The information which BB is concerned does not seem useful enough to
justify its existence in most other place (which may be related to qemu
printing the -drive parameter in question anyway, and for blockdev-add
the attribution is naturally unambiguous). Furthermore, as of a future
patch, bdrv_get_device_name(bs) will always return the empty string
before bdrv_open_inherit() returns.
Therefore, just dropping that information seems to be the best course of
action.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>