bpf_cookie can fail on perf_event_open(), when it runs after the task_work
selftest. The task_work test causes perf to lower
sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate, and bpf_cookie uses sample_freq,
which is validated against that sysctl. As a result,
perf_event_open() rejects the attr if the (now tighter) limit is
exceeded.
>From perf_event_open():
if (attr.freq) {
if (attr.sample_freq > sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate)
return -EINVAL;
} else {
if (attr.sample_period & (1ULL << 63))
return -EINVAL;
}
Switch bpf_cookie to use sample_period, which is not checked against
sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate.
Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250925215230.265501-1-mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com
attr.size = sizeof(attr);
attr.type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
attr.config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
- attr.freq = 1;
- attr.sample_freq = 10000;
+ attr.sample_period = 100000;
pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC);
if (!ASSERT_GE(pfd, 0, "perf_fd"))
goto cleanup;