+2009-03-12 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+ PR target/39445
+ * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_push): Don't set memory
+ alignment.
+
2009-03-12 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR target/39327
tmp = gen_rtx_MEM (mode, stack_pointer_rtx);
/* When we push an operand onto stack, it has to be aligned at least
- at the function argument boundary. */
- set_mem_align (tmp,
- ix86_function_arg_boundary (mode, NULL_TREE));
-
+ at the function argument boundary. However since we don't have
+ the argument type, we can't determine the actual argument
+ boundary. */
emit_move_insn (tmp, x);
}
+2009-03-12 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
+ PR target/39445
+ * gcc.target/i386/pr39445.c: New.
+
+ * gcc.target/i386/push-1.c: XFAIL.
+
2009-03-11 Adam Nemet <anemet@caviumnetworks.com>
* gcc.dg/inline-33.c: New test.
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-Os -msse2" } */
+
+#include "sse2-check.h"
+
+typedef struct { __m128 f __attribute__((packed)); } packed;
+
+__m128 __attribute__((noinline))
+foo (__m128 a1, __m128 a2, __m128 a3, __m128 a4,
+ __m128 a5, __m128 a6, __m128 a7, __m128 a8,
+ int b1, int b2, int b3, int b4, int b5, int b6, int b7, packed y)
+{
+ return y.f;
+}
+
+void
+sse2_test (void)
+{
+ packed x;
+ __m128 y = { 0 };
+ x.f = y;
+ y = foo (y, y, y, y, y, y, y, y, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, -1, x);
+ if (__builtin_memcmp (&y, &x.f, sizeof (y)) != 0)
+ abort ();
+}