c++: constexpr, inheritance, and local class [PR91933]

Here we complained about referring to nm3 from the local class member
function because referring to the base class subobject involved taking the
variable's address.  Let's shortcut this case to avoid that.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/91933
	* class.c (build_base_path): Shortcut simple non-pointer case.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR c++/91933
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-base7.C: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/class.c b/gcc/cp/class.c
index a81eeee77d904c8f640ca6b2e34ac1b24a39ed88..26e6882aa2b1ffb95302957b1e014f0ba5b1ecdd 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/class.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/class.c
@@ -331,6 +331,15 @@ build_base_path (enum tree_code code,
       return error_mark_node;
     }
 
+  bool uneval = (cp_unevaluated_operand != 0
+                || processing_template_decl
+                || in_template_function ());
+
+  /* For a non-pointer simple base reference, express it as a COMPONENT_REF
+     without taking its address (and so causing lambda capture, 91933).  */
+  if (code == PLUS_EXPR && !v_binfo && !want_pointer && !has_empty && !uneval)
+    return build_simple_base_path (expr, binfo);
+
   if (!want_pointer)
     {
       rvalue = !lvalue_p (expr);
@@ -358,9 +367,7 @@ build_base_path (enum tree_code code,
      template (even in instantiate_non_dependent_expr), we don't have vtables
      set up properly yet, and the value doesn't matter there either; we're
      just interested in the result of overload resolution.  */
-  if (cp_unevaluated_operand != 0
-      || processing_template_decl
-      || in_template_function ())
+  if (uneval)
     {
       expr = build_nop (ptr_target_type, expr);
       goto indout;

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-base7.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-base7.C
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..14e026e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-base7.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/91933
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct NoMut1 { int a, b; };
+struct NoMut3 : NoMut1 {
+  constexpr NoMut3(int a, int b) : NoMut1{a, b} {}
+};
+void mutable_subobjects() {
+  constexpr NoMut3 nm3 = {1, 2};
+  struct A {
+    void f() {
+      static_assert(nm3.a == 1, "");
+    }
+  };
+}