--- /dev/null
+From b61929c654f2e725644935737c4c1ea9c741e2f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
+Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 12:11:31 +0200
+Subject: crypto: drbg - Fixes panic in wait_for_completion call
+
+From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
+
+commit b61929c654f2e725644935737c4c1ea9c741e2f8 upstream.
+
+Initialise ctr_completion variable before use.
+
+Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
+Signed-off-by: Harsh Jain <harshjain.prof@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
+Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ crypto/drbg.c | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+--- a/crypto/drbg.c
++++ b/crypto/drbg.c
+@@ -1691,6 +1691,7 @@ static int drbg_init_sym_kernel(struct d
+ return PTR_ERR(sk_tfm);
+ }
+ drbg->ctr_handle = sk_tfm;
++ init_completion(&drbg->ctr_completion);
+
+ req = skcipher_request_alloc(sk_tfm, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!req) {
--- /dev/null
+From 1a3fc2c402810bf336882e695abd1678dbc8d279 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
+Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 16:03:42 +0200
+Subject: xen: avoid deadlock in xenbus driver
+
+From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
+
+commit 1a3fc2c402810bf336882e695abd1678dbc8d279 upstream.
+
+There has been a report about a deadlock in the xenbus driver:
+
+[ 247.979498] ======================================================
+[ 247.985688] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
+[ 247.991882] 4.12.0-rc4-00022-gc4b25c0 #575 Not tainted
+[ 247.997040] ------------------------------------------------------
+[ 248.003232] xenbus/91 is trying to acquire lock:
+[ 248.007875] (&u->msgbuffer_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffff00000863e904>]
+xenbus_dev_queue_reply+0x3c/0x230
+[ 248.017163]
+[ 248.017163] but task is already holding lock:
+[ 248.023096] (xb_write_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffff00000863a940>]
+xenbus_thread+0x5f0/0x798
+[ 248.031267]
+[ 248.031267] which lock already depends on the new lock.
+[ 248.031267]
+[ 248.039615]
+[ 248.039615] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
+[ 248.047176]
+[ 248.047176] -> #1 (xb_write_mutex){+.+...}:
+[ 248.052943] __lock_acquire+0x1728/0x1778
+[ 248.057498] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x288
+[ 248.061630] __mutex_lock+0x84/0x868
+[ 248.065755] mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x50
+[ 248.070227] xs_send+0x164/0x1f8
+[ 248.074015] xenbus_dev_request_and_reply+0x6c/0x88
+[ 248.079427] xenbus_file_write+0x260/0x420
+[ 248.084073] __vfs_write+0x48/0x138
+[ 248.088113] vfs_write+0xa8/0x1b8
+[ 248.091983] SyS_write+0x54/0xb0
+[ 248.095768] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28
+[ 248.099897]
+[ 248.099897] -> #0 (&u->msgbuffer_mutex){+.+.+.}:
+[ 248.106088] print_circular_bug+0x80/0x2e0
+[ 248.110730] __lock_acquire+0x1768/0x1778
+[ 248.115288] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x288
+[ 248.119417] __mutex_lock+0x84/0x868
+[ 248.123545] mutex_lock_nested+0x3c/0x50
+[ 248.128016] xenbus_dev_queue_reply+0x3c/0x230
+[ 248.133005] xenbus_thread+0x788/0x798
+[ 248.137306] kthread+0x110/0x140
+[ 248.141087] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
+
+It is rather easy to avoid by dropping xb_write_mutex before calling
+xenbus_dev_queue_reply().
+
+Fixes: fd8aa9095a95c02dcc35540a263267c29b8fda9d ("xen: optimize xenbus
+driver for multiple concurrent xenstore accesses").
+
+Reported-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
+Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
+Tested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
+Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
+ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c
++++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c
+@@ -299,17 +299,7 @@ static int process_msg(void)
+ mutex_lock(&xb_write_mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry(req, &xs_reply_list, list) {
+ if (req->msg.req_id == state.msg.req_id) {
+- if (req->state == xb_req_state_wait_reply) {
+- req->msg.type = state.msg.type;
+- req->msg.len = state.msg.len;
+- req->body = state.body;
+- req->state = xb_req_state_got_reply;
+- list_del(&req->list);
+- req->cb(req);
+- } else {
+- list_del(&req->list);
+- kfree(req);
+- }
++ list_del(&req->list);
+ err = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+@@ -317,6 +307,15 @@ static int process_msg(void)
+ mutex_unlock(&xb_write_mutex);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
++
++ if (req->state == xb_req_state_wait_reply) {
++ req->msg.type = state.msg.type;
++ req->msg.len = state.msg.len;
++ req->body = state.body;
++ req->state = xb_req_state_got_reply;
++ req->cb(req);
++ } else
++ kfree(req);
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&xs_response_mutex);