A recent commit refactored with_rocm_gpu_lock:
commit
fbb0edfe60edf4ca01884151e6d9b1353aaa0a7e
Date: Sat May 4 10:41:09 2024 +0200
[gdb/testsuite] Factor out proc with_lock
Factor out proc with_lock from with_rocm_gpu_lock, and move required procs
lock_file_acquire and lock_file_release to lib/gdb-utils.exp.
This causes regressions in gdb.rocm/*.exp (as well as in downstream
rocgdb). The issue can be reproduced in the following minimal test:
load_lib rocm.exp
set foo hello
with_rocm_gpu_lock {
verbose -logs $foo
}
The issue is that the body to execute under the lock is executed in the
context of with_rocm_gpu_lock (uplevel 1 used in with_lock) instead of
in the context of the "original" caller.
This patch adjusted with_rocm_gpu_lock to account for the new extra
frame in the call stack between the caller of with_rocm_gpu_lock and
where the code execution is triggered.
Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Change-Id: I79ce2c9615012215867ed5bb60144abe7dce28fe
# the GPU lock.
proc with_rocm_gpu_lock { body } {
- with_lock $::gpu_lock_filename $body
+ with_lock $::gpu_lock_filename {uplevel 1 $body}
# In case BODY returned early due to some testcase failing, and
# left GDB running, debugging the GPU.