bpf: Don't use %pK through printk

In the past %pK was preferable to %p as it would not leak raw pointer
values into the kernel log.
Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
the regular %p has been improved to avoid this issue.
Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used
through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or
acquire sleeping locks in atomic contexts.

Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer and
easier to reason about.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250811-restricted-pointers-bpf-v1-1-a1d7cc3cb9e7@linutronix.de

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 1e7fd3ee759e07534eee7d8b48cffa1dfea056fb..52fecb7a1fe36d233328aabbe5eadcbd7e07cc5a 100644 (file)
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ void bpf_jit_prog_release_other(struct bpf_prog *fp, struct bpf_prog *fp_other);
 static inline void bpf_jit_dump(unsigned int flen, unsigned int proglen,
                                u32 pass, void *image)
 {
-       pr_err("flen=%u proglen=%u pass=%u image=%pK from=%s pid=%d\n", flen,
+       pr_err("flen=%u proglen=%u pass=%u image=%p from=%s pid=%d\n", flen,
               proglen, pass, image, current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
 
        if (image)