z/c -> y/c vs. w/c)
2359 # if z->y rename considered: y/d, CONFLICT(z/b -> y/b vs. w/b),
2360 # CONFLICT(z/c -> y/c vs. w/c)
2361 # Optimal: ??
2362 #
2363 # Notes: In commit A, directory z got renamed to y. In commit B, directory z
2364 # did NOT get renamed; the directory is still present; instead it is
2365 # considered to have just renamed a subset of paths in directory z
2366 # elsewhere. This is much like testcase 6b2 (where commit B moves all
2367 # the original paths out of z/ but opted to keep d within z/).
2368 #
2369 # It was not clear in the past what should be done with this testcase;
2370 # in fact, I noted that I "just picked one" previously. However,
2371 # following the new logic for testcase 6b2, we should take the rename
2372 # and move z/d to y/d.
2373 #
2374 # 6b1, 6b2, and this case are definitely somewhat fuzzy in terms of
2375 # whether they are optimal for end users, but (a) the default for
2376 # directory rename detection is to mark these all as conflicts
2377 # anyway, (b) it feels like this is less prone to higher order corner
2378 # case confusion, and (c) the current algorithm requires less global
2379 # knowledge (i.e. less coupling in the algorithm between renames done
2380 # on both sides) which thus means users are better able to predict
2381 # the behavior, and predict it without computing as many details.
2382
2383 test_setup_8e () {
2384 test_create_repo 8e &&
2385 (
2386 cd 8e &&
2387
2388 mkdir z &&
2389 echo b >z/b &&
2390 echo c >z/c &&
2391 git add z &&
2392 test_tick &&
2393 git commit -m "O" &&
2394
2395 git branch O &&
2396 git branch A &&
2397 git branch B &&
2398
2399 git checkout A &&
2400 git mv z y &&
2401 test_tick &&
2402 git commit -m "A" &&
2403
2404 git checkout B &&
2405 git mv z w &&
2406 mkdir z &&
2407 echo d >z/d &&
2408 git add z/d &&
2409 test_tick &&
2410 git commit -m "B"
2411 )
2412 }
2413
2414 test_expect_success '8e: Both sides rename, one side adds to original directory' '
2415 test_setup_8e &&
2416 (
2417 cd 8e &&
2418
2419 git checkout A^0 &&
2420
2421 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
2422 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT.*rename/rename.*z/c.*y/c.*w/c out &&
2423 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT.*rename/rename.*z/b.*y/b.*w/b out &&
2424
2425 git ls-files -s >out &&
2426 test_line_count = 7 out &&
2427 git ls-files -u >out &&
2428 test_line_count = 6 out &&
2429 git ls-files -o >out &&
2430 test_line_count = 2 out &&
2431
2432 git rev-parse >actual \
2433 :1:z/b :2:y/b :3:w/b :1:z/c :2:y/c :3:w/c :0:y/d &&
2434 git rev-parse >expect \
2435 O:z/b O:z/b O:z/b O:z/c O:z/c O:z/c B:z/d &&
2436 test_cmp expect actual &&
2437
2438 git hash-object >actual \
2439 y/b w/b y/c w/c &&
2440 git rev-parse >expect \
2441 O:z/b O:z/b O:z/c O:z/c &&
2442 test_cmp expect actual &&
2443
2444 test_path_is_missing z/b &&
2445 test_path_is_missing z/c
2446 )
2447 '
2448
2449 ###########################################################################
2450 # SECTION 9: Other testcases
2451 #
2452 # This section consists of miscellaneous testcases I thought of during
2453 # the implementation which round out the testing.
2454 ###########################################################################
2455
2456 # Testcase 9a, Inner renamed directory within outer renamed directory
2457 # (Related to testcase 1f)
2458 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d/{e,f,g}}
2459 # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/w/{e,f,g}
2460 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d/{e,f,g,h},i}
2461 # Expected: y/{b,c,i}, x/w/{e,f,g,h}
2462 # NOTE: The only reason this one is interesting is because when a directory
2463 # is split into multiple other directories, we determine by the weight
2464 # of which one had the most paths going to it. A naive implementation
2465 # of that could take the new file in commit B at z/i to x/w/i or x/i.
2466
2467 test_setup_9a () {
2468 test_create_repo 9a &&
2469 (
2470 cd 9a &&
2471
2472 mkdir -p z/d &&
2473 echo b >z/b &&
2474 echo c >z/c &&
2475 echo e >z/d/e &&
2476 echo f >z/d/f &&
2477 echo g >z/d/g &&
2478 git add z &&
2479 test_tick &&
2480 git commit -m "O" &&
2481
2482 git branch O &&
2483 git branch A &&
2484 git branch B &&
2485
2486 git checkout A &&
2487 mkdir x &&
2488 git mv z/d x/w &&
2489 git mv z y &&
2490 test_tick &&
2491 git commit -m "A" &&
2492
2493 git checkout B &&
2494 echo h >z/d/h &&
2495 echo i >z/i &&
2496 git add z &&
2497 test_tick &&
2498 git commit -m "B"
2499 )
2500 }
2501
2502 test_expect_success '9a: Inner renamed directory within outer renamed directory' '
2503 test_setup_9a &&
2504 (
2505 cd 9a &&
2506
2507 git checkout A^0 &&
2508
2509 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
2510
2511 git ls-files -s >out &&
2512 test_line_count = 7 out &&
2513 git ls-files -u >out &&
2514 test_line_count = 0 out &&
2515 git ls-files -o >out &&
2516 test_line_count = 1 out &&
2517
2518 git rev-parse >actual \
2519 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/i &&
2520 git rev-parse >expect \
2521 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/i &&
2522 test_cmp expect actual &&
2523
2524 git rev-parse >actual \
2525 HEAD:x/w/e HEAD:x/w/f HEAD:x/w/g HEAD:x/w/h &&
2526 git rev-parse >expect \
2527 O:z/d/e O:z/d/f O:z/d/g B:z/d/h &&
2528 test_cmp expect actual
2529 )
2530 '
2531
2532 # Testcase 9b, Transitive rename with content merge
2533 # (Related to testcase 1c)
2534 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1
2535 # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/d_2
2536 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_3}
2537 # Expected: y/{b,c,d_merged}
2538
2539 test_setup_9b () {
2540 test_create_repo 9b &&
2541 (
2542 cd 9b &&
2543
2544 mkdir z &&
2545 echo b >z/b &&
2546 echo c >z/c &&
2547 mkdir x &&
2548 test_seq 1 10 >x/d &&
2549 git add z x &&
2550 test_tick &&
2551 git commit -m "O" &&
2552
2553 git branch O &&
2554 git branch A &&
2555 git branch B &&
2556
2557 git checkout A &&
2558 git mv z y &&
2559 test_seq 1 11 >x/d &&
2560 git add x/d &&
2561 test_tick &&
2562 git commit -m "A" &&
2563
2564 git checkout B &&
2565 test_seq 0 10 >x/d &&
2566 git mv x/d z/d &&
2567 git add z/d &&
2568 test_tick &&
2569 git commit -m "B"
2570 )
2571 }
2572
2573 test_expect_success '9b: Transitive rename with content merge' '
2574 test_setup_9b &&
2575 (
2576 cd 9b &&
2577
2578 git checkout A^0 &&
2579
2580 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
2581
2582 git ls-files -s >out &&
2583 test_line_count = 3 out &&
2584
2585 test_seq 0 11 >expected &&
2586 test_cmp expected y/d &&
2587 git add expected &&
2588 git rev-parse >actual \
2589 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d &&
2590 git rev-parse >expect \
2591 O:z/b O:z/c :0:expected &&
2592 test_cmp expect actual &&
2593 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:x/d &&
2594 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:z/d &&
2595 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
2596
2597 test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/d) != $(git rev-parse O:x/d) &&
2598 test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/d) != $(git rev-parse A:x/d) &&
2599 test $(git rev-parse HEAD:y/d) != $(git rev-parse B:z/d)
2600 )
2601 '
2602
2603 # Testcase 9c, Doubly transitive rename?
2604 # (Related to testcase 1c, 7e, and 9d)
2605 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/{d,e}, w/f
2606 # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/{d,e,f,g}
2607 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e}, w/f
2608 # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e}, x/{f,g}
2609 #
2610 # NOTE: x/f and x/g may be slightly confusing here. The rename from w/f to
2611 # x/f is clear. Let's look beyond that. Here's the logic:
2612 # Commit B renamed x/ -> z/
2613 # Commit A renamed z/ -> y/
2614 # So, we could possibly further rename x/f to z/f to y/f, a doubly
2615 # transient rename. However, where does it end? We can chain these
2616 # indefinitely (see testcase 9d). What if there is a D/F conflict
2617 # at z/f/ or y/f/? Or just another file conflict at one of those
2618 # paths? In the case of an N-long chain of transient renamings,
2619 # where do we "abort" the rename at? Can the user make sense of
2620 # the resulting conflict and resolve it?
2621 #
2622 # To avoid this confusion I use the simple rule that if the other side
2623 # of history did a directory rename to a path that your side renamed
2624 # away, then ignore that particular rename from the other side of
2625 # history for any implicit directory renames.
2626
2627 test_setup_9c () {
2628 test_create_repo 9c &&
2629 (
2630 cd 9c &&
2631
2632 mkdir z &&
2633 echo b >z/b &&
2634 echo c >z/c &&
2635 mkdir x &&
2636 echo d >x/d &&
2637 echo e >x/e &&
2638 mkdir w &&
2639 echo f >w/f &&
2640 git add z x w &&
2641 test_tick &&
2642 git commit -m "O" &&
2643
2644 git branch O &&
2645 git branch A &&
2646 git branch B &&
2647
2648 git checkout A &&
2649 git mv z y &&
2650 git mv w/f x/ &&
2651 echo g >x/g &&
2652 git add x/g &&
2653 test_tick &&
2654 git commit -m "A" &&
2655
2656 git checkout B &&
2657 git mv x/d z/d &&
2658 git mv x/e z/e &&
2659 test_tick &&
2660 git commit -m "B"
2661 )
2662 }
2663
2664 test_expect_success '9c: Doubly transitive rename?' '
2665 test_setup_9c &&
2666 (
2667 cd 9c &&
2668
2669 git checkout A^0 &&
2670
2671 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
2672 test_i18ngrep "WARNING: Avoiding applying x -> z rename to x/f" out &&
2673
2674 git ls-files -s >out &&
2675 test_line_count = 6 out &&
2676 git ls-files -o >out &&
2677 test_line_count = 1 out &&
2678
2679 git rev-parse >actual \
2680 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:y/d HEAD:y/e HEAD:x/f HEAD:x/g &&
2681 git rev-parse >expect \
2682 O:z/b O:z/c O:x/d O:x/e O:w/f A:x/g &&
2683 test_cmp expect actual
2684 )
2685 '
2686
2687 # Testcase 9d, N-fold transitive rename?
2688 # (Related to testcase 9c...and 1c and 7e)
2689 # Commit O: z/a, y/b, x/c, w/d, v/e, u/f
2690 # Commit A: y/{a,b}, w/{c,d}, u/{e,f}
2691 # Commit B: z/{a,t}, x/{b,c}, v/{d,e}, u/f
2692 # Expected: <see NOTE first>
2693 #
2694 # NOTE: z/ -> y/ (in commit A)
2695 # y/ -> x/ (in commit B)
2696 # x/ -> w/ (in commit A)
2697 # w/ -> v/ (in commit B)
2698 # v/ -> u/ (in commit A)
2699 # So, if we add a file to z, say z/t, where should it end up? In u?
2700 # What if there's another file or directory named 't' in one of the
2701 # intervening directories and/or in u itself? Also, shouldn't the
2702 # same logic that places 't' in u/ also move ALL other files to u/?
2703 # What if there are file or directory conflicts in any of them? If
2704 # we attempted to do N-way (N-fold? N-ary? N-uple?) transitive renames
2705 # like this, would the user have any hope of understanding any
2706 # conflicts or how their working tree ended up? I think not, so I'm
2707 # ruling out N-ary transitive renames for N>1.
2708 #
2709 # Therefore our expected result is:
2710 # z/t, y/a, x/b, w/c, u/d, u/e, u/f
2711 # The reason that v/d DOES get transitively renamed to u/d is that u/ isn't
2712 # renamed somewhere. A slightly sub-optimal result, but it uses fairly
2713 # simple rules that are consistent with what we need for all the other
2714 # testcases and simplifies things for the user.
2715
2716 test_setup_9d () {
2717 test_create_repo 9d &&
2718 (
2719 cd 9d &&
2720
2721 mkdir z y x w v u &&
2722 echo a >z/a &&
2723 echo b >y/b &&
2724 echo c >x/c &&
2725 echo d >w/d &&
2726 echo e >v/e &&
2727 echo f >u/f &&
2728 git add z y x w v u &&
2729 test_tick &&
2730 git commit -m "O" &&
2731
2732 git branch O &&
2733 git branch A &&
2734 git branch B &&
2735
2736 git checkout A &&
2737 git mv z/a y/ &&
2738 git mv x/c w/ &&
2739 git mv v/e u/ &&
2740 test_tick &&
2741 git commit -m "A" &&
2742
2743 git checkout B &&
2744 echo t >z/t &&
2745 git mv y/b x/ &&
2746 git mv w/d v/ &&
2747 git add z/t &&
2748 test_tick &&
2749 git commit -m "B"
2750 )
2751 }
2752
2753 test_expect_success '9d: N-way transitive rename?' '
2754 test_setup_9d &&
2755 (
2756 cd 9d &&
2757
2758 git checkout A^0 &&
2759
2760 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
2761 test_i18ngrep "WARNING: Avoiding applying z -> y rename to z/t" out &&
2762 test_i18ngrep "WARNING: Avoiding applying y -> x rename to y/a" out &&
2763 test_i18ngrep "WARNING: Avoiding applying x -> w rename to x/b" out &&
2764 test_i18ngrep "WARNING: Avoiding applying w -> v rename to w/c" out &&
2765
2766 git ls-files -s >out &&
2767 test_line_count = 7 out &&
2768 git ls-files -o >out &&
2769 test_line_count = 1 out &&
2770
2771 git rev-parse >actual \
2772 HEAD:z/t \
2773 HEAD:y/a HEAD:x/b HEAD:w/c \
2774 HEAD:u/d HEAD:u/e HEAD:u/f &&
2775 git rev-parse >expect \
2776 B:z/t \
2777 O:z/a O:y/b O:x/c \
2778 O:w/d O:v/e A:u/f &&
2779 test_cmp expect actual
2780 )
2781 '
2782
2783 # Testcase 9e, N-to-1 whammo
2784 # (Related to testcase 9c...and 1c and 7e)
2785 # Commit O: dir1/{a,b}, dir2/{d,e}, dir3/{g,h}, dirN/{j,k}
2786 # Commit A: dir1/{a,b,c,yo}, dir2/{d,e,f,yo}, dir3/{g,h,i,yo}, dirN/{j,k,l,yo}
2787 # Commit B: combined/{a,b,d,e,g,h,j,k}
2788 # Expected: combined/{a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l}, CONFLICT(Nto1) warnings,
2789 # dir1/yo, dir2/yo, dir3/yo, dirN/yo
2790
2791 test_setup_9e () {
2792 test_create_repo 9e &&
2793 (
2794 cd 9e &&
2795
2796 mkdir dir1 dir2 dir3 dirN &&
2797 echo a >dir1/a &&
2798 echo b >dir1/b &&
2799 echo d >dir2/d &&
2800 echo e >dir2/e &&
2801 echo g >dir3/g &&
2802 echo h >dir3/h &&
2803 echo j >dirN/j &&
2804 echo k >dirN/k &&
2805 git add dir* &&
2806 test_tick &&
2807 git commit -m "O" &&
2808
2809 git branch O &&
2810 git branch A &&
2811 git branch B &&
2812
2813 git checkout A &&
2814 echo c >dir1/c &&
2815 echo yo >dir1/yo &&
2816 echo f >dir2/f &&
2817 echo yo >dir2/yo &&
2818 echo i >dir3/i &&
2819 echo yo >dir3/yo &&
2820 echo l >dirN/l &&
2821 echo yo >dirN/yo &&
2822 git add dir* &&
2823 test_tick &&
2824 git commit -m "A" &&
2825
2826 git checkout B &&
2827 git mv dir1 combined &&
2828 git mv dir2/* combined/ &&
2829 git mv dir3/* combined/ &&
2830 git mv dirN/* combined/ &&
2831 test_tick &&
2832 git commit -m "B"
2833 )
2834 }
2835
2836 test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT '9e: N-to-1 whammo' '
2837 test_setup_9e &&
2838 (
2839 cd 9e &&
2840
2841 git checkout A^0 &&
2842
2843 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out &&
2844 grep "CONFLICT (implicit dir rename): Cannot map more than one path to combined/yo" out >error_line &&
2845 grep -q dir1/yo error_line &&
2846 grep -q dir2/yo error_line &&
2847 grep -q dir3/yo error_line &&
2848 grep -q dirN/yo error_line &&
2849
2850 git ls-files -s >out &&
2851 test_line_count = 16 out &&
2852 git ls-files -u >out &&
2853 test_line_count = 0 out &&
2854 git ls-files -o >out &&
2855 test_line_count = 2 out &&
2856
2857 git rev-parse >actual \
2858 :0:combined/a :0:combined/b :0:combined/c \
2859 :0:combined/d :0:combined/e :0:combined/f \
2860 :0:combined/g :0:combined/h :0:combined/i \
2861 :0:combined/j :0:combined/k :0:combined/l &&
2862 git rev-parse >expect \
2863 O:dir1/a O:dir1/b A:dir1/c \
2864 O:dir2/d O:dir2/e A:dir2/f \
2865 O:dir3/g O:dir3/h A:dir3/i \
2866 O:dirN/j O:dirN/k A:dirN/l &&
2867 test_cmp expect actual &&
2868
2869 git rev-parse >actual \
2870 :0:dir1/yo :0:dir2/yo :0:dir3/yo :0:dirN/yo &&
2871 git rev-parse >expect \
2872 A:dir1/yo A:dir2/yo A:dir3/yo A:dirN/yo &&
2873 test_cmp expect actual
2874 )
2875 '
2876
2877 # Testcase 9f, Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs
2878 # (Related to testcases 1e & 9g)
2879 # Commit O: goal/{a,b}/$more_files
2880 # Commit A: priority/{a,b}/$more_files
2881 # Commit B: goal/{a,b}/$more_files, goal/c
2882 # Expected: priority/{a,b}/$more_files, priority/c
2883
2884 test_setup_9f () {
2885 test_create_repo 9f &&
2886 (
2887 cd 9f &&
2888
2889 mkdir -p goal/a &&
2890 mkdir -p goal/b &&
2891 echo foo >goal/a/foo &&
2892 echo bar >goal/b/bar &&
2893 echo baz >goal/b/baz &&
2894 git add goal &&
2895 test_tick &&
2896 git commit -m "O" &&
2897
2898 git branch O &&
2899 git branch A &&
2900 git branch B &&
2901
2902 git checkout A &&
2903 git mv goal/ priority &&
2904 test_tick &&
2905 git commit -m "A" &&
2906
2907 git checkout B &&
2908 echo c >goal/c &&
2909 git add goal/c &&
2910 test_tick &&
2911 git commit -m "B"
2912 )
2913 }
2914
2915 test_expect_success '9f: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs' '
2916 test_setup_9f &&
2917 (
2918 cd 9f &&
2919
2920 git checkout A^0 &&
2921
2922 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
2923
2924 git ls-files -s >out &&
2925 test_line_count = 4 out &&
2926
2927 git rev-parse >actual \
2928 HEAD:priority/a/foo \
2929 HEAD:priority/b/bar \
2930 HEAD:priority/b/baz \
2931 HEAD:priority/c &&
2932 git rev-parse >expect \
2933 O:goal/a/foo \
2934 O:goal/b/bar \
2935 O:goal/b/baz \
2936 B:goal/c &&
2937 test_cmp expect actual &&
2938 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:goal/c
2939 )
2940 '
2941
2942 # Testcase 9g, Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs, immediate subdirs renamed
2943 # (Related to testcases 1e & 9f)
2944 # Commit O: goal/{a,b}/$more_files
2945 # Commit A: priority/{alpha,bravo}/$more_files
2946 # Commit B: goal/{a,b}/$more_files, goal/c
2947 # Expected: priority/{alpha,bravo}/$more_files, priority/c
2948 # We currently fail this test because the directory renames we detect are
2949 # goal/a/ -> priority/alpha/
2950 # goal/b/ -> priority/bravo/
2951 # We do not detect
2952 # goal/ -> priority/
2953 # because of no files found within goal/, and the fact that "a" != "alpha"
2954 # and "b" != "bravo". But I'm not sure it's really a failure given that
2955 # viewpoint...
2956
2957 test_setup_9g () {
2958 test_create_repo 9g &&
2959 (
2960 cd 9g &&
2961
2962 mkdir -p goal/a &&
2963 mkdir -p goal/b &&
2964 echo foo >goal/a/foo &&
2965 echo bar >goal/b/bar &&
2966 echo baz >goal/b/baz &&
2967 git add goal &&
2968 test_tick &&
2969 git commit -m "O" &&
2970
2971 git branch O &&
2972 git branch A &&
2973 git branch B &&
2974
2975 git checkout A &&
2976 mkdir priority &&
2977 git mv goal/a/ priority/alpha &&
2978 git mv goal/b/ priority/beta &&
2979 rmdir goal/ &&
2980 test_tick &&
2981 git commit -m "A" &&
2982
2983 git checkout B &&
2984 echo c >goal/c &&
2985 git add goal/c &&
2986 test_tick &&
2987 git commit -m "B"
2988 )
2989 }
2990
2991 test_expect_failure '9g: Renamed directory that only contained immediate subdirs, immediate subdirs renamed' '
2992 test_setup_9g &&
2993 (
2994 cd 9g &&
2995
2996 git checkout A^0 &&
2997
2998 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
2999
3000 git ls-files -s >out &&
3001 test_line_count = 4 out &&
3002
3003 git rev-parse >actual \
3004 HEAD:priority/alpha/foo \
3005 HEAD:priority/beta/bar \
3006 HEAD:priority/beta/baz \
3007 HEAD:priority/c &&
3008 git rev-parse >expect \
3009 O:goal/a/foo \
3010 O:goal/b/bar \
3011 O:goal/b/baz \
3012 B:goal/c &&
3013 test_cmp expect actual &&
3014 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:goal/c
3015 )
3016 '
3017
3018 # Testcase 9h, Avoid implicit rename if involved as source on other side
3019 # (Extremely closely related to testcase 3a)
3020 # Commit O: z/{b,c,d_1}
3021 # Commit A: z/{b,c,d_2}
3022 # Commit B: y/{b,c}, x/d_1
3023 # Expected: y/{b,c}, x/d_2
3024 # NOTE: If we applied the z/ -> y/ rename to z/d, then we'd end up with
3025 # a rename/rename(1to2) conflict (z/d -> y/d vs. x/d)
3026 test_setup_9h () {
3027 test_create_repo 9h &&
3028 (
3029 cd 9h &&
3030
3031 mkdir z &&
3032 echo b >z/b &&
3033 echo c >z/c &&
3034 printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\nd\n" >z/d &&
3035 git add z &&
3036 test_tick &&
3037 git commit -m "O" &&
3038
3039 git branch O &&
3040 git branch A &&
3041 git branch B &&
3042
3043 git checkout A &&
3044 test_tick &&
3045 echo more >>z/d &&
3046 git add z/d &&
3047 git commit -m "A" &&
3048
3049 git checkout B &&
3050 mkdir y &&
3051 mkdir x &&
3052 git mv z/b y/ &&
3053 git mv z/c y/ &&
3054 git mv z/d x/ &&
3055 rmdir z &&
3056 test_tick &&
3057 git commit -m "B"
3058 )
3059 }
3060
3061 test_expect_success '9h: Avoid dir rename on merely modified path' '
3062 test_setup_9h &&
3063 (
3064 cd 9h &&
3065
3066 git checkout A^0 &&
3067
3068 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
3069
3070 git ls-files -s >out &&
3071 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3072
3073 git rev-parse >actual \
3074 HEAD:y/b HEAD:y/c HEAD:x/d &&
3075 git rev-parse >expect \
3076 O:z/b O:z/c A:z/d &&
3077 test_cmp expect actual
3078 )
3079 '
3080
3081 ###########################################################################
3082 # Rules suggested by section 9:
3083 #
3084 # If the other side of history did a directory rename to a path that your
3085 # side renamed away, then ignore that particular rename from the other
3086 # side of history for any implicit directory renames.
3087 ###########################################################################
3088
3089 ###########################################################################
3090 # SECTION 10: Handling untracked files
3091 #
3092 # unpack_trees(), upon which the recursive merge algorithm is based, aborts
3093 # the operation if untracked or dirty files would be deleted or overwritten
3094 # by the merge. Unfortunately, unpack_trees() does not understand renames,
3095 # and if it doesn't abort, then it muddies up the working directory before
3096 # we even get to the point of detecting renames, so we need some special
3097 # handling, at least in the case of directory renames.
3098 ###########################################################################
3099
3100 # Testcase 10a, Overwrite untracked: normal rename/delete
3101 # Commit O: z/{b,c_1}
3102 # Commit A: z/b + untracked z/c + untracked z/d
3103 # Commit B: z/{b,d_1}
3104 # Expected: Aborted Merge +
3105 # ERROR_MSG(untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge)
3106
3107 test_setup_10a () {
3108 test_create_repo 10a &&
3109 (
3110 cd 10a &&
3111
3112 mkdir z &&
3113 echo b >z/b &&
3114 echo c >z/c &&
3115 git add z &&
3116 test_tick &&
3117 git commit -m "O" &&
3118
3119 git branch O &&
3120 git branch A &&
3121 git branch B &&
3122
3123 git checkout A &&
3124 git rm z/c &&
3125 test_tick &&
3126 git commit -m "A" &&
3127
3128 git checkout B &&
3129 git mv z/c z/d &&
3130 test_tick &&
3131 git commit -m "B"
3132 )
3133 }
3134
3135 test_expect_success '10a: Overwrite untracked with normal rename/delete' '
3136 test_setup_10a &&
3137 (
3138 cd 10a &&
3139
3140 git checkout A^0 &&
3141 echo very >z/c &&
3142 echo important >z/d &&
3143
3144 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3145 test_i18ngrep "The following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge" err &&
3146
3147 git ls-files -s >out &&
3148 test_line_count = 1 out &&
3149 git ls-files -o >out &&
3150 test_line_count = 4 out &&
3151
3152 echo very >expect &&
3153 test_cmp expect z/c &&
3154
3155 echo important >expect &&
3156 test_cmp expect z/d &&
3157
3158 git rev-parse HEAD:z/b >actual &&
3159 git rev-parse O:z/b >expect &&
3160 test_cmp expect actual
3161 )
3162 '
3163
3164 # Testcase 10b, Overwrite untracked: dir rename + delete
3165 # Commit O: z/{b,c_1}
3166 # Commit A: y/b + untracked y/{c,d,e}
3167 # Commit B: z/{b,d_1,e}
3168 # Expected: Failed Merge; y/b + untracked y/c + untracked y/d on disk +
3169 # z/c_1 -> z/d_1 rename recorded at stage 3 for y/d +
3170 # ERROR_MSG(refusing to lose untracked file at 'y/d')
3171
3172 test_setup_10b () {
3173 test_create_repo 10b &&
3174 (
3175 cd 10b &&
3176
3177 mkdir z &&
3178 echo b >z/b &&
3179 echo c >z/c &&
3180 git add z &&
3181 test_tick &&
3182 git commit -m "O" &&
3183
3184 git branch O &&
3185 git branch A &&
3186 git branch B &&
3187
3188 git checkout A &&
3189 git rm z/c &&
3190 git mv z/ y/ &&
3191 test_tick &&
3192 git commit -m "A" &&
3193
3194 git checkout B &&
3195 git mv z/c z/d &&
3196 echo e >z/e &&
3197 git add z/e &&
3198 test_tick &&
3199 git commit -m "B"
3200 )
3201 }
3202
3203 test_expect_success '10b: Overwrite untracked with dir rename + delete' '
3204 test_setup_10b &&
3205 (
3206 cd 10b &&
3207
3208 git checkout A^0 &&
3209 echo very >y/c &&
3210 echo important >y/d &&
3211 echo contents >y/e &&
3212
3213 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3214 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/delete).*Version B\^0 of y/d left in tree at y/d~B\^0" out &&
3215 test_i18ngrep "Error: Refusing to lose untracked file at y/e; writing to y/e~B\^0 instead" out &&
3216
3217 git ls-files -s >out &&
3218 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3219 git ls-files -u >out &&
3220 test_line_count = 2 out &&
3221 git ls-files -o >out &&
3222 test_line_count = 5 out &&
3223
3224 git rev-parse >actual \
3225 :0:y/b :3:y/d :3:y/e &&
3226 git rev-parse >expect \
3227 O:z/b O:z/c B:z/e &&
3228 test_cmp expect actual &&
3229
3230 echo very >expect &&
3231 test_cmp expect y/c &&
3232
3233 echo important >expect &&
3234 test_cmp expect y/d &&
3235
3236 echo contents >expect &&
3237 test_cmp expect y/e
3238 )
3239 '
3240
3241 # Testcase 10c, Overwrite untracked: dir rename/rename(1to2)
3242 # Commit O: z/{a,b}, x/{c,d}
3243 # Commit A: y/{a,b}, w/c, x/d + different untracked y/c
3244 # Commit B: z/{a,b,c}, x/d
3245 # Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b} + x/d + untracked y/c +
3246 # CONFLICT(rename/rename) x/c -> w/c vs y/c +
3247 # y/c~B^0 +
3248 # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose untracked file at y/c)
3249
3250 test_setup_10c () {
3251 test_create_repo 10c_$1 &&
3252 (
3253 cd 10c_$1 &&
3254
3255 mkdir z x &&
3256 echo a >z/a &&
3257 echo b >z/b &&
3258 echo c >x/c &&
3259 echo d >x/d &&
3260 git add z x &&
3261 test_tick &&
3262 git commit -m "O" &&
3263
3264 git branch O &&
3265 git branch A &&
3266 git branch B &&
3267
3268 git checkout A &&
3269 mkdir w &&
3270 git mv x/c w/c &&
3271 git mv z/ y/ &&
3272 test_tick &&
3273 git commit -m "A" &&
3274
3275 git checkout B &&
3276 git mv x/c z/ &&
3277 test_tick &&
3278 git commit -m "B"
3279 )
3280 }
3281
3282 test_expect_success '10c1: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2)' '
3283 test_setup_10c 1 &&
3284 (
3285 cd 10c_1 &&
3286
3287 git checkout A^0 &&
3288 echo important >y/c &&
3289
3290 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3291 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
3292 test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose untracked file at y/c; adding as y/c~B\^0 instead" out &&
3293
3294 git ls-files -s >out &&
3295 test_line_count = 6 out &&
3296 git ls-files -u >out &&
3297 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3298 git ls-files -o >out &&
3299 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3300
3301 git rev-parse >actual \
3302 :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:x/d :1:x/c :2:w/c :3:y/c &&
3303 git rev-parse >expect \
3304 O:z/a O:z/b O:x/d O:x/c O:x/c O:x/c &&
3305 test_cmp expect actual &&
3306
3307 git hash-object y/c~B^0 >actual &&
3308 git rev-parse O:x/c >expect &&
3309 test_cmp expect actual &&
3310
3311 echo important >expect &&
3312 test_cmp expect y/c
3313 )
3314 '
3315
3316 test_expect_success '10c2: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2), other direction' '
3317 test_setup_10c 2 &&
3318 (
3319 cd 10c_2 &&
3320
3321 git reset --hard &&
3322 git clean -fdqx &&
3323
3324 git checkout B^0 &&
3325 mkdir y &&
3326 echo important >y/c &&
3327
3328 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive A^0 >out 2>err &&
3329 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
3330 test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose untracked file at y/c; adding as y/c~HEAD instead" out &&
3331
3332 git ls-files -s >out &&
3333 test_line_count = 6 out &&
3334 git ls-files -u >out &&
3335 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3336 git ls-files -o >out &&
3337 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3338
3339 git rev-parse >actual \
3340 :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:x/d :1:x/c :3:w/c :2:y/c &&
3341 git rev-parse >expect \
3342 O:z/a O:z/b O:x/d O:x/c O:x/c O:x/c &&
3343 test_cmp expect actual &&
3344
3345 git hash-object y/c~HEAD >actual &&
3346 git rev-parse O:x/c >expect &&
3347 test_cmp expect actual &&
3348
3349 echo important >expect &&
3350 test_cmp expect y/c
3351 )
3352 '
3353
3354 # Testcase 10d, Delete untracked w/ dir rename/rename(2to1)
3355 # Commit O: z/{a,b,c_1}, x/{d,e,f_2}
3356 # Commit A: y/{a,b}, x/{d,e,f_2,wham_1} + untracked y/wham
3357 # Commit B: z/{a,b,c_1,wham_2}, y/{d,e}
3358 # Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b,d,e} + untracked y/{wham,wham~merged}+
3359 # CONFLICT(rename/rename) z/c_1 vs x/f_2 -> y/wham
3360 # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose untracked file at y/wham)
3361
3362 test_setup_10d () {
3363 test_create_repo 10d &&
3364 (
3365 cd 10d &&
3366
3367 mkdir z x &&
3368 echo a >z/a &&
3369 echo b >z/b &&
3370 echo c >z/c &&
3371 echo d >x/d &&
3372 echo e >x/e &&
3373 echo f >x/f &&
3374 git add z x &&
3375 test_tick &&
3376 git commit -m "O" &&
3377
3378 git branch O &&
3379 git branch A &&
3380 git branch B &&
3381
3382 git checkout A &&
3383 git mv z/c x/wham &&
3384 git mv z/ y/ &&
3385 test_tick &&
3386 git commit -m "A" &&
3387
3388 git checkout B &&
3389 git mv x/f z/wham &&
3390 git mv x/ y/ &&
3391 test_tick &&
3392 git commit -m "B"
3393 )
3394 }
3395
3396 test_expect_success '10d: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
3397 test_setup_10d &&
3398 (
3399 cd 10d &&
3400
3401 git checkout A^0 &&
3402 echo important >y/wham &&
3403
3404 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3405 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
3406 test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose untracked file at y/wham" out &&
3407
3408 git ls-files -s >out &&
3409 test_line_count = 6 out &&
3410 git ls-files -u >out &&
3411 test_line_count = 2 out &&
3412 git ls-files -o >out &&
3413 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3414
3415 git rev-parse >actual \
3416 :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:y/d :0:y/e :2:y/wham :3:y/wham &&
3417 git rev-parse >expect \
3418 O:z/a O:z/b O:x/d O:x/e O:z/c O:x/f &&
3419 test_cmp expect actual &&
3420
3421 test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/wham &&
3422
3423 echo important >expect &&
3424 test_cmp expect y/wham &&
3425
3426 # Test that the two-way merge in y/wham~merged is as expected
3427 git cat-file -p :2:y/wham >expect &&
3428 git cat-file -p :3:y/wham >other &&
3429 >empty &&
3430 test_must_fail git merge-file \
3431 -L "HEAD" \
3432 -L "" \
3433 -L "B^0" \
3434 expect empty other &&
3435 test_cmp expect y/wham~merged
3436 )
3437 '
3438
3439 # Testcase 10e, Does git complain about untracked file that's not in the way?
3440 # Commit O: z/{a,b}
3441 # Commit A: y/{a,b} + untracked z/c
3442 # Commit B: z/{a,b,c}
3443 # Expected: y/{a,b,c} + untracked z/c
3444
3445 test_setup_10e () {
3446 test_create_repo 10e &&
3447 (
3448 cd 10e &&
3449
3450 mkdir z &&
3451 echo a >z/a &&
3452 echo b >z/b &&
3453 git add z &&
3454 test_tick &&
3455 git commit -m "O" &&
3456
3457 git branch O &&
3458 git branch A &&
3459 git branch B &&
3460
3461 git checkout A &&
3462 git mv z/ y/ &&
3463 test_tick &&
3464 git commit -m "A" &&
3465
3466 git checkout B &&
3467 echo c >z/c &&
3468 git add z/c &&
3469 test_tick &&
3470 git commit -m "B"
3471 )
3472 }
3473
3474 test_expect_failure '10e: Does git complain about untracked file that is not really in the way?' '
3475 test_setup_10e &&
3476 (
3477 cd 10e &&
3478
3479 git checkout A^0 &&
3480 mkdir z &&
3481 echo random >z/c &&
3482
3483 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3484 test_i18ngrep ! "following untracked working tree files would be overwritten by merge" err &&
3485
3486 git ls-files -s >out &&
3487 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3488 git ls-files -u >out &&
3489 test_line_count = 0 out &&
3490 git ls-files -o >out &&
3491 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3492
3493 git rev-parse >actual \
3494 :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:y/c &&
3495 git rev-parse >expect \
3496 O:z/a O:z/b B:z/c &&
3497 test_cmp expect actual &&
3498
3499 echo random >expect &&
3500 test_cmp expect z/c
3501 )
3502 '
3503
3504 ###########################################################################
3505 # SECTION 11: Handling dirty (not up-to-date) files
3506 #
3507 # unpack_trees(), upon which the recursive merge algorithm is based, aborts
3508 # the operation if untracked or dirty files would be deleted or overwritten
3509 # by the merge. Unfortunately, unpack_trees() does not understand renames,
3510 # and if it doesn't abort, then it muddies up the working directory before
3511 # we even get to the point of detecting renames, so we need some special
3512 # handling. This was true even of normal renames, but there are additional
3513 # codepaths that need special handling with directory renames. Add
3514 # testcases for both renamed-by-directory-rename-detection and standard
3515 # rename cases.
3516 ###########################################################################
3517
3518 # Testcase 11a, Avoid losing dirty contents with simple rename
3519 # Commit O: z/{a,b_v1},
3520 # Commit A: z/{a,c_v1}, and z/c_v1 has uncommitted mods
3521 # Commit B: z/{a,b_v2}
3522 # Expected: ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c) +
3523 # z/a, staged version of z/c has sha1sum matching B:z/b_v2,
3524 # z/c~HEAD with contents of B:z/b_v2,
3525 # z/c with uncommitted mods on top of A:z/c_v1
3526
3527 test_setup_11a () {
3528 test_create_repo 11a &&
3529 (
3530 cd 11a &&
3531
3532 mkdir z &&
3533 echo a >z/a &&
3534 test_seq 1 10 >z/b &&
3535 git add z &&
3536 test_tick &&
3537 git commit -m "O" &&
3538
3539 git branch O &&
3540 git branch A &&
3541 git branch B &&
3542
3543 git checkout A &&
3544 git mv z/b z/c &&
3545 test_tick &&
3546 git commit -m "A" &&
3547
3548 git checkout B &&
3549 echo 11 >>z/b &&
3550 git add z/b &&
3551 test_tick &&
3552 git commit -m "B"
3553 )
3554 }
3555
3556 test_expect_success '11a: Avoid losing dirty contents with simple rename' '
3557 test_setup_11a &&
3558 (
3559 cd 11a &&
3560
3561 git checkout A^0 &&
3562 echo stuff >>z/c &&
3563
3564 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3565 test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c" out &&
3566
3567 test_seq 1 10 >expected &&
3568 echo stuff >>expected &&
3569 test_cmp expected z/c &&
3570
3571 git ls-files -s >out &&
3572 test_line_count = 2 out &&
3573 git ls-files -u >out &&
3574 test_line_count = 1 out &&
3575 git ls-files -o >out &&
3576 test_line_count = 4 out &&
3577
3578 git rev-parse >actual \
3579 :0:z/a :2:z/c &&
3580 git rev-parse >expect \
3581 O:z/a B:z/b &&
3582 test_cmp expect actual &&
3583
3584 git hash-object z/c~HEAD >actual &&
3585 git rev-parse B:z/b >expect &&
3586 test_cmp expect actual
3587 )
3588 '
3589
3590 # Testcase 11b, Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory rename
3591 # Commit O: z/a, x/{b,c_v1}
3592 # Commit A: z/{a,c_v1}, x/b, and z/c_v1 has uncommitted mods
3593 # Commit B: y/a, x/{b,c_v2}
3594 # Expected: y/{a,c_v2}, x/b, z/c_v1 with uncommitted mods untracked,
3595 # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c)
3596
3597
3598 test_setup_11b () {
3599 test_create_repo 11b &&
3600 (
3601 cd 11b &&
3602
3603 mkdir z x &&
3604 echo a >z/a &&
3605 echo b >x/b &&
3606 test_seq 1 10 >x/c &&
3607 git add z x &&
3608 test_tick &&
3609 git commit -m "O" &&
3610
3611 git branch O &&
3612 git branch A &&
3613 git branch B &&
3614
3615 git checkout A &&
3616 git mv x/c z/c &&
3617 test_tick &&
3618 git commit -m "A" &&
3619
3620 git checkout B &&
3621 git mv z y &&
3622 echo 11 >>x/c &&
3623 git add x/c &&
3624 test_tick &&
3625 git commit -m "B"
3626 )
3627 }
3628
3629 test_expect_success '11b: Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory rename' '
3630 test_setup_11b &&
3631 (
3632 cd 11b &&
3633
3634 git checkout A^0 &&
3635 echo stuff >>z/c &&
3636
3637 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3638 test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c" out &&
3639
3640 grep -q stuff z/c &&
3641 test_seq 1 10 >expected &&
3642 echo stuff >>expected &&
3643 test_cmp expected z/c &&
3644
3645 git ls-files -s >out &&
3646 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3647 git ls-files -u >out &&
3648 test_line_count = 0 out &&
3649 git ls-files -m >out &&
3650 test_line_count = 0 out &&
3651 git ls-files -o >out &&
3652 test_line_count = 4 out &&
3653
3654 git rev-parse >actual \
3655 :0:x/b :0:y/a :0:y/c &&
3656 git rev-parse >expect \
3657 O:x/b O:z/a B:x/c &&
3658 test_cmp expect actual &&
3659
3660 git hash-object y/c >actual &&
3661 git rev-parse B:x/c >expect &&
3662 test_cmp expect actual
3663 )
3664 '
3665
3666 # Testcase 11c, Avoid losing not-up-to-date with rename + D/F conflict
3667 # Commit O: y/a, x/{b,c_v1}
3668 # Commit A: y/{a,c_v1}, x/b, and y/c_v1 has uncommitted mods
3669 # Commit B: y/{a,c/d}, x/{b,c_v2}
3670 # Expected: Abort_msg("following files would be overwritten by merge") +
3671 # y/c left untouched (still has uncommitted mods)
3672
3673 test_setup_11c () {
3674 test_create_repo 11c &&
3675 (
3676 cd 11c &&
3677
3678 mkdir y x &&
3679 echo a >y/a &&
3680 echo b >x/b &&
3681 test_seq 1 10 >x/c &&
3682 git add y x &&
3683 test_tick &&
3684 git commit -m "O" &&
3685
3686 git branch O &&
3687 git branch A &&
3688 git branch B &&
3689
3690 git checkout A &&
3691 git mv x/c y/c &&
3692 test_tick &&
3693 git commit -m "A" &&
3694
3695 git checkout B &&
3696 mkdir y/c &&
3697 echo d >y/c/d &&
3698 echo 11 >>x/c &&
3699 git add x/c y/c/d &&
3700 test_tick &&
3701 git commit -m "B"
3702 )
3703 }
3704
3705 test_expect_success '11c: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' '
3706 test_setup_11c &&
3707 (
3708 cd 11c &&
3709
3710 git checkout A^0 &&
3711 echo stuff >>y/c &&
3712
3713 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3714 test_i18ngrep "following files would be overwritten by merge" err &&
3715
3716 grep -q stuff y/c &&
3717 test_seq 1 10 >expected &&
3718 echo stuff >>expected &&
3719 test_cmp expected y/c &&
3720
3721 git ls-files -s >out &&
3722 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3723 git ls-files -u >out &&
3724 test_line_count = 0 out &&
3725 git ls-files -m >out &&
3726 test_line_count = 1 out &&
3727 git ls-files -o >out &&
3728 test_line_count = 3 out
3729 )
3730 '
3731
3732 # Testcase 11d, Avoid losing not-up-to-date with rename + D/F conflict
3733 # Commit O: z/a, x/{b,c_v1}
3734 # Commit A: z/{a,c_v1}, x/b, and z/c_v1 has uncommitted mods
3735 # Commit B: y/{a,c/d}, x/{b,c_v2}
3736 # Expected: D/F: y/c_v2 vs y/c/d) +
3737 # Warning_Msg("Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c) +
3738 # y/{a,c~HEAD,c/d}, x/b, now-untracked z/c_v1 with uncommitted mods
3739
3740 test_setup_11d () {
3741 test_create_repo 11d &&
3742 (
3743 cd 11d &&
3744
3745 mkdir z x &&
3746 echo a >z/a &&
3747 echo b >x/b &&
3748 test_seq 1 10 >x/c &&
3749 git add z x &&
3750 test_tick &&
3751 git commit -m "O" &&
3752
3753 git branch O &&
3754 git branch A &&
3755 git branch B &&
3756
3757 git checkout A &&
3758 git mv x/c z/c &&
3759 test_tick &&
3760 git commit -m "A" &&
3761
3762 git checkout B &&
3763 git mv z y &&
3764 mkdir y/c &&
3765 echo d >y/c/d &&
3766 echo 11 >>x/c &&
3767 git add x/c y/c/d &&
3768 test_tick &&
3769 git commit -m "B"
3770 )
3771 }
3772
3773 test_expect_success '11d: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' '
3774 test_setup_11d &&
3775 (
3776 cd 11d &&
3777
3778 git checkout A^0 &&
3779 echo stuff >>z/c &&
3780
3781 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3782 test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at z/c" out &&
3783
3784 grep -q stuff z/c &&
3785 test_seq 1 10 >expected &&
3786 echo stuff >>expected &&
3787 test_cmp expected z/c &&
3788
3789 git ls-files -s >out &&
3790 test_line_count = 4 out &&
3791 git ls-files -u >out &&
3792 test_line_count = 1 out &&
3793 git ls-files -o >out &&
3794 test_line_count = 5 out &&
3795
3796 git rev-parse >actual \
3797 :0:x/b :0:y/a :0:y/c/d :3:y/c &&
3798 git rev-parse >expect \
3799 O:x/b O:z/a B:y/c/d B:x/c &&
3800 test_cmp expect actual &&
3801
3802 git hash-object y/c~HEAD >actual &&
3803 git rev-parse B:x/c >expect &&
3804 test_cmp expect actual
3805 )
3806 '
3807
3808 # Testcase 11e, Avoid deleting not-up-to-date with dir rename/rename(1to2)/add
3809 # Commit O: z/{a,b}, x/{c_1,d}
3810 # Commit A: y/{a,b,c_2}, x/d, w/c_1, and y/c_2 has uncommitted mods
3811 # Commit B: z/{a,b,c_1}, x/d
3812 # Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b} + x/d +
3813 # CONFLICT(rename/rename) x/c_1 -> w/c_1 vs y/c_1 +
3814 # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at y/c)
3815 # y/c~B^0 has O:x/c_1 contents
3816 # y/c~HEAD has A:y/c_2 contents
3817 # y/c has dirty file from before merge
3818
3819 test_setup_11e () {
3820 test_create_repo 11e &&
3821 (
3822 cd 11e &&
3823
3824 mkdir z x &&
3825 echo a >z/a &&
3826 echo b >z/b &&
3827 echo c >x/c &&
3828 echo d >x/d &&
3829 git add z x &&
3830 test_tick &&
3831 git commit -m "O" &&
3832
3833 git branch O &&
3834 git branch A &&
3835 git branch B &&
3836
3837 git checkout A &&
3838 git mv z/ y/ &&
3839 echo different >y/c &&
3840 mkdir w &&
3841 git mv x/c w/ &&
3842 git add y/c &&
3843 test_tick &&
3844 git commit -m "A" &&
3845
3846 git checkout B &&
3847 git mv x/c z/ &&
3848 test_tick &&
3849 git commit -m "B"
3850 )
3851 }
3852
3853 test_expect_success '11e: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(1to2)/add' '
3854 test_setup_11e &&
3855 (
3856 cd 11e &&
3857
3858 git checkout A^0 &&
3859 echo mods >>y/c &&
3860
3861 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3862 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
3863 test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at y/c" out &&
3864
3865 git ls-files -s >out &&
3866 test_line_count = 7 out &&
3867 git ls-files -u >out &&
3868 test_line_count = 4 out &&
3869 git ls-files -o >out &&
3870 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3871
3872 echo different >expected &&
3873 echo mods >>expected &&
3874 test_cmp expected y/c &&
3875
3876 git rev-parse >actual \
3877 :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:x/d :1:x/c :2:w/c :2:y/c :3:y/c &&
3878 git rev-parse >expect \
3879 O:z/a O:z/b O:x/d O:x/c O:x/c A:y/c O:x/c &&
3880 test_cmp expect actual &&
3881
3882 # See if y/c~merged has expected contents; requires manually
3883 # doing the expected file merge
3884 git cat-file -p A:y/c >c1 &&
3885 git cat-file -p B:z/c >c2 &&
3886 >empty &&
3887 test_must_fail git merge-file \
3888 -L "HEAD" \
3889 -L "" \
3890 -L "B^0" \
3891 c1 empty c2 &&
3892 test_cmp c1 y/c~merged
3893 )
3894 '
3895
3896 # Testcase 11f, Avoid deleting not-up-to-date w/ dir rename/rename(2to1)
3897 # Commit O: z/{a,b}, x/{c_1,d_2}
3898 # Commit A: y/{a,b,wham_1}, x/d_2, except y/wham has uncommitted mods
3899 # Commit B: z/{a,b,wham_2}, x/c_1
3900 # Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b} + untracked y/{wham~merged} +
3901 # y/wham with dirty changes from before merge +
3902 # CONFLICT(rename/rename) x/c vs x/d -> y/wham
3903 # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at y/wham)
3904
3905 test_setup_11f () {
3906 test_create_repo 11f &&
3907 (
3908 cd 11f &&
3909
3910 mkdir z x &&
3911 echo a >z/a &&
3912 echo b >z/b &&
3913 test_seq 1 10 >x/c &&
3914 echo d >x/d &&
3915 git add z x &&
3916 test_tick &&
3917 git commit -m "O" &&
3918
3919 git branch O &&
3920 git branch A &&
3921 git branch B &&
3922
3923 git checkout A &&
3924 git mv z/ y/ &&
3925 git mv x/c y/wham &&
3926 test_tick &&
3927 git commit -m "A" &&
3928
3929 git checkout B &&
3930 git mv x/d z/wham &&
3931 test_tick &&
3932 git commit -m "B"
3933 )
3934 }
3935
3936 test_expect_success '11f: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(2to1)' '
3937 test_setup_11f &&
3938 (
3939 cd 11f &&
3940
3941 git checkout A^0 &&
3942 echo important >>y/wham &&
3943
3944 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
3945 test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out &&
3946 test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at y/wham" out &&
3947
3948 git ls-files -s >out &&
3949 test_line_count = 4 out &&
3950 git ls-files -u >out &&
3951 test_line_count = 2 out &&
3952 git ls-files -o >out &&
3953 test_line_count = 3 out &&
3954
3955 test_seq 1 10 >expected &&
3956 echo important >>expected &&
3957 test_cmp expected y/wham &&
3958
3959 test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/wham &&
3960
3961 git rev-parse >actual \
3962 :0:y/a :0:y/b :2:y/wham :3:y/wham &&
3963 git rev-parse >expect \
3964 O:z/a O:z/b O:x/c O:x/d &&
3965 test_cmp expect actual &&
3966
3967 # Test that the two-way merge in y/wham~merged is as expected
3968 git cat-file -p :2:y/wham >expect &&
3969 git cat-file -p :3:y/wham >other &&
3970 >empty &&
3971 test_must_fail git merge-file \
3972 -L "HEAD" \
3973 -L "" \
3974 -L "B^0" \
3975 expect empty other &&
3976 test_cmp expect y/wham~merged
3977 )
3978 '
3979
3980 ###########################################################################
3981 # SECTION 12: Everything else
3982 #
3983 # Tests suggested by others. Tests added after implementation completed
3984 # and submitted. Grab bag.
3985 ###########################################################################
3986
3987 # Testcase 12a, Moving one directory hierarchy into another
3988 # (Related to testcase 9a)
3989 # Commit O: node1/{leaf1,leaf2}, node2/{leaf3,leaf4}
3990 # Commit A: node1/{leaf1,leaf2,node2/{leaf3,leaf4}}
3991 # Commit B: node1/{leaf1,leaf2,leaf5}, node2/{leaf3,leaf4,leaf6}
3992 # Expected: node1/{leaf1,leaf2,leaf5,node2/{leaf3,leaf4,leaf6}}
3993
3994 test_setup_12a () {
3995 test_create_repo 12a &&
3996 (
3997 cd 12a &&
3998
3999 mkdir -p node1 node2 &&
4000 echo leaf1 >node1/leaf1 &&
4001 echo leaf2 >node1/leaf2 &&
4002 echo leaf3 >node2/leaf3 &&
4003 echo leaf4 >node2/leaf4 &&
4004 git add node1 node2 &&
4005 test_tick &&
4006 git commit -m "O" &&
4007
4008 git branch O &&
4009 git branch A &&
4010 git branch B &&
4011
4012 git checkout A &&
4013 git mv node2/ node1/ &&
4014 test_tick &&
4015 git commit -m "A" &&
4016
4017 git checkout B &&
4018 echo leaf5 >node1/leaf5 &&
4019 echo leaf6 >node2/leaf6 &&
4020 git add node1 node2 &&
4021 test_tick &&
4022 git commit -m "B"
4023 )
4024 }
4025
4026 test_expect_success '12a: Moving one directory hierarchy into another' '
4027 test_setup_12a &&
4028 (
4029 cd 12a &&
4030
4031 git checkout A^0 &&
4032
4033 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
4034
4035 git ls-files -s >out &&
4036 test_line_count = 6 out &&
4037
4038 git rev-parse >actual \
4039 HEAD:node1/leaf1 HEAD:node1/leaf2 HEAD:node1/leaf5 \
4040 HEAD:node1/node2/leaf3 \
4041 HEAD:node1/node2/leaf4 \
4042 HEAD:node1/node2/leaf6 &&
4043 git rev-parse >expect \
4044 O:node1/leaf1 O:node1/leaf2 B:node1/leaf5 \
4045 O:node2/leaf3 \
4046 O:node2/leaf4 \
4047 B:node2/leaf6 &&
4048 test_cmp expect actual
4049 )
4050 '
4051
4052 # Testcase 12b1, Moving two directory hierarchies into each other
4053 # (Related to testcases 1c and 12c)
4054 # Commit O: node1/{leaf1, leaf2}, node2/{leaf3, leaf4}
4055 # Commit A: node1/{leaf1, leaf2, node2/{leaf3, leaf4}}
4056 # Commit B: node2/{leaf3, leaf4, node1/{leaf1, leaf2}}
4057 # Expected: node1/node2/{leaf3, leaf4}
4058 # node2/node1/{leaf1, leaf2}
4059 # NOTE: If there were new files added to the old node1/ or node2/ directories,
4060 # then we would need to detect renames for those directories and would
4061 # find that:
4062 # commit A renames node2/ -> node1/node2/
4063 # commit B renames node1/ -> node2/node1/
4064 # Applying those directory renames to the initial result (making all
4065 # four paths experience a transitive renaming), yields
4066 # node1/node2/node1/{leaf1, leaf2}
4067 # node2/node1/node2/{leaf3, leaf4}
4068 # as the result. It may be really weird to have two directories
4069 # rename each other, but simple rules give weird results when given
4070 # weird inputs. HOWEVER, the "If" at the beginning of those NOTE was
4071 # false; there were no new files added and thus there is no directory
4072 # rename detection to perform. As such, we just have simple renames
4073 # and the expected answer is:
4074 # node1/node2/{leaf3, leaf4}
4075 # node2/node1/{leaf1, leaf2}
4076
4077 test_setup_12b1 () {
4078 test_create_repo 12b1 &&
4079 (
4080 cd 12b1 &&
4081
4082 mkdir -p node1 node2 &&
4083 echo leaf1 >node1/leaf1 &&
4084 echo leaf2 >node1/leaf2 &&
4085 echo leaf3 >node2/leaf3 &&
4086 echo leaf4 >node2/leaf4 &&
4087 git add node1 node2 &&
4088 test_tick &&
4089 git commit -m "O" &&
4090
4091 git branch O &&
4092 git branch A &&
4093 git branch B &&
4094
4095 git checkout A &&
4096 git mv node2/ node1/ &&
4097 test_tick &&
4098 git commit -m "A" &&
4099
4100 git checkout B &&
4101 git mv node1/ node2/ &&
4102 test_tick &&
4103 git commit -m "B"
4104 )
4105 }
4106
4107 test_expect_failure '12b1: Moving two directory hierarchies into each other' '
4108 test_setup_12b1 &&
4109 (
4110 cd 12b1 &&
4111
4112 git checkout A^0 &&
4113
4114 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
4115
4116 git ls-files -s >out &&
4117 test_line_count = 4 out &&
4118
4119 git rev-parse >actual \
4120 HEAD:node2/node1/leaf1 \
4121 HEAD:node2/node1/leaf2 \
4122 HEAD:node1/node2/leaf3 \
4123 HEAD:node1/node2/leaf4 &&
4124 git rev-parse >expect \
4125 O:node1/leaf1 \
4126 O:node1/leaf2 \
4127 O:node2/leaf3 \
4128 O:node2/leaf4 &&
4129 test_cmp expect actual
4130 )
4131 '
4132
4133 # Testcase 12b2, Moving two directory hierarchies into each other
4134 # (Related to testcases 1c and 12c)
4135 # Commit O: node1/{leaf1, leaf2}, node2/{leaf3, leaf4}
4136 # Commit A: node1/{leaf1, leaf2, leaf5, node2/{leaf3, leaf4}}
4137 # Commit B: node2/{leaf3, leaf4, leaf6, node1/{leaf1, leaf2}}
4138 # Expected: node1/node2/{node1/{leaf1, leaf2}, leaf6}
4139 # node2/node1/{node2/{leaf3, leaf4}, leaf5}
4140 # NOTE: Without directory renames, we would expect
4141 # A: node2/leaf3 -> node1/node2/leaf3
4142 # A: node2/leaf1 -> node1/node2/leaf4
4143 # A: Adds node1/leaf5
4144 # B: node1/leaf1 -> node2/node1/leaf1
4145 # B: node1/leaf2 -> node2/node1/leaf2
4146 # B: Adds node2/leaf6
4147 # with directory rename detection, we note that
4148 # commit A renames node2/ -> node1/node2/
4149 # commit B renames node1/ -> node2/node1/
4150 # therefore, applying A's directory rename to the paths added in B gives:
4151 # B: node1/leaf1 -> node1/node2/node1/leaf1
4152 # B: node1/leaf2 -> node1/node2/node1/leaf2
4153 # B: Adds node1/node2/leaf6
4154 # and applying B's directory rename to the paths added in A gives:
4155 # A: node2/leaf3 -> node2/node1/node2/leaf3
4156 # A: node2/leaf1 -> node2/node1/node2/leaf4
4157 # A: Adds node2/node1/leaf5
4158 # resulting in the expected
4159 # node1/node2/{node1/{leaf1, leaf2}, leaf6}
4160 # node2/node1/{node2/{leaf3, leaf4}, leaf5}
4161 #
4162 # You may ask, is it weird to have two directories rename each other?
4163 # To which, I can do no more than shrug my shoulders and say that
4164 # even simple rules give weird results when given weird inputs.
4165
4166 test_setup_12b2 () {
4167 test_create_repo 12b2 &&
4168 (
4169 cd 12b2 &&
4170
4171 mkdir -p node1 node2 &&
4172 echo leaf1 >node1/leaf1 &&
4173 echo leaf2 >node1/leaf2 &&
4174 echo leaf3 >node2/leaf3 &&
4175 echo leaf4 >node2/leaf4 &&
4176 git add node1 node2 &&
4177 test_tick &&
4178 git commit -m "O" &&
4179
4180 git branch O &&
4181 git branch A &&
4182 git branch B &&
4183
4184 git checkout A &&
4185 git mv node2/ node1/ &&
4186 echo leaf5 >node1/leaf5 &&
4187 git add node1/leaf5 &&
4188 test_tick &&
4189 git commit -m "A" &&
4190
4191 git checkout B &&
4192 git mv node1/ node2/ &&
4193 echo leaf6 >node2/leaf6 &&
4194 git add node2/leaf6 &&
4195 test_tick &&
4196 git commit -m "B"
4197 )
4198 }
4199
4200 test_expect_success '12b2: Moving two directory hierarchies into each other' '
4201 test_setup_12b2 &&
4202 (
4203 cd 12b2 &&
4204
4205 git checkout A^0 &&
4206
4207 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
4208
4209 git ls-files -s >out &&
4210 test_line_count = 6 out &&
4211
4212 git rev-parse >actual \
4213 HEAD:node1/node2/node1/leaf1 \
4214 HEAD:node1/node2/node1/leaf2 \
4215 HEAD:node2/node1/node2/leaf3 \
4216 HEAD:node2/node1/node2/leaf4 \
4217 HEAD:node2/node1/leaf5 \
4218 HEAD:node1/node2/leaf6 &&
4219 git rev-parse >expect \
4220 O:node1/leaf1 \
4221 O:node1/leaf2 \
4222 O:node2/leaf3 \
4223 O:node2/leaf4 \
4224 A:node1/leaf5 \
4225 B:node2/leaf6 &&
4226 test_cmp expect actual
4227 )
4228 '
4229
4230 # Testcase 12c1, Moving two directory hierarchies into each other w/ content merge
4231 # (Related to testcase 12b)
4232 # Commit O: node1/{ leaf1_1, leaf2_1}, node2/{leaf3_1, leaf4_1}
4233 # Commit A: node1/{ leaf1_2, leaf2_2, node2/{leaf3_2, leaf4_2}}
4234 # Commit B: node2/{node1/{leaf1_3, leaf2_3}, leaf3_3, leaf4_3}
4235 # Expected: Content merge conflicts for each of:
4236 # node1/node2/node1/{leaf1, leaf2},
4237 # node2/node1/node2/{leaf3, leaf4}
4238 # NOTE: This is *exactly* like 12b1, except that every path is modified on
4239 # each side of the merge.
4240
4241 test_setup_12c1 () {
4242 test_create_repo 12c1 &&
4243 (
4244 cd 12c1 &&
4245
4246 mkdir -p node1 node2 &&
4247 printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\nleaf1\n" >node1/leaf1 &&
4248 printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\nleaf2\n" >node1/leaf2 &&
4249 printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\nleaf3\n" >node2/leaf3 &&
4250 printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\nleaf4\n" >node2/leaf4 &&
4251 git add node1 node2 &&
4252 test_tick &&
4253 git commit -m "O" &&
4254
4255 git branch O &&
4256 git branch A &&
4257 git branch B &&
4258
4259 git checkout A &&
4260 git mv node2/ node1/ &&
4261 for i in `git ls-files`; do echo side A >>$i; done &&
4262 git add -u &&
4263 test_tick &&
4264 git commit -m "A" &&
4265
4266 git checkout B &&
4267 git mv node1/ node2/ &&
4268 for i in `git ls-files`; do echo side B >>$i; done &&
4269 git add -u &&
4270 test_tick &&
4271 git commit -m "B"
4272 )
4273 }
4274
4275 test_expect_failure '12c1: Moving one directory hierarchy into another w/ content merge' '
4276 test_setup_12c1 &&
4277 (
4278 cd 12c1 &&
4279
4280 git checkout A^0 &&
4281
4282 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
4283
4284 git ls-files -u >out &&
4285 test_line_count = 12 out &&
4286
4287 git rev-parse >actual \
4288 :1:node2/node1/leaf1 \
4289 :1:node2/node1/leaf2 \
4290 :1:node1/node2/leaf3 \
4291 :1:node1/node2/leaf4 \
4292 :2:node2/node1/leaf1 \
4293 :2:node2/node1/leaf2 \
4294 :2:node1/node2/leaf3 \
4295 :2:node1/node2/leaf4 \
4296 :3:node2/node1/leaf1 \
4297 :3:node2/node1/leaf2 \
4298 :3:node1/node2/leaf3 \
4299 :3:node1/node2/leaf4 &&
4300 git rev-parse >expect \
4301 O:node1/leaf1 \
4302 O:node1/leaf2 \
4303 O:node2/leaf3 \
4304 O:node2/leaf4 \
4305 A:node1/leaf1 \
4306 A:node1/leaf2 \
4307 A:node1/node2/leaf3 \
4308 A:node1/node2/leaf4 \
4309 B:node2/node1/leaf1 \
4310 B:node2/node1/leaf2 \
4311 B:node2/leaf3 \
4312 B:node2/leaf4 &&
4313 test_cmp expect actual
4314 )
4315 '
4316
4317 # Testcase 12c2, Moving two directory hierarchies into each other w/ content merge
4318 # (Related to testcase 12b)
4319 # Commit O: node1/{ leaf1_1, leaf2_1}, node2/{leaf3_1, leaf4_1}
4320 # Commit A: node1/{ leaf1_2, leaf2_2, node2/{leaf3_2, leaf4_2}, leaf5}
4321 # Commit B: node2/{node1/{leaf1_3, leaf2_3}, leaf3_3, leaf4_3, leaf6}
4322 # Expected: Content merge conflicts for each of:
4323 # node1/node2/node1/{leaf1, leaf2}
4324 # node2/node1/node2/{leaf3, leaf4}
4325 # plus
4326 # node2/node1/leaf5
4327 # node1/node2/leaf6
4328 # NOTE: This is *exactly* like 12b2, except that every path from O is modified
4329 # on each side of the merge.
4330
4331 test_setup_12c2 () {
4332 test_create_repo 12c2 &&
4333 (
4334 cd 12c2 &&
4335
4336 mkdir -p node1 node2 &&
4337 printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\nleaf1\n" >node1/leaf1 &&
4338 printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\nleaf2\n" >node1/leaf2 &&
4339 printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\nleaf3\n" >node2/leaf3 &&
4340 printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\nleaf4\n" >node2/leaf4 &&
4341 git add node1 node2 &&
4342 test_tick &&
4343 git commit -m "O" &&
4344
4345 git branch O &&
4346 git branch A &&
4347 git branch B &&
4348
4349 git checkout A &&
4350 git mv node2/ node1/ &&
4351 for i in `git ls-files`; do echo side A >>$i; done &&
4352 git add -u &&
4353 echo leaf5 >node1/leaf5 &&
4354 git add node1/leaf5 &&
4355 test_tick &&
4356 git commit -m "A" &&
4357
4358 git checkout B &&
4359 git mv node1/ node2/ &&
4360 for i in `git ls-files`; do echo side B >>$i; done &&
4361 git add -u &&
4362 echo leaf6 >node2/leaf6 &&
4363 git add node2/leaf6 &&
4364 test_tick &&
4365 git commit -m "B"
4366 )
4367 }
4368
4369 test_expect_success '12c2: Moving one directory hierarchy into another w/ content merge' '
4370 test_setup_12c2 &&
4371 (
4372 cd 12c2 &&
4373
4374 git checkout A^0 &&
4375
4376 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
4377
4378 git ls-files -s >out &&
4379 test_line_count = 14 out &&
4380 git ls-files -u >out &&
4381 test_line_count = 12 out &&
4382
4383 git rev-parse >actual \
4384 :1:node1/node2/node1/leaf1 \
4385 :1:node1/node2/node1/leaf2 \
4386 :1:node2/node1/node2/leaf3 \
4387 :1:node2/node1/node2/leaf4 \
4388 :2:node1/node2/node1/leaf1 \
4389 :2:node1/node2/node1/leaf2 \
4390 :2:node2/node1/node2/leaf3 \
4391 :2:node2/node1/node2/leaf4 \
4392 :3:node1/node2/node1/leaf1 \
4393 :3:node1/node2/node1/leaf2 \
4394 :3:node2/node1/node2/leaf3 \
4395 :3:node2/node1/node2/leaf4 \
4396 :0:node2/node1/leaf5 \
4397 :0:node1/node2/leaf6 &&
4398 git rev-parse >expect \
4399 O:node1/leaf1 \
4400 O:node1/leaf2 \
4401 O:node2/leaf3 \
4402 O:node2/leaf4 \
4403 A:node1/leaf1 \
4404 A:node1/leaf2 \
4405 A:node1/node2/leaf3 \
4406 A:node1/node2/leaf4 \
4407 B:node2/node1/leaf1 \
4408 B:node2/node1/leaf2 \
4409 B:node2/leaf3 \
4410 B:node2/leaf4 \
4411 A:node1/leaf5 \
4412 B:node2/leaf6 &&
4413 test_cmp expect actual
4414 )
4415 '
4416
4417 # Testcase 12d, Rename/merge of subdirectory into the root
4418 # Commit O: a/b/subdir/foo
4419 # Commit A: subdir/foo
4420 # Commit B: a/b/subdir/foo, a/b/bar
4421 # Expected: subdir/foo, bar
4422
4423 test_setup_12d () {
4424 test_create_repo 12d &&
4425 (
4426 cd 12d &&
4427
4428 mkdir -p a/b/subdir &&
4429 test_commit a/b/subdir/foo &&
4430
4431 git branch O &&
4432 git branch A &&
4433 git branch B &&
4434
4435 git checkout A &&
4436 mkdir subdir &&
4437 git mv a/b/subdir/foo.t subdir/foo.t &&
4438 test_tick &&
4439 git commit -m "A" &&
4440
4441 git checkout B &&
4442 test_commit a/b/bar
4443 )
4444 }
4445
4446 test_expect_success '12d: Rename/merge subdir into the root, variant 1' '
4447 test_setup_12d &&
4448 (
4449 cd 12d &&
4450
4451 git checkout A^0 &&
4452
4453 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
4454
4455 git ls-files -s >out &&
4456 test_line_count = 2 out &&
4457
4458 git rev-parse >actual \
4459 HEAD:subdir/foo.t HEAD:bar.t &&
4460 git rev-parse >expect \
4461 O:a/b/subdir/foo.t B:a/b/bar.t &&
4462 test_cmp expect actual &&
4463
4464 git hash-object bar.t >actual &&
4465 git rev-parse B:a/b/bar.t >expect &&
4466 test_cmp expect actual &&
4467
4468 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:a/b/subdir/foo.t &&
4469 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:a/b/bar.t &&
4470 test_path_is_missing a/ &&
4471 test_path_is_file bar.t
4472 )
4473 '
4474
4475 # Testcase 12e, Rename/merge of subdirectory into the root
4476 # Commit O: a/b/foo
4477 # Commit A: foo
4478 # Commit B: a/b/foo, a/b/bar
4479 # Expected: foo, bar
4480
4481 test_setup_12e () {
4482 test_create_repo 12e &&
4483 (
4484 cd 12e &&
4485
4486 mkdir -p a/b &&
4487 test_commit a/b/foo &&
4488
4489 git branch O &&
4490 git branch A &&
4491 git branch B &&
4492
4493 git checkout A &&
4494 mkdir subdir &&
4495 git mv a/b/foo.t foo.t &&
4496 test_tick &&
4497 git commit -m "A" &&
4498
4499 git checkout B &&
4500 test_commit a/b/bar
4501 )
4502 }
4503
4504 test_expect_success '12e: Rename/merge subdir into the root, variant 2' '
4505 test_setup_12e &&
4506 (
4507 cd 12e &&
4508
4509 git checkout A^0 &&
4510
4511 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 &&
4512
4513 git ls-files -s >out &&
4514 test_line_count = 2 out &&
4515
4516 git rev-parse >actual \
4517 HEAD:foo.t HEAD:bar.t &&
4518 git rev-parse >expect \
4519 O:a/b/foo.t B:a/b/bar.t &&
4520 test_cmp expect actual &&
4521
4522 git hash-object bar.t >actual &&
4523 git rev-parse B:a/b/bar.t >expect &&
4524 test_cmp expect actual &&
4525
4526 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:a/b/foo.t &&
4527 test_must_fail git rev-parse HEAD:a/b/bar.t &&
4528 test_path_is_missing a/ &&
4529 test_path_is_file bar.t
4530 )
4531 '
4532
4533 # Testcase 12f, Rebase of patches with big directory rename
4534 # Commit O:
4535 # dir/subdir/{a,b,c,d,e_O,Makefile_TOP_O}
4536 # dir/subdir/tweaked/{f,g,h,Makefile_SUB_O}
4537 # dir/unchanged/<LOTS OF FILES>
4538 # Commit A:
4539 # (Remove f & g, move e into newsubdir, rename dir/->folder/, modify files)
4540 # folder/subdir/{a,b,c,d,Makefile_TOP_A}
4541 # folder/subdir/newsubdir/e_A
4542 # folder/subdir/tweaked/{h,Makefile_SUB_A}
4543 # folder/unchanged/<LOTS OF FILES>
4544 # Commit B1:
4545 # (add newfile.{c,py}, modify underscored files)
4546 # dir/{a,b,c,d,e_B1,Makefile_TOP_B1,newfile.c}
4547 # dir/tweaked/{f,g,h,Makefile_SUB_B1,newfile.py}
4548 # dir/unchanged/<LOTS OF FILES>
4549 # Commit B2:
4550 # (Modify e further, add newfile.rs)
4551 # dir/{a,b,c,d,e_B2,Makefile_TOP_B1,newfile.c,newfile.rs}
4552 # dir/tweaked/{f,g,h,Makefile_SUB_B1,newfile.py}
4553 # dir/unchanged/<LOTS OF FILES>
4554 # Expected:
4555 # B1-picked:
4556 # folder/subdir/{a,b,c,d,Makefile_TOP_Merge1,newfile.c}
4557 # folder/subdir/newsubdir/e_Merge1
4558 # folder/subdir/tweaked/{h,Makefile_SUB_Merge1,newfile.py}
4559 # folder/unchanged/<LOTS OF FILES>
4560 # B2-picked:
4561 # folder/subdir/{a,b,c,d,Makefile_TOP_Merge1,newfile.c,newfile.rs}
4562 # folder/subdir/newsubdir/e_Merge2
4563 # folder/subdir/tweaked/{h,Makefile_SUB_Merge1,newfile.py}
4564 # folder/unchanged/<LOTS OF FILES>
4565 #
4566 # Notes: This testcase happens to exercise lots of the
4567 # optimization-specific codepaths in merge-ort, and also
4568 # demonstrated a failing of the directory rename detection algorithm
4569 # in merge-recursive; newfile.c should not get pushed into
4570 # folder/subdir/newsubdir/, yet merge-recursive put it there because
4571 # the rename of dir/subdir/{a,b,c,d} -> folder/subdir/{a,b,c,d}
4572 # looks like
4573 # dir/ -> folder/,
4574 # whereas the rename of dir/subdir/e -> folder/subdir/newsubdir/e
4575 # looks like
4576 # dir/subdir/ -> folder/subdir/newsubdir/
4577 # and if we note that newfile.c is found in dir/subdir/, we might
4578 # overlook the dir/ -> folder/ rule that has more weight.
4579
4580 test_setup_12f () {
4581 test_create_repo 12f &&
4582 (
4583 cd 12f &&
4584
4585 mkdir -p dir/unchanged &&
4586 mkdir -p dir/subdir/tweaked &&
4587 echo a >dir/subdir/a &&
4588 echo b >dir/subdir/b &&
4589 echo c >dir/subdir/c &&
4590 echo d >dir/subdir/d &&
4591 test_seq 1 10 >dir/subdir/e &&
4592 test_seq 10 20 >dir/subdir/Makefile &&
4593 echo f >dir/subdir/tweaked/f &&
4594 echo g >dir/subdir/tweaked/g &&
4595 echo h >dir/subdir/tweaked/h &&
4596 test_seq 20 30 >dir/subdir/tweaked/Makefile &&
4597 for i in `test_seq 1 88`; do
4598 echo content $i >dir/unchanged/file_$i
4599 done &&
4600 git add . &&
4601 git commit -m "O" &&
4602
4603 git branch O &&
4604 git branch A &&
4605 git branch B &&
4606
4607 git switch A &&
4608 git rm dir/subdir/tweaked/f dir/subdir/tweaked/g &&
4609 test_seq 2 10 >dir/subdir/e &&
4610 test_seq 11 20 >dir/subdir/Makefile &&
4611 test_seq 21 30 >dir/subdir/tweaked/Makefile &&
4612 mkdir dir/subdir/newsubdir &&
4613 git mv dir/subdir/e dir/subdir/newsubdir/ &&
4614 git mv dir folder &&
4615 git add . &&
4616 git commit -m "A" &&
4617
4618 git switch B &&
4619 mkdir dir/subdir/newsubdir/ &&
4620 echo c code >dir/subdir/newfile.c &&
4621 echo python code >dir/subdir/newsubdir/newfile.py &&
4622 test_seq 1 11 >dir/subdir/e &&
4623 test_seq 10 21 >dir/subdir/Makefile &&
4624 test_seq 20 31 >dir/subdir/tweaked/Makefile &&
4625 git add . &&
4626 git commit -m "B1" &&
4627
4628 echo rust code >dir/subdir/newfile.rs &&
4629 test_seq 1 12 >dir/subdir/e &&
4630 git add . &&
4631 git commit -m "B2"
4632 )
4633 }
4634
4635 test_expect_failure '12f: Trivial directory resolve, caching, all kinds of fun' '
4636 test_setup_12f &&
4637 (
4638 cd 12f &&
4639
4640 git checkout A^0 &&
4641 git branch Bmod B &&
4642
4643 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true rebase A Bmod &&
4644
4645 echo Checking the pick of B1... &&
4646
4647 test_must_fail git rev-parse Bmod~1:dir &&
4648
4649 git ls-tree -r Bmod~1 >out &&
4650 test_line_count = 98 out &&
4651
4652 git diff --name-status A Bmod~1 >actual &&
4653 q_to_tab >expect <<-\EOF &&
4654 MQfolder/subdir/Makefile
4655 AQfolder/subdir/newfile.c
4656 MQfolder/subdir/newsubdir/e
4657 AQfolder/subdir/newsubdir/newfile.py
4658 MQfolder/subdir/tweaked/Makefile
4659 EOF
4660 test_cmp expect actual &&
4661
4662 # Three-way merged files
4663 test_seq 2 11 >e_Merge1 &&
4664 test_seq 11 21 >Makefile_TOP &&
4665 test_seq 21 31 >Makefile_SUB &&
4666 git hash-object >expect \
4667 e_Merge1 \
4668 Makefile_TOP \
4669 Makefile_SUB &&
4670 git rev-parse >actual \
4671 Bmod~1:folder/subdir/newsubdir/e \
4672 Bmod~1:folder/subdir/Makefile \
4673 Bmod~1:folder/subdir/tweaked/Makefile &&
4674 test_cmp expect actual &&
4675
4676 # New files showed up at the right location with right contents
4677 git rev-parse >expect \
4678 B~1:dir/subdir/newfile.c \
4679 B~1:dir/subdir/newsubdir/newfile.py &&
4680 git rev-parse >actual \
4681 Bmod~1:folder/subdir/newfile.c \
4682 Bmod~1:folder/subdir/newsubdir/newfile.py &&
4683 test_cmp expect actual &&
4684
4685 # Removed files
4686 test_path_is_missing folder/subdir/tweaked/f &&
4687 test_path_is_missing folder/subdir/tweaked/g &&
4688
4689 # Unchanged files or directories
4690 git rev-parse >actual \
4691 Bmod~1:folder/subdir/a \
4692 Bmod~1:folder/subdir/b \
4693 Bmod~1:folder/subdir/c \
4694 Bmod~1:folder/subdir/d \
4695 Bmod~1:folder/unchanged \
4696 Bmod~1:folder/subdir/tweaked/h &&
4697 git rev-parse >expect \
4698 O:dir/subdir/a \
4699 O:dir/subdir/b \
4700 O:dir/subdir/c \
4701 O:dir/subdir/d \
4702 O:dir/unchanged \
4703 O:dir/subdir/tweaked/h &&
4704 test_cmp expect actual &&
4705
4706 echo Checking the pick of B2... &&
4707
4708 test_must_fail git rev-parse Bmod:dir &&
4709
4710 git ls-tree -r Bmod >out &&
4711 test_line_count = 99 out &&
4712
4713 git diff --name-status Bmod~1 Bmod >actual &&
4714 q_to_tab >expect <<-\EOF &&
4715 AQfolder/subdir/newfile.rs
4716 MQfolder/subdir/newsubdir/e
4717 EOF
4718 test_cmp expect actual &&
4719
4720 # Three-way merged file
4721 test_seq 2 12 >e_Merge2 &&
4722 git hash-object e_Merge2 >expect &&
4723 git rev-parse Bmod:folder/subdir/newsubdir/e >actual &&
4724 test_cmp expect actual
4725 )
4726 '
4727
4728 ###########################################################################
4729 # SECTION 13: Checking informational and conflict messages
4730 #
4731 # A year after directory rename detection became the default, it was
4732 # instead decided to report conflicts on the pathname on the basis that
4733 # some users may expect the new files added or moved into a directory to
4734 # be unrelated to all the other files in that directory, and thus that
4735 # directory rename detection is unexpected. Test that the messages printed
4736 # match our expectation.
4737 ###########################################################################
4738
4739 # Testcase 13a, Basic directory rename with newly added files
4740 # Commit O: z/{b,c}
4741 # Commit A: y/{b,c}
4742 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d,e/f}
4743 # Expected: y/{b,c,d,e/f}, with notices/conflicts for both y/d and y/e/f
4744
4745 test_setup_13a () {
4746 test_create_repo 13a_$1 &&
4747 (
4748 cd 13a_$1 &&
4749
4750 mkdir z &&
4751 echo b >z/b &&
4752 echo c >z/c &&
4753 git add z &&
4754 test_tick &&
4755 git commit -m "O" &&
4756
4757 git branch O &&
4758 git branch A &&
4759 git branch B &&
4760
4761 git checkout A &&
4762 git mv z y &&
4763 test_tick &&
4764 git commit -m "A" &&
4765
4766 git checkout B &&
4767 echo d >z/d &&
4768 mkdir z/e &&
4769 echo f >z/e/f &&
4770 git add z/d z/e/f &&
4771 test_tick &&
4772 git commit -m "B"
4773 )
4774 }
4775
4776 test_expect_success '13a(conflict): messages for newly added files' '
4777 test_setup_13a conflict &&
4778 (
4779 cd 13a_conflict &&
4780
4781 git checkout A^0 &&
4782
4783 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
4784
4785 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT..file.location.*z/e/f.added.in.B^0.*y/e/f out &&
4786 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT..file.location.*z/d.added.in.B^0.*y/d out &&
4787
4788 git ls-files >paths &&
4789 ! grep z/ paths &&
4790 grep "y/[de]" paths &&
4791
4792 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
4793 test_path_is_file y/d &&
4794 test_path_is_missing z/e/f &&
4795 test_path_is_file y/e/f
4796 )
4797 '
4798
4799 test_expect_success '13a(info): messages for newly added files' '
4800 test_setup_13a info &&
4801 (
4802 cd 13a_info &&
4803
4804 git reset --hard &&
4805 git checkout A^0 &&
4806
4807 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
4808
4809 test_i18ngrep Path.updated:.*z/e/f.added.in.B^0.*y/e/f out &&
4810 test_i18ngrep Path.updated:.*z/d.added.in.B^0.*y/d out &&
4811
4812 git ls-files >paths &&
4813 ! grep z/ paths &&
4814 grep "y/[de]" paths &&
4815
4816 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
4817 test_path_is_file y/d &&
4818 test_path_is_missing z/e/f &&
4819 test_path_is_file y/e/f
4820 )
4821 '
4822
4823 # Testcase 13b, Transitive rename with conflicted content merge and default
4824 # "conflict" setting
4825 # (Related to testcase 1c, 9b)
4826 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/d_1
4827 # Commit A: y/{b,c}, x/d_2
4828 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d_3}
4829 # Expected: y/{b,c,d_merged}, with two conflict messages for y/d,
4830 # one about content, and one about file location
4831
4832 test_setup_13b () {
4833 test_create_repo 13b_$1 &&
4834 (
4835 cd 13b_$1 &&
4836
4837 mkdir x &&
4838 mkdir z &&
4839 test_seq 1 10 >x/d &&
4840 echo b >z/b &&
4841 echo c >z/c &&
4842 git add x z &&
4843 test_tick &&
4844 git commit -m "O" &&
4845
4846 git branch O &&
4847 git branch A &&
4848 git branch B &&
4849
4850 git checkout A &&
4851 git mv z y &&
4852 echo 11 >>x/d &&
4853 git add x/d &&
4854 test_tick &&
4855 git commit -m "A" &&
4856
4857 git checkout B &&
4858 echo eleven >>x/d &&
4859 git mv x/d z/d &&
4860 git add z/d &&
4861 test_tick &&
4862 git commit -m "B"
4863 )
4864 }
4865
4866 test_expect_success '13b(conflict): messages for transitive rename with conflicted content' '
4867 test_setup_13b conflict &&
4868 (
4869 cd 13b_conflict &&
4870
4871 git checkout A^0 &&
4872
4873 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
4874
4875 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT.*content.*Merge.conflict.in.y/d out &&
4876 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT..file.location.*x/d.renamed.to.z/d.*moved.to.y/d out &&
4877
4878 git ls-files >paths &&
4879 ! grep z/ paths &&
4880 grep "y/d" paths &&
4881
4882 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
4883 test_path_is_file y/d
4884 )
4885 '
4886
4887 test_expect_success '13b(info): messages for transitive rename with conflicted content' '
4888 test_setup_13b info &&
4889 (
4890 cd 13b_info &&
4891
4892 git reset --hard &&
4893 git checkout A^0 &&
4894
4895 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
4896
4897 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT.*content.*Merge.conflict.in.y/d out &&
4898 test_i18ngrep Path.updated:.*x/d.renamed.to.z/d.in.B^0.*moving.it.to.y/d out &&
4899
4900 git ls-files >paths &&
4901 ! grep z/ paths &&
4902 grep "y/d" paths &&
4903
4904 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
4905 test_path_is_file y/d
4906 )
4907 '
4908
4909 # Testcase 13c, Rename/rename(1to1) due to directory rename
4910 # Commit O: z/{b,c}, x/{d,e}
4911 # Commit A: y/{b,c,d}, x/e
4912 # Commit B: z/{b,c,d}, x/e
4913 # Expected: y/{b,c,d}, x/e, with info or conflict messages for d
4914 # A: renamed x/d -> z/d; B: renamed z/ -> y/ AND renamed x/d to y/d
4915 # One could argue A had partial knowledge of what was done with
4916 # d and B had full knowledge, but that's a slippery slope as
4917 # shown in testcase 13d.
4918
4919 test_setup_13c () {
4920 test_create_repo 13c_$1 &&
4921 (
4922 cd 13c_$1 &&
4923
4924 mkdir x &&
4925 mkdir z &&
4926 test_seq 1 10 >x/d &&
4927 echo e >x/e &&
4928 echo b >z/b &&
4929 echo c >z/c &&
4930 git add x z &&
4931 test_tick &&
4932 git commit -m "O" &&
4933
4934 git branch O &&
4935 git branch A &&
4936 git branch B &&
4937
4938 git checkout A &&
4939 git mv z y &&
4940 git mv x/d y/ &&
4941 test_tick &&
4942 git commit -m "A" &&
4943
4944 git checkout B &&
4945 git mv x/d z/d &&
4946 git add z/d &&
4947 test_tick &&
4948 git commit -m "B"
4949 )
4950 }
4951
4952 test_expect_success '13c(conflict): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via transitive rename' '
4953 test_setup_13c conflict &&
4954 (
4955 cd 13c_conflict &&
4956
4957 git checkout A^0 &&
4958
4959 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
4960
4961 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT..file.location.*x/d.renamed.to.z/d.*moved.to.y/d out &&
4962
4963 git ls-files >paths &&
4964 ! grep z/ paths &&
4965 grep "y/d" paths &&
4966
4967 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
4968 test_path_is_file y/d
4969 )
4970 '
4971
4972 test_expect_success '13c(info): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via transitive rename' '
4973 test_setup_13c info &&
4974 (
4975 cd 13c_info &&
4976
4977 git reset --hard &&
4978 git checkout A^0 &&
4979
4980 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
4981
4982 test_i18ngrep Path.updated:.*x/d.renamed.to.z/d.in.B^0.*moving.it.to.y/d out &&
4983
4984 git ls-files >paths &&
4985 ! grep z/ paths &&
4986 grep "y/d" paths &&
4987
4988 test_path_is_missing z/d &&
4989 test_path_is_file y/d
4990 )
4991 '
4992
4993 # Testcase 13d, Rename/rename(1to1) due to directory rename on both sides
4994 # Commit O: a/{z,y}, b/x, c/w
4995 # Commit A: a/z, b/{y,x}, d/w
4996 # Commit B: a/z, d/x, c/{y,w}
4997 # Expected: a/z, d/{y,x,w} with no file location conflict for x
4998 # Easy cases:
4999 # * z is always in a; so it stays in a.
5000 # * x starts in b, only modified on one side to move into d/
5001 # * w starts in c, only modified on one side to move into d/
5002 # Hard case:
5003 # * A renames a/y to b/y, and B renames b/->d/ => a/y -> d/y
5004 # * B renames a/y to c/y, and A renames c/->d/ => a/y -> d/y
5005 # No conflict in where a/y ends up, so put it in d/y.
5006
5007 test_setup_13d () {
5008 test_create_repo 13d_$1 &&
5009 (
5010 cd 13d_$1 &&
5011
5012 mkdir a &&
5013 mkdir b &&
5014 mkdir c &&
5015 echo z >a/z &&
5016 echo y >a/y &&
5017 echo x >b/x &&
5018 echo w >c/w &&
5019 git add a b c &&
5020 test_tick &&
5021 git commit -m "O" &&
5022
5023 git branch O &&
5024 git branch A &&
5025 git branch B &&
5026
5027 git checkout A &&
5028 git mv a/y b/ &&
5029 git mv c/ d/ &&
5030 test_tick &&
5031 git commit -m "A" &&
5032
5033 git checkout B &&
5034 git mv a/y c/ &&
5035 git mv b/ d/ &&
5036 test_tick &&
5037 git commit -m "B"
5038 )
5039 }
5040
5041 test_expect_success '13d(conflict): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via dual transitive rename' '
5042 test_setup_13d conflict &&
5043 (
5044 cd 13d_conflict &&
5045
5046 git checkout A^0 &&
5047
5048 test_must_fail git merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
5049
5050 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT..file.location.*a/y.renamed.to.b/y.*moved.to.d/y out &&
5051 test_i18ngrep CONFLICT..file.location.*a/y.renamed.to.c/y.*moved.to.d/y out &&
5052
5053 git ls-files >paths &&
5054 ! grep b/ paths &&
5055 ! grep c/ paths &&
5056 grep "d/y" paths &&
5057
5058 test_path_is_missing b/y &&
5059 test_path_is_missing c/y &&
5060 test_path_is_file d/y
5061 )
5062 '
5063
5064 test_expect_success '13d(info): messages for rename/rename(1to1) via dual transitive rename' '
5065 test_setup_13d info &&
5066 (
5067 cd 13d_info &&
5068
5069 git reset --hard &&
5070 git checkout A^0 &&
5071
5072 git -c merge.directoryRenames=true merge -s recursive B^0 >out 2>err &&
5073
5074 test_i18ngrep Path.updated.*a/y.renamed.to.b/y.*moving.it.to.d/y out &&
5075 test_i18ngrep Path.updated.*a/y.renamed.to.c/y.*moving.it.to.d/y out &&
5076
5077 git ls-files >paths &&
5078 ! grep b/ paths &&
5079 ! grep c/ paths &&
5080 grep "d/y" paths &&
5081
5082 test_path_is_missing b/y &&
5083 test_path_is_missing c/y &&
5084 test_path_is_file d/y
5085 )
5086 '
5087
5088 # Testcase 13e, directory rename in virtual merge base
5089 #
5090 # This testcase has a slightly different setup than all the above cases, in
5091 # order to include a recursive case:
5092 #
5093 # A C
5094 # o - o
5095 # / \ / \
5096 # O o X ?
5097 # \ / \ /
5098 # o o
5099 # B D
5100 #
5101 # Commit O: a/{z,y}
5102 # Commit A: b/{z,y}
5103 # Commit B: a/{z,y,x}
5104 # Commit C: b/{z,y,x}
5105 # Commit D: b/{z,y}, a/x
5106 # Expected: b/{z,y,x} (sort of; see below for why this might not be expected)
5107 #
5108 # NOTES: 'X' represents a virtual merge base. With the default of
5109 # directory rename detection yielding conflicts, merging A and B
5110 # results in a conflict complaining about whether 'x' should be
5111 # under 'a/' or 'b/'. However, when creating the virtual merge
5112 # base 'X', since virtual merge bases need to be written out as a
5113 # tree, we cannot have a conflict, so some resolution has to be
5114 # picked.
5115 #
5116 # In choosing the right resolution, it's worth noting here that
5117 # commits C & D are merges of A & B that choose different
5118 # locations for 'x' (i.e. they resolve the conflict differently),
5119 # and so it would be nice when merging C & D if git could detect
5120 # this difference of opinion and report a conflict. But the only
5121 # way to do so that I can think of would be to have the virtual
5122 # merge base place 'x' in some directory other than either 'a/' or
5123 # 'b/', which seems a little weird -- especially since it'd result
5124 # in a rename/rename(1to2) conflict with a source path that never
5125 # existed in any version.
5126 #
5127 # So, for now, when directory rename detection is set to
5128 # 'conflict' just avoid doing directory rename detection at all in
5129 # the recursive case. This will not allow us to detect a conflict
5130 # in the outer merge for this special kind of setup, but it at
5131 # least avoids hitting a BUG().
5132 #
5133 test_setup_13e () {
5134 test_create_repo 13e &&
5135 (
5136 cd 13e &&
5137
5138 mkdir a &&
5139 echo z >a/z &&
5140 echo y >a/y &&
5141 git add a &&
5142 test_tick &&
5143 git commit -m "O" &&
5144
5145 git branch O &&
5146 git branch A &&
5147 git branch B &&
5148
5149 git checkout A &&
5150 git mv a/ b/ &&
5151 test_tick &&
5152 git commit -m "A" &&
5153
5154 git checkout B &&
5155 echo x >a/x &&
5156 git add a &&
5157 test_tick &&
5158 git commit -m "B" &&
5159
5160 git branch C A &&
5161 git branch D B &&
5162
5163 git checkout C &&
5164 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=conflict merge B &&
5165 git add b/x &&
5166 test_tick &&
5167 git commit -m "C" &&
5168
5169
5170 git checkout D &&
5171 test_must_fail git -c merge.directoryRenames=conflict merge A &&
5172 git add b/x &&
5173 mkdir a &&
5174 git mv b/x a/x &&
5175 test_tick &&
5176 git commit -m "D"
5177 )
5178 }
5179
5180 test_expect_success '13e: directory rename detection in recursive case' '
5181 test_setup_13e &&
5182 (
5183 cd 13e &&
5184
5185 git checkout --quiet D^0 &&
5186
5187 git -c merge.directoryRenames=conflict merge -s recursive C^0 >out 2>err &&
5188
5189 test_i18ngrep ! CONFLICT out &&
5190 test_i18ngrep ! BUG: err &&
5191 test_i18ngrep ! core.dumped err &&
5192 test_must_be_empty err &&
5193
5194 git ls-files >paths &&
5195 ! grep a/x paths &&
5196 grep b/x paths
5197 )
5198 '
5199
5200 test_done