--- /dev/null
+From 5f9f0b11f0816b35867f2cf71e54d95f53f03902 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
+Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:37:10 +0100
+Subject: nfc: port100: handle command failure cleanly
+
+From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
+
+commit 5f9f0b11f0816b35867f2cf71e54d95f53f03902 upstream.
+
+If starting the transfer of a command suceeds but the transfer for the reply
+fails, it is not enough to initiate killing the transfer for the
+command may still be running. You need to wait for the killing to finish
+before you can reuse URB and buffer.
+
+Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+711468aa5c3a1eabf863@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
+Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
+Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/nfc/port100.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
++++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
+@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ static int port100_send_frame_async(stru
+
+ rc = port100_submit_urb_for_ack(dev, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (rc)
+- usb_unlink_urb(dev->out_urb);
++ usb_kill_urb(dev->out_urb);
+
+ exit:
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->out_urb_lock);
--- /dev/null
+From 64870ed1b12e235cfca3f6c6da75b542c973ff78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
+Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:14:44 -0500
+Subject: x86/speculation: Fix incorrect MDS/TAA mitigation status
+
+From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
+
+commit 64870ed1b12e235cfca3f6c6da75b542c973ff78 upstream.
+
+For MDS vulnerable processors with TSX support, enabling either MDS or
+TAA mitigations will enable the use of VERW to flush internal processor
+buffers at the right code path. IOW, they are either both mitigated
+or both not. However, if the command line options are inconsistent,
+the vulnerabilites sysfs files may not report the mitigation status
+correctly.
+
+For example, with only the "mds=off" option:
+
+ vulnerabilities/mds:Vulnerable; SMT vulnerable
+ vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort:Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable
+
+The mds vulnerabilities file has wrong status in this case. Similarly,
+the taa vulnerability file will be wrong with mds mitigation on, but
+taa off.
+
+Change taa_select_mitigation() to sync up the two mitigation status
+and have them turned off if both "mds=off" and "tsx_async_abort=off"
+are present.
+
+Update documentation to emphasize the fact that both "mds=off" and
+"tsx_async_abort=off" have to be specified together for processors that
+are affected by both TAA and MDS to be effective.
+
+ [ bp: Massage and add kernel-parameters.txt change too. ]
+
+Fixes: 1b42f017415b ("x86/speculation/taa: Add mitigation for TSX Async Abort")
+Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
+Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
+Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
+Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
+Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
+Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
+Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
+Cc: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
+Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
+Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
+Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
+Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
+Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
+Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
+Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
+Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
+Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191115161445.30809-2-longman@redhat.com
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ Documentation/hw-vuln/mds.rst | 7 +++++--
+ Documentation/hw-vuln/tsx_async_abort.rst | 5 ++++-
+ Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 11 +++++++++++
+ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
+ 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/Documentation/hw-vuln/mds.rst
++++ b/Documentation/hw-vuln/mds.rst
+@@ -265,8 +265,11 @@ time with the option "mds=". The valid a
+
+ ============ =============================================================
+
+-Not specifying this option is equivalent to "mds=full".
+-
++Not specifying this option is equivalent to "mds=full". For processors
++that are affected by both TAA (TSX Asynchronous Abort) and MDS,
++specifying just "mds=off" without an accompanying "tsx_async_abort=off"
++will have no effect as the same mitigation is used for both
++vulnerabilities.
+
+ Mitigation selection guide
+ --------------------------
+--- a/Documentation/hw-vuln/tsx_async_abort.rst
++++ b/Documentation/hw-vuln/tsx_async_abort.rst
+@@ -174,7 +174,10 @@ the option "tsx_async_abort=". The valid
+ CPU is not vulnerable to cross-thread TAA attacks.
+ ============ =============================================================
+
+-Not specifying this option is equivalent to "tsx_async_abort=full".
++Not specifying this option is equivalent to "tsx_async_abort=full". For
++processors that are affected by both TAA and MDS, specifying just
++"tsx_async_abort=off" without an accompanying "mds=off" will have no
++effect as the same mitigation is used for both vulnerabilities.
+
+ The kernel command line also allows to control the TSX feature using the
+ parameter "tsx=" on CPUs which support TSX control. MSR_IA32_TSX_CTRL is used
+--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
++++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+@@ -2365,6 +2365,12 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes
+ SMT on vulnerable CPUs
+ off - Unconditionally disable MDS mitigation
+
++ On TAA-affected machines, mds=off can be prevented by
++ an active TAA mitigation as both vulnerabilities are
++ mitigated with the same mechanism so in order to disable
++ this mitigation, you need to specify tsx_async_abort=off
++ too.
++
+ Not specifying this option is equivalent to
+ mds=full.
+
+@@ -4599,6 +4605,11 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes
+ vulnerable to cross-thread TAA attacks.
+ off - Unconditionally disable TAA mitigation
+
++ On MDS-affected machines, tsx_async_abort=off can be
++ prevented by an active MDS mitigation as both vulnerabilities
++ are mitigated with the same mechanism so in order to disable
++ this mitigation, you need to specify mds=off too.
++
+ Not specifying this option is equivalent to
+ tsx_async_abort=full. On CPUs which are MDS affected
+ and deploy MDS mitigation, TAA mitigation is not
+--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
++++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+@@ -303,8 +303,12 @@ static void __init taa_select_mitigation
+ return;
+ }
+
+- /* TAA mitigation is turned off on the cmdline (tsx_async_abort=off) */
+- if (taa_mitigation == TAA_MITIGATION_OFF)
++ /*
++ * TAA mitigation via VERW is turned off if both
++ * tsx_async_abort=off and mds=off are specified.
++ */
++ if (taa_mitigation == TAA_MITIGATION_OFF &&
++ mds_mitigation == MDS_MITIGATION_OFF)
+ goto out;
+
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MD_CLEAR))
+@@ -338,6 +342,15 @@ static void __init taa_select_mitigation
+ if (taa_nosmt || cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt())
+ cpu_smt_disable(false);
+
++ /*
++ * Update MDS mitigation, if necessary, as the mds_user_clear is
++ * now enabled for TAA mitigation.
++ */
++ if (mds_mitigation == MDS_MITIGATION_OFF &&
++ boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS)) {
++ mds_mitigation = MDS_MITIGATION_FULL;
++ mds_select_mitigation();
++ }
+ out:
+ pr_info("%s\n", taa_strings[taa_mitigation]);
+ }
--- /dev/null
+From cd5a2aa89e847bdda7b62029d94e95488d73f6b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
+Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:14:45 -0500
+Subject: x86/speculation: Fix redundant MDS mitigation message
+
+From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
+
+commit cd5a2aa89e847bdda7b62029d94e95488d73f6b2 upstream.
+
+Since MDS and TAA mitigations are inter-related for processors that are
+affected by both vulnerabilities, the followiing confusing messages can
+be printed in the kernel log:
+
+ MDS: Vulnerable
+ MDS: Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers
+
+To avoid the first incorrect message, defer the printing of MDS
+mitigation after the TAA mitigation selection has been done. However,
+that has the side effect of printing TAA mitigation first before MDS
+mitigation.
+
+ [ bp: Check box is affected/mitigations are disabled first before
+ printing and massage. ]
+
+Suggested-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
+Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
+Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
+Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
+Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
+Cc: Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
+Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
+Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
+Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
+Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
+Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
+Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
+Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191115161445.30809-3-longman@redhat.com
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 13 +++++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
++++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ static void __init spectre_v2_select_mit
+ static void __init ssb_select_mitigation(void);
+ static void __init l1tf_select_mitigation(void);
+ static void __init mds_select_mitigation(void);
++static void __init mds_print_mitigation(void);
+ static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void);
+
+ /* The base value of the SPEC_CTRL MSR that always has to be preserved. */
+@@ -107,6 +108,12 @@ void __init check_bugs(void)
+ mds_select_mitigation();
+ taa_select_mitigation();
+
++ /*
++ * As MDS and TAA mitigations are inter-related, print MDS
++ * mitigation until after TAA mitigation selection is done.
++ */
++ mds_print_mitigation();
++
+ arch_smt_update();
+
+ #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+@@ -244,6 +251,12 @@ static void __init mds_select_mitigation
+ (mds_nosmt || cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt()))
+ cpu_smt_disable(false);
+ }
++}
++
++static void __init mds_print_mitigation(void)
++{
++ if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS) || cpu_mitigations_off())
++ return;
+
+ pr_info("%s\n", mds_strings[mds_mitigation]);
+ }