There's no need for the 'ret' variable, we can just return directly the
result of the call to iterate_dir_item().
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
static int process_new_xattr(struct send_ctx *sctx)
{
- int ret = 0;
-
- ret = iterate_dir_item(sctx->send_root, sctx->left_path,
- __process_new_xattr, sctx);
-
- return ret;
+ return iterate_dir_item(sctx->send_root, sctx->left_path,
+ __process_new_xattr, sctx);
}
static int process_deleted_xattr(struct send_ctx *sctx)