KVM: x86: Unify cross-vCPU IBPB

KVM: x86: Unify cross-vCPU IBPB

Both SVM and VMX have similar implementation for executing an IBPB
between running different vCPUs on the same CPU to create separate
prediction domains for different vCPUs.

For VMX, when the currently loaded VMCS is changed in
vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs(), an IBPB is executed if there is no 'buddy', which
is the case on vCPU load. The intention is to execute an IBPB when
switching vCPUs, but not when switching the VMCS within the same vCPU.
Executing an IBPB on nested transitions within the same vCPU is handled
separately and conditionally in nested_vmx_vmexit().

For SVM, the current VMCB is tracked on vCPU load and an IBPB is
executed when it is changed. The intention is also to execute an IBPB
when switching vCPUs, although it is possible that in some cases an IBBP
is executed when switching VMCBs for the same vCPU. Executing an IBPB on
nested transitions should be handled separately, and is proposed at [1].

Unify the logic by tracking the last loaded vCPU and execuintg the IBPB
on vCPU change in kvm_arch_vcpu_load() instead. When a vCPU is
destroyed, make sure all references to it are removed from any CPU. This
is similar to how SVM clears the current_vmcb tracking on vCPU
destruction. Remove the current VMCB tracking in SVM as it is no longer
required, as well as the 'buddy' parameter to vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs().

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250221163352.3818347-4-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250320013759.3965869-1-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
[sean: tweak comment to stay at/under 80 columns]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>