-C Following\san\sincr-merge\soperation\sthat\sdoes\snot\scompletely\sconsume\sits\sinput\ssegments,\sstore\scontext\sin\sthe\srowid==1\srow\sof\sthe\s%_stat\stable\sthat\sallows\sthe\snext\sincr-merge\sto\spick\sup\swhere\sthe\sprevious\sleft\soff.
-D 2012-03-22T16:48:12.328
+C Add\stest\scases\sto\sfts4merge.test.
+D 2012-03-22T17:48:00.732
F Makefile.arm-wince-mingw32ce-gcc d6df77f1f48d690bd73162294bbba7f59507c72f
F Makefile.in 2f37e468503dbe79d35c9f6dffcf3fae1ae9ec20
F Makefile.linux-gcc 91d710bdc4998cb015f39edf3cb314ec4f4d7e23
F test/fts4aa.test 6e7f90420b837b2c685f3bcbe84c868492d40a68
F test/fts4content.test 17b2360f7d1a9a7e5aa8022783f5c5731b6dfd4f
F test/fts4langid.test 24a6e41063b416bbdf371ff6b4476fa41c194aa7
-F test/fts4merge.test 8e092654ab874afcc4a25f2255497eeb37da74e9
+F test/fts4merge.test 663607bef5575027295d0b7168370ccd0bae6522
F test/fts4merge2.test 5faa558d1b672f82b847d2a337465fa745e46891
F test/fts4merge3.test 2d2008772f45afc617fc34d10bcafbc8de1ca2ae
F test/func.test 6c5ce11e3a0021ca3c0649234e2d4454c89110ca
F tool/vdbe-compress.tcl d70ea6d8a19e3571d7ab8c9b75cba86d1173ff0f
F tool/warnings-clang.sh 9f406d66e750e8ac031c63a9ef3248aaa347ef2a
F tool/warnings.sh fbc018d67fd7395f440c28f33ef0f94420226381
-P 903ec5126dd981da6d7bab45c568f34b99446159
-R 36f0dde084aa3ea3b70c7d9b0328ed18
+P ab0a4f44fb67e9f0cb82297b80e728ca58cdb0fb
+R ad6c9794089ec45a4e493d1d79b6555f
U dan
-Z c1efcc23c92abcdb78f85442afae1924
+Z 8189e23423b7ab0255c97e908b40cc3e
SELECT level, group_concat(idx, ' ') FROM t4_segdir GROUP BY level;
} "0 {0 1 2 3 4 5} 1 0"
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Test cases 5.*
+#
+# Test that if a crisis-merge occurs that disrupts an ongoing incremental
+# merge, the next call to "merge=A,B" identifies this and starts a new
+# incremental merge. There are two scenarios:
+#
+# * There are less segments on the input level that the disrupted
+# incremental merge operated on, or
+#
+# * Sufficient segments exist on the input level but the segments
+# contain keys smaller than the largest key in the potential output
+# segment.
+#
+do_test 5.1 {
+ reset_db
+ fts3_build_db_1 1000
+} {}
+
+do_execsql_test 5.2 {
+ SELECT level, group_concat(idx, ' ') FROM t1_segdir GROUP BY level;
+} {
+ 0 {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7}
+ 1 {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13}
+ 2 {0 1 2}
+}
+
+do_execsql_test 5.3 {
+ INSERT INTO t1(t1) VALUES('merge=1,4');
+ SELECT level, group_concat(idx, ' ') FROM t1_segdir GROUP BY level;
+} {
+ 0 {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7}
+ 1 {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13}
+ 2 {0 1 2 3}
+}
+
+do_execsql_test 5.4 {SELECT quote(value) from t1_stat WHERE rowid=1} {X'0104'}
+do_test 5.5 {
+ foreach docid [execsql {SELECT docid FROM t1}] {
+ execsql {INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE docid=$docid}
+ }
+} {}
+
+do_execsql_test 5.6 {SELECT quote(value) from t1_stat WHERE rowid=1} {X'0104'}
+
+do_execsql_test 5.7 {
+ SELECT level, group_concat(idx, ' ') FROM t1_segdir GROUP BY level;
+ SELECT quote(value) from t1_stat WHERE rowid=1;
+} {
+ 0 {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15}
+ 1 {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11}
+ 2 {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7}
+ X'0104'
+}
+
+do_execsql_test 5.8 {
+ INSERT INTO t1(t1) VALUES('merge=1,4');
+ SELECT level, group_concat(idx, ' ') FROM t1_segdir GROUP BY level;
+ SELECT quote(value) from t1_stat WHERE rowid=1;
+} {
+ 0 {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15}
+ 1 {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11}
+ 2 {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7}
+ 3 {0}
+ X'0204'
+}
+
+do_test 5.9 {
+ set L [expr 16*16*8 + 16*4 + 1]
+ foreach docid [execsql {
+ SELECT docid FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT docid FROM t1 LIMIT $L
+ }] {
+ execsql {INSERT INTO t1 SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE docid=$docid}
+ }
+} {}
+
+do_execsql_test 5.10 {
+ SELECT level, group_concat(idx, ' ') FROM t1_segdir GROUP BY level;
+ SELECT quote(value) from t1_stat WHERE rowid=1;
+} {
+ 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 {0 1}
+ X'0204'
+}
+
+do_execsql_test 5.11 {
+ INSERT INTO t1(t1) VALUES('merge=10,4');
+ SELECT level, group_concat(idx, ' ') FROM t1_segdir GROUP BY level;
+ SELECT quote(value) from t1_stat WHERE rowid=1;
+} {
+ 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 {0 1}
+ X'0000'
+}
+
finish_test