When partially substituting a requires-expr, we don't want to perform
any additional checks beyond the substitution itself so as to minimize
checking requirements out of order. So don't check the return-type-req
of a compound-requirement during partial substitution. And don't check
the noexcept condition either since we can't do that on templated trees.
PR c++/113966
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constraint.cc (tsubst_compound_requirement): Don't check
the noexcept condition or the return-type-requirement when
partially substituting.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-friend17.C: New test.
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit
3a6f3354eaaf38b5e6be41e4ebf521d299593a6e)
/* Check the noexcept condition. */
bool noexcept_p = COMPOUND_REQ_NOEXCEPT_P (t);
- if (noexcept_p && !expr_noexcept_p (expr, quiet.complain))
+ if (noexcept_p && !processing_template_decl
+ && !expr_noexcept_p (expr, quiet.complain))
{
if (info.diagnose_unsatisfaction_p ())
inform (loc, "%qE is not %<noexcept%>", expr);
return error_mark_node;
/* Check expression against the result type. */
- if (type)
+ if (type && !processing_template_decl)
{
if (tree placeholder = type_uses_auto (type))
{
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/113966
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<class T> concept C = T::value;
+
+template<class T>
+struct A {
+ template<class U> requires U::value || requires { { T() } -> C; }
+ friend void f(A, U) { }
+
+ template<class U> requires requires { { g(U()) } noexcept; }
+ friend void f(A, U, U) { }
+};
+
+template struct A<int>;