There's no reason to have jbd2_journal_get_max_txn_bufs() public
function. Currently all users are internal and can use
journal->j_max_transaction_buffers instead. This saves some unnecessary
recomputations of the limit as a bonus which becomes important as this
function gets more complex in the following patch.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240624170127.3253-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
if (first_block < journal->j_tail)
freed += journal->j_last - journal->j_first;
/* Update tail only if we free significant amount of space */
- if (freed < jbd2_journal_get_max_txn_bufs(journal))
+ if (freed < journal->j_max_transaction_buffers)
update_tail = 0;
}
J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_state == T_COMMIT);
return journal;
}
+static int jbd2_journal_get_max_txn_bufs(journal_t *journal)
+{
+ return (journal->j_total_len - journal->j_fc_wbufsize) / 4;
+}
+
/*
* Given a journal_t structure, initialise the various fields for
* startup of a new journaling session. We use this both when creating
int jbd2_fc_wait_bufs(journal_t *journal, int num_blks);
int jbd2_fc_release_bufs(journal_t *journal);
-static inline int jbd2_journal_get_max_txn_bufs(journal_t *journal)
-{
- return (journal->j_total_len - journal->j_fc_wbufsize) / 4;
-}
-
/*
* is_journal_abort
*