This testcase in this PR (already fixed by
r13-6526-ge4692319fd5fc7)
demonstrates that maybe_constant_init can be called on an unevaluated
operand (e.g. from massage_init_elt) so this entry point should also
limit constant evaluation in that case, like maybe_constant_value does.
PR c++/109030
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constexpr.cc (maybe_constant_init_1): For an unevaluated
non-manifestly-constant operand, don't constant evaluate
and instead call fold_to_constant as in maybe_constant_value.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-inst2.C: New test.
&& (TREE_STATIC (decl) || DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)));
if (is_static)
manifestly_const_eval = true;
+
+ if (cp_unevaluated_operand && !manifestly_const_eval)
+ return fold_to_constant (t);
+
t = cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, allow_non_constant, !is_static,
mce_value (manifestly_const_eval),
false, decl);
--- /dev/null
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct __as_receiver {
+ int empty_env;
+};
+
+template<class T>
+constexpr int f(T t) {
+ return t.fail;
+};
+
+using type = decltype(__as_receiver{f(0)}); // OK, f<int> not instantiated