--- /dev/null
+From 52f6f9d74f31078964ca1574f7bb612da7877ac8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
+Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 23:03:48 +0100
+Subject: floppy: fix usercopy direction
+
+From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
+
+commit 52f6f9d74f31078964ca1574f7bb612da7877ac8 upstream.
+
+As sparse points out, these two copy_from_user() should actually be
+copy_to_user().
+
+Fixes: 229b53c9bf4e ("take floppy compat ioctls to sodding floppy.c")
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Acked-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
+Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
+Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
+Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/block/floppy.c | 4 ++--
+ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/block/floppy.c
++++ b/drivers/block/floppy.c
+@@ -3791,7 +3791,7 @@ static int compat_getdrvprm(int drive,
+ v.native_format = UDP->native_format;
+ mutex_unlock(&floppy_mutex);
+
+- if (copy_from_user(arg, &v, sizeof(struct compat_floppy_drive_params)))
++ if (copy_to_user(arg, &v, sizeof(struct compat_floppy_drive_params)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ return 0;
+ }
+@@ -3827,7 +3827,7 @@ static int compat_getdrvstat(int drive,
+ v.bufblocks = UDRS->bufblocks;
+ mutex_unlock(&floppy_mutex);
+
+- if (copy_from_user(arg, &v, sizeof(struct compat_floppy_drive_struct)))
++ if (copy_to_user(arg, &v, sizeof(struct compat_floppy_drive_struct)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ return 0;
+ Eintr:
--- /dev/null
+From 0be0bfd2de9dfdd2098a9c5b14bdd8f739c9165d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
+Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:24:34 +0300
+Subject: ovl: fix regression caused by overlapping layers detection
+
+From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
+
+commit 0be0bfd2de9dfdd2098a9c5b14bdd8f739c9165d upstream.
+
+Once upon a time, commit 2cac0c00a6cd ("ovl: get exclusive ownership on
+upper/work dirs") in v4.13 added some sanity checks on overlayfs layers.
+This change caused a docker regression. The root cause was mount leaks
+by docker, which as far as I know, still exist.
+
+To mitigate the regression, commit 85fdee1eef1a ("ovl: fix regression
+caused by exclusive upper/work dir protection") in v4.14 turned the
+mount errors into warnings for the default index=off configuration.
+
+Recently, commit 146d62e5a586 ("ovl: detect overlapping layers") in
+v5.2, re-introduced exclusive upper/work dir checks regardless of
+index=off configuration.
+
+This changes the status quo and mount leak related bug reports have
+started to re-surface. Restore the status quo to fix the regressions.
+To clarify, index=off does NOT relax overlapping layers check for this
+ovelayfs mount. index=off only relaxes exclusive upper/work dir checks
+with another overlayfs mount.
+
+To cover the part of overlapping layers detection that used the
+exclusive upper/work dir checks to detect overlap with self upper/work
+dir, add a trap also on the work base dir.
+
+Link: https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/34672
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20171006121405.GA32700@veci.piliscsaba.szeredi.hu/
+Link: https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/3540
+Fixes: 146d62e5a586 ("ovl: detect overlapping layers")
+Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
+Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
+Tested-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
+Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.txt | 2
+ fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h | 1
+ fs/overlayfs/super.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
+ 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.txt
++++ b/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.txt
+@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ beneath or above the path of another ove
+
+ Using an upper layer path and/or a workdir path that are already used by
+ another overlay mount is not allowed and may fail with EBUSY. Using
+-partially overlapping paths is not allowed but will not fail with EBUSY.
++partially overlapping paths is not allowed and may fail with EBUSY.
+ If files are accessed from two overlayfs mounts which share or overlap the
+ upper layer and/or workdir path the behavior of the overlay is undefined,
+ though it will not result in a crash or deadlock.
+--- a/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
++++ b/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
+@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct ovl_fs {
+ bool workdir_locked;
+ /* Traps in ovl inode cache */
+ struct inode *upperdir_trap;
++ struct inode *workbasedir_trap;
+ struct inode *workdir_trap;
+ struct inode *indexdir_trap;
+ /* Inode numbers in all layers do not use the high xino_bits */
+--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
++++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ static void ovl_free_fs(struct ovl_fs *o
+ {
+ unsigned i;
+
++ iput(ofs->workbasedir_trap);
+ iput(ofs->indexdir_trap);
+ iput(ofs->workdir_trap);
+ iput(ofs->upperdir_trap);
+@@ -1007,6 +1008,25 @@ static int ovl_setup_trap(struct super_b
+ return 0;
+ }
+
++/*
++ * Determine how we treat concurrent use of upperdir/workdir based on the
++ * index feature. This is papering over mount leaks of container runtimes,
++ * for example, an old overlay mount is leaked and now its upperdir is
++ * attempted to be used as a lower layer in a new overlay mount.
++ */
++static int ovl_report_in_use(struct ovl_fs *ofs, const char *name)
++{
++ if (ofs->config.index) {
++ pr_err("overlayfs: %s is in-use as upperdir/workdir of another mount, mount with '-o index=off' to override exclusive upperdir protection.\n",
++ name);
++ return -EBUSY;
++ } else {
++ pr_warn("overlayfs: %s is in-use as upperdir/workdir of another mount, accessing files from both mounts will result in undefined behavior.\n",
++ name);
++ return 0;
++ }
++}
++
+ static int ovl_get_upper(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs,
+ struct path *upperpath)
+ {
+@@ -1044,14 +1064,12 @@ static int ovl_get_upper(struct super_bl
+ upper_mnt->mnt_flags &= ~(MNT_NOATIME | MNT_NODIRATIME | MNT_RELATIME);
+ ofs->upper_mnt = upper_mnt;
+
+- err = -EBUSY;
+ if (ovl_inuse_trylock(ofs->upper_mnt->mnt_root)) {
+ ofs->upperdir_locked = true;
+- } else if (ofs->config.index) {
+- pr_err("overlayfs: upperdir is in-use by another mount, mount with '-o index=off' to override exclusive upperdir protection.\n");
+- goto out;
+ } else {
+- pr_warn("overlayfs: upperdir is in-use by another mount, accessing files from both mounts will result in undefined behavior.\n");
++ err = ovl_report_in_use(ofs, "upperdir");
++ if (err)
++ goto out;
+ }
+
+ err = 0;
+@@ -1161,16 +1179,19 @@ static int ovl_get_workdir(struct super_
+
+ ofs->workbasedir = dget(workpath.dentry);
+
+- err = -EBUSY;
+ if (ovl_inuse_trylock(ofs->workbasedir)) {
+ ofs->workdir_locked = true;
+- } else if (ofs->config.index) {
+- pr_err("overlayfs: workdir is in-use by another mount, mount with '-o index=off' to override exclusive workdir protection.\n");
+- goto out;
+ } else {
+- pr_warn("overlayfs: workdir is in-use by another mount, accessing files from both mounts will result in undefined behavior.\n");
++ err = ovl_report_in_use(ofs, "workdir");
++ if (err)
++ goto out;
+ }
+
++ err = ovl_setup_trap(sb, ofs->workbasedir, &ofs->workbasedir_trap,
++ "workdir");
++ if (err)
++ goto out;
++
+ err = ovl_make_workdir(sb, ofs, &workpath);
+
+ out:
+@@ -1289,16 +1310,16 @@ static int ovl_get_lower_layers(struct s
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+- err = -EBUSY;
+- if (ovl_is_inuse(stack[i].dentry)) {
+- pr_err("overlayfs: lowerdir is in-use as upperdir/workdir\n");
+- goto out;
+- }
+-
+ err = ovl_setup_trap(sb, stack[i].dentry, &trap, "lowerdir");
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+
++ if (ovl_is_inuse(stack[i].dentry)) {
++ err = ovl_report_in_use(ofs, "lowerdir");
++ if (err)
++ goto out;
++ }
++
+ mnt = clone_private_mount(&stack[i]);
+ err = PTR_ERR(mnt);
+ if (IS_ERR(mnt)) {
+@@ -1445,8 +1466,8 @@ out_err:
+ * - another layer of this overlayfs instance
+ * - upper/work dir of any overlayfs instance
+ */
+-static int ovl_check_layer(struct super_block *sb, struct dentry *dentry,
+- const char *name)
++static int ovl_check_layer(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs,
++ struct dentry *dentry, const char *name)
+ {
+ struct dentry *next = dentry, *parent;
+ int err = 0;
+@@ -1458,13 +1479,11 @@ static int ovl_check_layer(struct super_
+
+ /* Walk back ancestors to root (inclusive) looking for traps */
+ while (!err && parent != next) {
+- if (ovl_is_inuse(parent)) {
+- err = -EBUSY;
+- pr_err("overlayfs: %s path overlapping in-use upperdir/workdir\n",
+- name);
+- } else if (ovl_lookup_trap_inode(sb, parent)) {
++ if (ovl_lookup_trap_inode(sb, parent)) {
+ err = -ELOOP;
+ pr_err("overlayfs: overlapping %s path\n", name);
++ } else if (ovl_is_inuse(parent)) {
++ err = ovl_report_in_use(ofs, name);
+ }
+ next = parent;
+ parent = dget_parent(next);
+@@ -1485,7 +1504,8 @@ static int ovl_check_overlapping_layers(
+ int i, err;
+
+ if (ofs->upper_mnt) {
+- err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs->upper_mnt->mnt_root, "upperdir");
++ err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs, ofs->upper_mnt->mnt_root,
++ "upperdir");
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+@@ -1496,13 +1516,14 @@ static int ovl_check_overlapping_layers(
+ * workbasedir. In that case, we already have their traps in
+ * inode cache and we will catch that case on lookup.
+ */
+- err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs->workbasedir, "workdir");
++ err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs, ofs->workbasedir, "workdir");
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ofs->numlower; i++) {
+- err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs->lower_layers[i].mnt->mnt_root,
++ err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs,
++ ofs->lower_layers[i].mnt->mnt_root,
+ "lowerdir");
+ if (err)
+ return err;