While testing the patch for PR 85605 on aarch64, it was noticed that
imm_choice_comparison.c test failed. This was because canonicalize_comparison
was not being called in the ccmp case. This can be noticed without the patch
for PR 85605 as evidence of the new testcase.
Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu.
PR target/117346
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_gen_ccmp_first): Call
canonicalize_comparison before figuring out the cmp_mode/cc_mode.
(aarch64_gen_ccmp_next): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/aarch64/imm_choice_comparison-1.c: New test.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>
if (op_mode == VOIDmode)
op_mode = GET_MODE (op1);
+ if (CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (op1))
+ canonicalize_comparison (op_mode, &code, &op1);
+
switch (op_mode)
{
case E_QImode:
if (op_mode == VOIDmode)
op_mode = GET_MODE (op1);
+ if (CONST_SCALAR_INT_P (op1))
+ canonicalize_comparison (op_mode, &cmp_code, &op1);
+
switch (op_mode)
{
case E_QImode:
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" } } */
+
+/* PR target/117346 */
+/* Make sure going through ccmp uses similar to non ccmp-case. */
+/* This is similar to imm_choice_comparison.c's check except to force
+ the use of ccmp by reording the comparison and putting the cast before. */
+
+/*
+** check:
+** ...
+** mov w[0-9]+, -16777217
+** ...
+*/
+
+int
+check (int x, int y)
+{
+ unsigned xu = x;
+ if (xu > 0xfefffffe && x > y)
+ return 100;
+
+ return x;
+}
+
+/*
+** check1:
+** ...
+** mov w[0-9]+, -16777217
+** ...
+*/
+
+int
+check1 (int x, int y)
+{
+ unsigned xu = x;
+ if (x > y && xu > 0xfefffffe)
+ return 100;
+
+ return x;
+}