The condition deciding whether or not to increase cpu_data->tick_intercepts
in teo_update() is reverse, so fix it.
Fixes: d619b5cc6780 ("cpuidle: teo: Simplify counting events used for tick management")
Cc: 6.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.14+: 0796ddf4a7f0: cpuidle: teo: Use this_cpu_ptr() where possible
Cc: 6.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.14+: 8f3f01082d7a: cpuidle: governors: teo: Use s64 consistently in teo_update()
Cc: 6.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.14+: b54df61c7428: cpuidle: governors: teo: Decay metrics below DECAY_SHIFT threshold
Cc: 6.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> 6.14+: 083654ded547: cpuidle: governors: teo: Rework the handling of tick wakeups
Cc: 6.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5085160.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki
cpu_data->state_bins[idx_timer].hits += PULSE;
} else {
cpu_data->state_bins[idx_duration].intercepts += PULSE;
- if (TICK_NSEC <= measured_ns)
+ if (measured_ns <= TICK_NSEC)
cpu_data->tick_intercepts += PULSE;
}
}