Documentation: Remove repeated word in docs

Remove the repeated word "to" docs.

Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250207073433.23604-1-hanchunchao@inspur.com

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml
index 2a98b26630cb1c0a88c0740d813d54ad881b3629..c155c9c6db39223b135f6bef86187352cd226af0 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ properties:
 
   microchip,rx-int-gpios:
     description:
-      GPIO phandle of GPIO connected to to INT1 pin of the MCP251XFD, which
+      GPIO phandle of GPIO connected to INT1 pin of the MCP251XFD, which
       signals a pending RX interrupt.
     maxItems: 1
 

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
index 12aa63840830475b3e56aafcf00c2d20a37e4627..e231d127cd4054ee46ed875dd834bbb91cfa5ae9 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
@@ -4521,8 +4521,8 @@ Both online and offline repair can use this strategy.
 | For this second effort, the ondisk parent pointer format as originally   |
 | proposed was ``(parent_inum, parent_gen, dirent_pos) → (dirent_name)``.  |
 | The format was changed during development to eliminate the requirement   |
-| of repair tools needing to to ensure that the ``dirent_pos`` field       |
-| always matched when reconstructing a directory.                          |
+| of repair tools needing to ensure that the ``dirent_pos`` field always   |
+| matched when reconstructing a directory.                                 |
 |                                                                          |
 | There were a few other ways to have solved that problem:                 |
 |                                                                          |