TEST_ff_f (fdim, 0, 9, 0, NO_INEXACT_EXCEPTION|ERRNO_UNCHANGED),
TEST_ff_f (fdim, -9, 0, 0, NO_INEXACT_EXCEPTION|ERRNO_UNCHANGED),
TEST_ff_f (fdim, 0, -9, 9, NO_INEXACT_EXCEPTION|ERRNO_UNCHANGED),
+#if TEST_COND_binary64
+ TEST_ff_f (fdim, 1.0, -0x1.0000000000001p-53, 1.0, INEXACT_EXCEPTION|ERRNO_UNCHANGED, 0x1.0000000000001p0, INEXACT_EXCEPTION|ERRNO_UNCHANGED, 1.0, INEXACT_EXCEPTION|ERRNO_UNCHANGED, 0x1.0000000000001p0, INEXACT_EXCEPTION|ERRNO_UNCHANGED),
+#endif
TEST_ff_f (fdim, min_subnorm_value, min_subnorm_value, 0, NO_INEXACT_EXCEPTION|ERRNO_UNCHANGED),
TEST_ff_f (fdim, -min_subnorm_value, -min_subnorm_value, 0, NO_INEXACT_EXCEPTION|ERRNO_UNCHANGED),
TEST_ff_f (fdim, min_subnorm_value, -min_subnorm_value, 2*min_subnorm_value, NO_INEXACT_EXCEPTION|ERRNO_UNCHANGED),
--- /dev/null
+/* Return positive difference between arguments. i386 version.
+ Copyright (C) 1997-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ This file is part of the GNU C Library.
+
+ The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
+ License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
+ version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+
+ The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
+ Lesser General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
+ License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
+ <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <fpu_control.h>
+#include <math.h>
+#include <math_private.h>
+
+double
+__fdim (double x, double y)
+{
+ if (islessequal (x, y))
+ return 0.0;
+
+ /* To avoid double rounding, set double precision for the
+ subtraction. math_narrow_eval is still needed to eliminate
+ excess range in the case of overflow. If the result of the
+ subtraction is in the subnormal range for double, it is exact, so
+ no issues of double rounding for subnormals arise. */
+ fpu_control_t cw, cw_double;
+ _FPU_GETCW (cw);
+ cw_double = (cw & ~_FPU_EXTENDED) | _FPU_DOUBLE;
+ _FPU_SETCW (cw_double);
+ double r = math_narrow_eval (x - y);
+ _FPU_SETCW (cw);
+ if (isinf (r) && !isinf (x) && !isinf (y))
+ __set_errno (ERANGE);
+
+ return r;
+}
+weak_alias (__fdim, fdim)
+#ifdef NO_LONG_DOUBLE
+strong_alias (__fdim, __fdiml)
+weak_alias (__fdim, fdiml)
+#endif