The Xen mapcache is able to create long term mappings, they are called
"locked" mappings. The third parameter of the xen_map_cache call
specifies if a mapping is a "locked" mapping.
>From the QEMU point of view there are two kinds of long term mappings:
[a] device memory mappings, such as option roms and video memory
[b] dma mappings, created by dma_memory_map & friends
After certain operations, ballooning a VM in particular, Xen asks QEMU
kindly to destroy all mappings. However, certainly [a] mappings are
present and cannot be removed. That's not a problem as they are not
affected by balloonning. The *real* problem is that if there are any
mappings of type [b], any outstanding dma operations could fail. This is
a known shortcoming. In other words, when Xen asks QEMU to destroy all
mappings, it is an error if any [b] mappings exist.
However today we have no way of distinguishing [a] from [b]. Because of
that, we cannot even print a decent warning.
This patch introduces a new "dma" bool field to MapCacheRev entires, to
remember if a given mapping is for dma or is a long term device memory
mapping. When xen_invalidate_map_cache is called, we print a warning if
any [b] mappings exist. We ignore [a] mappings.
Mappings created by qemu_map_ram_ptr are assumed to be [a], while
mappings created by address_space_map->qemu_ram_ptr_length are assumed
to be [b].
The goal of the patch is to make debugging and system understanding
easier.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
(cherry picked from commit
1ff7c5986a515d2d936eba026ff19947bbc7cb92)
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* In that case just map until the end of the page.
*/
if (block->offset == 0) {
- return xen_map_cache(addr, 0, 0);
+ return xen_map_cache(addr, 0, 0, false);
}
- block->host = xen_map_cache(block->offset, block->max_length, 1);
+ block->host = xen_map_cache(block->offset, block->max_length, 1, false);
}
return ramblock_ptr(block, addr);
}
* In that case just map the requested area.
*/
if (block->offset == 0) {
- return xen_map_cache(addr, *size, 1);
+ return xen_map_cache(addr, *size, 1, true);
}
- block->host = xen_map_cache(block->offset, block->max_length, 1);
+ block->host = xen_map_cache(block->offset, block->max_length, 1, true);
}
return ramblock_ptr(block, addr);
void xen_map_cache_init(phys_offset_to_gaddr_t f,
void *opaque);
uint8_t *xen_map_cache(hwaddr phys_addr, hwaddr size,
- uint8_t lock);
+ uint8_t lock, bool dma);
ram_addr_t xen_ram_addr_from_mapcache(void *ptr);
void xen_invalidate_map_cache_entry(uint8_t *buffer);
void xen_invalidate_map_cache(void);
static inline uint8_t *xen_map_cache(hwaddr phys_addr,
hwaddr size,
- uint8_t lock)
+ uint8_t lock,
+ bool dma)
{
abort();
}
hwaddr paddr_index;
hwaddr size;
QTAILQ_ENTRY(MapCacheRev) next;
+ bool dma;
} MapCacheRev;
typedef struct MapCache {
}
static uint8_t *xen_map_cache_unlocked(hwaddr phys_addr, hwaddr size,
- uint8_t lock)
+ uint8_t lock, bool dma)
{
MapCacheEntry *entry, *pentry = NULL;
hwaddr address_index;
if (lock) {
MapCacheRev *reventry = g_malloc0(sizeof(MapCacheRev));
entry->lock++;
+ reventry->dma = dma;
reventry->vaddr_req = mapcache->last_entry->vaddr_base + address_offset;
reventry->paddr_index = mapcache->last_entry->paddr_index;
reventry->size = entry->size;
}
uint8_t *xen_map_cache(hwaddr phys_addr, hwaddr size,
- uint8_t lock)
+ uint8_t lock, bool dma)
{
uint8_t *p;
mapcache_lock();
- p = xen_map_cache_unlocked(phys_addr, size, lock);
+ p = xen_map_cache_unlocked(phys_addr, size, lock, dma);
mapcache_unlock();
return p;
}
mapcache_lock();
QTAILQ_FOREACH(reventry, &mapcache->locked_entries, next) {
- DPRINTF("There should be no locked mappings at this time, "
- "but "TARGET_FMT_plx" -> %p is present\n",
+ if (!reventry->dma) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ fprintf(stderr, "Locked DMA mapping while invalidating mapcache!"
+ " "TARGET_FMT_plx" -> %p is present\n",
reventry->paddr_index, reventry->vaddr_req);
}