In issue #1200 Coverity believes we may use an uninitialized field
smp.sess here while it's not possible because the returned variable
necessarily matches SCOPE_PROC hence smp.sess is not used. But it
cannot see this and it could be confusing if the code later evolved
into something more complex. That's not a critical path so let's
first reset the sample.
static int vars_parse_cli_get_var(char **args, char *payload, struct appctx *appctx, void *private)
{
struct vars *vars;
- struct sample smp;
+ struct sample smp = { };
int i;
if (!cli_has_level(appctx, ACCESS_LVL_OPER))