--- /dev/null
+From 87e94dbc210a720a34be5c1174faee5c84be963e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Eric Leblond <eric@regit.org>
+Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 18:56:38 +0200
+Subject: netfilter: synproxy: fix conntrackd interaction
+
+From: Eric Leblond <eric@regit.org>
+
+commit 87e94dbc210a720a34be5c1174faee5c84be963e upstream.
+
+This patch fixes the creation of connection tracking entry from
+netlink when synproxy is used. It was missing the addition of
+the synproxy extension.
+
+This was causing kernel crashes when a conntrack entry created by
+conntrackd was used after the switch of traffic from active node
+to the passive node.
+
+Signed-off-by: Eric Leblond <eric@regit.org>
+Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 4 ++++
+ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
++++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
+ #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_zones.h>
+ #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp.h>
+ #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_labels.h>
++#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.h>
++#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_synproxy.h>
+ #ifdef CONFIG_NF_NAT_NEEDED
+ #include <net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.h>
+ #include <net/netfilter/nf_nat_l4proto.h>
+@@ -1798,6 +1800,8 @@ ctnetlink_create_conntrack(struct net *n
+ nf_ct_tstamp_ext_add(ct, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ nf_ct_ecache_ext_add(ct, 0, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ nf_ct_labels_ext_add(ct);
++ nfct_seqadj_ext_add(ct);
++ nfct_synproxy_ext_add(ct);
+
+ /* we must add conntrack extensions before confirmation. */
+ ct->status |= IPS_CONFIRMED;
--- /dev/null
+From 2638fd0f92d4397884fd991d8f4925cb3f081901 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
+Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:55:11 -0700
+Subject: netfilter: xt_TCPMSS: add more sanity tests on tcph->doff
+
+From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
+
+commit 2638fd0f92d4397884fd991d8f4925cb3f081901 upstream.
+
+Denys provided an awesome KASAN report pointing to an use
+after free in xt_TCPMSS
+
+I have provided three patches to fix this issue, either in xt_TCPMSS or
+in xt_tcpudp.c. It seems xt_TCPMSS patch has the smallest possible
+impact.
+
+Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
+Reported-by: Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c | 6 +++++-
+ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c
++++ b/net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c
+@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ tcpmss_mangle_packet(struct sk_buff *skb
+ tcph = (struct tcphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + tcphoff);
+ tcp_hdrlen = tcph->doff * 4;
+
+- if (len < tcp_hdrlen)
++ if (len < tcp_hdrlen || tcp_hdrlen < sizeof(struct tcphdr))
+ return -1;
+
+ if (info->mss == XT_TCPMSS_CLAMP_PMTU) {
+@@ -156,6 +156,10 @@ tcpmss_mangle_packet(struct sk_buff *skb
+ if (len > tcp_hdrlen)
+ return 0;
+
++ /* tcph->doff has 4 bits, do not wrap it to 0 */
++ if (tcp_hdrlen >= 15 * 4)
++ return 0;
++
+ /*
+ * MSS Option not found ?! add it..
+ */