match.pd: Fix up FFS -> CTZ + 1 optimization [PR97325]
And no testcase was included, I'm including one below.
Anyway, this PR and the other CTZ related discussions led me to discover a
bug I've made earlier, CLZ/CTZ builtins have unsigned arguments and e.g.
both the vr-values.cc and now gimple-range.cc code heavily relies on that,
but __builtin_ffs has a signed operand and this optimization was incorrectly
making the operand signed too, so I guess it would greatly confuse VRP in
some cases.