drm/i915/fbc: s/intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen()/intel_fbc_surface_size_ok()/

Rename intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen() to intel_fbc_surface_size_ok()
so that the naming scheme is the same for the surface size vs. plane
size checks. "surface size" is what bspec talks about.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240705145254.3355-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
index bf655d6dc8ff86187840b65d26578206354ed045..779e96dd3f6ff13612ef093908c3ecbdf6f919b4 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ static void intel_fbc_max_surface_size(struct intel_display *display,
  * the X and Y offset registers. That's why we include the src x/y offsets
  * instead of just looking at the plane size.
  */
-static bool intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
+static bool intel_fbc_surface_size_ok(const struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
 {
        struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(plane_state->uapi.plane->dev);
        unsigned int effective_w, effective_h, max_w, max_h;
@@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ static int intel_fbc_check_plane(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
                return 0;
        }
 
-       if (!intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen(plane_state)) {
+       if (!intel_fbc_surface_size_ok(plane_state)) {
                plane_state->no_fbc_reason = "surface size too big";
                return 0;
        }