When using TBL for (say) a V4SI permutation, the aarch64 port first
asks target-independent code to lower to a V16QI permutation.
Then, during code generation, an input like:
(reg:V4SI R)
gets converted to:
(subreg:V16QI (reg:V4SI R) 0)
aarch64_vectorize_vec_perm_const had:
d.op0 = op0 ? force_reg (op_mode, op0) : NULL_RTX;
if (op0 == op1)
d.op1 = d.op0;
else
d.op1 = op1 ? force_reg (op_mode, op1) : NULL_RTX;
But subregs (unlike regs) are not shared, so the op0 == op1 check
always failed for this case. We'd then force each subreg into a
fresh register, meaning that during the later:
aarch64_expand_vec_perm_1 (d->target, d->op0, d->op1, sel);
there is no way for aarch64_expand_vec_perm_1 to realise that
d->op0 and d->op1 are the same value. It would therefore generate
a two-input TBL in the testcase, even though a single-input TBL
is enough.
I'm not sure forcing subregs to a fresh regiter is a good idea --
it caused problems for copysign & co. -- but that's not something
to fiddle with during stage 4. Using op0 == op1 for rtx equality
is independently wrong, so we might as well just fix that for now.
The patch gets rid of extra MOVs that are a regression from GCC 14.
The testcase is based on one from Kugan, itself based on TSVC.
gcc/
PR target/115258
* config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_vectorize_vec_perm_const): Use
d.one_vector_p to decide whether op1 should be a copy of op0.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/115258
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr115258_2.c: New test.
Co-authored-by: Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kvivekananda@nvidia.com>
d.op_vec_flags = aarch64_classify_vector_mode (d.op_mode);
d.target = target;
d.op0 = op0 ? force_reg (op_mode, op0) : NULL_RTX;
- if (op0 == op1)
- d.op1 = d.op0;
+ if (op0 && d.one_vector_p)
+ d.op1 = copy_rtx (d.op0);
else
d.op1 = op1 ? force_reg (op_mode, op1) : NULL_RTX;
d.testing_p = !target;
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Ofast -mcpu=neoverse-v2" } */
+
+extern __attribute__((aligned(64))) float a[32000], b[32000];
+int dummy(float[32000], float[32000], float);
+
+void s1112() {
+
+ for (int nl = 0; nl < 100000 * 3; nl++) {
+ for (int i = 32000 - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ a[i] = b[i] + (float)1.;
+ }
+ dummy(a, b, 0.);
+ }
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tmov\tv[0-9]+\.16b,} } } */