--- /dev/null
+From matttbe@kernel.org Mon Mar 4 09:10:32 2024
+From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
+Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 18:21:21 +0100
+Subject: mptcp: continue marking the first subflow as UNCONNECTED
+To: stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sashal@kernel.org
+Cc: MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>, "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
+Message-ID: <20240228172121.243458-2-matttbe@kernel.org>
+
+From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
+
+After the 'Fixes' commit mentioned below, which is a partial backport,
+the MPTCP worker was no longer marking the first subflow as "UNCONNECTED"
+when the socket was transitioning to TCP_CLOSE state.
+
+As a result, in v6.1, it was no longer possible to reconnect to the just
+disconnected socket. Continue to do that like before, only for the first
+subflow.
+
+A few refactoring have been done around the 'msk->subflow' in later
+versions, and it looks like this is not needed to do that there, but
+still needed in v6.1. Without that, the 'disconnect' tests from the
+mptcp_connect.sh selftest fail: they repeat the transfer 3 times by
+reconnecting to the server each time.
+
+Fixes: 7857e35ef10e ("mptcp: get rid of msk->subflow")
+Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 ++
+ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
+
+diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+index cdabb00648bd2..125825db642cc 100644
+--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
++++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+@@ -2440,6 +2440,8 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
+ need_push = (flags & MPTCP_CF_PUSH) && __mptcp_retransmit_pending_data(sk);
+ if (!dispose_it) {
+ __mptcp_subflow_disconnect(ssk, subflow, flags);
++ if (msk->subflow && ssk == msk->subflow->sk)
++ msk->subflow->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
+ release_sock(ssk);
+
+ goto out;
+--
+2.43.0
+