We currently ICE upon the following code while building the "[...] is
private within this context" error message
=== cut here ===
class A { enum Enum{}; };
template<typename E, template<typename> class Alloc>
class B : private Alloc<E>, private A {};
template<typename E, template<typename> class Alloc>
int B<E, Alloc>::foo (Enum m) { return 42; }
=== cut here ===
The problem is that since r11-6880, after detecting that Enum cannot be
accessed in B, enforce_access will access the TYPE_BINFO of all the
bases of B, which ICEs for any that is a BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM.
This patch simply skips such bases.
PR c++/116323
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* search.cc (get_parent_with_private_access): Only call access_in_type
for RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P base BINFOs.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/template/access43.C: New test.
tree base_binfo = NULL_TREE;
- /* Iterate through immediate parent classes. */
+ /* Iterate through immediate parent classes.
+ Note that the base list might contain WILDCARD_TYPE_P types, that
+ should be ignored here. */
for (int i = 0; BINFO_BASE_ITERATE (binfo, i, base_binfo); i++)
{
+ tree base_binfo_type = BINFO_TYPE (base_binfo);
/* This parent had private access. Therefore that's why BINFO can't
access DECL. */
- if (access_in_type (BINFO_TYPE (base_binfo), decl) == ak_private)
+ if (RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (base_binfo_type)
+ && access_in_type (base_binfo_type, decl) == ak_private)
return base_binfo;
}
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/116323
+// { dg-do "compile" }
+// { dg-additional-options "-Wno-template-body" }
+
+class A { enum Enum{}; };
+
+template<typename E, template<typename> class Alloc>
+class B : private Alloc<E>, private A {};
+
+template<typename E, template<typename> class Alloc>
+int B<E, Alloc>::foo (Enum m) { return 42; } // { dg-error "is private" }