--- /dev/null
+From 99b9402a36f0799f25feee4465bfa4b8dfa74b4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
+Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:40:43 +0900
+Subject: nilfs2: fix underflow in second superblock position calculations
+
+From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
+
+commit 99b9402a36f0799f25feee4465bfa4b8dfa74b4d upstream.
+
+Macro NILFS_SB2_OFFSET_BYTES, which computes the position of the second
+superblock, underflows when the argument device size is less than 4096
+bytes. Therefore, when using this macro, it is necessary to check in
+advance that the device size is not less than a lower limit, or at least
+that underflow does not occur.
+
+The current nilfs2 implementation lacks this check, causing out-of-bound
+block access when mounting devices smaller than 4096 bytes:
+
+ I/O error, dev loop0, sector 36028797018963960 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0
+ phys_seg 1 prio class 2
+ NILFS (loop0): unable to read secondary superblock (blocksize = 1024)
+
+In addition, when trying to resize the filesystem to a size below 4096
+bytes, this underflow occurs in nilfs_resize_fs(), passing a huge number
+of segments to nilfs_sufile_resize(), corrupting parameters such as the
+number of segments in superblocks. This causes excessive loop iterations
+in nilfs_sufile_resize() during a subsequent resize ioctl, causing
+semaphore ns_segctor_sem to block for a long time and hang the writer
+thread:
+
+ INFO: task segctord:5067 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
+ Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-syzkaller-00015-gf6feea56f66d #0
+ "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
+ task:segctord state:D stack:23456 pid:5067 ppid:2
+ flags:0x00004000
+ Call Trace:
+ <TASK>
+ context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:5293 [inline]
+ __schedule+0x1409/0x43f0 kernel/sched/core.c:6606
+ schedule+0xc3/0x190 kernel/sched/core.c:6682
+ rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0xfcf/0x14a0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1190
+ nilfs_transaction_lock+0x25c/0x4f0 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:357
+ nilfs_segctor_thread_construct fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2486 [inline]
+ nilfs_segctor_thread+0x52f/0x1140 fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2570
+ kthread+0x270/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376
+ ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
+ </TASK>
+ ...
+ Call Trace:
+ <TASK>
+ folio_mark_accessed+0x51c/0xf00 mm/swap.c:515
+ __nilfs_get_page_block fs/nilfs2/page.c:42 [inline]
+ nilfs_grab_buffer+0x3d3/0x540 fs/nilfs2/page.c:61
+ nilfs_mdt_submit_block+0xd7/0x8f0 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:121
+ nilfs_mdt_read_block+0xeb/0x430 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:176
+ nilfs_mdt_get_block+0x12d/0xbb0 fs/nilfs2/mdt.c:251
+ nilfs_sufile_get_segment_usage_block fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:92 [inline]
+ nilfs_sufile_truncate_range fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:679 [inline]
+ nilfs_sufile_resize+0x7a3/0x12b0 fs/nilfs2/sufile.c:777
+ nilfs_resize_fs+0x20c/0xed0 fs/nilfs2/super.c:422
+ nilfs_ioctl_resize fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c:1033 [inline]
+ nilfs_ioctl+0x137c/0x2440 fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c:1301
+ ...
+
+This fixes these issues by inserting appropriate minimum device size
+checks or anti-underflow checks, depending on where the macro is used.
+
+Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0000000000004e1dfa05f4a48e6b@google.com
+Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230214224043.24141-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
+Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
+Reported-by: <syzbot+f0c4082ce5ebebdac63b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
+Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
+Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c | 7 +++++++
+ fs/nilfs2/super.c | 9 +++++++++
+ fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c | 8 +++++++-
+ 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
++++ b/fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c
+@@ -1129,7 +1129,14 @@ static int nilfs_ioctl_set_alloc_range(s
+
+ minseg = range[0] + segbytes - 1;
+ do_div(minseg, segbytes);
++
++ if (range[1] < 4096)
++ goto out;
++
+ maxseg = NILFS_SB2_OFFSET_BYTES(range[1]);
++ if (maxseg < segbytes)
++ goto out;
++
+ do_div(maxseg, segbytes);
+ maxseg--;
+
+--- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c
++++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
+@@ -409,6 +409,15 @@ int nilfs_resize_fs(struct super_block *
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
++ * Prevent underflow in second superblock position calculation.
++ * The exact minimum size check is done in nilfs_sufile_resize().
++ */
++ if (newsize < 4096) {
++ ret = -ENOSPC;
++ goto out;
++ }
++
++ /*
+ * Write lock is required to protect some functions depending
+ * on the number of segments, the number of reserved segments,
+ * and so forth.
+--- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
++++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
+@@ -544,9 +544,15 @@ static int nilfs_load_super_block(struct
+ {
+ struct nilfs_super_block **sbp = nilfs->ns_sbp;
+ struct buffer_head **sbh = nilfs->ns_sbh;
+- u64 sb2off = NILFS_SB2_OFFSET_BYTES(nilfs->ns_bdev->bd_inode->i_size);
++ u64 sb2off, devsize = nilfs->ns_bdev->bd_inode->i_size;
+ int valid[2], swp = 0;
+
++ if (devsize < NILFS_SEG_MIN_BLOCKS * NILFS_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE + 4096) {
++ nilfs_err(sb, "device size too small");
++ return -EINVAL;
++ }
++ sb2off = NILFS_SB2_OFFSET_BYTES(devsize);
++
+ sbp[0] = nilfs_read_super_block(sb, NILFS_SB_OFFSET_BYTES, blocksize,
+ &sbh[0]);
+ sbp[1] = nilfs_read_super_block(sb, sb2off, blocksize, &sbh[1]);