Schedule by INSN_COST in case of tie

2018-09-13  Vlad Lazar  <vlad.lazar@arm.com>

	* haifa-sched.c (rank_for_schedule): Schedule by INSN_COST.
	(rfs_decision): New scheduling decision.

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@264270 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 6583bc01220c3ff34bb441fc381822605b177561..b754f10ff6661aaff8022423d4639125f4a6cf0c 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2018-09-13  Vlad Lazar  <vlad.lazar@arm.com>
+
+       * haifa-sched.c (rank_for_schedule): Schedule by INSN_COST.
+       (rfs_decision): New scheduling decision.
+
 2018-09-13  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
 
        PR bootstrap/87134

diff --git a/gcc/haifa-sched.c b/gcc/haifa-sched.c
index 4f0221f6f43714fdce9119b76ea2f9fb79b46873..1fdc9df9fb26f23758ec8326cec91eecc4c917c1 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/haifa-sched.c
+++ b/gcc/haifa-sched.c
@@ -2542,7 +2542,7 @@ enum rfs_decision {
   RFS_SCHED_GROUP, RFS_PRESSURE_DELAY, RFS_PRESSURE_TICK,
   RFS_FEEDS_BACKTRACK_INSN, RFS_PRIORITY, RFS_SPECULATION,
   RFS_SCHED_RANK, RFS_LAST_INSN, RFS_PRESSURE_INDEX,
-  RFS_DEP_COUNT, RFS_TIE, RFS_FUSION, RFS_N };
+  RFS_DEP_COUNT, RFS_TIE, RFS_FUSION, RFS_COST, RFS_N };
 
 /* Corresponding strings for print outs.  */
 static const char *rfs_str[RFS_N] = {
@@ -2550,7 +2550,7 @@ static const char *rfs_str[RFS_N] = {
   "RFS_SCHED_GROUP", "RFS_PRESSURE_DELAY", "RFS_PRESSURE_TICK",
   "RFS_FEEDS_BACKTRACK_INSN", "RFS_PRIORITY", "RFS_SPECULATION",
   "RFS_SCHED_RANK", "RFS_LAST_INSN", "RFS_PRESSURE_INDEX",
-  "RFS_DEP_COUNT", "RFS_TIE", "RFS_FUSION" };
+  "RFS_DEP_COUNT", "RFS_TIE", "RFS_FUSION", "RFS_COST" };
 
 /* Statistical breakdown of rank_for_schedule decisions.  */
 struct rank_for_schedule_stats_t { unsigned stats[RFS_N]; };
@@ -2803,6 +2803,14 @@ rank_for_schedule (const void *x, const void *y)
   if (flag_sched_dep_count_heuristic && val != 0)
     return rfs_result (RFS_DEP_COUNT, val, tmp, tmp2);
 
+  /* Sort by INSN_COST rather than INSN_LUID.  This means that instructions
+     which take longer to execute are prioritised and it leads to more
+     dual-issue opportunities on in-order cores which have this feature.  */
+
+  if (INSN_COST (tmp) != INSN_COST (tmp2))
+    return rfs_result (RFS_COST, INSN_COST (tmp2) - INSN_COST (tmp),
+                      tmp, tmp2);
+
   /* If insns are equally good, sort by INSN_LUID (original insn order),
      so that we make the sort stable.  This minimizes instruction movement,
      thus minimizing sched's effect on debugging and cross-jumping.  */