]> git.ipfire.org Git - thirdparty/linux.git/commitdiff
sched/core: Fix priority checking for DL server picks
authorJoel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Mon, 27 May 2024 12:06:53 +0000 (14:06 +0200)
committerPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:22:36 +0000 (12:22 +0200)
In core scheduling, a DL server pick (which is CFS task) should be
given higher priority than tasks in other classes.

Not doing so causes CFS starvation. A kselftest is added later to
demonstrate this.  A CFS task that is competing with RT tasks can
be completely starved without this and the DL server's boosting
completely ignored.

Fix these problems.

Reported-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Signed-off-by: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org>
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/48b78521d86f3b33c24994d843c1aad6b987dda9.1716811044.git.bristot@kernel.org
kernel/sched/core.c

index f95600c092d444b85a0cab7e9b2545d444025450..11abfcdafd8dc8b190236b589b3157b3abb9c759 100644 (file)
@@ -163,6 +163,9 @@ static inline int __task_prio(const struct task_struct *p)
        if (p->sched_class == &stop_sched_class) /* trumps deadline */
                return -2;
 
+       if (p->dl_server)
+               return -1; /* deadline */
+
        if (rt_prio(p->prio)) /* includes deadline */
                return p->prio; /* [-1, 99] */
 
@@ -192,8 +195,24 @@ static inline bool prio_less(const struct task_struct *a,
        if (-pb < -pa)
                return false;
 
-       if (pa == -1) /* dl_prio() doesn't work because of stop_class above */
-               return !dl_time_before(a->dl.deadline, b->dl.deadline);
+       if (pa == -1) { /* dl_prio() doesn't work because of stop_class above */
+               const struct sched_dl_entity *a_dl, *b_dl;
+
+               a_dl = &a->dl;
+               /*
+                * Since,'a' and 'b' can be CFS tasks served by DL server,
+                * __task_prio() can return -1 (for DL) even for those. In that
+                * case, get to the dl_server's DL entity.
+                */
+               if (a->dl_server)
+                       a_dl = a->dl_server;
+
+               b_dl = &b->dl;
+               if (b->dl_server)
+                       b_dl = b->dl_server;
+
+               return !dl_time_before(a_dl->deadline, b_dl->deadline);
+       }
 
        if (pa == MAX_RT_PRIO + MAX_NICE)       /* fair */
                return cfs_prio_less(a, b, in_fi);