Problem: [security]: Heap buffer overflow when calling complete_add()
in the first call of 'completefunc'
Solution: Call check_cursor() after calling 'completefunc' (zeertzjq)
closes: #14391
Signed-off-by: zeertzjq <zeertzjq@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brabandt <cb@256bit.org>
--textlock;
curwin->w_cursor = pos; // restore the cursor position
+ check_cursor(); // make sure cursor position is valid, just in case
validate_cursor();
if (!EQUAL_POS(curwin->w_cursor, pos))
{
State = save_State;
curwin->w_cursor = pos; // restore the cursor position
+ check_cursor(); // make sure cursor position is valid, just in case
validate_cursor();
if (!EQUAL_POS(curwin->w_cursor, pos))
{
call StopVimInTerminal(buf)
endfunc
+func Test_completefunc_first_call_complete_add()
+ new
+
+ func Complete(findstart, base) abort
+ if a:findstart
+ let col = col('.')
+ call complete_add('#')
+ return col - 1
+ else
+ return []
+ endif
+ endfunc
+
+ set completeopt=longest completefunc=Complete
+ " This used to cause heap-buffer-overflow
+ call assert_fails('call feedkeys("ifoo#\<C-X>\<C-U>", "xt")', 'E840:')
+
+ delfunc Complete
+ set completeopt& completefunc&
+ bwipe!
+endfunc
+
" vim: shiftwidth=2 sts=2 expandtab nofoldenable
static int included_patches[] =
{ /* Add new patch number below this line */
+/**/
+ 254,
/**/
253,
/**/