if (sym->attr.use_assoc || sym->attr.in_common)
return 1;
+ /* The namespace of a module procedure interface holds the arguments and
+ symbols, and so the symbol namespace can be different to that of the
+ procedure. */
+ if (sym->ns != gfc_current_ns
+ && gfc_current_ns->proc_name->abr_modproc_decl
+ && sym->ns->proc_name->attr.function
+ && sym->attr.result
+ && !strcmp (sym->ns->proc_name->name, gfc_current_ns->proc_name->name))
+ return 0;
+
/* Check if the symbol's ns is inside the pure procedure. */
for (ns = gfc_current_ns; ns; ns = ns->parent)
{
--- /dev/null
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+! Test the fix for PR119948, which used to fail as indicated below with,
+! "Error: Bad allocate-object at (1) for a PURE procedure"
+!
+! Contributed by Damian Rouson <damian@archaeologic.codes>
+!
+module test_m
+ implicit none
+
+ type test_t
+ integer, allocatable :: i
+ end type
+
+ interface
+ pure module function construct_test(arg) result(test)
+ implicit none
+ type(test_t) :: test
+ type(test_t), intent(in) :: arg
+ end function
+ pure module function construct_test_sub(arg) result(test)
+ implicit none
+ type(test_t) :: test
+ type(test_t), intent(in) :: arg
+ end function
+ end interface
+
+contains
+ module procedure construct_test
+ allocate(test%i, source = arg%i) ! Used to fail here
+ end procedure
+end module
+
+submodule (test_m)test_s
+contains
+ module procedure construct_test_sub
+ allocate(test%i, source = arg%i) ! This was OK.
+ end procedure
+end submodule
+
+ use test_m
+ type(test_t) :: res, dummy
+ dummy%i = 42
+ res = construct_test (dummy)
+ if (res%i /= dummy%i) stop 1
+ dummy%i = -42
+ res = construct_test_sub (dummy)
+ if (res%i /= dummy%i) stop 2
+ deallocate (res%i, dummy%i)
+end