Rename make_huge_page_split_spte() to make_small_spte(). This ensures
that the usage of "small_spte" and "huge_spte" are consistent between
make_huge_spte() and make_small_spte().
This should also reduce some confusion as make_huge_page_split_spte()
almost reads like it will create a huge SPTE, when in fact it is
creating a small SPTE to split the huge SPTE.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240823235648.3236880-6-dmatlack@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
continue;
}
- spte = make_huge_page_split_spte(kvm, huge_spte, sp->role, index);
+ spte = make_small_spte(kvm, huge_spte, sp->role, index);
mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
__rmap_add(kvm, cache, slot, sptep, gfn, sp->role.access);
}
* This is used during huge page splitting to build the SPTEs that make up the
* new page table.
*/
-u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 huge_spte,
- union kvm_mmu_page_role role, int index)
+u64 make_small_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 huge_spte,
+ union kvm_mmu_page_role role, int index)
{
u64 child_spte = huge_spte;
unsigned int pte_access, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
u64 old_spte, bool prefetch, bool synchronizing,
bool host_writable, u64 *new_spte);
-u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 huge_spte,
- union kvm_mmu_page_role role, int index);
+u64 make_small_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 huge_spte,
+ union kvm_mmu_page_role role, int index);
u64 make_huge_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 small_spte, int level);
u64 make_nonleaf_spte(u64 *child_pt, bool ad_disabled);
u64 make_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gfn, unsigned int access);
* not been linked in yet and thus is not reachable from any other CPU.
*/
for (i = 0; i < SPTE_ENT_PER_PAGE; i++)
- sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(kvm, huge_spte, sp->role, i);
+ sp->spt[i] = make_small_spte(kvm, huge_spte, sp->role, i);
/*
* Replace the huge spte with a pointer to the populated lower level